This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Your slow edit warring on this is disruptive. I suggest you self revert. Selfstudier ( talk) 19:34, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Some of this explains the continued strong Western support for Israel – which has now largely become reflexive) Multiple sources dispute the claim that Israel is militarily isolated. How could they be if multiple great powers are sending them weapons? (Germany, UK, and the US, amid other countries.)
I notice that you added to your user page that you were "an urologist in residency", which surprised me because I thought urologists agreed that the first sound in urology was /j/? -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 23:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the
guide to appealing blocks (specifically
this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the
arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (
by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
Hi. This addition seems contradicted by the Pentagon according to the same source: The Pentagon quickly issued a clarification that Austin was “citing an estimate from the Hamas-controlled health ministry that more than 25,000 total Palestinians have been killed in Gaza.” It looks like he said over 25,000 Palestinians in total were killed, not women and children. We could add this clarification as well, but is Austin's supposed declaration appropriate for lede in the first place? Thanks Vugarmamadov ( talk) 23:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
This is just horrible beyond words, not even English: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Israel&diff=prev&oldid=1213871590&title=Israel&diffonly=1
This is extremely redundant and silly: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Israel&diff=prev&oldid=1213892014&title=Israel&diffonly=1
Sometimes I think they do it on purpose. You are always the voice of sanity. Sorry for bothering you. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.9.122.76 ( talk) 19:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
You've said on multiple state pages that there is "clear consensus on 2024 United States election talk page to include Kennedy in states that he has write-in or direct ballot access on."
Is that true though? I'm looking at Talk:2024 United States elections and not seeing anything of the sort. Not being snarky, just curious where that consensus is. Woko Sapien ( talk) 17:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
As you might be aware, your attempt to close
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) was
reverted by
Silver seren with the edit summary this is not an AfD where non-admin closure is appropriate
.
Seconding that sentiment, I wanted to draw your attention to WP:BADNAC, which states:
A non-admin closure is not appropriate in any of the following situations: ...
2. The outcome is a close call (especially where there are several valid outcomes) or likely to be controversial.
3. The non-admin has little or no experience editing Wikipedia generally or has little or no previous participation in discussions.
I notice you have fairly limited experience at AfD, so while the enthusiasm to help AfDs is very welcome, it might be worth sticking around to gain some experience by participating in AfD discussions before attempting to closure future AfDs.
Finally, per WP:EARLY, note that deletion discussions usually close after seven days. Your attempted close was after six days, and none of the conditions for an early close applied. Thanks, and happy editing! IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 21:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Persecution of First Nations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 04:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Ethnic Cleansing and the Indian. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 08:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi KlayCax, I have moved this article to Draft:Gary Clayton Anderson to allow you to add secondary sources such as media coverage demonstrating that the subject meets notability requirements for biographies. Thanks. AusLondonder ( talk) 08:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Jeffrey Ostler. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and there's no indication that this person passes WP:NPROF – h-index is 6 according to Scopus. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 |
Your slow edit warring on this is disruptive. I suggest you self revert. Selfstudier ( talk) 19:34, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Some of this explains the continued strong Western support for Israel – which has now largely become reflexive) Multiple sources dispute the claim that Israel is militarily isolated. How could they be if multiple great powers are sending them weapons? (Germany, UK, and the US, amid other countries.)
I notice that you added to your user page that you were "an urologist in residency", which surprised me because I thought urologists agreed that the first sound in urology was /j/? -- SashiRolls 🌿 · 🍥 23:16, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the
guide to appealing blocks (specifically
this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{
unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the
arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (
by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."
Hi. This addition seems contradicted by the Pentagon according to the same source: The Pentagon quickly issued a clarification that Austin was “citing an estimate from the Hamas-controlled health ministry that more than 25,000 total Palestinians have been killed in Gaza.” It looks like he said over 25,000 Palestinians in total were killed, not women and children. We could add this clarification as well, but is Austin's supposed declaration appropriate for lede in the first place? Thanks Vugarmamadov ( talk) 23:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
This is just horrible beyond words, not even English: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Israel&diff=prev&oldid=1213871590&title=Israel&diffonly=1
This is extremely redundant and silly: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/?title=Israel&diff=prev&oldid=1213892014&title=Israel&diffonly=1
Sometimes I think they do it on purpose. You are always the voice of sanity. Sorry for bothering you. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.9.122.76 ( talk) 19:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
You've said on multiple state pages that there is "clear consensus on 2024 United States election talk page to include Kennedy in states that he has write-in or direct ballot access on."
Is that true though? I'm looking at Talk:2024 United States elections and not seeing anything of the sort. Not being snarky, just curious where that consensus is. Woko Sapien ( talk) 17:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
As you might be aware, your attempt to close
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) was
reverted by
Silver seren with the edit summary this is not an AfD where non-admin closure is appropriate
.
Seconding that sentiment, I wanted to draw your attention to WP:BADNAC, which states:
A non-admin closure is not appropriate in any of the following situations: ...
2. The outcome is a close call (especially where there are several valid outcomes) or likely to be controversial.
3. The non-admin has little or no experience editing Wikipedia generally or has little or no previous participation in discussions.
I notice you have fairly limited experience at AfD, so while the enthusiasm to help AfDs is very welcome, it might be worth sticking around to gain some experience by participating in AfD discussions before attempting to closure future AfDs.
Finally, per WP:EARLY, note that deletion discussions usually close after seven days. Your attempted close was after six days, and none of the conditions for an early close applied. Thanks, and happy editing! IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 21:42, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Persecution of First Nations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. microbiologyMarcus petri dish· growths 04:19, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Ethnic Cleansing and the Indian. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 ( talk) 08:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi KlayCax, I have moved this article to Draft:Gary Clayton Anderson to allow you to add secondary sources such as media coverage demonstrating that the subject meets notability requirements for biographies. Thanks. AusLondonder ( talk) 08:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Jeffrey Ostler. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and there's no indication that this person passes WP:NPROF – h-index is 6 according to Scopus. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 11:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)