Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fluorescent penetrant inspection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defect. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Light&highbeautyforever! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ‑‑ Volteer1 ( talk) 00:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
K-Quarantine#Drive-through testing has incomplete text "Kit that detects both flu and COVID-19", added here. PrimeHunter ( talk) 16:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi there. I couldn't help but notice you have an article awaiting review at WP:GAN#LAW. I've recently listed an article for review there myself, that is of similar length to yours. In my experience articles can sit at GAN for many, many months awaiting a review, so I was wondering if there was any chance you'd be interested in speeding up the process trading reviews? So I'll review your nomination and in return (either once yours is finished or simultaneously, whichever suits you) you could review my own? Please be thorough with your review though and don't feel awkward about failing it if you don't think it's up to scratch, as I will be doing the same. No worries if you're too busy or otherwise not interested though. I just figured there was no harm in asking. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane ( talk) 02:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Leigh Saufley you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Damien Linnane --
Damien Linnane (
talk)
06:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
The article
Leigh Saufley you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Leigh Saufley for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Damien Linnane --
Damien Linnane (
talk)
06:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leigh Saufley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of New England.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
The article
Leigh Saufley you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Leigh Saufley for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Damien Linnane --
Damien Linnane (
talk)
08:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Genevieve McDonald you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Aussie Article Writer --
Aussie Article Writer (
talk)
18:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
The article
Genevieve McDonald you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Genevieve McDonald for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Aussie Article Writer --
Aussie Article Writer (
talk)
16:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I've noticed you've been adding "Anti-vaccine activist" to the lead of several BLPs of politicians, and writing heavily about their vaccine-related activities, which I believe distorts and misrepresents the source material and pushes a point-of-view in disproportion to (or in absence of) its coverage in reliable secondary sources. I've stated my concerns a Talk:Anne Dauphinais, and have edited that article to address them. I see similar issues at Chris A. Johansen, e.g. it appears you alone are inferring that criticism of COVID-19 lockdown measures, mask requirements, or vaccine mandates equates with anti-vaccine activism. While some clickbait sources use terms like " anti-vaxx rally" in headlines, the articles clarify the rallies are "opposing new vaccine mandates for health care workers" (note also post 2013 Newsweek is considered not generally reliable). With politically controversial and sensitive issues, especially anything COVID-19 related, it is important to be extra vigilant against any personal biases, straying from source material, or presenting and arranging true statements in a way that misrepresents the context. Please review WP:BLPBALANCE, WP:BLPCAT, MOS:LABEL, WP:COP and WP:COPDEF, and strive to give BLPs on politicians equal care and consideration, regardless of party. Cheers, --Animalparty! ( talk) 19:25, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
The article Dave Thomas (skeptic) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
A. C. Santacruz ⁂
Talk
15:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Maine House of Representatives election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Underwood.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fluorescent penetrant inspection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defect. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Light&highbeautyforever! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ‑‑ Volteer1 ( talk) 00:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
K-Quarantine#Drive-through testing has incomplete text "Kit that detects both flu and COVID-19", added here. PrimeHunter ( talk) 16:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi there. I couldn't help but notice you have an article awaiting review at WP:GAN#LAW. I've recently listed an article for review there myself, that is of similar length to yours. In my experience articles can sit at GAN for many, many months awaiting a review, so I was wondering if there was any chance you'd be interested in speeding up the process trading reviews? So I'll review your nomination and in return (either once yours is finished or simultaneously, whichever suits you) you could review my own? Please be thorough with your review though and don't feel awkward about failing it if you don't think it's up to scratch, as I will be doing the same. No worries if you're too busy or otherwise not interested though. I just figured there was no harm in asking. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane ( talk) 02:45, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Leigh Saufley you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Damien Linnane --
Damien Linnane (
talk)
06:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
The article
Leigh Saufley you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Leigh Saufley for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Damien Linnane --
Damien Linnane (
talk)
06:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leigh Saufley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of New England.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
The article
Leigh Saufley you nominated as a
good article has passed
; see
Talk:Leigh Saufley for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can
nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Damien Linnane --
Damien Linnane (
talk)
08:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Genevieve McDonald you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Aussie Article Writer --
Aussie Article Writer (
talk)
18:01, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
The article
Genevieve McDonald you nominated as a
good article has failed
; see
Talk:Genevieve McDonald for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
Aussie Article Writer --
Aussie Article Writer (
talk)
16:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I've noticed you've been adding "Anti-vaccine activist" to the lead of several BLPs of politicians, and writing heavily about their vaccine-related activities, which I believe distorts and misrepresents the source material and pushes a point-of-view in disproportion to (or in absence of) its coverage in reliable secondary sources. I've stated my concerns a Talk:Anne Dauphinais, and have edited that article to address them. I see similar issues at Chris A. Johansen, e.g. it appears you alone are inferring that criticism of COVID-19 lockdown measures, mask requirements, or vaccine mandates equates with anti-vaccine activism. While some clickbait sources use terms like " anti-vaxx rally" in headlines, the articles clarify the rallies are "opposing new vaccine mandates for health care workers" (note also post 2013 Newsweek is considered not generally reliable). With politically controversial and sensitive issues, especially anything COVID-19 related, it is important to be extra vigilant against any personal biases, straying from source material, or presenting and arranging true statements in a way that misrepresents the context. Please review WP:BLPBALANCE, WP:BLPCAT, MOS:LABEL, WP:COP and WP:COPDEF, and strive to give BLPs on politicians equal care and consideration, regardless of party. Cheers, --Animalparty! ( talk) 19:25, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
The article Dave Thomas (skeptic) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
A. C. Santacruz ⁂
Talk
15:54, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 Maine House of Representatives election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Underwood.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)