An article that is only a few short paragraphs long does not need three entire lines devoted to trivia concerning an unrelated artist. Even the article devoted to Sheik Yerbouti barely mentions it, and the Hammersmith Odeon article doesn't mention it at all, and these are where it should be mentioned, if at all. How many minutes Zappa to a song has little to do with Peter Frampton. 63.143.228.110 ( talk) 00:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello Laber,
I hope you are well. Can you help me uploading a photo? ( Hebrew Mountain Man ( talk) 21:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC))
A synagogue is definitely folklore. Regarding the informational criteria, Wikipedia should only use informational pictures per definitionem, so that should apply too. However, there has been no case so far where this license was "tested", so one cannot be completely sure. Laber□ T 22:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Maybe try the visual editor? Just click on the pencil at the upper right of the editing window. -- Laber□ T 23:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Yes, but don't forget to add your sources to the article and always write in the edit summary why you removed larger portions of the article if you did so. -- Laber□ T 20:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
I declined your AIV report regarding President John Henry Eden, as the editor has edited only once, the edit was not clearly vandalistic, and the editor received no talk-page warnings. The account cannot be considered a VOA at this point. Deor ( talk) 20:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Can you please put back my changes on Demographic Transition. As I explained in my edits https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Demographic_transition&diff=prev&oldid=718163756 is because I am using latest data from wikipedia article /info/en/?search=List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependent_territories_by_fertility_rate
As for this https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Demographic_transition&diff=next&oldid=718163756 edit The section heading has been wrong since it was created. The explanation for why it was wrong (done by somebody else) has been sitting in wikipedia for 6 years now. /info/en/?search=Talk:Demographic_transition#.22Non-applicability_to_less-developed_countries.22
Please put back my changes. They are correct. Krishna Pagadala ( talk) 02:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello Laberkiste. Thank you for your feedback. I am writing you because you reverted my edition of Josefina Molina article due to unsourced content. I am very sorry for not including this information, but this is the first time I edit an article in Wikipedia. I have the missing information, how do we do it? Do I send it to you and you complete the article or shall I undo your reversion and complete it myself? I do not want to cause any trouble. Thank you very much in advance. Cmorchi ( talk) 21:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Greetings. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halal snack pack, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –
Davey2010
Talk 00:12, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm SwisterTwister. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Nam phrik aarne, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 19:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
I am unsure from what time I have this IP but never read fore-mentioned article and rather edited by 172.56.41.247 (talk) 16:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC) Talk:Jan Łukasiewicz. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.40.113 ( talk) 06:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re a highly active Huggle user (top 20, actually). The Wikimedia Collaboration Team is researching a project that we hope will be useful to people who use Huggle and others engaged in edit-review and anti-vandalism. Using artificial intelligence programming (in ORES) and other means, we believe we can create feeds of Recent Changes that are better tailored to the type of work you do, helping you to be more effective and efficient. (The technology will have other benefits as well, which we can talk about.)
We're in the early stages of planning this and want to speak with people like yourself to better understand your work, goals and issues. If you’re interested in helping, I’d like to set up a time to meet by video conference, so that you can explain and demonstrate (via screensharing) some of your workflows, and we can ask and answer any questions.
To participate, please email the following information to me, jmatazzoniwikimedia.org, or send it to designresearch
wikimedia.org:
Thanks! JMatazzoni (WMF) ( talk) 19:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Perhaps you should also read WP:NOTBLUE. Specifically: "citations are required for … … statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged". I think you knew when you made your edit on Black Supremacy, that some serious, experienced editors HAD challenged the claim in the RfC.
NOTBLUE goes on "If it really is common knowledge, it really isn't that difficult to source." ie the underlying reason we don't bother to source 'Paris is a City', is not because it is self-evident, but because we COULD find innumerable RS to support the claim if need be. So, ask yourself, why cannot editors find a broad sweep of RS describing THESE organisations as inherently 'racist', or indeed in many cases as 'Black Supremacist' at all? Pincrete ( talk) 22:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
If you persist in filing reports with no evidence and/or duplicate reports, you risk being blocked for disruption.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:09, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
An article that is only a few short paragraphs long does not need three entire lines devoted to trivia concerning an unrelated artist. Even the article devoted to Sheik Yerbouti barely mentions it, and the Hammersmith Odeon article doesn't mention it at all, and these are where it should be mentioned, if at all. How many minutes Zappa to a song has little to do with Peter Frampton. 63.143.228.110 ( talk) 00:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello Laber,
I hope you are well. Can you help me uploading a photo? ( Hebrew Mountain Man ( talk) 21:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC))
A synagogue is definitely folklore. Regarding the informational criteria, Wikipedia should only use informational pictures per definitionem, so that should apply too. However, there has been no case so far where this license was "tested", so one cannot be completely sure. Laber□ T 22:28, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Maybe try the visual editor? Just click on the pencil at the upper right of the editing window. -- Laber□ T 23:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Yes, but don't forget to add your sources to the article and always write in the edit summary why you removed larger portions of the article if you did so. -- Laber□ T 20:20, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
I declined your AIV report regarding President John Henry Eden, as the editor has edited only once, the edit was not clearly vandalistic, and the editor received no talk-page warnings. The account cannot be considered a VOA at this point. Deor ( talk) 20:38, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Can you please put back my changes on Demographic Transition. As I explained in my edits https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Demographic_transition&diff=prev&oldid=718163756 is because I am using latest data from wikipedia article /info/en/?search=List_of_sovereign_states_and_dependent_territories_by_fertility_rate
As for this https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Demographic_transition&diff=next&oldid=718163756 edit The section heading has been wrong since it was created. The explanation for why it was wrong (done by somebody else) has been sitting in wikipedia for 6 years now. /info/en/?search=Talk:Demographic_transition#.22Non-applicability_to_less-developed_countries.22
Please put back my changes. They are correct. Krishna Pagadala ( talk) 02:19, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello Laberkiste. Thank you for your feedback. I am writing you because you reverted my edition of Josefina Molina article due to unsourced content. I am very sorry for not including this information, but this is the first time I edit an article in Wikipedia. I have the missing information, how do we do it? Do I send it to you and you complete the article or shall I undo your reversion and complete it myself? I do not want to cause any trouble. Thank you very much in advance. Cmorchi ( talk) 21:24, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Greetings. At least one of
your recent edits, such as the edit you made to
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halal snack pack, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be
reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use
the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. –
Davey2010
Talk 00:12, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi, I'm SwisterTwister. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Nam phrik aarne, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. SwisterTwister talk 19:11, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
I am unsure from what time I have this IP but never read fore-mentioned article and rather edited by 172.56.41.247 (talk) 16:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC) Talk:Jan Łukasiewicz. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.40.113 ( talk) 06:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re a highly active Huggle user (top 20, actually). The Wikimedia Collaboration Team is researching a project that we hope will be useful to people who use Huggle and others engaged in edit-review and anti-vandalism. Using artificial intelligence programming (in ORES) and other means, we believe we can create feeds of Recent Changes that are better tailored to the type of work you do, helping you to be more effective and efficient. (The technology will have other benefits as well, which we can talk about.)
We're in the early stages of planning this and want to speak with people like yourself to better understand your work, goals and issues. If you’re interested in helping, I’d like to set up a time to meet by video conference, so that you can explain and demonstrate (via screensharing) some of your workflows, and we can ask and answer any questions.
To participate, please email the following information to me, jmatazzoniwikimedia.org, or send it to designresearch
wikimedia.org:
Thanks! JMatazzoni (WMF) ( talk) 19:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Perhaps you should also read WP:NOTBLUE. Specifically: "citations are required for … … statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged". I think you knew when you made your edit on Black Supremacy, that some serious, experienced editors HAD challenged the claim in the RfC.
NOTBLUE goes on "If it really is common knowledge, it really isn't that difficult to source." ie the underlying reason we don't bother to source 'Paris is a City', is not because it is self-evident, but because we COULD find innumerable RS to support the claim if need be. So, ask yourself, why cannot editors find a broad sweep of RS describing THESE organisations as inherently 'racist', or indeed in many cases as 'Black Supremacist' at all? Pincrete ( talk) 22:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
If you persist in filing reports with no evidence and/or duplicate reports, you risk being blocked for disruption.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 14:09, 25 May 2016 (UTC)