Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Please don't accuse editors of having ulterior motives for their edits, as you did at Talk:Zootopia. The reason that people have been reverting your edits is because saying the film has received "critical acclaim" is unsourced. You can't read the numbers from a website and determine through your own analysis whether it counts as critical acclaim or not – this is original research, and it is forbidden on Wikipedia. What we need is a source that explicitly says the film received critical acclaim. However, as I said on the talk page, I prefer to simply report what the review aggregators say. In my opinion, simplistic statements about "critical acclaim" don't really add much to the article. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
@NinjaRobotPirate
http://www.ew.com/article/2016/03/04/zootopia-reviews-roundup
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/top/bestofrt/?year=2016
On the site Rotten Tomotes Zootopia is listed as the #1 film of 2016! This is critical acclaim! And your attempt to undermine what I said is all based on fallacy!
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Zootopia. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — C.Fred ( talk) 18:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Mlpearc ( open channel) 19:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:40, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Please don't accuse editors of having ulterior motives for their edits, as you did at Talk:Zootopia. The reason that people have been reverting your edits is because saying the film has received "critical acclaim" is unsourced. You can't read the numbers from a website and determine through your own analysis whether it counts as critical acclaim or not – this is original research, and it is forbidden on Wikipedia. What we need is a source that explicitly says the film received critical acclaim. However, as I said on the talk page, I prefer to simply report what the review aggregators say. In my opinion, simplistic statements about "critical acclaim" don't really add much to the article. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 00:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
@NinjaRobotPirate
http://www.ew.com/article/2016/03/04/zootopia-reviews-roundup
https://www.rottentomatoes.com/top/bestofrt/?year=2016
On the site Rotten Tomotes Zootopia is listed as the #1 film of 2016! This is critical acclaim! And your attempt to undermine what I said is all based on fallacy!
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at
Zootopia. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — C.Fred ( talk) 18:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello and
welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Mlpearc ( open channel) 19:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)