This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Aditya α ß 18:16, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
For some obscure reason, Linkin Park's song, New Divide has rapidly made it's way back into the top ten holding the number-two spot pushing Paparazzi back down to number-three. It must be the Transformers 2 movie since "New Divide" is the theme song. On my iTunes, I have enabled a popularity meter so that I can tell how far the songs are apart from one another in sales. I Gotta Feeling is leading by quiet a lot but Gaga and Linkin Park are fairly tied. • вяαdcяo chat 06:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
(Outdent)At present im caught in a little retro mood, listening to "Thriller", "Hung Up" and "ABBA". Amongst the newbies, I love Keri Hilson's "Knock You Down", still loving Taylor Swift's "Love Story" and of course Gaga is always there. I still haven't listened to "I Gotta Feeling" and Mariah's new track "Obsessed". --Legolas (talk2me) 06:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
(Outdent)Good. I fear for PAparazzi still. And i listened to IGAF, sorry Brad, I didnt like it at all. There is no spunk at all which is commonly associated with BEP music. And yeahhh " 4 Minutes" passed its GA review. --Legolas (talk2me) 09:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I've given the prose a copy edit, but I haven't finished with the article yet (need to look at sources). Regarding the lead, since the article is quite big, four paragraphs would be more appropriate. I suggest one paragraph for the background/release/music structure/lyrics, one paragraph for the critical/commercial info, one paragraph for the video and one paragraph for the live info. — Please comment R 2 16:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
ok
excuse me but im not sockpuppetry u block my other account forever ok so then u will be reported for unessicary blocking and editing a u get it trouble so leave my page alone.
Why'd you revert teh changes to her singles? Putting the certifications in the same table along with the titles makes it look really unpleasant to the eye. Lady Gaga (along with Rihanna) is one of the only artists who doesn't have a separate certifications and Singles section. I'm not trying to down you or anything, but i just don't see the reasoning. Impracticable ( talk) 16:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
i was to add the Fame Part one prior to the disscusion that is why videography was the chosen heading. I agree with the fame ball thing. An I told you I would get it to the GA. MJs death shocking, I almost cried. I hear alot of jokes and rumours and a tribute tour to cover the Uk dates and possibly a world onw with JT, Madge and hopefully Gaga. --Officially I am not Cloverfield Monsta I need help with this 08:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloverfield Monsta ( talk • contribs)
Legolas, please post a sockpuppet investigation for this and ask for a checkuser on the matter. Be sure to mention User:Dance-pop's original account as well as the others he's used. You're right, this account does look very similar, but I'd prefer to be absolutely sure. If we get a checkuser to look into things, we may also be able to look into the possibility of a rangeblock as well. Thanks. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 23:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
(Outdent)He he. Though we are not supposed to troll about it, I have to admit he is pretty stupid because its always his editing pattern which gets him blocked. Well leave it, lets go back to business. You saw that the Gaga bio failed GA (which was obvious), but I must advice you not to make comments in GA1 pages regarding other users. I have seen that admins do take notice of those things. --Legolas (talk2me) 06:21, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
No it doesn't. The video was made like a movie, and it also has about 8 minutes. The four screenshots are used in one image, so that keeps it to minimal use. Also, your image is included in that four screenshot image, so, if the other image fails, it means your image fails as well. Alecsdaniel ( talk) 11:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Can you help? I'm guessing you're an administrator so how do I delete images I upload, I think there's quite a few a don't use, is there a file or something?
The comment was not a personal attack against you, I just wandered why you went 3-days in the past and found the other image I uploaded and only commented on that one and no others. You ignored my comment on it, did I not make a valid point about the comparisons' between the two videos?
Jayy008 (
talk) 14:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
No problem. I'll keep an eye on the articles whenever I can :) • вяαdcяo chat 08:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Howdy! Let's talk: WP:COVERDISCUSS. - eo ( talk) 12:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Please do not delete this post as you did with my last message to you. You continually deleting Chillin is quite clearly going against consensus due to the amount of people on the page opposed to the deletion of this article. I suggest you nominate it at Articles for deletion if you still do not see why what you are doing is a violation of the Wikipedia project. Tikkuy ( talk) 13:09, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi legolas2186 im a new user/account thing on wikipedia and i wanted to ask if you teach me how to edit lady gaga pages and to stop vandalism etc. Ladgy ( talk) 07:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey. Just a quick message that you'd be glad to hear that Paparazzi is back at number-two on the Australian iTunes Store. • вяαdcяo chat 08:58, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Legolas, yes it's been a while, Im really busy this weeks, I finish the semester in one week and a half. I will try then to comment on the peer review. Ohh and finally someone is creating the Madonna wikiproject, I also will try to help you with "Holiday", altough it seems that you don't need to much help, wow I didn't know you already nominated "Everybody" and "Burning Up", that was fast. Regards. Frcm1988 ( talk) 16:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
heya, could you do me a huge favour? could you put a block on IP edits on the beyonce discography and the cascada discography because ip edits are driving me insane! :) Mister sparky ( talk) 17:26, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah Hi excuse me how Are any of the images I've posted on the Madonna section innapropriate??? Can you explain me why do you keep changing my posts??
Yeah hi this is ElPilotoDi would you mind explaining to me how are any of the images I've posted in the Madonna category innapropriate?? why do you keep removing them??? And if its because you dont like them just let me know OK?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElPilotoDi ( talk • contribs) 04:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah This is ElPilotoDi what does that mean how can I have them NOT deleted and do any of the other images i've posted have that??
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pokerfacesheet.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 10:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
dear legolas it's ladgy i have some video pics for all gaga's music videos i hope there are ok se ya Ladgy ( talk) 11:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey - I'm looking at both edits and it seems its more of a content dispute here. I don't see a lot of cruft being added and both of you are trying to maintain it constructively. Which parts in particular are bothering you or reading too cruft-y? I've left a message on Tikkuy's Talk Page, asking him to please engage in discussion on the article's Talk Page. I'm not going to block anyone at this point, but I'm sure you know that any other admin could swoop in and block you both for 3RR if it keeps going back and forth. - eo ( talk) 12:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below.
Sandstein 13:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Legolas2186 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Blocking me and User:Tikkuy for this reason will it stop the dispute? A 3rd opinioner was involved in it and he was sorting out the matter. Then why me and Tikkuy are not given the chance to sort this out? The blocking admin simply didnot saw or bother to explain anything. USer:Tikkuy is a newbie and needs to be explained what is reliable and what is not. I believe the block is completely unjustified.
Decline reason:
You continued to edit war after being warned to stop. I see no reason to unblock. Closedmouth ( talk) 14:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock|Hi. I believe I have been unblocked, but I still cannot edit. Will someone please take a look at it?}}
{{unblock-auto|1=171.161.160.10|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Legolas2186". The reason given for Legolas2186's block is: "Edit warring: on Chillin".|3=Sandstein|4=1510022}}
Sorry for the late reply. I don't know if I can commit to anything right now, but I'll see what I can do. Don't expect much though, and I don't know when I can get around to it. Dabomb87 ( talk) 17:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey there. I wanted to inform you that their were a number of recent revisions poorly sourced or perhaps unsourced content regarding "Boys Boys Boys" as the next single and Gaga being a hermaphrodite. I have reverted both edits. There has also been an article created for "Boys Boys Boys" which I have redirected to the "The Fame" album page. I just noticed that you have been blocked which is completely unjustified as you were editing under guidelines and reverting for more than a reasonable purpose. By the way, how was the Sticky&Sweat tour? You must of had a ball! • вяαdcяo chat 07:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey Legolas, how you doin'? I haven't started the review yet, cause I'm reviewing an article like right now. Don't worry, I'll promise you that I'll have the review done by today. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
No need to apologize, I know you have a life, so all is cool. :) Sounds great. Okay, I found some info., so check it out... if its good or awful. Also, I didn't have any luck with Madonna talking about the song, maybe you'll have a better luck at it. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I read that, too. Sure, I'll try to see what I come up with. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Alright. Congratulations on "Borderline" and "Burning Up" passing GA. About time, huh? :) Oh, no. The secret is out. Yeah, me and Carpet are cool. Um, like three weeks ago I talked to him on IM and asked him when he was coming back and he said he's not sure. He says that he needs to fix some problems in his personal life, so. I agree, its not the same without him. :( -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:23, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thisusedtobemyplaygroundmusicvideo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 11:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Borderlinemusicvideo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 13:29, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bedtimestorymusicvideo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 13:29, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey Stifle, can you take a look at the contributions of ElPilotoDi? Uploaded a number of images failing copyright and license and continuously adding them to the articles when being told not to do so. --Legolas (talk2me) 12:14, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for your message. I'm sorry that we got off on the wrong foot here. As for Chillin, wouldn't DJBooth be alright as a source as long as it's just for a review? I understand that it can't be used for any actual information, but considering it's just a review, I would have thought that being a subjective opinion, it would be allowed. Regarding the YouTube video, thanks for clearing that up, I understand now. I've made a few changes to the article that I'd added originally before you reverted due to the reasons we're discussing now. You didn't say anything about those changes, so I'm assuming that it's alright to keep them.
Thanks! Tikkuy ( talk) 14:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
To be completely honest, I don't know why you decided now to do the article, I was improving it little by little months ago, I never fully finish it because I didn't have the time,but well I don't own the article so you are fully able to edit the way you want it, I just think is a bit rude to do it in this way, considering how fast you developed the articles. Just look is almost finished, and sorry if Im mistaken but it looks that you only do this so you can have more and more GA, but like I said you are free to do whatever you want, I don't own it, and sorry if this is upseting to you its just the way I feel. Frcm1988 ( talk) 00:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
It would be great if you could issue warnings when you are reverting unsourced changes/vandalism. Otherwise, it makes it difficult to issue blocks. Thanks for your help editing/patrolling. Plastikspork ( talk) 05:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Hiya. I was just wondering why you'd reverted my change to The Fame when we'd already discussed the change on the article's talk page. It most certainly wasn't vandalism, as you said. Tikkuy ( talk) 11:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I am good thanks. How are you doing? • вяαdcяo chat 05:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
"Chillin (Catch vs 9th)" is not the same song as "Chillin", it is a remix. You deleted my earlier edit citing a lack of source, but the source currently posted proves nothing, its simply a link to Wale's website. I have the mixtape and have listened to it several times and I can assure you that the song that appears on the mixtape is not the same as the single.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ropo153 ( talk • contribs) 18:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey, how are you? Hope fine...I just want let you know that the next single by Lady Gaga in Italy is...Paparazzi! WONDERFUL! --♫ S manu! 20:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank! --♫ S manu! 09:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
this information for SAS I did myself. I only wanted to add there because I thought that information will be suitable for this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MattRus ( talk • contribs) 23:09, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
The song was not released only in the U.S.A. For example it was released in Spain [1] and well..most of Europe [2]. Alecsdaniel ( talk) 18:30, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the message. I am home a couple hours earlier than I expected. Happy birthday to you aswel for yesterday! • вяαdcяo chat 05:27, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't mean to sound rude, but you revert a good deal of edits I make to Lady Gaga and related pages, when I'm just doing my best to add good information. You act as if you own those articles, and I would appreciate it if you let myself and other editors have a chance to contribute. Thank you. Oh, and happy belated birthday. Pokerdance ( talk/ contribs) 20:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Are you for real? Here are the sources, I've showed them to you before [3] [4]. What's your source that sais that it was U.S only? Alecsdaniel ( talk) 16:47, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Legolas, I'm from Romania, so what you've said it's a little bit weird for me. What do you mean by that (I mean the image with the covers - they are updated on the Harper Collins website, the publisher.) By the way, are you a Septimus Heap fan? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shauki Alg ( talk • contribs) 06:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Okay, but why my image is not rationale at all, and the first it is? I don't get it... It's the same image, with a cover changed. Shauk_Alg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shauki Alg ( talk • contribs) 06:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your message, but I don't need your permission to delete poorly written, unencyclopedic rubbish whether it is sourced or not. Paul75 ( talk) 08:44, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
What are your sources that say that the song was released only in the U.S.A.? Alecsdaniel ( talk) 10:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you've made a few recent edits to Kylie Minogue and I wondered if you are aware of the FAR at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Kylie Minogue/archive1. If so, I would welcome your opinion. Rossrs ( talk) 13:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
From WP:GAN, "Articles can be nominated by anyone, and reviewed by any registered user who has not contributed significantly to the article." It does not matter who created the article or contributed to it the most. And I do not see any major edit war going on, and I have improved the structure since it failed. Also, articles that fail can be renominated at any time.
Also, my edits to The Fame were not vandalism. Charmed36 removed alternate cover artwork for no reason, and the singles section has better structure. As for no references, it contains information that is referenced in each article (hence the "Main article" templates in the section).
This is exactly what I meant when I confronted you earlier about your ownership of articles. I advise you stop as this is against Wikipedia policy. Anyone is allowed to make constructive edits to the project, not just you. Pokerdance ( talk/ contribs) 03:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I'd like more info on what you mean. I'm not 'adding' any info or 'vandalising' (You've GOT to be kidding). The edit was that on some singles, if they got the same chart position more that once in a row, then there was a rowspan, however it was only on the early singles and only some of them anyway. So in what way am I vandalising? -- The Rogue Leader
Hi, yes I finally got some time now, Im going to correct mostly the reference's format and a few misspellings and adding missing words, I will try to do a review of the article's body but won't promise anything, after all I am not a good copyeditor. Regards. Frcm1988 ( talk) 04:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank You for explaining. -- The Rogue Leader
Look, Legolas, I have a good source. I've written you an email. Please reply to me. Ok? And stop thinking that your are the only creator of the Septimus Heap page. Shauki
Like the image with the books, you led people into confusion. And with the movie it’s the same. Jean McGinley confirmed that via email:
While the article says that the movie will be full animation it will actually be live action with animation, not full animation. Sorry for any confusion! Best regards, Jean McGinley Subsidiary Rights Manager HarperCollins Children’s Books
And Angie Sage:
Movie ... It will be live action. There was an article last week in the Hollywood Reporter that has got it wrong & this has led to some confusion... But it is not being animated. They probably got it wrong because Warners have just got an animation studio to begin work on Stanley the rat (some of the creatures will need animation of course), but the animation will be within a live action movie. But it is true about David Frankel. However, Bob Lieber will not (I think) be doing the screenplay as I was told they were looking for another writer. So I hope that clears it up. Angie —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shauki Alg ( talk • contribs) 10:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
The IP is the same, even if I am logged in or not. Understand that? It's the same, boy! :) Check it. And why don't you want to reply to my email to talk about this? We are both fans of Septimus Heap, and I can prove it to you that I have sources. Only if you are going to reply to my email... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shauki Alg ( talk • contribs) 10:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
OK then, if you're also a fan, let's talk via email. I've written to you yesterday an email. From an address that stars with Petru****@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shauki Alg ( talk • contribs) 10:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
There is no need to be rude. I know they didn't chart together . And this is different to the previous topic we were talking about. My edit was putting "Borderline & "Lucky Star" the other way 'round because " "Borderline" was released as the 4th single while "Lucky Star" was released as the 5th. On the " Madonna singles discography" page they are in reverse order. So if you want to corect me, please go ahead and talk to me because I like to learn from my mistakes. However there is no reason to tell me to 'listen to reason'. I know I'm not what you could call 'high ranking', but I'm not stupid. Please reply and give me reasons why I am wrong. The Rogue Leader ( talk) 14:10, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, lol. I must of been like that when I first signed up. I'll have to put the discography page on my watchlist so I can keep an eye. Also, I fixed up the grammar in the singles section on The Fame article. Hopefully, it makes it flow a little better. • вяαdcяo chat 08:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
I TOLD YOU TO ADD A PROPER SOURCE! THE ARTICLE IS INCOMPLETE WITHOUT THE MENTIONING OF THAT! Alecsdaniel ( talk) 10:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
hey legolas its ladg im just wondering how u got them userboxs cause im trying to get some but its just confusing so im just wondering if you could help thats all and keep up the good gaga work and on the autralian show 20-1 4 minutes is number 17 on greatsest duo songs shame ok then bye. Ladgy ( talk) 01:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I have looked again at the prose; it has definitely improved, and I have made a few further tweaks to the lead. I'm not sure I can do much more; apart from not having a lot of time at the moment, I simply don't know enough about pop music. To get to FA, I still think your best bet is to find an informed copyeditor able to give the necessary time to the article. Have you tried direct approaches to the writers of some of the featured pop music articles? Good luck with it anyway; your hard work deserves some encouragement and reward. Brianboulton ( talk) 07:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
How was what I did malicious at ALL? I was moving the page from Greatest Hits Volume 3 (Madonna album) to Celebration (Madonna album), because the OFFICIAL title of the release is Celebration. What the hell is wrong with that? This site is absolutely ridiculous. BambooBanga ( talk) 08:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't think it's a controversial change. I have left a reason in both edit summaries, and if they choose to revert it, I will take it to the talk pages. Pokerdance ( talk/ contribs) 08:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey I saw the message you left for me concerning The Virgin Toue article, first of all thnx 4 agreeing with me that myimage is the ebst ;P. And second of all how can I prove what you told me the image needs to prove? I would really appreciate if u could help me. Thnx —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElPilotoDi ( talk • contribs) 13:10, 23 July 2009 (UTC) R U talkin bout the 10 rationale use points?? Thnx 4 Ur help I really appreciate it. LOL do you really like my Virgin tour iamge better??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElPilotoDi ( talk • contribs) 13:22, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Ok :) There are two articles for Starstruck both lacking notability, therefore I nominated each for speedy deletion which I was unsure if it was the correct thing to do. Some administrator came along and denied the requests so it looks like redirecting will have to do. • вяαdcяo chat 07:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
(Outdent)Yup. Same guy. So its gonna be a smash. --Legolas (talk2me) 09:17, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Legolas2186, contrary to your recent edit summary, there is not an exception to citation requirements for content in lead sections. Have a look at Wikipedia:Lead section#Citations, which hopefully should explain the situation. PhilKnight ( talk) 15:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey Legolas! Did you checked the image at the virgin tour?? I want to know if its right, and also i dont want that other user to start changing it again. Thnx —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElPilotoDi ( talk • contribs) 19:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Upgradeumusicvideo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σ xplicit 04:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
-- Brian Reading ( talk) 09:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
I've pulled it again. Please provide a reference. If I search for Lady Gaga on irishcharts.ie, I get Paparazzi, Poker Face, and Just Dance. If I search for "LoveGame", I get zip.—
Kww(
talk) 10:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
:If IRMA says it didn't chart, it didn't chart. Acharts is a pretty half-assed place, and when it's contradicted by the official source, it shouldn't be used.—
Kww(
talk) 10:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Didn't notice that lonely little "49" on the page.—
Kww(
talk) 11:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Like dat? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElPilotoDi ( talk • contribs) 20:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
The article Sleaze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
ApprenticeFan
talk
contribs 10:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I am getting really irritated because my uploads are being marked for speedy deletion when their use complies with wikipedia's regulations and rules. Please go to the She Ain't Got... page to see what I mean
This is so unfair! I don't understand why you are taking the image down! There are thousands of pages on singles that have screenshots to illustrate the music video! Why are you picking on me? You are not trying to help make wikipedia better at all! You are just putting people off it completely! The page clearly states "PLEASE HELP IMPROVE THIS ARTICLE BY EXPANDING IT" and that's exactly what I have been doing but people like you and Explicit are trying to throw this and that at me as if I am wrong when I am not. What is your problem? Do you not have a life? Or eyes - to see the countless other pages on singles that have screenshots? Maybe I should stop insulting you! Maybe then this bullying will stop.
You are really horrible! I don't understand why you are making such a fuss about the one image! I was EXPANDING the page - as the template requested - and doing it within Wikipedia's regulations and rules whether YOUR PERSONAL OPINION thinks so or not.
I don't care anymore. You have got what you wanted. Have a nice day. I hope you are happy now. Oh by the way, I have removed the EXPANSION template from the She Ain't Got... page as obviously the page is complete as it can be without a chart history (which I will be sure to create once the single charts). There obviously isn't anything more that can be done to that page - oh except add screenshots for the music video (but that isn't allowed is it? - oh but it it is on these pages: [[Halo_(Beyonc%C3%A9_Knowles_song), Ego_(Beyoncé_Knowles_song), Sweet Dreams (Beyoncé Knowles song)). So what's so special about those pages that allows them to have screenshots? They don't add anything more or anything less to the pages than what my sreenshot added to the She Ain't Got... page. If you feel the need to delete that screenshot then shouldn't you delete all the others that are up illustrating music videos? Oh but there's one little problem...I didn't post the others, so deleting them is of no interest to you =)
It's a sad day. spoke with him this morning. He said he's not coming back - he just doesn't have the drive anymore. MaJic ( talk) 14:17, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I felt a new section was for the best. Yeah, I kinda felt bad for him when he was telling me he was dealing with personal stuff. But, its good that he's taking some time off Wikipedia and trying to deal with it. Yeah, if I talk to him I'll let him know you say 'Hi!'. :) I'll do a copy-edit for "Get Together" and let you know. Yeah, let me know when you're done with "Jump" so I can do the same. Hey, will you be working on the album in your sandbox? If so, I think I might have some helpful links, regarding the development of the album. Unless, you have that covered? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I'm WannaBeSomething, and I'm just startin' out... I have a little question:
I would like to join the WikiProject Madonna. What do I need to do? (I don't know who should I ask it to)
--
WannaBeSomething (
talk) 00:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Please, stop bothering me, Legolas. All the information I've added recently is true, all right?
Who do you think you are? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.46.216.120 ( talk) 10:01, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there! What's up? Sorry for the recent dissappearance, I haven't had as much time to focus on this project, with having a job now, a girl that I currently have a chance with, hopefully..., and class coming up. Time has been tight for me... so, how are things going on Wiki?^^ CarpetCrawler message me 00:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:4minutes sheet music.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:08, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Not much really. I have been editing a little less but i'm still here :) I'm kind of wondering what I should do next on wikipedia. I've got a couple of music related articles on my mind. • вяαdcяo chat 09:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
That was terrible! One person was attempting to put a micropenis on my page! Pokerdance ( talk/ contribs) 09:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the link. I actually purchased the song on the iTunes Store earlier today and I am very pleased. • вяαdcяo chat 10:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi Legolas, I would like to join this wikiproject. I agree with you, many Madonna pages really need a lot of work.
Thanks for the invite. PopMusicBuff talk 14:39, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Dear editor please can you add your opinion to the following discussion to help reach a consensus. ( Lil-unique1 ( talk) 16:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC))
Hi Legolas2186, I see that you have reverted my edits describing the key of Poker Face, probably because I deleted the source which states the piece is in A minor. I deleted the source because it provides a transcription for piano in an easier key to play in, yet close enough such that most cannot tell it is not the original key. I have re-edited the article while keeping the source. I'll leave it to you to decide whether the source should go, but just note that the key of the music of Poker Face from that source is incorrect.
Thanks, Andy
— Andy W. ( talk/ contrb.) 20:29, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey why did you change the image at the re-invention tour??? Also i would love to join the madonna wiki-project.
hey im asking a big favor can u help me keep the broken-hearted girl beyonce page up beacuse people have been commeting thats it is the next single i believe so 2 so please help i beg u please!!!!!! P.S. comment on my peage i you do so please and thank you bye. and i luv the new madonna song i think it's hot and should be number 1 on all i tunes thaks and bye. Ladgy ( talk) 07:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Dabomb87 ( talk) 13:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey I created Mjp. Could you please tell me what you think of the article. Help me edit it. Madonna works out! Upload a picture! Mjp2515 ( talk) 02:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Mitä hittiä is still not the Finnish singles chart. If you go to the official Finnish chart site, you will see no mention of Mitä hittiä there. The article about Mitä hittiä also tells that it is not the Finnish singles chart. The Finnish chart is called Suomen virallinen lista, not Mitä hittiä. YuckieDuck ( talk) 09:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey there! I will read the article now and suggest what can be improved. • вяαdcяo chat 08:29, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Excuse me, why did you removed the international cover section from the "Bedtime Stories (Madonna album)? It was very relevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElPilotoDi ( talk • contribs) 21:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
I watched those two videos. Both were awesome! How funny is the Outta Space one? LMFAO! • вяαdcяo chat 12:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
Aditya α ß 18:16, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
For some obscure reason, Linkin Park's song, New Divide has rapidly made it's way back into the top ten holding the number-two spot pushing Paparazzi back down to number-three. It must be the Transformers 2 movie since "New Divide" is the theme song. On my iTunes, I have enabled a popularity meter so that I can tell how far the songs are apart from one another in sales. I Gotta Feeling is leading by quiet a lot but Gaga and Linkin Park are fairly tied. • вяαdcяo chat 06:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
(Outdent)At present im caught in a little retro mood, listening to "Thriller", "Hung Up" and "ABBA". Amongst the newbies, I love Keri Hilson's "Knock You Down", still loving Taylor Swift's "Love Story" and of course Gaga is always there. I still haven't listened to "I Gotta Feeling" and Mariah's new track "Obsessed". --Legolas (talk2me) 06:38, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
(Outdent)Good. I fear for PAparazzi still. And i listened to IGAF, sorry Brad, I didnt like it at all. There is no spunk at all which is commonly associated with BEP music. And yeahhh " 4 Minutes" passed its GA review. --Legolas (talk2me) 09:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I've given the prose a copy edit, but I haven't finished with the article yet (need to look at sources). Regarding the lead, since the article is quite big, four paragraphs would be more appropriate. I suggest one paragraph for the background/release/music structure/lyrics, one paragraph for the critical/commercial info, one paragraph for the video and one paragraph for the live info. — Please comment R 2 16:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
ok
excuse me but im not sockpuppetry u block my other account forever ok so then u will be reported for unessicary blocking and editing a u get it trouble so leave my page alone.
Why'd you revert teh changes to her singles? Putting the certifications in the same table along with the titles makes it look really unpleasant to the eye. Lady Gaga (along with Rihanna) is one of the only artists who doesn't have a separate certifications and Singles section. I'm not trying to down you or anything, but i just don't see the reasoning. Impracticable ( talk) 16:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
i was to add the Fame Part one prior to the disscusion that is why videography was the chosen heading. I agree with the fame ball thing. An I told you I would get it to the GA. MJs death shocking, I almost cried. I hear alot of jokes and rumours and a tribute tour to cover the Uk dates and possibly a world onw with JT, Madge and hopefully Gaga. --Officially I am not Cloverfield Monsta I need help with this 08:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cloverfield Monsta ( talk • contribs)
Legolas, please post a sockpuppet investigation for this and ask for a checkuser on the matter. Be sure to mention User:Dance-pop's original account as well as the others he's used. You're right, this account does look very similar, but I'd prefer to be absolutely sure. If we get a checkuser to look into things, we may also be able to look into the possibility of a rangeblock as well. Thanks. Hersfold ( t/ a/ c) 23:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
(Outdent)He he. Though we are not supposed to troll about it, I have to admit he is pretty stupid because its always his editing pattern which gets him blocked. Well leave it, lets go back to business. You saw that the Gaga bio failed GA (which was obvious), but I must advice you not to make comments in GA1 pages regarding other users. I have seen that admins do take notice of those things. --Legolas (talk2me) 06:21, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
No it doesn't. The video was made like a movie, and it also has about 8 minutes. The four screenshots are used in one image, so that keeps it to minimal use. Also, your image is included in that four screenshot image, so, if the other image fails, it means your image fails as well. Alecsdaniel ( talk) 11:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Can you help? I'm guessing you're an administrator so how do I delete images I upload, I think there's quite a few a don't use, is there a file or something?
The comment was not a personal attack against you, I just wandered why you went 3-days in the past and found the other image I uploaded and only commented on that one and no others. You ignored my comment on it, did I not make a valid point about the comparisons' between the two videos?
Jayy008 (
talk) 14:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
No problem. I'll keep an eye on the articles whenever I can :) • вяαdcяo chat 08:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Howdy! Let's talk: WP:COVERDISCUSS. - eo ( talk) 12:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Please do not delete this post as you did with my last message to you. You continually deleting Chillin is quite clearly going against consensus due to the amount of people on the page opposed to the deletion of this article. I suggest you nominate it at Articles for deletion if you still do not see why what you are doing is a violation of the Wikipedia project. Tikkuy ( talk) 13:09, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi legolas2186 im a new user/account thing on wikipedia and i wanted to ask if you teach me how to edit lady gaga pages and to stop vandalism etc. Ladgy ( talk) 07:30, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey. Just a quick message that you'd be glad to hear that Paparazzi is back at number-two on the Australian iTunes Store. • вяαdcяo chat 08:58, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Legolas, yes it's been a while, Im really busy this weeks, I finish the semester in one week and a half. I will try then to comment on the peer review. Ohh and finally someone is creating the Madonna wikiproject, I also will try to help you with "Holiday", altough it seems that you don't need to much help, wow I didn't know you already nominated "Everybody" and "Burning Up", that was fast. Regards. Frcm1988 ( talk) 16:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
heya, could you do me a huge favour? could you put a block on IP edits on the beyonce discography and the cascada discography because ip edits are driving me insane! :) Mister sparky ( talk) 17:26, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah Hi excuse me how Are any of the images I've posted on the Madonna section innapropriate??? Can you explain me why do you keep changing my posts??
Yeah hi this is ElPilotoDi would you mind explaining to me how are any of the images I've posted in the Madonna category innapropriate?? why do you keep removing them??? And if its because you dont like them just let me know OK?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElPilotoDi ( talk • contribs) 04:50, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah This is ElPilotoDi what does that mean how can I have them NOT deleted and do any of the other images i've posted have that??
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pokerfacesheet.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 10:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
dear legolas it's ladgy i have some video pics for all gaga's music videos i hope there are ok se ya Ladgy ( talk) 11:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey - I'm looking at both edits and it seems its more of a content dispute here. I don't see a lot of cruft being added and both of you are trying to maintain it constructively. Which parts in particular are bothering you or reading too cruft-y? I've left a message on Tikkuy's Talk Page, asking him to please engage in discussion on the article's Talk Page. I'm not going to block anyone at this point, but I'm sure you know that any other admin could swoop in and block you both for 3RR if it keeps going back and forth. - eo ( talk) 12:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
below.
Sandstein 13:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Legolas2186 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Blocking me and User:Tikkuy for this reason will it stop the dispute? A 3rd opinioner was involved in it and he was sorting out the matter. Then why me and Tikkuy are not given the chance to sort this out? The blocking admin simply didnot saw or bother to explain anything. USer:Tikkuy is a newbie and needs to be explained what is reliable and what is not. I believe the block is completely unjustified.
Decline reason:
You continued to edit war after being warned to stop. I see no reason to unblock. Closedmouth ( talk) 14:05, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{
unblock|Hi. I believe I have been unblocked, but I still cannot edit. Will someone please take a look at it?}}
{{unblock-auto|1=171.161.160.10|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Legolas2186". The reason given for Legolas2186's block is: "Edit warring: on Chillin".|3=Sandstein|4=1510022}}
Sorry for the late reply. I don't know if I can commit to anything right now, but I'll see what I can do. Don't expect much though, and I don't know when I can get around to it. Dabomb87 ( talk) 17:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey there. I wanted to inform you that their were a number of recent revisions poorly sourced or perhaps unsourced content regarding "Boys Boys Boys" as the next single and Gaga being a hermaphrodite. I have reverted both edits. There has also been an article created for "Boys Boys Boys" which I have redirected to the "The Fame" album page. I just noticed that you have been blocked which is completely unjustified as you were editing under guidelines and reverting for more than a reasonable purpose. By the way, how was the Sticky&Sweat tour? You must of had a ball! • вяαdcяo chat 07:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey Legolas, how you doin'? I haven't started the review yet, cause I'm reviewing an article like right now. Don't worry, I'll promise you that I'll have the review done by today. :) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 14:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
No need to apologize, I know you have a life, so all is cool. :) Sounds great. Okay, I found some info., so check it out... if its good or awful. Also, I didn't have any luck with Madonna talking about the song, maybe you'll have a better luck at it. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 03:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I read that, too. Sure, I'll try to see what I come up with. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:14, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Alright. Congratulations on "Borderline" and "Burning Up" passing GA. About time, huh? :) Oh, no. The secret is out. Yeah, me and Carpet are cool. Um, like three weeks ago I talked to him on IM and asked him when he was coming back and he said he's not sure. He says that he needs to fix some problems in his personal life, so. I agree, its not the same without him. :( -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:23, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Thisusedtobemyplaygroundmusicvideo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 11:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Borderlinemusicvideo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 13:29, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bedtimestorymusicvideo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stifle ( talk) 13:29, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey Stifle, can you take a look at the contributions of ElPilotoDi? Uploaded a number of images failing copyright and license and continuously adding them to the articles when being told not to do so. --Legolas (talk2me) 12:14, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi! Thanks for your message. I'm sorry that we got off on the wrong foot here. As for Chillin, wouldn't DJBooth be alright as a source as long as it's just for a review? I understand that it can't be used for any actual information, but considering it's just a review, I would have thought that being a subjective opinion, it would be allowed. Regarding the YouTube video, thanks for clearing that up, I understand now. I've made a few changes to the article that I'd added originally before you reverted due to the reasons we're discussing now. You didn't say anything about those changes, so I'm assuming that it's alright to keep them.
Thanks! Tikkuy ( talk) 14:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
To be completely honest, I don't know why you decided now to do the article, I was improving it little by little months ago, I never fully finish it because I didn't have the time,but well I don't own the article so you are fully able to edit the way you want it, I just think is a bit rude to do it in this way, considering how fast you developed the articles. Just look is almost finished, and sorry if Im mistaken but it looks that you only do this so you can have more and more GA, but like I said you are free to do whatever you want, I don't own it, and sorry if this is upseting to you its just the way I feel. Frcm1988 ( talk) 00:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
It would be great if you could issue warnings when you are reverting unsourced changes/vandalism. Otherwise, it makes it difficult to issue blocks. Thanks for your help editing/patrolling. Plastikspork ( talk) 05:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Hiya. I was just wondering why you'd reverted my change to The Fame when we'd already discussed the change on the article's talk page. It most certainly wasn't vandalism, as you said. Tikkuy ( talk) 11:35, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
I am good thanks. How are you doing? • вяαdcяo chat 05:28, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
"Chillin (Catch vs 9th)" is not the same song as "Chillin", it is a remix. You deleted my earlier edit citing a lack of source, but the source currently posted proves nothing, its simply a link to Wale's website. I have the mixtape and have listened to it several times and I can assure you that the song that appears on the mixtape is not the same as the single.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ropo153 ( talk • contribs) 18:41, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey, how are you? Hope fine...I just want let you know that the next single by Lady Gaga in Italy is...Paparazzi! WONDERFUL! --♫ S manu! 20:11, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank! --♫ S manu! 09:43, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
this information for SAS I did myself. I only wanted to add there because I thought that information will be suitable for this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MattRus ( talk • contribs) 23:09, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
The song was not released only in the U.S.A. For example it was released in Spain [1] and well..most of Europe [2]. Alecsdaniel ( talk) 18:30, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for the message. I am home a couple hours earlier than I expected. Happy birthday to you aswel for yesterday! • вяαdcяo chat 05:27, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't mean to sound rude, but you revert a good deal of edits I make to Lady Gaga and related pages, when I'm just doing my best to add good information. You act as if you own those articles, and I would appreciate it if you let myself and other editors have a chance to contribute. Thank you. Oh, and happy belated birthday. Pokerdance ( talk/ contribs) 20:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Are you for real? Here are the sources, I've showed them to you before [3] [4]. What's your source that sais that it was U.S only? Alecsdaniel ( talk) 16:47, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, Legolas, I'm from Romania, so what you've said it's a little bit weird for me. What do you mean by that (I mean the image with the covers - they are updated on the Harper Collins website, the publisher.) By the way, are you a Septimus Heap fan? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shauki Alg ( talk • contribs) 06:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Okay, but why my image is not rationale at all, and the first it is? I don't get it... It's the same image, with a cover changed. Shauk_Alg —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shauki Alg ( talk • contribs) 06:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for your message, but I don't need your permission to delete poorly written, unencyclopedic rubbish whether it is sourced or not. Paul75 ( talk) 08:44, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
What are your sources that say that the song was released only in the U.S.A.? Alecsdaniel ( talk) 10:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I notice you've made a few recent edits to Kylie Minogue and I wondered if you are aware of the FAR at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Kylie Minogue/archive1. If so, I would welcome your opinion. Rossrs ( talk) 13:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
From WP:GAN, "Articles can be nominated by anyone, and reviewed by any registered user who has not contributed significantly to the article." It does not matter who created the article or contributed to it the most. And I do not see any major edit war going on, and I have improved the structure since it failed. Also, articles that fail can be renominated at any time.
Also, my edits to The Fame were not vandalism. Charmed36 removed alternate cover artwork for no reason, and the singles section has better structure. As for no references, it contains information that is referenced in each article (hence the "Main article" templates in the section).
This is exactly what I meant when I confronted you earlier about your ownership of articles. I advise you stop as this is against Wikipedia policy. Anyone is allowed to make constructive edits to the project, not just you. Pokerdance ( talk/ contribs) 03:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I'd like more info on what you mean. I'm not 'adding' any info or 'vandalising' (You've GOT to be kidding). The edit was that on some singles, if they got the same chart position more that once in a row, then there was a rowspan, however it was only on the early singles and only some of them anyway. So in what way am I vandalising? -- The Rogue Leader
Hi, yes I finally got some time now, Im going to correct mostly the reference's format and a few misspellings and adding missing words, I will try to do a review of the article's body but won't promise anything, after all I am not a good copyeditor. Regards. Frcm1988 ( talk) 04:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank You for explaining. -- The Rogue Leader
Look, Legolas, I have a good source. I've written you an email. Please reply to me. Ok? And stop thinking that your are the only creator of the Septimus Heap page. Shauki
Like the image with the books, you led people into confusion. And with the movie it’s the same. Jean McGinley confirmed that via email:
While the article says that the movie will be full animation it will actually be live action with animation, not full animation. Sorry for any confusion! Best regards, Jean McGinley Subsidiary Rights Manager HarperCollins Children’s Books
And Angie Sage:
Movie ... It will be live action. There was an article last week in the Hollywood Reporter that has got it wrong & this has led to some confusion... But it is not being animated. They probably got it wrong because Warners have just got an animation studio to begin work on Stanley the rat (some of the creatures will need animation of course), but the animation will be within a live action movie. But it is true about David Frankel. However, Bob Lieber will not (I think) be doing the screenplay as I was told they were looking for another writer. So I hope that clears it up. Angie —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shauki Alg ( talk • contribs) 10:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
The IP is the same, even if I am logged in or not. Understand that? It's the same, boy! :) Check it. And why don't you want to reply to my email to talk about this? We are both fans of Septimus Heap, and I can prove it to you that I have sources. Only if you are going to reply to my email... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shauki Alg ( talk • contribs) 10:43, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
OK then, if you're also a fan, let's talk via email. I've written to you yesterday an email. From an address that stars with Petru****@yahoo.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shauki Alg ( talk • contribs) 10:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
There is no need to be rude. I know they didn't chart together . And this is different to the previous topic we were talking about. My edit was putting "Borderline & "Lucky Star" the other way 'round because " "Borderline" was released as the 4th single while "Lucky Star" was released as the 5th. On the " Madonna singles discography" page they are in reverse order. So if you want to corect me, please go ahead and talk to me because I like to learn from my mistakes. However there is no reason to tell me to 'listen to reason'. I know I'm not what you could call 'high ranking', but I'm not stupid. Please reply and give me reasons why I am wrong. The Rogue Leader ( talk) 14:10, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, lol. I must of been like that when I first signed up. I'll have to put the discography page on my watchlist so I can keep an eye. Also, I fixed up the grammar in the singles section on The Fame article. Hopefully, it makes it flow a little better. • вяαdcяo chat 08:58, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
I TOLD YOU TO ADD A PROPER SOURCE! THE ARTICLE IS INCOMPLETE WITHOUT THE MENTIONING OF THAT! Alecsdaniel ( talk) 10:14, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
hey legolas its ladg im just wondering how u got them userboxs cause im trying to get some but its just confusing so im just wondering if you could help thats all and keep up the good gaga work and on the autralian show 20-1 4 minutes is number 17 on greatsest duo songs shame ok then bye. Ladgy ( talk) 01:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I have looked again at the prose; it has definitely improved, and I have made a few further tweaks to the lead. I'm not sure I can do much more; apart from not having a lot of time at the moment, I simply don't know enough about pop music. To get to FA, I still think your best bet is to find an informed copyeditor able to give the necessary time to the article. Have you tried direct approaches to the writers of some of the featured pop music articles? Good luck with it anyway; your hard work deserves some encouragement and reward. Brianboulton ( talk) 07:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
How was what I did malicious at ALL? I was moving the page from Greatest Hits Volume 3 (Madonna album) to Celebration (Madonna album), because the OFFICIAL title of the release is Celebration. What the hell is wrong with that? This site is absolutely ridiculous. BambooBanga ( talk) 08:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
I don't think it's a controversial change. I have left a reason in both edit summaries, and if they choose to revert it, I will take it to the talk pages. Pokerdance ( talk/ contribs) 08:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey I saw the message you left for me concerning The Virgin Toue article, first of all thnx 4 agreeing with me that myimage is the ebst ;P. And second of all how can I prove what you told me the image needs to prove? I would really appreciate if u could help me. Thnx —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElPilotoDi ( talk • contribs) 13:10, 23 July 2009 (UTC) R U talkin bout the 10 rationale use points?? Thnx 4 Ur help I really appreciate it. LOL do you really like my Virgin tour iamge better??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElPilotoDi ( talk • contribs) 13:22, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Ok :) There are two articles for Starstruck both lacking notability, therefore I nominated each for speedy deletion which I was unsure if it was the correct thing to do. Some administrator came along and denied the requests so it looks like redirecting will have to do. • вяαdcяo chat 07:26, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
(Outdent)Yup. Same guy. So its gonna be a smash. --Legolas (talk2me) 09:17, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Legolas2186, contrary to your recent edit summary, there is not an exception to citation requirements for content in lead sections. Have a look at Wikipedia:Lead section#Citations, which hopefully should explain the situation. PhilKnight ( talk) 15:53, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey Legolas! Did you checked the image at the virgin tour?? I want to know if its right, and also i dont want that other user to start changing it again. Thnx —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElPilotoDi ( talk • contribs) 19:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Upgradeumusicvideo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Σ xplicit 04:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
-- Brian Reading ( talk) 09:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
I've pulled it again. Please provide a reference. If I search for Lady Gaga on irishcharts.ie, I get Paparazzi, Poker Face, and Just Dance. If I search for "LoveGame", I get zip.—
Kww(
talk) 10:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
:If IRMA says it didn't chart, it didn't chart. Acharts is a pretty half-assed place, and when it's contradicted by the official source, it shouldn't be used.—
Kww(
talk) 10:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)Didn't notice that lonely little "49" on the page.—
Kww(
talk) 11:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Like dat? —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElPilotoDi ( talk • contribs) 20:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
The article Sleaze has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
dated prod}}
will stop the
Proposed Deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. The
Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
ApprenticeFan
talk
contribs 10:42, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I am getting really irritated because my uploads are being marked for speedy deletion when their use complies with wikipedia's regulations and rules. Please go to the She Ain't Got... page to see what I mean
This is so unfair! I don't understand why you are taking the image down! There are thousands of pages on singles that have screenshots to illustrate the music video! Why are you picking on me? You are not trying to help make wikipedia better at all! You are just putting people off it completely! The page clearly states "PLEASE HELP IMPROVE THIS ARTICLE BY EXPANDING IT" and that's exactly what I have been doing but people like you and Explicit are trying to throw this and that at me as if I am wrong when I am not. What is your problem? Do you not have a life? Or eyes - to see the countless other pages on singles that have screenshots? Maybe I should stop insulting you! Maybe then this bullying will stop.
You are really horrible! I don't understand why you are making such a fuss about the one image! I was EXPANDING the page - as the template requested - and doing it within Wikipedia's regulations and rules whether YOUR PERSONAL OPINION thinks so or not.
I don't care anymore. You have got what you wanted. Have a nice day. I hope you are happy now. Oh by the way, I have removed the EXPANSION template from the She Ain't Got... page as obviously the page is complete as it can be without a chart history (which I will be sure to create once the single charts). There obviously isn't anything more that can be done to that page - oh except add screenshots for the music video (but that isn't allowed is it? - oh but it it is on these pages: [[Halo_(Beyonc%C3%A9_Knowles_song), Ego_(Beyoncé_Knowles_song), Sweet Dreams (Beyoncé Knowles song)). So what's so special about those pages that allows them to have screenshots? They don't add anything more or anything less to the pages than what my sreenshot added to the She Ain't Got... page. If you feel the need to delete that screenshot then shouldn't you delete all the others that are up illustrating music videos? Oh but there's one little problem...I didn't post the others, so deleting them is of no interest to you =)
It's a sad day. spoke with him this morning. He said he's not coming back - he just doesn't have the drive anymore. MaJic ( talk) 14:17, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
I felt a new section was for the best. Yeah, I kinda felt bad for him when he was telling me he was dealing with personal stuff. But, its good that he's taking some time off Wikipedia and trying to deal with it. Yeah, if I talk to him I'll let him know you say 'Hi!'. :) I'll do a copy-edit for "Get Together" and let you know. Yeah, let me know when you're done with "Jump" so I can do the same. Hey, will you be working on the album in your sandbox? If so, I think I might have some helpful links, regarding the development of the album. Unless, you have that covered? -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I'm WannaBeSomething, and I'm just startin' out... I have a little question:
I would like to join the WikiProject Madonna. What do I need to do? (I don't know who should I ask it to)
--
WannaBeSomething (
talk) 00:30, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Please, stop bothering me, Legolas. All the information I've added recently is true, all right?
Who do you think you are? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.46.216.120 ( talk) 10:01, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi there! What's up? Sorry for the recent dissappearance, I haven't had as much time to focus on this project, with having a job now, a girl that I currently have a chance with, hopefully..., and class coming up. Time has been tight for me... so, how are things going on Wiki?^^ CarpetCrawler message me 00:19, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:4minutes sheet music.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the " my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot ( talk) 05:08, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Not much really. I have been editing a little less but i'm still here :) I'm kind of wondering what I should do next on wikipedia. I've got a couple of music related articles on my mind. • вяαdcяo chat 09:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
That was terrible! One person was attempting to put a micropenis on my page! Pokerdance ( talk/ contribs) 09:38, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the link. I actually purchased the song on the iTunes Store earlier today and I am very pleased. • вяαdcяo chat 10:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi Legolas, I would like to join this wikiproject. I agree with you, many Madonna pages really need a lot of work.
Thanks for the invite. PopMusicBuff talk 14:39, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Dear editor please can you add your opinion to the following discussion to help reach a consensus. ( Lil-unique1 ( talk) 16:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC))
Hi Legolas2186, I see that you have reverted my edits describing the key of Poker Face, probably because I deleted the source which states the piece is in A minor. I deleted the source because it provides a transcription for piano in an easier key to play in, yet close enough such that most cannot tell it is not the original key. I have re-edited the article while keeping the source. I'll leave it to you to decide whether the source should go, but just note that the key of the music of Poker Face from that source is incorrect.
Thanks, Andy
— Andy W. ( talk/ contrb.) 20:29, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey why did you change the image at the re-invention tour??? Also i would love to join the madonna wiki-project.
hey im asking a big favor can u help me keep the broken-hearted girl beyonce page up beacuse people have been commeting thats it is the next single i believe so 2 so please help i beg u please!!!!!! P.S. comment on my peage i you do so please and thank you bye. and i luv the new madonna song i think it's hot and should be number 1 on all i tunes thaks and bye. Ladgy ( talk) 07:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Dabomb87 ( talk) 13:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey I created Mjp. Could you please tell me what you think of the article. Help me edit it. Madonna works out! Upload a picture! Mjp2515 ( talk) 02:32, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Mitä hittiä is still not the Finnish singles chart. If you go to the official Finnish chart site, you will see no mention of Mitä hittiä there. The article about Mitä hittiä also tells that it is not the Finnish singles chart. The Finnish chart is called Suomen virallinen lista, not Mitä hittiä. YuckieDuck ( talk) 09:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Hey there! I will read the article now and suggest what can be improved. • вяαdcяo chat 08:29, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Excuse me, why did you removed the international cover section from the "Bedtime Stories (Madonna album)? It was very relevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ElPilotoDi ( talk • contribs) 21:36, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
I watched those two videos. Both were awesome! How funny is the Outta Space one? LMFAO! • вяαdcяo chat 12:27, 8 August 2009 (UTC)