Happy New Year KojiDude! |
-- bulletproof 3:16 09:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
What the hell is up KojiDude! Long time no see! Man we've missed you here mate! Never really been the same without you. How's it going man? Where the hell have you been? Man we need to catch up. Send me an E-mail sometime or I'll drop by your forum lol. I've been really busy finishing up quarter finals so I haven't been on as much either. Glad to see you back again. Cheers!-- bulletproof 3:16 06:21, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments on my RFA. Even though it failed with 28 supports, 42 opposes, and 15 neutrals, I am grateful for the suggestions and advice I have received and I do hope to improve as a Wikipedian. If you ever need my help in any endeavor, feel free to drop me a line. -- Shark face 217 20:08, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to
Power Rangers: Jungle Fury, you will be
blocked from editing. --
Koji
Dude
(Contributions) 03:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Since the RfA has finished, I will comment here. In response to "Isn't it more important that he knew the pages met the speedy delete criteria than it is that he knew which template to use? And, if he becomes an admin, he won't need to use those templates anymore.", you need to give a reason to delete an article. Not knowing which criteria in which to delete an article is extremely problematic as, if he does not know the SD criteria, it can cause major problems with the accuracy of his deletions. Furthermore, most of the examples I listed shouldn't have been deleted under any criteria. — Dark talk 04:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Not really, since it was redirected. Koji, I think you should quickly undo your edit to Talk:Android (Dragon Ball) because the template said to use {{ hangon}} (see here). Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 01:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Would you have any spare time on your hands? I ask because I'd like to get the Majin Buu, Djinn Boo, etc., redirects fixed, and two heads are better than one. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 05:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my recent request for adminship which was successful with 89 supports, 0 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Unfortunately all I can offer is this lame text thanks rather than some fancy-smancy thank-you spam template thingy. I was very pleased to receive such strong support and to hear so many nice comments from editors whom I respect. I’ll do my best with the tools, and if you ever see me going astray don’t hesitate to drop a note on my talk page. Thanks again for your support!-- Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 01:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
KojiDude...Thank you for supporting my nomination for adminship. Through it I have become aware of a great many people who can help me in my future editing endeavors. Even though I was not promoted, your support shows that I still have something to contribute to Wikipedia, even if it is minor edits to fix spelling and grammar to working in WikiProjects to help others make great articles. If you wish to further discuss the nomination, please use its talk page. Stop by my talk page anytime, even if it is just to say hello. Have a wonderful day! - LA @ 04:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC) |
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.
If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight ( talk) 02:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I thought about that, but didn't do it in case there were any references to them by their original numbering. (Which there weren't in the RfA, but I can't really be sure of that on pages outside the RfA). Splash - tk 00:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
My respect for you just increased significantly.
And yes, it should be DHMO :) dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 02:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Hilarious ( [1]), Thanks =) Apis ( talk) 06:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Koji.
I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote, in other words, "heck no :( " Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your support. -- Avi ( talk) 17:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Friendly notice to let you know that things like this can come off as insulting. Antelan talk 02:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Why do you think it's necessary to give these two a perfunctory nod in the Freeza article? For their part in the area they're mentioned in they're naught but filler, a "by the way, some disposable henchmen were there too" parting shot. The main crux of the article isn't the lackeys, which Freeza has plenty of and to spare we could name still - but their boss.
The straight-shot rv bothers me as well, but 'k. That sentence with Cold and Trunks tosses commas around like they're going outta style. 98.199.186.160 ( talk) 02:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Please keep your commentary civil and on the reasoning. This is not appropriate. Balloonman ( talk) 23:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight ( talk) 04:05, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm a bit uncomfortable with the term. Do we really have to link to a word everybody knows of? WP:CONTEXT discourages this. Please reply below, I'd like to keep the conversation on one page. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 22:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Kurt is entitled to his opinion, just as Tree is entitled to his opinion of Kurt's opinion. Since it wasn't a blatant personal attack, just a comment on the character of the action, I don't think it was appropriate to edit it. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 23:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
diff made me smile. Sorry I wasnt' watching the page. I go in waves at WT:RFA. Some days, it strikes me as absolutely hilarious in its proposterousness. And so I comment (or archive). Most days, it strikes me as "same old, same old". WT:RFA should redirect to WP:PEREN, in my humbled opinion. But still, thanks for the creds..:-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 00:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
RfA: Many thanks | ||
Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. -- jbmurray ( talk • contribs) 06:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for signing my guestbook, here's the promised award. No need to reply.
The SimsFan Special Thank You Award | ||
Signing my Guestbook, thanks. SimsFan Talk • Centre of Ops • Sign and Get Award 07:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC) |
There you go. SimsFan Talk • Centre of Ops • Sign and Get Award 07:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Sinistrals, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinistrals. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 00:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Although you opposed me in my recent RFA I will still say thanks as from your comments and the other users comments that opposed me I have made a todo list for before my next RFA. I hope I will have resolved all of the issues before then and I hope that you would be able to support me in the future. If you would like to reply to this message or have any more suggestions for me then please message me on my talk page. Thanks again. ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 16:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Glad you like it =) Feel free to add the same template to your talk page as people often jump right to your talk page so it makes sense to have one there. I would've done so, but there was no permissive like on your main page. Happy editing, xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 21:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
I didn't know that a prod tag can only be removed once. Should we just make an WP:AFD and be over with it? Please reply below, Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 03:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your support in myRfA, which closed successfully this morning. TravellingCari the Busy Bee 19:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I'll keep an eye on him. Thanks for the help. -- Unquestionable Truth-- 19:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
It's also been happening on Majin Boo Saga, though I don't if that page should be semi-protected as well. Have you watchlisted it? Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 16:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi there - thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed 69/10/3 yesterday. I will put the tools to good use and hopefully justify the confidence you had in me. Best wishes Fritzpoll ( talk) 11:58, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Please read WP:V. All content of Wikipedia should be attributable to a source. Wikipedia editors are not supposed to writing their own ideas about the subject, but reporting on what others have said. But we need to know who those others are... Madagascar periwinkle ( talk) 22:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year KojiDude! |
-- bulletproof 3:16 09:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
What the hell is up KojiDude! Long time no see! Man we've missed you here mate! Never really been the same without you. How's it going man? Where the hell have you been? Man we need to catch up. Send me an E-mail sometime or I'll drop by your forum lol. I've been really busy finishing up quarter finals so I haven't been on as much either. Glad to see you back again. Cheers!-- bulletproof 3:16 06:21, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your comments on my RFA. Even though it failed with 28 supports, 42 opposes, and 15 neutrals, I am grateful for the suggestions and advice I have received and I do hope to improve as a Wikipedian. If you ever need my help in any endeavor, feel free to drop me a line. -- Shark face 217 20:08, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to
Power Rangers: Jungle Fury, you will be
blocked from editing. --
Koji
Dude
(Contributions) 03:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Since the RfA has finished, I will comment here. In response to "Isn't it more important that he knew the pages met the speedy delete criteria than it is that he knew which template to use? And, if he becomes an admin, he won't need to use those templates anymore.", you need to give a reason to delete an article. Not knowing which criteria in which to delete an article is extremely problematic as, if he does not know the SD criteria, it can cause major problems with the accuracy of his deletions. Furthermore, most of the examples I listed shouldn't have been deleted under any criteria. — Dark talk 04:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Not really, since it was redirected. Koji, I think you should quickly undo your edit to Talk:Android (Dragon Ball) because the template said to use {{ hangon}} (see here). Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 01:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Would you have any spare time on your hands? I ask because I'd like to get the Majin Buu, Djinn Boo, etc., redirects fixed, and two heads are better than one. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 05:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for supporting my recent request for adminship which was successful with 89 supports, 0 opposes, and 2 neutrals. Unfortunately all I can offer is this lame text thanks rather than some fancy-smancy thank-you spam template thingy. I was very pleased to receive such strong support and to hear so many nice comments from editors whom I respect. I’ll do my best with the tools, and if you ever see me going astray don’t hesitate to drop a note on my talk page. Thanks again for your support!-- Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 01:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
KojiDude...Thank you for supporting my nomination for adminship. Through it I have become aware of a great many people who can help me in my future editing endeavors. Even though I was not promoted, your support shows that I still have something to contribute to Wikipedia, even if it is minor edits to fix spelling and grammar to working in WikiProjects to help others make great articles. If you wish to further discuss the nomination, please use its talk page. Stop by my talk page anytime, even if it is just to say hello. Have a wonderful day! - LA @ 04:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC) |
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.
If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight ( talk) 02:41, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I thought about that, but didn't do it in case there were any references to them by their original numbering. (Which there weren't in the RfA, but I can't really be sure of that on pages outside the RfA). Splash - tk 00:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
My respect for you just increased significantly.
And yes, it should be DHMO :) dihydrogen monoxide ( H2O) 02:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Hilarious ( [1]), Thanks =) Apis ( talk) 06:44, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello, Koji.
I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote, in other words, "heck no :( " Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your support. -- Avi ( talk) 17:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Friendly notice to let you know that things like this can come off as insulting. Antelan talk 02:00, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Why do you think it's necessary to give these two a perfunctory nod in the Freeza article? For their part in the area they're mentioned in they're naught but filler, a "by the way, some disposable henchmen were there too" parting shot. The main crux of the article isn't the lackeys, which Freeza has plenty of and to spare we could name still - but their boss.
The straight-shot rv bothers me as well, but 'k. That sentence with Cold and Trunks tosses commas around like they're going outta style. 98.199.186.160 ( talk) 02:44, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Please keep your commentary civil and on the reasoning. This is not appropriate. Balloonman ( talk) 23:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight ( talk) 04:05, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm a bit uncomfortable with the term. Do we really have to link to a word everybody knows of? WP:CONTEXT discourages this. Please reply below, I'd like to keep the conversation on one page. Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 22:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Kurt is entitled to his opinion, just as Tree is entitled to his opinion of Kurt's opinion. Since it wasn't a blatant personal attack, just a comment on the character of the action, I don't think it was appropriate to edit it. xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 23:51, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
diff made me smile. Sorry I wasnt' watching the page. I go in waves at WT:RFA. Some days, it strikes me as absolutely hilarious in its proposterousness. And so I comment (or archive). Most days, it strikes me as "same old, same old". WT:RFA should redirect to WP:PEREN, in my humbled opinion. But still, thanks for the creds..:-) Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 00:59, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
RfA: Many thanks | ||
Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. -- jbmurray ( talk • contribs) 06:00, 18 May 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for signing my guestbook, here's the promised award. No need to reply.
The SimsFan Special Thank You Award | ||
Signing my Guestbook, thanks. SimsFan Talk • Centre of Ops • Sign and Get Award 07:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC) |
There you go. SimsFan Talk • Centre of Ops • Sign and Get Award 07:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated Sinistrals, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinistrals. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Judgesurreal777 ( talk) 00:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Although you opposed me in my recent RFA I will still say thanks as from your comments and the other users comments that opposed me I have made a todo list for before my next RFA. I hope I will have resolved all of the issues before then and I hope that you would be able to support me in the future. If you would like to reply to this message or have any more suggestions for me then please message me on my talk page. Thanks again. ·Add§hore· Talk/ Cont 16:14, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
Glad you like it =) Feel free to add the same template to your talk page as people often jump right to your talk page so it makes sense to have one there. I would've done so, but there was no permissive like on your main page. Happy editing, xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 21:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
I didn't know that a prod tag can only be removed once. Should we just make an WP:AFD and be over with it? Please reply below, Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 03:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks so much for your support in myRfA, which closed successfully this morning. TravellingCari the Busy Bee 19:20, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I'll keep an eye on him. Thanks for the help. -- Unquestionable Truth-- 19:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
It's also been happening on Majin Boo Saga, though I don't if that page should be semi-protected as well. Have you watchlisted it? Lord Sesshomaru ( talk • edits) 16:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi there - thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed 69/10/3 yesterday. I will put the tools to good use and hopefully justify the confidence you had in me. Best wishes Fritzpoll ( talk) 11:58, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
Please read WP:V. All content of Wikipedia should be attributable to a source. Wikipedia editors are not supposed to writing their own ideas about the subject, but reporting on what others have said. But we need to know who those others are... Madagascar periwinkle ( talk) 22:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)