If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:LittleDipper, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Widefox; talk 22:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia. Disruptive only account.
[1]
Widefox;
talk
22:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, LittleDipper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Ancient Japanese art".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac ( talk) 08:22, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Seems that you have problems with Disruptive edits. Before to add quotes, it is necessary a reliable source, seems that you don't have any reliable source that supports your sentence. that is why I deleted your edit. Please Before to add something , be sure to make with sources. Thanks. LuigiPortaro29 ( talk) 13:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Western World shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Khirurg ( talk) 23:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:LittleDipper reported by User:Khirurg (Result: ). Thank you.
Khirurg (
talk)
04:25, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Western world, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hellenism ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:46, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=
I'm sorry. My edit warring was me making (apparently failed) attempts to uphold
WP:ONUS). As for the personal attacks, it's just that I got carried away because I was afraid of not having the guts to go on, and tried to boost myself, that I forgot the No Personal attacks rule. Some were attacks that I didn't know were attacks. I promise never to do such a thing again.
Anu-Dingir
(Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 18:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC) ~~~~}}
.
NeilN
talk to me
16:39, 17 March 2018 (UTC)LittleDipper ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm sorry. My edit warring was me making (apparently failed) attempts to uphold WP:ONUS). As for the personal attacks, it's just that I got carried away because I was afraid of not having the guts to go on, and tried to boost myself, that I forgot the No Personal attacks rule. Some were attacks that I didn't know were attacks. I promise never to do such a thing again. Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 18:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC) ~~~~
Decline reason:
Nothing in this request gives a reassurance that such problems won't recur. WP:ONUS says the exact opposite of what you try to justify with it. And "trying to boost yourself" with personal attacks because you "were afraid of not having the guts to go on"? We're here to collaboratively write an encyclopedia, not to have some kind of survivalist contest. The standard offer may be the best way forward. Huon ( talk) 01:38, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
If you want to be unblocked you'll need to address your repeated personal attacks and edit warring. -- NeilN talk to me 16:42, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry. My edit warring was out of (apparently failed) attempts to uphold WP:ONUS). As for the personal attacks, I felt bullied, and it was a way of expressing myself, and some were attacks that I didn't know were attacks. I promise never to do such a thing again. Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 18:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
User:Huon, I'm ready. Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 11:55, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
LittleDipper ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I know that it hasn't been six minths yet, but waiting for six months is not the point: the change is. I'm not going to excuse anything I did. I would just like to promise that I wouldn't violate any Wikipedia policy ever again, especially now that I learned not to violate any policy the hard way. And since blocks are supposed to be preventative, that would be a good reason to unblock me. Plus, I'm worried about people pretending to be professionals and disrupting articles severely in the process, and there are cases where I believe I am the only one who can fully spot the damage and fix it, that is another perfectly good reason. Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 11:53, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but the bit about, "I'm worried about people pretending to be professionals and disrupting articles", convinces me you do not understand how to not edit disruptively. We do not edit based on our own expertise. We edit based on material from WP:reliable sources with a reputation for fact checking. When we disagree about content, we discuss our opposing views until we reach an agreement. Only you can edit some subjects correctly? Deary me, if you disagree with another person's edits, you discuss until you reach agreement. You must affirm understanding this, as a bare minimum, before I would consider unblocking you. Please read WP:BRD. Please explain what it means in your own words. As for the timer on the WP:standard offer, IMHO it should start over with the timestamp of this unblock request. My advice would be to wait till 6 months from now and then try again. Sorry, I cannot be more helpful. -- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 02:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
User:Huon, User:NeilN, how do other admins see my accout unblock request? Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 02:44, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Likewise I suggest you put (ethics, Western and modern concept of social justice, moral autonomy, monotheism) under Judaism. I also suggest that you put a note right after Roman culture that says "many primary sources, influenced by century-old Enlightenment currents of thought, celebrate Greece and Rome as the birthplaces of Western civilization, emphasizing the massive unparalleled impact of the Greeks and Romans, but also ignoring and taking for granted important historical nuances."
Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 22:24, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
User:Favonian, I'm afraid you and NeilN have mistakenly accused an innocent IP for being me. If you check my IP address, you will see that to be so. Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 02:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
User:Huon, can I ask a question, just for clarification? How is WP:ONUS the "exact opposite" of what I tried to justify it with? Just want to know. Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 05:09, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:LittleDipper, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Widefox; talk 22:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia. Disruptive only account.
[1]
Widefox;
talk
22:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
Hello, LittleDipper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Ancient Japanese art".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac ( talk) 08:22, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Seems that you have problems with Disruptive edits. Before to add quotes, it is necessary a reliable source, seems that you don't have any reliable source that supports your sentence. that is why I deleted your edit. Please Before to add something , be sure to make with sources. Thanks. LuigiPortaro29 ( talk) 13:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Western World shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Khirurg ( talk) 23:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. The thread is
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:LittleDipper reported by User:Khirurg (Result: ). Thank you.
Khirurg (
talk)
04:25, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Western world, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hellenism ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:46, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=
I'm sorry. My edit warring was me making (apparently failed) attempts to uphold
WP:ONUS). As for the personal attacks, it's just that I got carried away because I was afraid of not having the guts to go on, and tried to boost myself, that I forgot the No Personal attacks rule. Some were attacks that I didn't know were attacks. I promise never to do such a thing again.
Anu-Dingir
(Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 18:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC) ~~~~}}
.
NeilN
talk to me
16:39, 17 March 2018 (UTC)LittleDipper ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I'm sorry. My edit warring was me making (apparently failed) attempts to uphold WP:ONUS). As for the personal attacks, it's just that I got carried away because I was afraid of not having the guts to go on, and tried to boost myself, that I forgot the No Personal attacks rule. Some were attacks that I didn't know were attacks. I promise never to do such a thing again. Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 18:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC) ~~~~
Decline reason:
Nothing in this request gives a reassurance that such problems won't recur. WP:ONUS says the exact opposite of what you try to justify with it. And "trying to boost yourself" with personal attacks because you "were afraid of not having the guts to go on"? We're here to collaboratively write an encyclopedia, not to have some kind of survivalist contest. The standard offer may be the best way forward. Huon ( talk) 01:38, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
.
If you want to be unblocked you'll need to address your repeated personal attacks and edit warring. -- NeilN talk to me 16:42, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
I'm sorry. My edit warring was out of (apparently failed) attempts to uphold WP:ONUS). As for the personal attacks, I felt bullied, and it was a way of expressing myself, and some were attacks that I didn't know were attacks. I promise never to do such a thing again. Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 18:53, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
User:Huon, I'm ready. Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 11:55, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
LittleDipper ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I know that it hasn't been six minths yet, but waiting for six months is not the point: the change is. I'm not going to excuse anything I did. I would just like to promise that I wouldn't violate any Wikipedia policy ever again, especially now that I learned not to violate any policy the hard way. And since blocks are supposed to be preventative, that would be a good reason to unblock me. Plus, I'm worried about people pretending to be professionals and disrupting articles severely in the process, and there are cases where I believe I am the only one who can fully spot the damage and fix it, that is another perfectly good reason. Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 11:53, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but the bit about, "I'm worried about people pretending to be professionals and disrupting articles", convinces me you do not understand how to not edit disruptively. We do not edit based on our own expertise. We edit based on material from WP:reliable sources with a reputation for fact checking. When we disagree about content, we discuss our opposing views until we reach an agreement. Only you can edit some subjects correctly? Deary me, if you disagree with another person's edits, you discuss until you reach agreement. You must affirm understanding this, as a bare minimum, before I would consider unblocking you. Please read WP:BRD. Please explain what it means in your own words. As for the timer on the WP:standard offer, IMHO it should start over with the timestamp of this unblock request. My advice would be to wait till 6 months from now and then try again. Sorry, I cannot be more helpful. -- Dlohcierekim ( talk) 02:47, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
User:Huon, User:NeilN, how do other admins see my accout unblock request? Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 02:44, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Likewise I suggest you put (ethics, Western and modern concept of social justice, moral autonomy, monotheism) under Judaism. I also suggest that you put a note right after Roman culture that says "many primary sources, influenced by century-old Enlightenment currents of thought, celebrate Greece and Rome as the birthplaces of Western civilization, emphasizing the massive unparalleled impact of the Greeks and Romans, but also ignoring and taking for granted important historical nuances."
Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 22:24, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
User:Favonian, I'm afraid you and NeilN have mistakenly accused an innocent IP for being me. If you check my IP address, you will see that to be so. Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 02:13, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
User:Huon, can I ask a question, just for clarification? How is WP:ONUS the "exact opposite" of what I tried to justify it with? Just want to know. Anu-Dingir (Please offer a sacrifice!!!!) 05:09, 19 March 2018 (UTC)