hi khadim kia hal hay

Please use the talk page to discuss. Both matters that have been reverted have been seperately outlined there. They are both original research and cannot be added to the entry as such. Thanks. PelleSmith 14:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Please respond on the talk page. I'm sure you know that I'll violate 3RR now if I revert you again. The reference does not draw your conclusion. The conclusion is ORIGINAL RESEARCH. Don't send up bogus references please. Lets work on improving this article. PelleSmith 14:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Do not use sockpuppets in an attempt to edit war. Also, please familiarize yourself with the WP:3RR policy, you may be blocked for violating it. -- Strothra 14:21, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Please do not use personal attacks. and present arguements on talk page of the article.

Ok then I'm sure you support the request for a checkuser? PelleSmith 14:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Warning you against using sockpuppets is hardly a personal attack. Please see the policy at WP:NPA.-- Strothra 14:37, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Tell me how to proceed with checkuser?

What is the process for it?

If you are interested Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. But bare in mind if someone is a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet running a checkuser on themselves isn't exactly a smart thing to do. PelleSmith 14:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply

Also in this particular instance if you wanted to prove that that you are no sock or meatpuppet you would run your username against the IP that first made those edits minutes before you stepped in. PelleSmith 14:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Chakdara.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. — Strothra 14:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC) reply

A tag has been placed on PASHA, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:PASHA. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J Milburn 11:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on ICMS, by Father Goose, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ICMS is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ICMS, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate ICMS itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. -- Android Mouse Bot 2 22:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC) reply