![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vespers Rising, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
Your additions to
Vespers Rising and
Fossil fuel have been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
VernoWhitney (
talk)
20:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page
Template:Babel/sandbox worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Jim1138 (
talk)
01:32, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Working People's Party/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Llightex ( talk) 22:45, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Benjamin F. Conley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Geoffrey R. Pyatt may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 07:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Dhanush may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 07:46, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Legalism (Chinese philosophy) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Dog Days (book), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeff Kinney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Haider Al-Abadi may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:45, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hoodoo (folk magic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voodoo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello there,I'm that user who's been the victim of editing the Fields Medal page(i.e.I got blocked with charge of Vandalism.).I've got three question:1)When the current protected status of that page ends,Does the page current contents remain in place or they are replaced with the old version? 2)I've prepared a new and somehow comprehensive table about Fields medalists.I posted this table on the discussion section of the Fields Medal page,and I request for comments about this(If You come there and see my that table I will be really glad,and don't forget to put your comment about it down there!;-)),but so far,just one person did so.Is it normal? 3)Should I submit a request for edit to replace the new table with current one?Or should I wait for reaching a consensus?Thank You. Rezameyqani (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rezameyqani ( talk • contribs)
Hi there,
According to Wikipedia's Video Game Editing Guidelines, "Remakes" should have their own article rather than being added onto the original game's page.
Here is a statement taken from Wikipedia's Video Game Editing Guidelines:
"If you can verify enough information to write a non-stub section about the distinct reception of a video game remake, as well as a non-stub section about its distinct game development or design, then the remake will qualify for its own article."
Therefore, Private Servers need to remain off Toontown Online.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starsky135 ( talk • contribs)
Hey,
First of all, Toontown Rewritten did not have its own section at all, only 1-2 sentences that mentioned its existence. There is not enough information to write an entire section. Also, the guidelines quote:
If there is not enough distinct information on the remake for a complete article, the few distinct aspects of the remake should be covered in the original game's article.
Toontown Rewritten is not notable enough for its own article; look at the Deletion log, and, especially, the recent nomination for deletion. There, you will see that a separate article for TTR lacks notability, and meets the criteria for having a small mention in the Toontown Online article as per Wikipedia's Video Game Guidelines.
Note that I am not advocating an entire section for TTR, nor for any other private servers (which would be a mess). TTR is the most popular remake, and it has an authentic source, too. Llightex ( talk) 23:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peloponnesian League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hellenic League. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:
Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 23:31, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
AiScaler may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:35, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Internet bot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bandwidth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:31, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Llightex, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and ƬheStrike Σagle 10:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
My eyes are having a problem, causing the innocent edit to be reverted, so I accidentally pressed the revert button. Eye snore ( pc) 22:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PIN proteins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PGP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:04, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, A Fragment on Government. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Jeremy_Bentham#Publications. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jeremy_Bentham#Publications – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Pam D 23:02, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Llightex. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
CLAW hypothesis into
The Revenge of Gaia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
23:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lycus, son of Poseidon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiope. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Argument from reason, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naturalism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebecca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laban. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
I found your name at Category:User js (probably because you posted the corresponding userbox on your user page), in the level-unspecified list of JavaScript programmers.
I was wondering how experienced you are at JavaScript, and whether you might be interested in getting involved with developing user scripts, hobnobbing with other JavaScript programmers, and organizing and improving JavaScript articles and support pages.
We do all of that and more at the JavaScript WikiProject.
Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page.
For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts.
The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library. If you know of any good ones, please add them.
If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list.
Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 16:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Since it happened less than a minute after I made the edit, I'm assuming it was automated.
Either way, I think my edit was completely justified, because the text I deleted was basically just name-calling. It was akin to appending something like "Hillary Clinton (also known as Shillary the Corrupt Hag[45])" or "Donald Trump (also known as Drumpf or 'that orange asshole'[11]) to a random mention of the name of a famous politician.
I don't doubt that there are many pro-choicers who refer to the pro-life side as the "anti-choice movement", just like I'm sure there are plenty of pro-lifers who refer to the pro-choice side as the "pro-death movement". However, including that kind of name-calling on the main pages for each movement would be a stretch, and adding it to a random mention of the name on a page about a 1976 law seems ridiculous.
I don't intend to go on a WP:POINT spree, but if you still think my deletion of that sentence was unfounded, I would like to know if you think that that kind of "also known by its opponents as" info should be added to every mention of every political and social movement on every page. If not, what makes this instance different? 194.54.31.80 ( talk) 15:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
You're obviously interested in windmills. There is a dedicated WikiProject covering mills in general - WP:MILLS. Just add your name to the members list and you're in! Mjroots ( talk) 16:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove these from medical articles. We reference every sentence generally. Thanks. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 19:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for joining up!
If you haven't already, please add Wikipedia:WikiProject JavaScript to your watchlist, so you can spot activity on the WikiProject's talk page.
(By the way, there's a new message there now, about jsfiddle). The Transhumanist 21:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
I heavily revised it. If you have time, please check it for accuracy and flow. Thank you. The Transhumanist 20:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
And it actually works as intended.
It is called StripSearch.
Its instruction manual (for users) and a code walk-through (for programmers) are included at User talk:The Transhumanist/StripSearch.js.
Any and all comments would be appreciated. The Transhumanist 09:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Happiness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atman ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Llightex,
The last time I contacted you, you replied:
I've been working on scripts to view and to develop outlines (a type of list article). Would you mind looking under the hood? They are far from perfect, so if you notice anything that could be improved (such as my approach, programming style, ideas for cool new features, or even new scripts), I'd be very interested in your feedback. To make it easier for other programmers to follow along with what each script does, I've made extensive notes explaining the source code on their talk page.
So far, there is:
It is my objective to build a set of scripts that fully automate the process of creating outlines. This end goal is a long way off ( AI-complete?). In the meantime, I hope to increase productivity as much as I can. Fifty percent automation would double an editor's productivity. I think I could reach 80% automation (a five-fold increase in productivity) within a couple years.
There's more:
I look forward to your comments, questions, ideas, and suggestions. The Transhumanist 08:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
P.S.: Please ping me so I don't miss your reply. Thanks. -TT
Hello, Llightex. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
There's a new user script: SearchSuite.js
It enhances search results.
Please take a look at it and let me know how it can be improved.
Thanks. — The Transhumanist 10:18, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
The portal system is being overhauled.
They could really use some input from JS programmers on what is possible. — The Transhumanist 22:43, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Regarding your comment on Islamic terrorism:
Terrorism is not Islamic ,because unjust violence is not Jihad and not Islamic in principle...It is a politicized distortion of Islamic teachings, like Crusades to Christianity, and modern Zionism to Judaism -- Haywi ( talk) 12:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Llightex. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Llightex,
Thank you for creating Facebook content oversight board.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please expand to include more sources not published by Facebook. I did a quick search and found that there are many available from the past two months.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ComplexRational}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
ComplexRational ( talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Poverty Knowledge, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Llightex. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Poverty Knowledge".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo ( talk) 09:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Llightex/Archive 1,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of
WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a
Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the
RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so
here.
The article cites " Oppenheimer 2015" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]]
to
your common.js page. Thanks,
Renata (
talk)
01:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
HI Llightex/Archive 1,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the
RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so
here.
Hello, Llightex. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Poverty Knowledge".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 20:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
^^ Mywikiaccount28 ( talk) 20:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Hey Mywikiaccount28, if you look at my edit message ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Llightex&oldid=997272929), and my message on your talk page ( /info/en/?search=User_talk:Mywikiaccount28#Hawley_article), I did not ignore what you said. I started a discussion earlier on the "Josh Hawley" talk page: see /info/en/?search=Talk:Josh_Hawley#%22Conspiracy_theorist%22, and let'd discuss there further! In the future, please check your own talk page for incoming messages 🙂 Llightex ( talk) 20:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Vespers Rising, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
Your additions to
Vespers Rising and
Fossil fuel have been removed, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without
permission from the copyright holder. For
legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be
blocked from editing.
VernoWhitney (
talk)
20:57, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page
Template:Babel/sandbox worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the
sandbox instead. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to
this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Jim1138 (
talk)
01:32, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Working People's Party/meta/shortname requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Llightex ( talk) 22:45, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Benjamin F. Conley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Geoffrey R. Pyatt may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 07:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Dhanush may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 07:46, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Legalism (Chinese philosophy) may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Dog Days (book), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeff Kinney. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:14, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Haider Al-Abadi may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:45, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hoodoo (folk magic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Voodoo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Hello there,I'm that user who's been the victim of editing the Fields Medal page(i.e.I got blocked with charge of Vandalism.).I've got three question:1)When the current protected status of that page ends,Does the page current contents remain in place or they are replaced with the old version? 2)I've prepared a new and somehow comprehensive table about Fields medalists.I posted this table on the discussion section of the Fields Medal page,and I request for comments about this(If You come there and see my that table I will be really glad,and don't forget to put your comment about it down there!;-)),but so far,just one person did so.Is it normal? 3)Should I submit a request for edit to replace the new table with current one?Or should I wait for reaching a consensus?Thank You. Rezameyqani (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rezameyqani ( talk • contribs)
Hi there,
According to Wikipedia's Video Game Editing Guidelines, "Remakes" should have their own article rather than being added onto the original game's page.
Here is a statement taken from Wikipedia's Video Game Editing Guidelines:
"If you can verify enough information to write a non-stub section about the distinct reception of a video game remake, as well as a non-stub section about its distinct game development or design, then the remake will qualify for its own article."
Therefore, Private Servers need to remain off Toontown Online.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starsky135 ( talk • contribs)
Hey,
First of all, Toontown Rewritten did not have its own section at all, only 1-2 sentences that mentioned its existence. There is not enough information to write an entire section. Also, the guidelines quote:
If there is not enough distinct information on the remake for a complete article, the few distinct aspects of the remake should be covered in the original game's article.
Toontown Rewritten is not notable enough for its own article; look at the Deletion log, and, especially, the recent nomination for deletion. There, you will see that a separate article for TTR lacks notability, and meets the criteria for having a small mention in the Toontown Online article as per Wikipedia's Video Game Guidelines.
Note that I am not advocating an entire section for TTR, nor for any other private servers (which would be a mess). TTR is the most popular remake, and it has an authentic source, too. Llightex ( talk) 23:14, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peloponnesian League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hellenic League. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:
Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! -- Tom (LT) ( talk) 23:31, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
AiScaler may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:35, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Internet bot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bandwidth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:31, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Llightex, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Here are some pages which are a little more fun:
We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (developer) and ƬheStrike Σagle 10:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
My eyes are having a problem, causing the innocent edit to be reverted, so I accidentally pressed the revert button. Eye snore ( pc) 22:33, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PIN proteins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PGP. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:04, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, A Fragment on Government. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Jeremy_Bentham#Publications. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Jeremy_Bentham#Publications – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Pam D 23:02, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Llightex. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
CLAW hypothesis into
The Revenge of Gaia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. —
Diannaa 🍁 (
talk)
23:53, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lycus, son of Poseidon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiope. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:59, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Argument from reason, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Naturalism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:54, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebecca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laban. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
I found your name at Category:User js (probably because you posted the corresponding userbox on your user page), in the level-unspecified list of JavaScript programmers.
I was wondering how experienced you are at JavaScript, and whether you might be interested in getting involved with developing user scripts, hobnobbing with other JavaScript programmers, and organizing and improving JavaScript articles and support pages.
We do all of that and more at the JavaScript WikiProject.
Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page.
For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts.
The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library. If you know of any good ones, please add them.
If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list.
Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 16:51, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Since it happened less than a minute after I made the edit, I'm assuming it was automated.
Either way, I think my edit was completely justified, because the text I deleted was basically just name-calling. It was akin to appending something like "Hillary Clinton (also known as Shillary the Corrupt Hag[45])" or "Donald Trump (also known as Drumpf or 'that orange asshole'[11]) to a random mention of the name of a famous politician.
I don't doubt that there are many pro-choicers who refer to the pro-life side as the "anti-choice movement", just like I'm sure there are plenty of pro-lifers who refer to the pro-choice side as the "pro-death movement". However, including that kind of name-calling on the main pages for each movement would be a stretch, and adding it to a random mention of the name on a page about a 1976 law seems ridiculous.
I don't intend to go on a WP:POINT spree, but if you still think my deletion of that sentence was unfounded, I would like to know if you think that that kind of "also known by its opponents as" info should be added to every mention of every political and social movement on every page. If not, what makes this instance different? 194.54.31.80 ( talk) 15:05, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
You're obviously interested in windmills. There is a dedicated WikiProject covering mills in general - WP:MILLS. Just add your name to the members list and you're in! Mjroots ( talk) 16:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove these from medical articles. We reference every sentence generally. Thanks. Doc James ( talk · contribs · email) 19:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for joining up!
If you haven't already, please add Wikipedia:WikiProject JavaScript to your watchlist, so you can spot activity on the WikiProject's talk page.
(By the way, there's a new message there now, about jsfiddle). The Transhumanist 21:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
I heavily revised it. If you have time, please check it for accuracy and flow. Thank you. The Transhumanist 20:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
And it actually works as intended.
It is called StripSearch.
Its instruction manual (for users) and a code walk-through (for programmers) are included at User talk:The Transhumanist/StripSearch.js.
Any and all comments would be appreciated. The Transhumanist 09:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Happiness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atman ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:52, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi Llightex,
The last time I contacted you, you replied:
I've been working on scripts to view and to develop outlines (a type of list article). Would you mind looking under the hood? They are far from perfect, so if you notice anything that could be improved (such as my approach, programming style, ideas for cool new features, or even new scripts), I'd be very interested in your feedback. To make it easier for other programmers to follow along with what each script does, I've made extensive notes explaining the source code on their talk page.
So far, there is:
It is my objective to build a set of scripts that fully automate the process of creating outlines. This end goal is a long way off ( AI-complete?). In the meantime, I hope to increase productivity as much as I can. Fifty percent automation would double an editor's productivity. I think I could reach 80% automation (a five-fold increase in productivity) within a couple years.
There's more:
I look forward to your comments, questions, ideas, and suggestions. The Transhumanist 08:16, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
P.S.: Please ping me so I don't miss your reply. Thanks. -TT
Hello, Llightex. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
There's a new user script: SearchSuite.js
It enhances search results.
Please take a look at it and let me know how it can be improved.
Thanks. — The Transhumanist 10:18, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
The portal system is being overhauled.
They could really use some input from JS programmers on what is possible. — The Transhumanist 22:43, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Regarding your comment on Islamic terrorism:
Terrorism is not Islamic ,because unjust violence is not Jihad and not Islamic in principle...It is a politicized distortion of Islamic teachings, like Crusades to Christianity, and modern Zionism to Judaism -- Haywi ( talk) 12:00, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Llightex. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Llightex,
Thank you for creating Facebook content oversight board.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please expand to include more sources not published by Facebook. I did a quick search and found that there are many available from the past two months.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ComplexRational}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the
Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
ComplexRational ( talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Poverty Knowledge, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot ( talk) 01:29, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello, Llightex. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Poverty Knowledge".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo ( talk) 09:04, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Llightex/Archive 1,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of
WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a
Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the
RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so
here.
The article cites " Oppenheimer 2015" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]]
to
your common.js page. Thanks,
Renata (
talk)
01:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
HI Llightex/Archive 1,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the
RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so
here.
Hello, Llightex. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Poverty Knowledge".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian ( talk) 20:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
^^ Mywikiaccount28 ( talk) 20:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Hey Mywikiaccount28, if you look at my edit message ( https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User:Llightex&oldid=997272929), and my message on your talk page ( /info/en/?search=User_talk:Mywikiaccount28#Hawley_article), I did not ignore what you said. I started a discussion earlier on the "Josh Hawley" talk page: see /info/en/?search=Talk:Josh_Hawley#%22Conspiracy_theorist%22, and let'd discuss there further! In the future, please check your own talk page for incoming messages 🙂 Llightex ( talk) 20:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)