Hi Katiedel0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Majun e Baqi ( talk) 20:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... Hello! How can one address a user who has monopolized a page by eliminating user edits that help to offer an objective counterbalance and has then locked the page to further edits? I tried to raise my concern for the bias presented on the page in favour of keeping sections that other users deemed appropriate, which were subsequently removed, and the user blocked me from participating in further discussion. Is there any recourse for bullying and monopolizing information on this site? Thank you! Katiedel0 ( talk) 20:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC) Hi Katiedel0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Majun e Baqi ( talk) 20:18, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
I have questions, see above Katiedel0 ( talk) 20:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, no idea how to tag you in response but I have not been addressed directly, I have been tagged in another user's thread and been accused of essentially trolling. I assumed i was prevented from discussing because i tried to click on the ongoing discussions which said user referenced as a place to debate these edits further and i was not allowed entry. My apologies for the assumption but none of this is transparent or user friendly to someone unfamiliar with it.
Thank you Katiedel0 ( talk) 21:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
I will add, it does not take require a full set of layers put objections to draw attraction to the over bias being presented. To call a critique of a philosophical movement a "conspiracy" is sufficiently demonstrative in and of itself. Example: Neitzche's criticism of Kant was a german weirdo's conspiracy theory to destroy mankind. Is that objective? Katiedel0 ( talk) 21:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Autocorrect but I'll leave that to you and my new friend to decipher x Katiedel0 ( talk) 21:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Hi Katiedel0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Majun e Baqi ( talk) 20:02, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
Please help me with... Hello! How can one address a user who has monopolized a page by eliminating user edits that help to offer an objective counterbalance and has then locked the page to further edits? I tried to raise my concern for the bias presented on the page in favour of keeping sections that other users deemed appropriate, which were subsequently removed, and the user blocked me from participating in further discussion. Is there any recourse for bullying and monopolizing information on this site? Thank you! Katiedel0 ( talk) 20:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC) Hi Katiedel0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! Majun e Baqi ( talk) 20:18, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
I have questions, see above Katiedel0 ( talk) 20:27, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, no idea how to tag you in response but I have not been addressed directly, I have been tagged in another user's thread and been accused of essentially trolling. I assumed i was prevented from discussing because i tried to click on the ongoing discussions which said user referenced as a place to debate these edits further and i was not allowed entry. My apologies for the assumption but none of this is transparent or user friendly to someone unfamiliar with it.
Thank you Katiedel0 ( talk) 21:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
I will add, it does not take require a full set of layers put objections to draw attraction to the over bias being presented. To call a critique of a philosophical movement a "conspiracy" is sufficiently demonstrative in and of itself. Example: Neitzche's criticism of Kant was a german weirdo's conspiracy theory to destroy mankind. Is that objective? Katiedel0 ( talk) 21:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Autocorrect but I'll leave that to you and my new friend to decipher x Katiedel0 ( talk) 21:17, 28 June 2020 (UTC)