Hello, L5boat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing).==References== {{Reflist}}
Hello, I'm
Edwardx. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Edwardx (
talk)
21:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Full date of birth MUST be cited with a reliable source, see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. You cannot use the Forbes citation for this, when it is not in the source. Have had to revert. Edwardx ( talk) 13:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
According to WP:CASTEID policy, we can only mention the caste of a living subject if they have self-identified it in an interview, tweet, etc. Sources mentioning caste, but in third person, for example the author of the article or somebody else, can't be used. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 11:08, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
There is a clear consensus against including the caste of persons in biographies, if the caste doesn't have any impact on the person's life. And even in this case, there needs to be self-identification, which is reported by reliable sources per the biography of living people policy.While, I agree that caste plays a major role in Indian politics, it is Wikipedia, not an Indian politics forum. Also, the representatives of many castes change their identities using suffixes like "-Rajput" or "-Thakor" for the sake of upward mobility and associate it with a more "successful caste", making it more unreliable. If you could find sources with self-identification, by all means add it. In many such cases, I was able to replace with sources conforming with the policies. Note that this criteria doesn't apply to biographies of dead individuals, for which a good RS would suffice. I remember restoring caste for such BIOs after their demise. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 11:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Kushabhau Thakre, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 14:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, L5boat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>
, copy the whole thing).==References== {{Reflist}}
Hello, I'm
Edwardx. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Edwardx (
talk)
21:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Full date of birth MUST be cited with a reliable source, see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons and Wikipedia:Reliable sources. You cannot use the Forbes citation for this, when it is not in the source. Have had to revert. Edwardx ( talk) 13:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
According to WP:CASTEID policy, we can only mention the caste of a living subject if they have self-identified it in an interview, tweet, etc. Sources mentioning caste, but in third person, for example the author of the article or somebody else, can't be used. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 11:08, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
There is a clear consensus against including the caste of persons in biographies, if the caste doesn't have any impact on the person's life. And even in this case, there needs to be self-identification, which is reported by reliable sources per the biography of living people policy.While, I agree that caste plays a major role in Indian politics, it is Wikipedia, not an Indian politics forum. Also, the representatives of many castes change their identities using suffixes like "-Rajput" or "-Thakor" for the sake of upward mobility and associate it with a more "successful caste", making it more unreliable. If you could find sources with self-identification, by all means add it. In many such cases, I was able to replace with sources conforming with the policies. Note that this criteria doesn't apply to biographies of dead individuals, for which a good RS would suffice. I remember restoring caste for such BIOs after their demise. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 11:11, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Please do not add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles, as you did at Kushabhau Thakre, as this contravenes WP:NOINDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 14:22, 30 June 2024 (UTC)