You might pay attention to ANI and make sure this is addressed. You might also contact User:Nathan_Johnson, who 'closed' the rfc, and help him understand the unanticipated consequences of his words. -- HectorMoffet ( talk) 19:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Ankh. Morpork 21:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Kabulbuddha! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot ( talk) 01:21, 2 November 2012 (UTC) |
Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe, citing a tabloid citing a private letter, is not a reliable source for something that would have many sources if it were true. Pilger's claims did not hold up in court. I've tagged the source on the grounds that it is not a historical book by a Cambodian scholar. Nic Dunlop actually is such a scholar, so please replace Operation Gladio with his book. TheTimesAreAChanging ( talk) 01:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Salvio
Let's talk about it!
13:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC) |
Kabulbuddha ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am unsure what has happened here, I have been editing in good faith and used wikipedia dispute resolutions in my dealings here and now I am being accused of being someone else and have been blocked. Not much else I can say but it is surely unfair but if that is how it works here then so be it. Kabulbuddha ( talk) 14:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have already been confirmed by another CheckUser that you are a sockpuppet of Zrdragon12. Unless you're going to give a compelling reason why you should be unblocked, then your talk page and email access will also be revoked. Elockid ( Talk) 15:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Kabulbuddha ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your check user has not identified me as anyone else, my IP address is not used by anyone else, your assumptions are wrong but if that is how you work here then so be it,no skin off my nose.I have better things to do than mess around with your BS. This is not a request to be unblocked, I would not come back here if you paid me. Kabulbuddha ( talk) 15:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Fine, then. Please don't use the unblock request template for supposedly final rants like this. — Daniel Case ( talk) 15:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You might pay attention to ANI and make sure this is addressed. You might also contact User:Nathan_Johnson, who 'closed' the rfc, and help him understand the unanticipated consequences of his words. -- HectorMoffet ( talk) 19:02, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Ankh. Morpork 21:57, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Kabulbuddha! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree ( I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot ( talk) 01:21, 2 November 2012 (UTC) |
Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe, citing a tabloid citing a private letter, is not a reliable source for something that would have many sources if it were true. Pilger's claims did not hold up in court. I've tagged the source on the grounds that it is not a historical book by a Cambodian scholar. Nic Dunlop actually is such a scholar, so please replace Operation Gladio with his book. TheTimesAreAChanging ( talk) 01:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This account has been
blocked indefinitely as a
sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are
allowed, but using them for
illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may
appeal this block by adding the text {{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Salvio
Let's talk about it!
13:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC) |
Kabulbuddha ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am unsure what has happened here, I have been editing in good faith and used wikipedia dispute resolutions in my dealings here and now I am being accused of being someone else and have been blocked. Not much else I can say but it is surely unfair but if that is how it works here then so be it. Kabulbuddha ( talk) 14:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have already been confirmed by another CheckUser that you are a sockpuppet of Zrdragon12. Unless you're going to give a compelling reason why you should be unblocked, then your talk page and email access will also be revoked. Elockid ( Talk) 15:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Kabulbuddha ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your check user has not identified me as anyone else, my IP address is not used by anyone else, your assumptions are wrong but if that is how you work here then so be it,no skin off my nose.I have better things to do than mess around with your BS. This is not a request to be unblocked, I would not come back here if you paid me. Kabulbuddha ( talk) 15:31, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Fine, then. Please don't use the unblock request template for supposedly final rants like this. — Daniel Case ( talk) 15:59, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.