![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
No I was referring to him blanking to remove the vandalism notices. Wasnt aware he was allowed to do that. JakeDHS07 15:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Largo,
The article about our swekey authentication key has been deleted.
I just wanted it to be informative, I removed any external link. I think this article is important because the swekey is the first and only authentication key designed for web sites and web applications.
I read your guidelines very carefuly and I didnt find what in the article caused the deletion. The fact that I write an article on our own product is only 'discouraged' but not forbidden, and since our product is not yet commercialized I have only few chances to see somebody else but me writing the article.
Can you please tell me what I did wrong and what I can fix it to have my swekey page published ?
Thanks,
Luc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swekey ( talk • contribs) 19:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Once you go Specknock, you never go back. Woodyallenfan2004 ( talk) 07:08, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Why did you delete famous animators on youtube. Srsly >:C user:Skybullet71519 { talk} —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC).
I am sorry I created the page. I was confused when I was creating a user review page for myself, and accidently created the page. И i m b u s a n i a talk 07:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Why did you delete this entry, and the talk page or it? Please give reasons. I didn't write all the text for fun. It was duplicated, because people kept deleting the page when I first put up the text. Research Method ( talk) 23:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the page of the Hermes Project was marked as advertisement. I was rewriting it using a more neutral language and adding references, but someone deleted my edits swiftly. Now the page is in its original form, marked as advertisement again. What did I do wrong? 24.242.19.236 ( talk) 07:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
This is to make it consistent with Easy Company which is already there as an article. I cannot see what is so special about Easy Company. The others were just as important. Those who died in Fox Company deserve just as much recognition as Easy Company. Do you not agree? Wallie ( talk) 21:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
I thought the individual articles were okay. There's a lot of interest in military subjects and military history. I think there must be substantial independent news coverage of accomplsihments and interviews establishing company specific coverage. I would support keeping them separate with an expansion needed and additional sourcing needed tags (easy company already has an article it looks like). Articles on these subjects would be a lot more encyclopedic subjects than some of the stuff that slide through... :) Just offering up my 2 cents. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 22:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi there - I have redone the material; it is now in EM applications under diagnostic electron microscopy. No complaints yet and I think this is the best place for it. I have more material to add and will do so as I get a chance. ( Hedgemonkey ( talk) 23:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC))
I have removed the \{\{dated prod|concern = Software article with no indication of notability, no references.|month = November|day = 24|year = 2008|time = 13:55|timestamp = 20081124135503\}\} tag from Perimeter (EU Project), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the \{\{prod\}\} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Haemmerlech ( talk) 16:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Before requesting deletion of an article please check category assigned to it and see all other articles that set precedent for article. Can you go back in and remove the deletion request tag for Texas station gambling hall. Thanks, -- BoldSolitude ( talk) 17:38, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
The article was moved from article Texas Station that wasn't named correctly and that was never contested. Other articles like this have been contested and they have all failed to get approved for deletion. Notable depends on ones own definition. If you're talking about world renown then all casinos need deleted. Can you name any casino in china? If your talking about notable because it's noteworthy of what casinos are open in Las Vegas as the category casinos in las vegas is setup for then it applies. Again, I saw a similiar page contested for deletion and it was denied. If you don't want to remove the tag then that's fine. I was just trying to inform you of the categories that it is assigned to and why those categories are noteworthy.-- BoldSolitude ( talk) 17:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
It was amazingly fast how these articles got deleted. Is orangemike another ID of yours or a friend of yours? I was going to add more about these casino's when I had the time. That is why they are stub articles. I will file a petition with admin. More than two opinions should be taken before something is deleted. This is not wikipedia intention either, to delete possible valid articles without a real consensus. Two opinions do not create a consensus. As I mentioned, both of these articles were moved from other articles that were named wrong. These articles were never challenged, thus the consensus must have been that they are valid. Did you or orangemike read any of my comments or look at the history of the articles before deleting them? I really don't understand the purpose of deleting these. They are noteworthy. A category is setup for them. It's not a directory, it's information. We'll see how this turns out. I'm just trying to help improve wikipedia and be constructive. I don't understand why articles are deleted without a true consensus. If you can provide me with links on how to contest this then I would appreciate it, if not then I'll find them on my own. Thanks, -- BoldSolitude ( talk) 18:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
I gave reason for why it is notable. Definition of "notable" is not well defined. My definition of notable is that it is a casino operating in Las Vegas which is one of the largest gambling capitols in the world. I think it's notable of what casino's are there. It's not a directory. I'm sure when wikipedia was in its infancy there was a category (States in the US). So by trying to complete that category will be creating a directory? Couldn't anything by that definition be called a directory? Again, it comes down to opinion. Since both articles that you and orangemike deleted were well established shows that no one found any problem with them. Also, since these articles were well established then that at the minimum would suggest more care be taken in considering deleting them. Neither you nor orangemike seemed to have taken the time to look into that aspect of it. Actually, the speed in which they were deleted allowed no time at all to look into them. I have requested third party unpartial mediation, I found the link on my own. If you had wanted to help me you could have gave me suggestions on how to make it "notable" by your definition instead of deleting it. You didn't look into the history or comments of the article at all, or you would have found that it was moved from another article. Some research on your own before marking something for deletion should be part of wikipedia guidlines as well. -- BoldSolitude ( talk) 19:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm not going to continue to respond here. This will be my last post. I don't think you understand me or you're not fully comprehending what I said. I am not saying that anything is immune to deletion, I never even hinted at that in the least bit. That is your interpretation of my words, please go back and read exactly what I said. What I said was that since these articles were moved from well established articles and the history of those articles show that no one had any issues then more restraint should have been given in deleting these. At least a 24hr timeframe insteead of a couple of minutes. That is all I have ever suggested in any of my comments. This is what I was trying to point out on the talk page. I'm not the one contradicting myself. -- BoldSolitude ( talk) 20:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Looks like there's already been a similar discussion in the previous section, but I'll leave you this note as a courtesy. I declined your speedy deletion request on Westin Causarina Las Vegas Hotel, Casino & Spa. An article with that many editors over that long a period of time is unlikely to be an uncontroversial deletion, so it would not qualify for db-corp. If you think notability is an issue, AfD is the way to go.-- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
you state on your user page that one of your interests is linguistics and that i can appreciate very much. you also say that you are interested in judaism. just out of curiosity, why is that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Somody ( talk • contribs) 13:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I just created the above article and got a message that you want to delete it. What can I do to prevent it? Explanation: This article was created as a homework for my computer class and we are obliged to maintain it until the end of January 2009 (end of semester). Currently, I am having a hard time to upload some of my private photos. Please tell me what I can do to prevent deletion, but please take into account that my native tongue is German, not English. Thanks, CIvictim CIvictim ( talk) 19:24, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I was wondering if you had a chance to look at the draft that we posted. Let me know! Happy Thanksgiving. Thanks so much. WPAS ( talk) 21:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)WPAS WPAS ( talk) 21:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I read your critics about my additions to faroe islands. Why do you say its vandalism? These informations are true and the picture too. People need to know what is happening to whales in this region. I hope you answer me. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Voodoo911 ( talk • contribs) 16:56, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear Mr. or Ms. Largoplazo:
I am sorry about creating these articles that do not meet wikipedia criteria. I work at a publishing company and the author requested that some articles be posted on Wikipedia in order to bring more publicity. As you said, the series of Tyranta has not been selling well, though it has been called an interesting series.
Though the author by the name of Cheryl Grant may be thoroughly disappointed that the articles did not meet criteria, the publishing company will not object to their deletion as it has been saved in a file.
Cordially-
Linda Mancia ( talk) 03:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC) L.M.
Mr. or Ms. Largoplazo
I am fully aware that Wikipedia does not want any advertizing. But the information in the articles in question are completely 100% valid, in addition to being unbiased. Maybe Tyranta is a little-known series- but I believe that Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, and encyclopedias should tell all. If you have an article on Louise of Savoy or Marguerite d'Angouleme, shouldn't there be one for a little known author as proof that this person wrote a series, something described by one fan as "lost art"?
Cordially-
Linda Mancia ( talk) 03:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Would you mind weighing in on this AfD: Brownmark Films The discussion has been re-listed several times and I'm hoping to finally get consensus on it. Thanks! SERSeanCrane ( talk) 18:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Last week the article was fine. Today you say that C&A is not relevant. I disagree. That company employs over 450 people in Omaha, NE, which is a huge part of the local economy. Please look at other company articles (NetShops, etc) and tell me why their articles are acceptable and mine is not. I plan to add quite a few Omaha business articles so it would be good for me to know how to satisfy every editor here which is evidently what I need to do considering that (as I mentioned before) the article was fine last week, but now you feel it should be deleted. Accessomaha ( talk) 12:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
digitalmischief (
talk)
04:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Absolutely no problem, thanks for the heads up. -- digitalmischief ( talk) 04:32, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Largo: Did you mean this to go on User:Bnuttsin2/FANET? davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 04:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure how to respond to this all. And I'm not sure what you want me to do now either. At first I had the idea that you wanted me to follow a type of formatting that fit the appropriateness of Wikipedia, but now I'm utterly perplexed. So what do want me to do?
Secondly, I'm not quite sure what you mean about writing about Tyranta. Is it too little known to write about? Did Marguerite d'Angouleme deserve an entire Wikipedia page when she's almost as unknown as Tyranta? Was Mary of Burgundy so well known that she has a link too? I mentioned these questions in my last post, and you didn't answer them.
Contrary to what you may think, Mr. or Ms. Largoplazo, I am not upset or offended by you at all. But I'm furious at the response by this administrator.
I do not know this so called administrator having never spoken to them before. I do not trust them. I will not even rely only on their word that they are an administrator. Is he/she trying to tell me that Tyranta nor Cheryl Grant exists? I have personally sat down with Cheryl to talk about her books and is there any other proof than that? Just because this administrator "carefully" searched google and amazon, does that mean that Tyranta is a farce? I checked out a book that there is definitely proof existed, and it didn't show up on amazon or google. It took Cheryl 15 years to write the series and has nearly devoted her life to it. Cheryl would be shocked at this administrator's response. I'd rather not think that this administrator would have to go to Mr. or Ms. Largoplazo to talk about my articles without sending me a message too.
In conclusion, I'm not quite sure where this leaves me besides a false accusation. I'm starting a new article in what I believe is the correct format, and I hope it will not be deleted.
Sincerely,
Linda Mancia
Linda Mancia ( talk) 01:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
After reading your reply to User:Linda Mancia above, I have to ask: Have you ever considered joining the Wikipedia:Welcoming committee? You definitely have the right attitude for the job. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 02:13, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
This school has had a new Principal of the school, Michael Masson, as of December the 9th. Every time I change the principal section of Brooke Weston, it gets edited. Could you please refrain from doing this as it is an update on the college info. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.169.179.77 ( talk) 21:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry I couldn't respond sooner but the Internet was down in my area. I wish it could've stayed down until next week, though, as soon as I read your reply.
This being the third time I have spoken to you, it is obvious to me that as our small talk phase draws to a close your replies have clearly gotten nastier. You have abandoned all polite pretenses in order to say what you've wanted to say all along: that you don't care what I have to say, you think that Tyranta is a bunch of trash that isn't worth noticing, and that you obviously don't care about the fans of Tyranta. So unless you have an apology somewhere in your next reply don't bother responding: talk to the fans.
I have already phoned up Ann Rice (its Mrs. Rice), who has a website based on Tyranta, in order to show you that there are people out there who think that Tyranta is a Wikipedia page worth reading. She in turn phoned up book clubs who have rated Tyranta an A+, and gave me a list of 50 names of people who are willing to create Wikipedia accounts in order to show that they care about those pages. I know one of the names, Dr. Diane Fisher, who I've seen reduce people to tears. She is a major fan of Tyranta through her daughter. I'm not threatening you, but in the events that have led up to these matters it calls for emergency action.
After reading reply after reply of yours that gave me more questions than answers, I'm beginning to think you want me to leave you alone. But you said things that have definitely upset me and upset Ann too, once I told her about them:
1) The things the administrator said: "I couldn't find anything about Tyranta.... you did a good job proposing it for deletion...". The person was clearly implying that they thought Tyranta didn't exist, putting their entire faith in vague search engines. They were not saying anything about notability, and I was telling the truth about not knowing if they were being truthful. Maybe this person should word their phrases better. In addition, whatever is said about me should go directly to me.
2) I never said Cheryl (Ms. Grant to you) devoting her entire life to Tyranta was going to save my articles from deletion. I think that after someone claimed she nor her books existed I had to say something. If you spent 15 years trying to do a good job publishing a series and someone who clearly has never done anything like it came around and said: "Your books don't exist." there is a perfectly good reason for you to respond angrily. Cheryl isn't here to defend herself, so I will. If you can't put this into perspecive, try doing a similar thing for 15 years and then call me back.
3) What really upset Ann was what you said about Tyranta not being significant enough. Ann first read Tyranta over the summer when the Twilight series was starting to get popular. She took out the first Twilight book and the third Tyranta book for contrast. Ann said that after reading Tyranta she never wanted to look at another Twilight book again. It's not just Ann either, anyone who read Twilight then Tyranta has agreed it's better. The point of this story: If Tyranta surpasses the leading book of the times it definitely is significant enough in the eyes of the readers. Something about it should be out here on Wikipedia.
4) Cheryl's books are not unspecified sources; they are primary sources that helped me write the articles. Her books are eight, fully true, sources. I don't think that anything else is needed but I'll gather some info from Ann's website. There are some reviews in there from clubs and stuff. Or "if it meets Wikipedia standards" maybe that's okay.
5) Yes, I believe I do know plenty about Marguerite d'Angouleme and Mary of Burgundy, but most don't. You didn't either until I made you look. After reading the Heptameron (which you probably don't know about) I have taken a writer's word for calling it a famous play. I've mentioned it, people stare at me blankly. The point is, no one goes looking up Marguerite or Mary unless they're doing a history report, they're French, or they have too much spare time. There are a few people who know Marguerite, but when it comes to Mary, they know more about Tyranta. I ask them about Mary: "Why would a woman rule over a shade of reddish-brown?" But Tyranta: "Wasn't it that book written by your author-friend.... Charlene?"
I cannot believe people want you for their welcoming committee unless it's a sarcastic one, I having handled myself better than you given the position I was in. Understand that I'm upset, but if you fly off into a rage and don't apologize for the hurt you caused me, you have heard the last of Linda Mancia.
Formally,
-Linda Mancia
Linda Mancia ( talk) 02:14, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! What was this about? Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 13:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Hey Largoplazo, it's Ann Rice here. I got a call from a very distraught Linda Mancia yesterday about your comments about Tyranta. I wasn't actually going to post until Linda said you said "No one cares about the Tyranta" right to her face! People do care about Tyranta, and a lot more than they care about Marguerite d'Angouleme or Mary of Burgundy, seeing as they're both dead. Linda's not going to respond to you because of the extremely rude and nasty comments you posted about her. She also said that if you didn't try and resolve things no further contact will be pursued.
It was around one when I got the call. Linda sounded like she was in tears. Through all the pauses for breath I could make out the story: She had some articles that didn't meet the criteria, you proposed them for deletion, she tried making new ones. It wouldv'e gone well if a certain administrator hadn't posted some very rude comments about Ms. Grant that Linda angrily responded to. You defended the administrator, criticizing Linda for not knowing the rules. You even insinuated she was stupid at one point in the message. Yes she does know who they are, she graduated at one of the top colleges in the country and as a major in history.
You could not have read the entire thing that she posted. I can believe that, after you angrily burst out at Linda in her second post without bothering to read the first one. Please read it all. It has five, fully true reasons about how you offended her. Granted, she definitely could've been nicer, but she's not the only one at fault here. You definitely are guilty, in addition to the administrator and the person who recommended you for the welcoming committee for instigating.
Furtermore, you could not have read the part about Cheryl's books or my website, or you would probably have said something about them instead of going "you will not prevail". It was a good thing Linda's not here to respond to you, otherwise she would have a heart attack!
Posting articles about Tyranta in order "to prevail" is not what Linda wanted to do. She did give you reasons for significance of Tyranta. People care. I care. Dr. Fisher cares. We have a website devoted to this series and how can you possibly say Tyranta is not significant? How can you possibly say these aren't "germane issues"? You don't care about people who read Tyranta and the people who don't that are missing out on a good story? How could you!?
Linda also knows that the articles have been deleted. I myself checked and they aren't there. She isn't nearly as upset as I was when I heard about it because most of the fury was because of you. You ganged up on her and then you had the nerve to say its because the rules of Wikipedia her articles have been deleted? Is there a rule in Wikipedia about being polite to other users? Looking at the responses to different people whose articles you mercilessly deleted, I am shocked. I never expected you to be Eleanor Roosevelt but I never thought you'd be an executioner. Is this your day job? Does Wikipedia employ soulless people who don't care about others for a welcoming committee? What is this: Welcome to Wikipedia, abandon all hope because your articles will never be published before deleted by executioners? Yes, you have every right to apologize! Because if you can't face Linda you're going to have to face me, Dr. Fisher, and 50 other people.
-An upset citizen named Ann Rice
Ann Rice ( talk) 15:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
But what IS acceptable on this site? That's my userpage, and I should be able to write what I want on it as long as I refrain from vulgarity and anything offensive. If I cannot submit a biography, at least let me have my user page the way I want since no one is going to see it anyway... No harm done by keeping that the way it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmarino27 ( talk • contribs) 18:09, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Aww, well Im keeping my user page the way it is. It is a contribution to wikipedia, I live a fruitful life and it can enlighten people. I made myself relevant by referencing my contributions to the internet through my famous blog and made myself significant by discussing my existence as an aspiring restauranteur. So yes, I am significant AND my page is useful and contributed greatly to wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmarino27 ( talk • contribs) 02:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
A personal issue, huh? Linda is not turning this into a personal issue. You and two other people have offended her deeply, but she's not writing these articles for you. She's writing them to put a topic onto Wikipedia that was not previously there before. I've heard destroyers can't grow things, but you may have put some articles for the same reason. Why do people post on Wikipedia anyway? To put information on something. If you think that the topic is insignificant, that's your problem. Because you're just one person, and me, Linda, Dr. Fisher, Cheryl, Sarah Webber, Gillian Reed, Rhonda Denton, Charlotte Jackson, Maria Somers, Elizabeth Kelly, and 50 others are 60 persons. One person will not bar the way of sixty, no matter what way you look at it.
We of the Tyranta fans are not going to be stopped by a person who's not even going to tell us their real name, their gender (though its obvious you're male), won't apologize for offending two people, disregards half of what we say, says that we are insignificant, refers us to the gestapo, and hides behind the rules of Wikipedia, all the time in a really sarcastic, haughty way. The person who posted I'm Sorry did a good job on relaying some info of your dastardly doings. You open up people's user pages and then delete their personal things? Is that morally right? Apparently you like feeding on people's upsetness and indignation. Are you some sort of human leech?
The things that you do really make me feel ill. But I'll have know if you touch a single one of Linda's future articles and do the exact same things that you're doing now, we will respond. We have those old articles saved up on file, so I'm going to put them up again just to see you speedily delete them. I'll put them up again. And again. And keep doing it until you leave us and Tyranta alone.
Don't think I'm not restraining myself, because if I acted on my feelings, there'd be blood all over this talk page!!!!
-Ann
Ann Rice ( talk) 22:05, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi largoplazo. This is Gillian Reed, one of the admirers of Tyranta. Ann Rice made a post on her website today telling everyone to create Wikipedia accounts. So I did. The post also mentioned someone named Largoplazo using usertalk interfering with getting a Tyranta page on Wikipedia. So I searched and here I am! After reading your messages to my fellow Tyranta lovers, I understand there has been heated conflicts between you, Linda, and Ann and that you're probably sick of us all.
While Linda's messages have been relatively decent, what Ann said in her last post was pretty blasphemous. She called you a human leech. I can understand why you threatened her with being blocked. Knowing that Ann will never apologize to you, I'd better say sorry for her. Sorry!
This still doesn't exclude you from the thorns of justice, though. You said things that I have taken offense to. I don't particularly enjoy it when someone calls me a cohort without knowing anything about me. Where I come from, "cohort" means "mindless robot". I just happen to enjoy the Tyranta series, that's all. The poetry and the conflicting emotions, particularly in the character Juliana, are amazing. I'm the poet/artist in the group, so I pay attention to those sort of things.
As a page about a book there must be some exceptions in Wikipedia guidelines. Take sources for example. There are the primary sources of the books themselves and the secondary source of Ann's website, but outside that I'm not quite sure about sources. But if it is about the books and its plot, setting, theme, characters, and conflicts, as well as reviews that can be found on the site, wouldn't that be enough to support a Wikipage?
Once again, I apologize for any sort of anger we have caused you. Linda and Ann are slightly sensitive if crossed. A little less so when it comes to criticism, I am trying to be polite in order to cover all inconveniences done. But it would be good for Wikipedia if Tyranta was one of its topics and I don't appreciate it when people try to stop that from happening. Gillian Reed ( talk) 00:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
To everyone watching this page who is interested in the Tyranta issue: Please see my comment on User talk:Gillian Reed#Tyranta. Largoplazo: Sorry about abusing your talk page like this, but I think this is the one page where everyone interested is looking. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 06:01, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Somehow, Twinkle failed to complete your nomination. Only the log listing has been done, and your deletion rationale is lost. The tag itself has not been inserted. -- Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 16:32, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
this is new place in guntur district all ready existing one is krishna district the name of gudivada is two differnet places actually old post was wrongly mapping please correct that map —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raviperni ( talk • contribs) 21:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Largo, Thanks for your comments, I have added a clarification in the Demand Generation talk page, as I believe is the correct process. Stevenwoods99 ( talk) 21:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
First of all I have not been playing any silly cat and mouse games in regards to chicken pizzas. I thought the article was noteworthy but if you don't then just remove it. You will see from my contributions that I take my responsibilities to Wikipedia very seriously. I do not appreciate you writing that I am playing silly games on my talk page for all and sundry to see, in fact I take it as a personal insult. I would be grateful if you could post an apology to it under your comment.
Thank you and Merry Christmas
-- Bravo Plantation ( talk) 22:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
But I thought that the redirects were more helpful, obviously I misjudged the severity of the situation and for that I humbly apologise for any inconvenience caused. That said, I still do not expect to publically be accused of playing silly games on my talk page that any member of the public can see. I feel that you used a very unfortunate choice of words and I am deeply offended by them.
-- Bravo Plantation ( talk) 23:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Sometimes articles are tagged for deletion. How do i join such a request? Unfortunatly I want to join your deletion request on Philiosophilia since the article does not correspond with wiki rules (yet) as you convincingly pointed out. Therefore I'll try to have the rules changed before i'll add it again. ;) -- Sophieophil ( talk) 16:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
It wasn't enough to let my articles sit there and wait to be deleted, this one didn't even have the chance. You had to speedily delete the article and why? Because you were entitled. Because as soon as you heard the words "Tyranta by Cheryl Grant" you went "She's not giving up! I'll take things to the next level." So now I can't even plead my case because you speedily deleted my article. Did you even read it? No? It was different than the other ones. It did establish notability. Oh, sorry, I'm not going to serve it to you on a silver platter because that would ruin the article, but seeing that there are people think Tyranta is notable to develop a site, as well as links to ther sites that establish its notability. I have that in my sources. And you should try asking me before speedily deleting my article, because then I would be able to actually do something. You stole my rights as a citizen of the Wikicommunity. So take that automated bot thingy off my talk page and bring the Davis Sable article back. There are 24 significant characters in the Tyranta series, so unless you want to go through this 23 more times, you had better give me a thoughtful, apologetic response.
From, Linda Mancia ( talk) 13:43, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
This is my first time i post on wikipedia and i don't know how to put it on romanian language. I will translate it in english also but i want it in romanian too. maybe you can help me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Himnosiss ( talk • contribs) 09:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes, it is ok. Thanks for the tip. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Himnosiss ( talk • contribs) 09:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thanks largo plazo old buddy i'm sorry about the old hampster jibe. toodles, adam x —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamamirsmith ( talk • contribs) 18:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | → | Archive 10 |
No I was referring to him blanking to remove the vandalism notices. Wasnt aware he was allowed to do that. JakeDHS07 15:11, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi Largo,
The article about our swekey authentication key has been deleted.
I just wanted it to be informative, I removed any external link. I think this article is important because the swekey is the first and only authentication key designed for web sites and web applications.
I read your guidelines very carefuly and I didnt find what in the article caused the deletion. The fact that I write an article on our own product is only 'discouraged' but not forbidden, and since our product is not yet commercialized I have only few chances to see somebody else but me writing the article.
Can you please tell me what I did wrong and what I can fix it to have my swekey page published ?
Thanks,
Luc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swekey ( talk • contribs) 19:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Once you go Specknock, you never go back. Woodyallenfan2004 ( talk) 07:08, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
Why did you delete famous animators on youtube. Srsly >:C user:Skybullet71519 { talk} —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:11, 9 November 2008 (UTC).
I am sorry I created the page. I was confused when I was creating a user review page for myself, and accidently created the page. И i m b u s a n i a talk 07:02, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Why did you delete this entry, and the talk page or it? Please give reasons. I didn't write all the text for fun. It was duplicated, because people kept deleting the page when I first put up the text. Research Method ( talk) 23:48, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, the page of the Hermes Project was marked as advertisement. I was rewriting it using a more neutral language and adding references, but someone deleted my edits swiftly. Now the page is in its original form, marked as advertisement again. What did I do wrong? 24.242.19.236 ( talk) 07:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
This is to make it consistent with Easy Company which is already there as an article. I cannot see what is so special about Easy Company. The others were just as important. Those who died in Fox Company deserve just as much recognition as Easy Company. Do you not agree? Wallie ( talk) 21:23, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
I thought the individual articles were okay. There's a lot of interest in military subjects and military history. I think there must be substantial independent news coverage of accomplsihments and interviews establishing company specific coverage. I would support keeping them separate with an expansion needed and additional sourcing needed tags (easy company already has an article it looks like). Articles on these subjects would be a lot more encyclopedic subjects than some of the stuff that slide through... :) Just offering up my 2 cents. ChildofMidnight ( talk) 22:28, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi there - I have redone the material; it is now in EM applications under diagnostic electron microscopy. No complaints yet and I think this is the best place for it. I have more material to add and will do so as I get a chance. ( Hedgemonkey ( talk) 23:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC))
I have removed the \{\{dated prod|concern = Software article with no indication of notability, no references.|month = November|day = 24|year = 2008|time = 13:55|timestamp = 20081124135503\}\} tag from Perimeter (EU Project), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the \{\{prod\}\} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Haemmerlech ( talk) 16:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Before requesting deletion of an article please check category assigned to it and see all other articles that set precedent for article. Can you go back in and remove the deletion request tag for Texas station gambling hall. Thanks, -- BoldSolitude ( talk) 17:38, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
The article was moved from article Texas Station that wasn't named correctly and that was never contested. Other articles like this have been contested and they have all failed to get approved for deletion. Notable depends on ones own definition. If you're talking about world renown then all casinos need deleted. Can you name any casino in china? If your talking about notable because it's noteworthy of what casinos are open in Las Vegas as the category casinos in las vegas is setup for then it applies. Again, I saw a similiar page contested for deletion and it was denied. If you don't want to remove the tag then that's fine. I was just trying to inform you of the categories that it is assigned to and why those categories are noteworthy.-- BoldSolitude ( talk) 17:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
It was amazingly fast how these articles got deleted. Is orangemike another ID of yours or a friend of yours? I was going to add more about these casino's when I had the time. That is why they are stub articles. I will file a petition with admin. More than two opinions should be taken before something is deleted. This is not wikipedia intention either, to delete possible valid articles without a real consensus. Two opinions do not create a consensus. As I mentioned, both of these articles were moved from other articles that were named wrong. These articles were never challenged, thus the consensus must have been that they are valid. Did you or orangemike read any of my comments or look at the history of the articles before deleting them? I really don't understand the purpose of deleting these. They are noteworthy. A category is setup for them. It's not a directory, it's information. We'll see how this turns out. I'm just trying to help improve wikipedia and be constructive. I don't understand why articles are deleted without a true consensus. If you can provide me with links on how to contest this then I would appreciate it, if not then I'll find them on my own. Thanks, -- BoldSolitude ( talk) 18:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
I gave reason for why it is notable. Definition of "notable" is not well defined. My definition of notable is that it is a casino operating in Las Vegas which is one of the largest gambling capitols in the world. I think it's notable of what casino's are there. It's not a directory. I'm sure when wikipedia was in its infancy there was a category (States in the US). So by trying to complete that category will be creating a directory? Couldn't anything by that definition be called a directory? Again, it comes down to opinion. Since both articles that you and orangemike deleted were well established shows that no one found any problem with them. Also, since these articles were well established then that at the minimum would suggest more care be taken in considering deleting them. Neither you nor orangemike seemed to have taken the time to look into that aspect of it. Actually, the speed in which they were deleted allowed no time at all to look into them. I have requested third party unpartial mediation, I found the link on my own. If you had wanted to help me you could have gave me suggestions on how to make it "notable" by your definition instead of deleting it. You didn't look into the history or comments of the article at all, or you would have found that it was moved from another article. Some research on your own before marking something for deletion should be part of wikipedia guidlines as well. -- BoldSolitude ( talk) 19:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm not going to continue to respond here. This will be my last post. I don't think you understand me or you're not fully comprehending what I said. I am not saying that anything is immune to deletion, I never even hinted at that in the least bit. That is your interpretation of my words, please go back and read exactly what I said. What I said was that since these articles were moved from well established articles and the history of those articles show that no one had any issues then more restraint should have been given in deleting these. At least a 24hr timeframe insteead of a couple of minutes. That is all I have ever suggested in any of my comments. This is what I was trying to point out on the talk page. I'm not the one contradicting myself. -- BoldSolitude ( talk) 20:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Looks like there's already been a similar discussion in the previous section, but I'll leave you this note as a courtesy. I declined your speedy deletion request on Westin Causarina Las Vegas Hotel, Casino & Spa. An article with that many editors over that long a period of time is unlikely to be an uncontroversial deletion, so it would not qualify for db-corp. If you think notability is an issue, AfD is the way to go.-- Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
you state on your user page that one of your interests is linguistics and that i can appreciate very much. you also say that you are interested in judaism. just out of curiosity, why is that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Somody ( talk • contribs) 13:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I just created the above article and got a message that you want to delete it. What can I do to prevent it? Explanation: This article was created as a homework for my computer class and we are obliged to maintain it until the end of January 2009 (end of semester). Currently, I am having a hard time to upload some of my private photos. Please tell me what I can do to prevent deletion, but please take into account that my native tongue is German, not English. Thanks, CIvictim CIvictim ( talk) 19:24, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello! I was wondering if you had a chance to look at the draft that we posted. Let me know! Happy Thanksgiving. Thanks so much. WPAS ( talk) 21:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)WPAS WPAS ( talk) 21:30, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I read your critics about my additions to faroe islands. Why do you say its vandalism? These informations are true and the picture too. People need to know what is happening to whales in this region. I hope you answer me. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Voodoo911 ( talk • contribs) 16:56, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Dear Mr. or Ms. Largoplazo:
I am sorry about creating these articles that do not meet wikipedia criteria. I work at a publishing company and the author requested that some articles be posted on Wikipedia in order to bring more publicity. As you said, the series of Tyranta has not been selling well, though it has been called an interesting series.
Though the author by the name of Cheryl Grant may be thoroughly disappointed that the articles did not meet criteria, the publishing company will not object to their deletion as it has been saved in a file.
Cordially-
Linda Mancia ( talk) 03:11, 6 December 2008 (UTC) L.M.
Mr. or Ms. Largoplazo
I am fully aware that Wikipedia does not want any advertizing. But the information in the articles in question are completely 100% valid, in addition to being unbiased. Maybe Tyranta is a little-known series- but I believe that Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, and encyclopedias should tell all. If you have an article on Louise of Savoy or Marguerite d'Angouleme, shouldn't there be one for a little known author as proof that this person wrote a series, something described by one fan as "lost art"?
Cordially-
Linda Mancia ( talk) 03:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi! Would you mind weighing in on this AfD: Brownmark Films The discussion has been re-listed several times and I'm hoping to finally get consensus on it. Thanks! SERSeanCrane ( talk) 18:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Last week the article was fine. Today you say that C&A is not relevant. I disagree. That company employs over 450 people in Omaha, NE, which is a huge part of the local economy. Please look at other company articles (NetShops, etc) and tell me why their articles are acceptable and mine is not. I plan to add quite a few Omaha business articles so it would be good for me to know how to satisfy every editor here which is evidently what I need to do considering that (as I mentioned before) the article was fine last week, but now you feel it should be deleted. Accessomaha ( talk) 12:23, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.
digitalmischief (
talk)
04:27, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Absolutely no problem, thanks for the heads up. -- digitalmischief ( talk) 04:32, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Largo: Did you mean this to go on User:Bnuttsin2/FANET? davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 04:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm not quite sure how to respond to this all. And I'm not sure what you want me to do now either. At first I had the idea that you wanted me to follow a type of formatting that fit the appropriateness of Wikipedia, but now I'm utterly perplexed. So what do want me to do?
Secondly, I'm not quite sure what you mean about writing about Tyranta. Is it too little known to write about? Did Marguerite d'Angouleme deserve an entire Wikipedia page when she's almost as unknown as Tyranta? Was Mary of Burgundy so well known that she has a link too? I mentioned these questions in my last post, and you didn't answer them.
Contrary to what you may think, Mr. or Ms. Largoplazo, I am not upset or offended by you at all. But I'm furious at the response by this administrator.
I do not know this so called administrator having never spoken to them before. I do not trust them. I will not even rely only on their word that they are an administrator. Is he/she trying to tell me that Tyranta nor Cheryl Grant exists? I have personally sat down with Cheryl to talk about her books and is there any other proof than that? Just because this administrator "carefully" searched google and amazon, does that mean that Tyranta is a farce? I checked out a book that there is definitely proof existed, and it didn't show up on amazon or google. It took Cheryl 15 years to write the series and has nearly devoted her life to it. Cheryl would be shocked at this administrator's response. I'd rather not think that this administrator would have to go to Mr. or Ms. Largoplazo to talk about my articles without sending me a message too.
In conclusion, I'm not quite sure where this leaves me besides a false accusation. I'm starting a new article in what I believe is the correct format, and I hope it will not be deleted.
Sincerely,
Linda Mancia
Linda Mancia ( talk) 01:03, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
After reading your reply to User:Linda Mancia above, I have to ask: Have you ever considered joining the Wikipedia:Welcoming committee? You definitely have the right attitude for the job. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 02:13, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
This school has had a new Principal of the school, Michael Masson, as of December the 9th. Every time I change the principal section of Brooke Weston, it gets edited. Could you please refrain from doing this as it is an update on the college info. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.169.179.77 ( talk) 21:52, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm sorry I couldn't respond sooner but the Internet was down in my area. I wish it could've stayed down until next week, though, as soon as I read your reply.
This being the third time I have spoken to you, it is obvious to me that as our small talk phase draws to a close your replies have clearly gotten nastier. You have abandoned all polite pretenses in order to say what you've wanted to say all along: that you don't care what I have to say, you think that Tyranta is a bunch of trash that isn't worth noticing, and that you obviously don't care about the fans of Tyranta. So unless you have an apology somewhere in your next reply don't bother responding: talk to the fans.
I have already phoned up Ann Rice (its Mrs. Rice), who has a website based on Tyranta, in order to show you that there are people out there who think that Tyranta is a Wikipedia page worth reading. She in turn phoned up book clubs who have rated Tyranta an A+, and gave me a list of 50 names of people who are willing to create Wikipedia accounts in order to show that they care about those pages. I know one of the names, Dr. Diane Fisher, who I've seen reduce people to tears. She is a major fan of Tyranta through her daughter. I'm not threatening you, but in the events that have led up to these matters it calls for emergency action.
After reading reply after reply of yours that gave me more questions than answers, I'm beginning to think you want me to leave you alone. But you said things that have definitely upset me and upset Ann too, once I told her about them:
1) The things the administrator said: "I couldn't find anything about Tyranta.... you did a good job proposing it for deletion...". The person was clearly implying that they thought Tyranta didn't exist, putting their entire faith in vague search engines. They were not saying anything about notability, and I was telling the truth about not knowing if they were being truthful. Maybe this person should word their phrases better. In addition, whatever is said about me should go directly to me.
2) I never said Cheryl (Ms. Grant to you) devoting her entire life to Tyranta was going to save my articles from deletion. I think that after someone claimed she nor her books existed I had to say something. If you spent 15 years trying to do a good job publishing a series and someone who clearly has never done anything like it came around and said: "Your books don't exist." there is a perfectly good reason for you to respond angrily. Cheryl isn't here to defend herself, so I will. If you can't put this into perspecive, try doing a similar thing for 15 years and then call me back.
3) What really upset Ann was what you said about Tyranta not being significant enough. Ann first read Tyranta over the summer when the Twilight series was starting to get popular. She took out the first Twilight book and the third Tyranta book for contrast. Ann said that after reading Tyranta she never wanted to look at another Twilight book again. It's not just Ann either, anyone who read Twilight then Tyranta has agreed it's better. The point of this story: If Tyranta surpasses the leading book of the times it definitely is significant enough in the eyes of the readers. Something about it should be out here on Wikipedia.
4) Cheryl's books are not unspecified sources; they are primary sources that helped me write the articles. Her books are eight, fully true, sources. I don't think that anything else is needed but I'll gather some info from Ann's website. There are some reviews in there from clubs and stuff. Or "if it meets Wikipedia standards" maybe that's okay.
5) Yes, I believe I do know plenty about Marguerite d'Angouleme and Mary of Burgundy, but most don't. You didn't either until I made you look. After reading the Heptameron (which you probably don't know about) I have taken a writer's word for calling it a famous play. I've mentioned it, people stare at me blankly. The point is, no one goes looking up Marguerite or Mary unless they're doing a history report, they're French, or they have too much spare time. There are a few people who know Marguerite, but when it comes to Mary, they know more about Tyranta. I ask them about Mary: "Why would a woman rule over a shade of reddish-brown?" But Tyranta: "Wasn't it that book written by your author-friend.... Charlene?"
I cannot believe people want you for their welcoming committee unless it's a sarcastic one, I having handled myself better than you given the position I was in. Understand that I'm upset, but if you fly off into a rage and don't apologize for the hurt you caused me, you have heard the last of Linda Mancia.
Formally,
-Linda Mancia
Linda Mancia ( talk) 02:14, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi there! What was this about? Wiki San Roze †αLҝ 13:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Hey Largoplazo, it's Ann Rice here. I got a call from a very distraught Linda Mancia yesterday about your comments about Tyranta. I wasn't actually going to post until Linda said you said "No one cares about the Tyranta" right to her face! People do care about Tyranta, and a lot more than they care about Marguerite d'Angouleme or Mary of Burgundy, seeing as they're both dead. Linda's not going to respond to you because of the extremely rude and nasty comments you posted about her. She also said that if you didn't try and resolve things no further contact will be pursued.
It was around one when I got the call. Linda sounded like she was in tears. Through all the pauses for breath I could make out the story: She had some articles that didn't meet the criteria, you proposed them for deletion, she tried making new ones. It wouldv'e gone well if a certain administrator hadn't posted some very rude comments about Ms. Grant that Linda angrily responded to. You defended the administrator, criticizing Linda for not knowing the rules. You even insinuated she was stupid at one point in the message. Yes she does know who they are, she graduated at one of the top colleges in the country and as a major in history.
You could not have read the entire thing that she posted. I can believe that, after you angrily burst out at Linda in her second post without bothering to read the first one. Please read it all. It has five, fully true reasons about how you offended her. Granted, she definitely could've been nicer, but she's not the only one at fault here. You definitely are guilty, in addition to the administrator and the person who recommended you for the welcoming committee for instigating.
Furtermore, you could not have read the part about Cheryl's books or my website, or you would probably have said something about them instead of going "you will not prevail". It was a good thing Linda's not here to respond to you, otherwise she would have a heart attack!
Posting articles about Tyranta in order "to prevail" is not what Linda wanted to do. She did give you reasons for significance of Tyranta. People care. I care. Dr. Fisher cares. We have a website devoted to this series and how can you possibly say Tyranta is not significant? How can you possibly say these aren't "germane issues"? You don't care about people who read Tyranta and the people who don't that are missing out on a good story? How could you!?
Linda also knows that the articles have been deleted. I myself checked and they aren't there. She isn't nearly as upset as I was when I heard about it because most of the fury was because of you. You ganged up on her and then you had the nerve to say its because the rules of Wikipedia her articles have been deleted? Is there a rule in Wikipedia about being polite to other users? Looking at the responses to different people whose articles you mercilessly deleted, I am shocked. I never expected you to be Eleanor Roosevelt but I never thought you'd be an executioner. Is this your day job? Does Wikipedia employ soulless people who don't care about others for a welcoming committee? What is this: Welcome to Wikipedia, abandon all hope because your articles will never be published before deleted by executioners? Yes, you have every right to apologize! Because if you can't face Linda you're going to have to face me, Dr. Fisher, and 50 other people.
-An upset citizen named Ann Rice
Ann Rice ( talk) 15:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
But what IS acceptable on this site? That's my userpage, and I should be able to write what I want on it as long as I refrain from vulgarity and anything offensive. If I cannot submit a biography, at least let me have my user page the way I want since no one is going to see it anyway... No harm done by keeping that the way it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmarino27 ( talk • contribs) 18:09, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Aww, well Im keeping my user page the way it is. It is a contribution to wikipedia, I live a fruitful life and it can enlighten people. I made myself relevant by referencing my contributions to the internet through my famous blog and made myself significant by discussing my existence as an aspiring restauranteur. So yes, I am significant AND my page is useful and contributed greatly to wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmarino27 ( talk • contribs) 02:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
A personal issue, huh? Linda is not turning this into a personal issue. You and two other people have offended her deeply, but she's not writing these articles for you. She's writing them to put a topic onto Wikipedia that was not previously there before. I've heard destroyers can't grow things, but you may have put some articles for the same reason. Why do people post on Wikipedia anyway? To put information on something. If you think that the topic is insignificant, that's your problem. Because you're just one person, and me, Linda, Dr. Fisher, Cheryl, Sarah Webber, Gillian Reed, Rhonda Denton, Charlotte Jackson, Maria Somers, Elizabeth Kelly, and 50 others are 60 persons. One person will not bar the way of sixty, no matter what way you look at it.
We of the Tyranta fans are not going to be stopped by a person who's not even going to tell us their real name, their gender (though its obvious you're male), won't apologize for offending two people, disregards half of what we say, says that we are insignificant, refers us to the gestapo, and hides behind the rules of Wikipedia, all the time in a really sarcastic, haughty way. The person who posted I'm Sorry did a good job on relaying some info of your dastardly doings. You open up people's user pages and then delete their personal things? Is that morally right? Apparently you like feeding on people's upsetness and indignation. Are you some sort of human leech?
The things that you do really make me feel ill. But I'll have know if you touch a single one of Linda's future articles and do the exact same things that you're doing now, we will respond. We have those old articles saved up on file, so I'm going to put them up again just to see you speedily delete them. I'll put them up again. And again. And keep doing it until you leave us and Tyranta alone.
Don't think I'm not restraining myself, because if I acted on my feelings, there'd be blood all over this talk page!!!!
-Ann
Ann Rice ( talk) 22:05, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Hi largoplazo. This is Gillian Reed, one of the admirers of Tyranta. Ann Rice made a post on her website today telling everyone to create Wikipedia accounts. So I did. The post also mentioned someone named Largoplazo using usertalk interfering with getting a Tyranta page on Wikipedia. So I searched and here I am! After reading your messages to my fellow Tyranta lovers, I understand there has been heated conflicts between you, Linda, and Ann and that you're probably sick of us all.
While Linda's messages have been relatively decent, what Ann said in her last post was pretty blasphemous. She called you a human leech. I can understand why you threatened her with being blocked. Knowing that Ann will never apologize to you, I'd better say sorry for her. Sorry!
This still doesn't exclude you from the thorns of justice, though. You said things that I have taken offense to. I don't particularly enjoy it when someone calls me a cohort without knowing anything about me. Where I come from, "cohort" means "mindless robot". I just happen to enjoy the Tyranta series, that's all. The poetry and the conflicting emotions, particularly in the character Juliana, are amazing. I'm the poet/artist in the group, so I pay attention to those sort of things.
As a page about a book there must be some exceptions in Wikipedia guidelines. Take sources for example. There are the primary sources of the books themselves and the secondary source of Ann's website, but outside that I'm not quite sure about sources. But if it is about the books and its plot, setting, theme, characters, and conflicts, as well as reviews that can be found on the site, wouldn't that be enough to support a Wikipage?
Once again, I apologize for any sort of anger we have caused you. Linda and Ann are slightly sensitive if crossed. A little less so when it comes to criticism, I am trying to be polite in order to cover all inconveniences done. But it would be good for Wikipedia if Tyranta was one of its topics and I don't appreciate it when people try to stop that from happening. Gillian Reed ( talk) 00:18, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
To everyone watching this page who is interested in the Tyranta issue: Please see my comment on User talk:Gillian Reed#Tyranta. Largoplazo: Sorry about abusing your talk page like this, but I think this is the one page where everyone interested is looking. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 06:01, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
Somehow, Twinkle failed to complete your nomination. Only the log listing has been done, and your deletion rationale is lost. The tag itself has not been inserted. -- Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 16:32, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
this is new place in guntur district all ready existing one is krishna district the name of gudivada is two differnet places actually old post was wrongly mapping please correct that map —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raviperni ( talk • contribs) 21:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Largo, Thanks for your comments, I have added a clarification in the Demand Generation talk page, as I believe is the correct process. Stevenwoods99 ( talk) 21:35, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
First of all I have not been playing any silly cat and mouse games in regards to chicken pizzas. I thought the article was noteworthy but if you don't then just remove it. You will see from my contributions that I take my responsibilities to Wikipedia very seriously. I do not appreciate you writing that I am playing silly games on my talk page for all and sundry to see, in fact I take it as a personal insult. I would be grateful if you could post an apology to it under your comment.
Thank you and Merry Christmas
-- Bravo Plantation ( talk) 22:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
But I thought that the redirects were more helpful, obviously I misjudged the severity of the situation and for that I humbly apologise for any inconvenience caused. That said, I still do not expect to publically be accused of playing silly games on my talk page that any member of the public can see. I feel that you used a very unfortunate choice of words and I am deeply offended by them.
-- Bravo Plantation ( talk) 23:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
Sometimes articles are tagged for deletion. How do i join such a request? Unfortunatly I want to join your deletion request on Philiosophilia since the article does not correspond with wiki rules (yet) as you convincingly pointed out. Therefore I'll try to have the rules changed before i'll add it again. ;) -- Sophieophil ( talk) 16:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
It wasn't enough to let my articles sit there and wait to be deleted, this one didn't even have the chance. You had to speedily delete the article and why? Because you were entitled. Because as soon as you heard the words "Tyranta by Cheryl Grant" you went "She's not giving up! I'll take things to the next level." So now I can't even plead my case because you speedily deleted my article. Did you even read it? No? It was different than the other ones. It did establish notability. Oh, sorry, I'm not going to serve it to you on a silver platter because that would ruin the article, but seeing that there are people think Tyranta is notable to develop a site, as well as links to ther sites that establish its notability. I have that in my sources. And you should try asking me before speedily deleting my article, because then I would be able to actually do something. You stole my rights as a citizen of the Wikicommunity. So take that automated bot thingy off my talk page and bring the Davis Sable article back. There are 24 significant characters in the Tyranta series, so unless you want to go through this 23 more times, you had better give me a thoughtful, apologetic response.
From, Linda Mancia ( talk) 13:43, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
This is my first time i post on wikipedia and i don't know how to put it on romanian language. I will translate it in english also but i want it in romanian too. maybe you can help me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Himnosiss ( talk • contribs) 09:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Yes, it is ok. Thanks for the tip. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Himnosiss ( talk • contribs) 09:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thanks largo plazo old buddy i'm sorry about the old hampster jibe. toodles, adam x —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamamirsmith ( talk • contribs) 18:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)