Wolfgang42
Happy New Year!
When do you anticipate competing the editorial process on my submission: PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL ISSUES AFFECTING EXPEDITIONARY SPACE MISSIONS?
Kanasnick (aka Nick Kanas)
nick.kanas@ucsf.edu
Chris,
This is Kanasnick. I am new to Wikipedia and am having trouble understanding how to respond to your edit of my article. Please bear with me.
If you are asking about the copyright status of the images in the article, all of them were acquired from Wikimedia Commons, and the copyright information is there.
If you want me to include some suggested categories for the article, I went through the Wikipedia Category index, and the following terms seemed appropriate: popular culture, science and culture, maps, mental health, psychotherapy, positive psychology, psychiatry, astronomy, human spaceflight, interplanetary spaceflight, interstellar travel, astronaut, cultural studies, psychology, sociology.
Kanasnick ( talk) 15:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Kanasnick
[1] File upload wizard is for adding images and media. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 14:34, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Wolfgang42--Thank you for clarifying things with Chris and helping tidy up my article. I look forward to having it accepted.
Kanasnick (
talk)
05:13, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Kanasnick
I changed my article under "Psychological and Sociological Issues Affecting Expeditionary Space Missions" in response to the editorial comments in the following ways:
1. The style is more encyclopedic, and subjective information has been deleted. 2. As a result, the article is shorter, and the title has been changed to reflect the content. 3. The references have been put in ref/ref format.
Kanasnick ( talk) 00:04, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Kanasnick
Welcome to Wikipedia, Kanasnick! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
N2e and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
helpme}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! N2e ( talk) 20:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
N2e ( talk) 22:24, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
RESPONSE TO YOUR RESPONSE
Thank you for your response to my submission. I have found this to be a very frustrating experience. I have written a review paper summarizing the research from my lab and others on psychological issues in space. I keep getting accused of writing an essay, yet the last two versions of my article are fact and review based, not opinion based, with ample use of references to papers and books. Apparently this type of review (which is common in scientific journals and books) is not acceptable to some of the Wikipedia editors. So, this is where things stand at the moment. Kanasnick ( talk) 21:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Kanasnick
Thank you for your response to my submission. I have found this to be a very frustrating experience. I have written a review paper summarizing the research from my lab and others on psychological issues in space. I keep getting accused of writing an essay, yet the last two versions of my manuscript are fact and review based, not opinion based, with ample use of references to papers and books. Apparently this type of review (which is common in scientific journals and books) is not acceptable to some of the Wikipedia editors, even though I have read similar accepted reviews in Wikipedia. An earlier version of my manuscript had some opinion, but this was deleted in the last two versions. However, I feel this submisson has been typecast somehow and that the changes have not been appreciated. I was encouraged to write this review by NASA, but it has been so frustrating and time consuming that I am thinking of submitting it to a journal instead. Kanasnick ( talk) 21:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Kanasnick
<ref name=kanas2008> ... </ref>
then the same citation may be reused, without all the "... </ref>
metadata, simply by slightly changing the syntax to this <ref name=kanas2008/>
and then skipping the metadata entirely the second, third, etc. time the citation is used in the article. As an example, I have reused the kanas2008 citation once, just to illustrate. Take a look at the references section, and you will see that Reference has two superscripted latin letters (a, b, etc.) by it. Each of those superscripts are hotlinks to the part of the article where that citation was used. Done — After I never heard back from you on my comment of 20 Jan 2013, I did nothing on the draft article for a long time.
However, with the recent announcement of
501-day Mars flyby mission in the news, and also a recent noteworthy
asteroid visit to Earth, I decided to work on it on my own: I have now created an article on the topic you proposed. See it here:
Psychological and sociological issues affecting space travel
It still needs a lot of work, but now that it is out in the article mainspace, you'll find that many more editors will find, and at the margins, begin to improve the article. Out of all this, and over time, we can expect to see a good and useful article emerge. I look forward to your help in improving the article, but do recommend you look over WP:COI and self-disclose who you are and your authorship of many of the sources on the article Talk page before you do much editing. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 19:03, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Wolfgang42
Happy New Year!
When do you anticipate competing the editorial process on my submission: PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIOLOGICAL ISSUES AFFECTING EXPEDITIONARY SPACE MISSIONS?
Kanasnick (aka Nick Kanas)
nick.kanas@ucsf.edu
Chris,
This is Kanasnick. I am new to Wikipedia and am having trouble understanding how to respond to your edit of my article. Please bear with me.
If you are asking about the copyright status of the images in the article, all of them were acquired from Wikimedia Commons, and the copyright information is there.
If you want me to include some suggested categories for the article, I went through the Wikipedia Category index, and the following terms seemed appropriate: popular culture, science and culture, maps, mental health, psychotherapy, positive psychology, psychiatry, astronomy, human spaceflight, interplanetary spaceflight, interstellar travel, astronaut, cultural studies, psychology, sociology.
Kanasnick ( talk) 15:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)Kanasnick
[1] File upload wizard is for adding images and media. ChrisGualtieri ( talk) 14:34, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
Wolfgang42--Thank you for clarifying things with Chris and helping tidy up my article. I look forward to having it accepted.
Kanasnick (
talk)
05:13, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Kanasnick
I changed my article under "Psychological and Sociological Issues Affecting Expeditionary Space Missions" in response to the editorial comments in the following ways:
1. The style is more encyclopedic, and subjective information has been deleted. 2. As a result, the article is shorter, and the title has been changed to reflect the content. 3. The references have been put in ref/ref format.
Kanasnick ( talk) 00:04, 4 January 2013 (UTC)Kanasnick
Welcome to Wikipedia, Kanasnick! Thank you for
your contributions. I am
N2e and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on
my talk page. You can also check out
Wikipedia:Questions or type {{
helpme}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! N2e ( talk) 20:34, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
N2e ( talk) 22:24, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
RESPONSE TO YOUR RESPONSE
Thank you for your response to my submission. I have found this to be a very frustrating experience. I have written a review paper summarizing the research from my lab and others on psychological issues in space. I keep getting accused of writing an essay, yet the last two versions of my article are fact and review based, not opinion based, with ample use of references to papers and books. Apparently this type of review (which is common in scientific journals and books) is not acceptable to some of the Wikipedia editors. So, this is where things stand at the moment. Kanasnick ( talk) 21:25, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Kanasnick
Thank you for your response to my submission. I have found this to be a very frustrating experience. I have written a review paper summarizing the research from my lab and others on psychological issues in space. I keep getting accused of writing an essay, yet the last two versions of my manuscript are fact and review based, not opinion based, with ample use of references to papers and books. Apparently this type of review (which is common in scientific journals and books) is not acceptable to some of the Wikipedia editors, even though I have read similar accepted reviews in Wikipedia. An earlier version of my manuscript had some opinion, but this was deleted in the last two versions. However, I feel this submisson has been typecast somehow and that the changes have not been appreciated. I was encouraged to write this review by NASA, but it has been so frustrating and time consuming that I am thinking of submitting it to a journal instead. Kanasnick ( talk) 21:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)Kanasnick
<ref name=kanas2008> ... </ref>
then the same citation may be reused, without all the "... </ref>
metadata, simply by slightly changing the syntax to this <ref name=kanas2008/>
and then skipping the metadata entirely the second, third, etc. time the citation is used in the article. As an example, I have reused the kanas2008 citation once, just to illustrate. Take a look at the references section, and you will see that Reference has two superscripted latin letters (a, b, etc.) by it. Each of those superscripts are hotlinks to the part of the article where that citation was used. Done — After I never heard back from you on my comment of 20 Jan 2013, I did nothing on the draft article for a long time.
However, with the recent announcement of
501-day Mars flyby mission in the news, and also a recent noteworthy
asteroid visit to Earth, I decided to work on it on my own: I have now created an article on the topic you proposed. See it here:
Psychological and sociological issues affecting space travel
It still needs a lot of work, but now that it is out in the article mainspace, you'll find that many more editors will find, and at the margins, begin to improve the article. Out of all this, and over time, we can expect to see a good and useful article emerge. I look forward to your help in improving the article, but do recommend you look over WP:COI and self-disclose who you are and your authorship of many of the sources on the article Talk page before you do much editing. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 19:03, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)