Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geremy.Hebert ( talk • contribs) 20:54, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I've restored the article here. ~ Riana ⁂ 13:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to
Neoliberalism, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with
Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the
reversion of clear-cut
vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. –
S. Rich (
talk)
21:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Just want to thank you for your awesome answer at the Reference Desk [1].
If you don't mind me asking, how did you managed to find the answer? Did you managed to Google it with the right keywords or was it thanks to professional experience? ECS LIVA Z ( talk) 22:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
I refer to this edit of yours in which you deleted a diagram with the explanation "bad picture. cant[sic] read anything on that". Your editing of others' comments is vandalism that leaves the sentence "This diagram shows..." floating without meaning. The graph to which you object is currently in use in the article Thermal conductivity and you should put comments about it on the article's or graph's pages (comments have been requested there!). Blooteuth ( talk) 14:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Hallo Kharon,
kleiner Hinweis re [2]: Das Aprostroph-s kommt in der Pluralbildung im Englischen eigentlich nie vor. Und wenn man die besitzanzeigenden Form bildet, dann schlägt zumindest The Elements of Style konsequent "'s" vor [3]. Nix für ungut - habe ich früher auch reichlich falsch gemacht, und mache es immer noch gelegentlich, wenn ich nicht aufpasse! -- Stephan Schulz ( talk) 13:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Berlin#Recreation, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
L.R. Wormwood (
talk)
13:30, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
From now on, I'll attack you on your talk page, as I have been told: your posts are destitute of any insight or scientific thinking. They are useless and a waste of time, ours and yours (which apparently doesn't matter since you seem to have a lot of time).-- Doroletho ( talk) 16:03, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
and sorry that I initially deleted it. I had the page open possibly in two tabs. In some sequence I refreshed one of these tabs to see Graeme Bartlett earlier suggestion. However it happened I then got to think that this suggestion had been removed and, seeing that you had made a later edit, wrongly concluded that you had deleted that edit. My bad. Greg Kaye 09:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Kharon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Tigraan
Click here to contact me
10:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Howdy Kharon. In relation to the above mentioned ANI, I took the liberty of checking over your editing history. Of your last 500 edits alone, a vast majority of them are to ResDesk. It's possible you may be addicted to RefDesk & that might be a core of you current troubles. GoodDay ( talk) 17:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Subcategories in Wikipedia take precedence over their parent categories. See: Subcategorization.
"Apart from certain exceptions (i.e. non-diffusing subcategories, see below), an article should be categorised as low down in the category hierarchy as possible, without duplication in parent categories above it. In other words, a page or category should rarely be placed in both a category and a subcategory or parent category".
If you see a subcategory listed alongside its parent/parents, it is the parent that should be removed. Now stop playing games and do something productive. Dimadick ( talk) 07:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geremy.Hebert ( talk • contribs) 20:54, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I've restored the article here. ~ Riana ⁂ 13:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to
Neoliberalism, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with
Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the
reversion of clear-cut
vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. –
S. Rich (
talk)
21:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Just want to thank you for your awesome answer at the Reference Desk [1].
If you don't mind me asking, how did you managed to find the answer? Did you managed to Google it with the right keywords or was it thanks to professional experience? ECS LIVA Z ( talk) 22:17, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
I refer to this edit of yours in which you deleted a diagram with the explanation "bad picture. cant[sic] read anything on that". Your editing of others' comments is vandalism that leaves the sentence "This diagram shows..." floating without meaning. The graph to which you object is currently in use in the article Thermal conductivity and you should put comments about it on the article's or graph's pages (comments have been requested there!). Blooteuth ( talk) 14:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
Hallo Kharon,
kleiner Hinweis re [2]: Das Aprostroph-s kommt in der Pluralbildung im Englischen eigentlich nie vor. Und wenn man die besitzanzeigenden Form bildet, dann schlägt zumindest The Elements of Style konsequent "'s" vor [3]. Nix für ungut - habe ich früher auch reichlich falsch gemacht, und mache es immer noch gelegentlich, wenn ich nicht aufpasse! -- Stephan Schulz ( talk) 13:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Berlin#Recreation, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you.
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
L.R. Wormwood (
talk)
13:30, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
From now on, I'll attack you on your talk page, as I have been told: your posts are destitute of any insight or scientific thinking. They are useless and a waste of time, ours and yours (which apparently doesn't matter since you seem to have a lot of time).-- Doroletho ( talk) 16:03, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
and sorry that I initially deleted it. I had the page open possibly in two tabs. In some sequence I refreshed one of these tabs to see Graeme Bartlett earlier suggestion. However it happened I then got to think that this suggestion had been removed and, seeing that you had made a later edit, wrongly concluded that you had deleted that edit. My bad. Greg Kaye 09:59, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Kharon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
Tigraan
Click here to contact me
10:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Howdy Kharon. In relation to the above mentioned ANI, I took the liberty of checking over your editing history. Of your last 500 edits alone, a vast majority of them are to ResDesk. It's possible you may be addicted to RefDesk & that might be a core of you current troubles. GoodDay ( talk) 17:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Subcategories in Wikipedia take precedence over their parent categories. See: Subcategorization.
"Apart from certain exceptions (i.e. non-diffusing subcategories, see below), an article should be categorised as low down in the category hierarchy as possible, without duplication in parent categories above it. In other words, a page or category should rarely be placed in both a category and a subcategory or parent category".
If you see a subcategory listed alongside its parent/parents, it is the parent that should be removed. Now stop playing games and do something productive. Dimadick ( talk) 07:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)