←Archive 4 ( 151 - 200) | Khukri's talk archive 5 (201 - 250). Please do not modify | Archive 6 ( 251 - 300)→ |
Hi again, it's me. I was just wondering on what basis you can delete people's comments on a discussion page. At least you had the decency to notify me before removing my material but some haven't. I think it was classified as a "Rant" and deleted. Still, i was wondering if you could point me to the freedom of speech section here. Thanks again for your help. Spite & Malice 11:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry, your message wasn't spam. I'll keep tabs on the project and watch it. BuickCenturyDriver ( Honk, contribs, odometer) 21:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi there; the edit which you pick up, and which as you say I corrected, was of course just a typo generated in the white-heat of composition!-- Anthony.bradbury 10:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey! I wanted to have your input on the copyright series. I really have no clue on how to insert it into the uw system since there are only 2 levels. Do you have an idea? -- lucasbfr talk 11:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Do you know why Qxz retired? (This is a real question, not a gossip one.) ~ Step trip 01:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my recent successful RfA.-- Anthony.bradbury 10:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit that you've reverted was actually a grammar fixture. Please be more careful of your revert. — ze ro » 18:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you recently changed the icon parameter to the vandalism series of warnings. Could you please explain how the change differs from the current optional icon parser (I'm not a scripting guru)? Also can you let me know if you are going to add it to the other 100 odd uw templates please, as this series is now out of sync with the rest of the temaplates? Many thanks Khu kri 07:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Hmm. Where do I sign up? -- AAA! ( AAAA) 08:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Look at this diff. Did I do the right thing here? -- AAA! ( AAAA) 08:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
You probably didn't know that you did this since your probably replaced the icons with AWB but: On uw-copyright and uw-pinfo, you made the icons 25px, as you probably did for all the ones you replaced. However, I had previously made both a lot bigger because they are serious violations. The first can cause trouble for Wikipedia and the second can cause a lot of trouble for editors. So, I've changed them back. Please discuss below if you don't agree. Thanks! -- TeckWiz Parlate Contribs @(Lets go Yankees!) 15:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Discussion moved over to WT:UW
Overview entries completed as best I could understand what was required. The "rfc-xxx" templates redirect to the original template names, since those are in use by the rfc crowd (and therefore should not be deleted). Should I strike through the original names in this case, just to indicate no further changes needed? -- Ben TALK/ HIST 18:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Welcome back by the way ;). How was Caen? -- lucasbfr talk 13:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for creating all those new templates! We're going to have to do something about the cut and paste move one though. As of now, it requires two parameters. So, either we give it a special templates notice, or we change it to just "from [article]". -- TeckWiz Parlate Contribs @(Lets go Yankees!) 14:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Just to let you know, I haven't had chance yet to follow up on the RfA prod idea, I've had 2 stressfull days at work, but I plan to work on it monday and tuesday (when I'm supposed to be doing revision!), as I said, it may be a longish process to get it certified, but the minute I do, I'll let you know. Let me know if you want a nom whilst we're waiting ;-) Ryan Postlethwaite 00:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
This implies that rollback is special to Administrators only. It's not explicit - is there any difference between 1-click rollback and any other kind? (If any other kind exists) Sʟυмgυм • т • c 23:04, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I checked some random templates, and it seems that if a lot are implementing the {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|[[:{{{1}}}]]|an article}} (subst=subst:) thingie, very few to none of them are implementing the same trick on the second parameter. I was quite surprised to be honest. You know AWB much more than I do, so if you want to replace the {{{2|Thank you.}}} into {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} that would be great! (yeah that's ugly but the output is nicer) -- lucasbfr talk 12:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
May 2007
Thanks for your reminder; I was previously unaware of the discussion you mentioned. Sorry for any trouble I may have caused. — Wenli 23:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Why, of course not! :-) I am going to write a nom either today or during the weekend. Once I've finished it, I'll inform you so you may add your co-nom. Or, vice versa if you write the nom first. Best regards, Hús ö nd 17:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
just to let you know, the RfA prod idea's on limbo at the minute - consensus is stuck :-( however....... I did offer you that nom in a normal RfA, so let me know whenever you wish to take it. Ryan Postlethwaite 19:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! I would take down my wiki-vacation banner but I still don't have a lot of time to contribute lately. :) -- Renesis ( talk) 20:18, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my RFA, which passed with 53-1-0. I will put myself into the various tasks of a administrator immediately, and if I make any mistakes, feel free to shout at me or smack me in my head.
Good luck on your RFA too! Aquarius • talk 03:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
This page is a broken redirect to User:Khukri/statuschanger, and it's showing up on the broken redirects list. Do you want it retained, or should it be deleted? -- ais523 10:21, 15 May 2007 ( U T C)
It shows. But really, that's probably a good thing. If an American had written the uw series they'd probably be full of car horns and all start of with "You jackass". Natalie 15:43, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey! Cheers for moving the above template to the standard form, any chance you can take a look at it and suggest any changes? Ryan Postlethwaite 00:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted to congratulate you for your probable successful nomination. I think the consensus won't be hard to check ;) -- lucasbfr talk 23:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations, you are now an administrator - the first time I've "pushed the button" to grant admin rights in over a year! :) I'm so rusty, I borrowed the form of this "congrats" from Warofdreams. Anyway, if you haven't already, now is the time look through the Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide and Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Best wishes and good luck, Cecropia 00:00, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Khukri, congratulations on your successful RFA. Use your new tools wisely. :-) Best regards, Hús ö nd 02:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL. |
![]() |
I wish to just thank everyone who supported me on my recent RfA which passed. To be given such support with some extremely flattering comments have made me realise that there is a fantastic community spirit out there. Even though many of us sit in the background plodding away, it shows that my/our work has been recognised and I am grateful for the trust that has been placed in me for the future. As always any problems, ideas or general screwups I'm always open to suggestions. All the best Khu kri 16:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC) |
Hey Khukri...I was just looking at your RFA when I noticed that I didn't support you. I remember seeing your RFA on the main page, and I thought I !voted but I guess I didn't and my mind is playing tricks on me. Well, here's a post RFA support that doesn't really mean anything (but it's the thought that counts :)). -- R Parlate Contribs @ (Let's go Yankees!) 17:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
An only warning IS a final warning. He had 2 bot warnings and an only warning on 15 April that next time he'd be blocked. It's a static IP, meaning the normal rules applying to anons don't apply. Nardman1 21:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
This is what I was going to post to you before but edit conflicted you jumped the gun, and reposted. Khu kri 21:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
For future note from {{ uw-aiv}}: However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. Khu kri 21:57, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
If you ever wanted to become "K", this is why you can't :). Well...maybe the crats would let it slide since it's so long ago. -- R Parlate Contribs @ (Let's go Yankees!) 00:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
For everything, starting with WP:UW to your recent nomination! I'll of course annoy you with stupid requests since you are waaaaay more experienced. I'm already starting to have headaches in the "should I delete or not" part, it's much easier to tag stuff for deletion knowing that someone will double check. On the other hand I'm starting to see the need for the speedy deletion message (I have some ideas ;)).
Well, to be honest I still ponders (?) whether or not I'll still talk to you, since you achieved getting 7 more votes than I did ;). Cheers -- lucasbfr talk 15:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
No problem. It seems someone else has dealt with it. - Dudesleeper · Talk 17:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for getting back to me on my page. Unfortunately, we disagree on the issue of him committing vandalism only once.
Maybe the user was experimenting if we assume good faith. You're right though, in that the user hasn't been given a final warning. I've given the user this final warning due to the two nonsense article creations and one page blank, so then he knows the situation now. If he signs and commits more vandalism acts, admins can then feel free to take action. Thanks for your time and enlightening me more on Wikipedia's procedures on dealing with vandals - the admin board for vandalism is under-utilized in my opinion. LuciferMorgan 10:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
I see that Pigsonthewing has been engaged in extensive edit-warring at Sutton Coldfield. I think I should draw your attention to this. He was banned from wiki for a year, and then banned from making more than one revert per week for a further year after that. L.J.Skinner wot| I did 11:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
I didn't quite understand the purpose of "subst"--this helps. Thanks! Freshacconci 13:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. The ip in question vandalized Belen Jesuit notable alumni on May 17, 18, 20, and 21. Callelinea 15:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
65.13.58.108 he vandalized again.. at Belen Jesuit and christipher culumbus hight school at the notable alumni.. Callelinea 13:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Could you please give him a final warning? thanks.. Callelinea 16:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thanks to both of you. Now how do I send a warning in the future? I had no idea I could send one. Callelinea 17:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
There are a whole series of warning templates you can use to warn people. If you read WP:WARN, you can see a comprehensive list of them, including how to use them. Basically, you type, {{subst:uw-test1|some article}} - ~~~~, with the correct article name (optional). This will give you something like this;
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page
some article on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. -
Alison
☺
17:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)</nowiki>
Feel free to delete this,
Khukri :-) You don't have to be an admin to warn folks. You can also welcome people in the same manner with the {{
welcome}} template -
Alison
☺
17:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
User:Hairchrm/sha1 - Hair chr m 02:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, if you read Seattle_Seahawks#Current_depth_chart and click on Blake Vining, all you get is a page with zero content which must not even be created in the future.
I don't know anything about sports, so please explain to me why Vining is the only player from this chart who must not have his own article—not now, not in the future.
All the best, <K F> 21:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
I have no problem with deleting the article, when I looked at it originally, it said she was going to be taking on the role of Elphaba soon, now it says she will be primary backup. That's not notability, so if you want to delete it, then I have no objections. Corvus cornix
Hi Khurki. From a google cache of the Wikipedia article, it appears there used to be a more appropriate version of this article. I can't revert back to it because it was deleted, but wondered if you, as an admin, could restore it (so we get the history for GFDL)? -- Siobhan Hansa 18:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Can you explain why you felt the need to delete the Giorgos Efrem wiki entry?
You say "Youth player, not part of senior squad" How could you possibly know this when he hasn't even properly joined the new club? —Preceding unsigned comment added by RedZinc ( talk • contribs)
Hi... I think this vandalism was actually a response to the final warning. They occurred in the same minute. -- Rrburke( talk) 14:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi Khukri
Thank you for your swift response to delete personal info from the edit hisotry of the article
Naperville Central High School. Is there a user warning template that covers both vandalism and publishing of other peoples personal info? All I could find was {{
uw-pinfo}}, which looks like it only is concerned about users with a wiki account. The reason I ask is it is not the first time that I see people add personal info and unfit comments about poeple in school articles.
Best regards
Mads
Angelbo
Talk /
Contribs
08:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
You did it a while ago thanks for the help with the article Invasion of Machurucuto. Carlitos 00:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
I reported 71.49.180.197 cause he had a final warning then he had a page reverted by a bot then he vandalized Avian Flu, Thus vandalizing after his final warning. Oysterguitarist 14:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I have been blocked from editing pages. The problem, it turns out, is because my IP address has been blocked by you. I don't know what I've done to get myself blocked so if you respond and help get this problem sorted out it would be much appreciated. Free Thinker 21:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I appologise for any inconveniance my last post RE:My IP has been blocked may have caused. After talking to my dad it turns out various other people also use our broadband connection. I can assure you that I didn't cause the vandalism myself and any changes made by me will be made under my user name. Free Thinker 21:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Is there a warning we give to users who have made nonsense pages. Cause when a user makes a page with nonsense i only put a {{db-nonsense}} on the page but i never give them a warning cause i don't have a warning to give them. Cheers Oysterguitarist 23:11, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the links. I am still trying to read/find all the wikipedia pages that have information i could use fight vandalism, spam, and other things i don't know about (yet). Cheers oysterguitarist ~Talk 13:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Recently i was on RC Patrol when i undid a users talk page ( User talk:Mochajava97) mistaking it for vandalism because it was blanked. When i went to give a warning i found it was blanked by the user who's talk page it was. I appologized on the current version. They have not noticed yet. I was wondering if you could help me by undoing what i did. I just don't want a conflict to start from my mistake. Thank you.
oysterguitarist ~Talk 00:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
You might not be able to answer this but, I am a user at tab wiki [ [4]] we are having trouble with spamming vandaism and sockpuppets there is an overwhelming amount of them. That would be fine cause an admin would usually take care of that but there are no admins that have been going on. where could this be reported i was thinking meta wiki but i don't know. If you can't answer this that's ok. Cheers oysterguitarist~ Talk 05:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
←Archive 4 ( 151 - 200) | Khukri's talk archive 5 (201 - 250). Please do not modify | Archive 6 ( 251 - 300)→ |
Hi again, it's me. I was just wondering on what basis you can delete people's comments on a discussion page. At least you had the decency to notify me before removing my material but some haven't. I think it was classified as a "Rant" and deleted. Still, i was wondering if you could point me to the freedom of speech section here. Thanks again for your help. Spite & Malice 11:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Don't worry, your message wasn't spam. I'll keep tabs on the project and watch it. BuickCenturyDriver ( Honk, contribs, odometer) 21:10, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi there; the edit which you pick up, and which as you say I corrected, was of course just a typo generated in the white-heat of composition!-- Anthony.bradbury 10:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Hey! I wanted to have your input on the copyright series. I really have no clue on how to insert it into the uw system since there are only 2 levels. Do you have an idea? -- lucasbfr talk 11:30, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Do you know why Qxz retired? (This is a real question, not a gossip one.) ~ Step trip 01:28, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my recent successful RfA.-- Anthony.bradbury 10:52, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi, the recent edit that you've reverted was actually a grammar fixture. Please be more careful of your revert. — ze ro » 18:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Hi, you recently changed the icon parameter to the vandalism series of warnings. Could you please explain how the change differs from the current optional icon parser (I'm not a scripting guru)? Also can you let me know if you are going to add it to the other 100 odd uw templates please, as this series is now out of sync with the rest of the temaplates? Many thanks Khu kri 07:38, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Hmm. Where do I sign up? -- AAA! ( AAAA) 08:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Look at this diff. Did I do the right thing here? -- AAA! ( AAAA) 08:23, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
You probably didn't know that you did this since your probably replaced the icons with AWB but: On uw-copyright and uw-pinfo, you made the icons 25px, as you probably did for all the ones you replaced. However, I had previously made both a lot bigger because they are serious violations. The first can cause trouble for Wikipedia and the second can cause a lot of trouble for editors. So, I've changed them back. Please discuss below if you don't agree. Thanks! -- TeckWiz Parlate Contribs @(Lets go Yankees!) 15:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Discussion moved over to WT:UW
Overview entries completed as best I could understand what was required. The "rfc-xxx" templates redirect to the original template names, since those are in use by the rfc crowd (and therefore should not be deleted). Should I strike through the original names in this case, just to indicate no further changes needed? -- Ben TALK/ HIST 18:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Welcome back by the way ;). How was Caen? -- lucasbfr talk 13:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for creating all those new templates! We're going to have to do something about the cut and paste move one though. As of now, it requires two parameters. So, either we give it a special templates notice, or we change it to just "from [article]". -- TeckWiz Parlate Contribs @(Lets go Yankees!) 14:54, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Just to let you know, I haven't had chance yet to follow up on the RfA prod idea, I've had 2 stressfull days at work, but I plan to work on it monday and tuesday (when I'm supposed to be doing revision!), as I said, it may be a longish process to get it certified, but the minute I do, I'll let you know. Let me know if you want a nom whilst we're waiting ;-) Ryan Postlethwaite 00:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
This implies that rollback is special to Administrators only. It's not explicit - is there any difference between 1-click rollback and any other kind? (If any other kind exists) Sʟυмgυм • т • c 23:04, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey, I checked some random templates, and it seems that if a lot are implementing the {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|[[:{{{1}}}]]|an article}} (subst=subst:) thingie, very few to none of them are implementing the same trick on the second parameter. I was quite surprised to be honest. You know AWB much more than I do, so if you want to replace the {{{2|Thank you.}}} into {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} that would be great! (yeah that's ugly but the output is nicer) -- lucasbfr talk 12:45, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
May 2007
Thanks for your reminder; I was previously unaware of the discussion you mentioned. Sorry for any trouble I may have caused. — Wenli 23:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Why, of course not! :-) I am going to write a nom either today or during the weekend. Once I've finished it, I'll inform you so you may add your co-nom. Or, vice versa if you write the nom first. Best regards, Hús ö nd 17:00, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
just to let you know, the RfA prod idea's on limbo at the minute - consensus is stuck :-( however....... I did offer you that nom in a normal RfA, so let me know whenever you wish to take it. Ryan Postlethwaite 19:26, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks! I would take down my wiki-vacation banner but I still don't have a lot of time to contribute lately. :) -- Renesis ( talk) 20:18, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my RFA, which passed with 53-1-0. I will put myself into the various tasks of a administrator immediately, and if I make any mistakes, feel free to shout at me or smack me in my head.
Good luck on your RFA too! Aquarius • talk 03:02, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
This page is a broken redirect to User:Khukri/statuschanger, and it's showing up on the broken redirects list. Do you want it retained, or should it be deleted? -- ais523 10:21, 15 May 2007 ( U T C)
It shows. But really, that's probably a good thing. If an American had written the uw series they'd probably be full of car horns and all start of with "You jackass". Natalie 15:43, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Hey! Cheers for moving the above template to the standard form, any chance you can take a look at it and suggest any changes? Ryan Postlethwaite 00:49, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
I just wanted to congratulate you for your probable successful nomination. I think the consensus won't be hard to check ;) -- lucasbfr talk 23:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations, you are now an administrator - the first time I've "pushed the button" to grant admin rights in over a year! :) I'm so rusty, I borrowed the form of this "congrats" from Warofdreams. Anyway, if you haven't already, now is the time look through the Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide and Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Best wishes and good luck, Cecropia 00:00, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello Khukri, congratulations on your successful RFA. Use your new tools wisely. :-) Best regards, Hús ö nd 02:02, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations. Here are what pass for words of wisdom from the puppy: |
|
DISCLAIMER: This humor does not reflect the official humor of Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, or Jimbo Wales. All rights released under GFDL. |
![]() |
I wish to just thank everyone who supported me on my recent RfA which passed. To be given such support with some extremely flattering comments have made me realise that there is a fantastic community spirit out there. Even though many of us sit in the background plodding away, it shows that my/our work has been recognised and I am grateful for the trust that has been placed in me for the future. As always any problems, ideas or general screwups I'm always open to suggestions. All the best Khu kri 16:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC) |
Hey Khukri...I was just looking at your RFA when I noticed that I didn't support you. I remember seeing your RFA on the main page, and I thought I !voted but I guess I didn't and my mind is playing tricks on me. Well, here's a post RFA support that doesn't really mean anything (but it's the thought that counts :)). -- R Parlate Contribs @ (Let's go Yankees!) 17:13, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
An only warning IS a final warning. He had 2 bot warnings and an only warning on 15 April that next time he'd be blocked. It's a static IP, meaning the normal rules applying to anons don't apply. Nardman1 21:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
This is what I was going to post to you before but edit conflicted you jumped the gun, and reposted. Khu kri 21:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
For future note from {{ uw-aiv}}: However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. Khu kri 21:57, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
If you ever wanted to become "K", this is why you can't :). Well...maybe the crats would let it slide since it's so long ago. -- R Parlate Contribs @ (Let's go Yankees!) 00:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
For everything, starting with WP:UW to your recent nomination! I'll of course annoy you with stupid requests since you are waaaaay more experienced. I'm already starting to have headaches in the "should I delete or not" part, it's much easier to tag stuff for deletion knowing that someone will double check. On the other hand I'm starting to see the need for the speedy deletion message (I have some ideas ;)).
Well, to be honest I still ponders (?) whether or not I'll still talk to you, since you achieved getting 7 more votes than I did ;). Cheers -- lucasbfr talk 15:28, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
No problem. It seems someone else has dealt with it. - Dudesleeper · Talk 17:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for getting back to me on my page. Unfortunately, we disagree on the issue of him committing vandalism only once.
Maybe the user was experimenting if we assume good faith. You're right though, in that the user hasn't been given a final warning. I've given the user this final warning due to the two nonsense article creations and one page blank, so then he knows the situation now. If he signs and commits more vandalism acts, admins can then feel free to take action. Thanks for your time and enlightening me more on Wikipedia's procedures on dealing with vandals - the admin board for vandalism is under-utilized in my opinion. LuciferMorgan 10:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
I see that Pigsonthewing has been engaged in extensive edit-warring at Sutton Coldfield. I think I should draw your attention to this. He was banned from wiki for a year, and then banned from making more than one revert per week for a further year after that. L.J.Skinner wot| I did 11:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
I didn't quite understand the purpose of "subst"--this helps. Thanks! Freshacconci 13:47, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. The ip in question vandalized Belen Jesuit notable alumni on May 17, 18, 20, and 21. Callelinea 15:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
65.13.58.108 he vandalized again.. at Belen Jesuit and christipher culumbus hight school at the notable alumni.. Callelinea 13:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Could you please give him a final warning? thanks.. Callelinea 16:28, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thanks to both of you. Now how do I send a warning in the future? I had no idea I could send one. Callelinea 17:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
There are a whole series of warning templates you can use to warn people. If you read WP:WARN, you can see a comprehensive list of them, including how to use them. Basically, you type, {{subst:uw-test1|some article}} - ~~~~, with the correct article name (optional). This will give you something like this;
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page
some article on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been
reverted or removed. Please take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. -
Alison
☺
17:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)</nowiki>
Feel free to delete this,
Khukri :-) You don't have to be an admin to warn folks. You can also welcome people in the same manner with the {{
welcome}} template -
Alison
☺
17:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
User:Hairchrm/sha1 - Hair chr m 02:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi, if you read Seattle_Seahawks#Current_depth_chart and click on Blake Vining, all you get is a page with zero content which must not even be created in the future.
I don't know anything about sports, so please explain to me why Vining is the only player from this chart who must not have his own article—not now, not in the future.
All the best, <K F> 21:27, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
I have no problem with deleting the article, when I looked at it originally, it said she was going to be taking on the role of Elphaba soon, now it says she will be primary backup. That's not notability, so if you want to delete it, then I have no objections. Corvus cornix
Hi Khurki. From a google cache of the Wikipedia article, it appears there used to be a more appropriate version of this article. I can't revert back to it because it was deleted, but wondered if you, as an admin, could restore it (so we get the history for GFDL)? -- Siobhan Hansa 18:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Can you explain why you felt the need to delete the Giorgos Efrem wiki entry?
You say "Youth player, not part of senior squad" How could you possibly know this when he hasn't even properly joined the new club? —Preceding unsigned comment added by RedZinc ( talk • contribs)
Hi... I think this vandalism was actually a response to the final warning. They occurred in the same minute. -- Rrburke( talk) 14:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi Khukri
Thank you for your swift response to delete personal info from the edit hisotry of the article
Naperville Central High School. Is there a user warning template that covers both vandalism and publishing of other peoples personal info? All I could find was {{
uw-pinfo}}, which looks like it only is concerned about users with a wiki account. The reason I ask is it is not the first time that I see people add personal info and unfit comments about poeple in school articles.
Best regards
Mads
Angelbo
Talk /
Contribs
08:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
You did it a while ago thanks for the help with the article Invasion of Machurucuto. Carlitos 00:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
I reported 71.49.180.197 cause he had a final warning then he had a page reverted by a bot then he vandalized Avian Flu, Thus vandalizing after his final warning. Oysterguitarist 14:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I have been blocked from editing pages. The problem, it turns out, is because my IP address has been blocked by you. I don't know what I've done to get myself blocked so if you respond and help get this problem sorted out it would be much appreciated. Free Thinker 21:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
I appologise for any inconveniance my last post RE:My IP has been blocked may have caused. After talking to my dad it turns out various other people also use our broadband connection. I can assure you that I didn't cause the vandalism myself and any changes made by me will be made under my user name. Free Thinker 21:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Is there a warning we give to users who have made nonsense pages. Cause when a user makes a page with nonsense i only put a {{db-nonsense}} on the page but i never give them a warning cause i don't have a warning to give them. Cheers Oysterguitarist 23:11, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the links. I am still trying to read/find all the wikipedia pages that have information i could use fight vandalism, spam, and other things i don't know about (yet). Cheers oysterguitarist ~Talk 13:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Recently i was on RC Patrol when i undid a users talk page ( User talk:Mochajava97) mistaking it for vandalism because it was blanked. When i went to give a warning i found it was blanked by the user who's talk page it was. I appologized on the current version. They have not noticed yet. I was wondering if you could help me by undoing what i did. I just don't want a conflict to start from my mistake. Thank you.
oysterguitarist ~Talk 00:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
You might not be able to answer this but, I am a user at tab wiki [ [4]] we are having trouble with spamming vandaism and sockpuppets there is an overwhelming amount of them. That would be fine cause an admin would usually take care of that but there are no admins that have been going on. where could this be reported i was thinking meta wiki but i don't know. If you can't answer this that's ok. Cheers oysterguitarist~ Talk 05:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)