This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
If you feel that failing to find any reliable sources on Google does not demonstrate a lack of competence with the search engine, then that's an obvious difference we have between us. However, it could be that your interpretation of what a reliable source is differs to mine. A possibility which I overlooked. Citing AGF and NPA though? Come on, get over it. There's certainly no bad faith involved, or instead of voting, I'd have speedily closed the nomination. That's how I work. - Hahnch e n 04:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you put "please provide [WP:RS that article is factually incorrect" in the article. Could you tell me what does it mean and how should I request this article to be deleted? Thanks. DrGladwin 23:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi
I dont understand why the kurri kurri wikipedia entry can't have an external reference to it's official website, there are any number of other towns/regions entries in Wikipedia that have an external link to official websites??? Why is it ok for some and not for others?
thanks
Brendan Brooks - brendan@hyperweb.com.au
Hey, you suggested transwikiing to WikiTravel. I just wanted to point out that WikiTravel is pretty much the one place we can't transwiki to because of differences in licensing. -- Wafulz 06:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
In looking through the history of the subject page, the entry you removed has been previously removed by anonymous editors several times and subsequently re-instated. It is a correctly included entry on the ATM disambiguation page and it should remain on that page.
Please do not completely remove sections of pertinent information of articles. If you have a concern that something might not be neutral then enter into discussion how it can be improved, but simply eliminating entire sections is not proper editorship. I'll take my response either here or on my talk page. Bstone 19:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi i do not see why my external link : www.draytonmanorplus.co.uk, can not be added to the external link page on the Drayton Manor Theme Park site. It is in the content of Drayton Manor and provides a huge resource to is.
Adam —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adz1991 ( talk • contribs) 19:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC).
I'd like to modify some of my comments in UHSA's talkpage (some of my comments are inaccurate). How do I do that? The page is being closely monitored for vandalism. Thanks. DrGladwin 23:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey, i don't see why Drayton Manor Net, is allowed to keep there external link on the Drayton Manor Theme Park Page which claims to be the best unofficial website when this is a false claim, and Drayton Manor Plus is not allowed on there. ? Adam —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adz1991 ( talk • contribs) 13:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC).
O.k cheers for that
I feel that the Article should include many external links, to allow visiters to research futher into the subject, in this case drayton manor.
How is this article useful or not vanity?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Boyer
Based on things i've seen speedy deleted i think this qualifies?
Madrugada 18:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
If you feel that failing to find any reliable sources on Google does not demonstrate a lack of competence with the search engine, then that's an obvious difference we have between us. However, it could be that your interpretation of what a reliable source is differs to mine. A possibility which I overlooked. Citing AGF and NPA though? Come on, get over it. There's certainly no bad faith involved, or instead of voting, I'd have speedily closed the nomination. That's how I work. - Hahnch e n 04:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you put "please provide [WP:RS that article is factually incorrect" in the article. Could you tell me what does it mean and how should I request this article to be deleted? Thanks. DrGladwin 23:05, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi
I dont understand why the kurri kurri wikipedia entry can't have an external reference to it's official website, there are any number of other towns/regions entries in Wikipedia that have an external link to official websites??? Why is it ok for some and not for others?
thanks
Brendan Brooks - brendan@hyperweb.com.au
Hey, you suggested transwikiing to WikiTravel. I just wanted to point out that WikiTravel is pretty much the one place we can't transwiki to because of differences in licensing. -- Wafulz 06:19, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
In looking through the history of the subject page, the entry you removed has been previously removed by anonymous editors several times and subsequently re-instated. It is a correctly included entry on the ATM disambiguation page and it should remain on that page.
Please do not completely remove sections of pertinent information of articles. If you have a concern that something might not be neutral then enter into discussion how it can be improved, but simply eliminating entire sections is not proper editorship. I'll take my response either here or on my talk page. Bstone 19:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi i do not see why my external link : www.draytonmanorplus.co.uk, can not be added to the external link page on the Drayton Manor Theme Park site. It is in the content of Drayton Manor and provides a huge resource to is.
Adam —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adz1991 ( talk • contribs) 19:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC).
I'd like to modify some of my comments in UHSA's talkpage (some of my comments are inaccurate). How do I do that? The page is being closely monitored for vandalism. Thanks. DrGladwin 23:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Hey, i don't see why Drayton Manor Net, is allowed to keep there external link on the Drayton Manor Theme Park Page which claims to be the best unofficial website when this is a false claim, and Drayton Manor Plus is not allowed on there. ? Adam —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Adz1991 ( talk • contribs) 13:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC).
O.k cheers for that
I feel that the Article should include many external links, to allow visiters to research futher into the subject, in this case drayton manor.
How is this article useful or not vanity?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karen_Boyer
Based on things i've seen speedy deleted i think this qualifies?
Madrugada 18:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)