Hi. I'm asking you to delete this subpage:
User:K.e.coffman/My_allegedly_problematic_behaviour with {{
Db-u1}}
.
WP:POLEMIC states that: Users should generally not maintain in public view negative information related to others without very good reason. Negative evidence, laundry lists of wrongs, collations of diffs and criticisms related to problems, etc., should be removed, blanked, or kept privately (i.e., not on the wiki) if they will not be imminently used, and the same once no longer needed.
Please see a recent MfD about a similar subpage: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MrX/w. In it, it was decided that the userpage can stay only for a duration needed for gathering evidence. Since yours has existed for months and you did not use any of it in the ArbCom case, it's not permitted by the user page policy in my view. If you want to keep the page, you could re-create it and remove mentions of the users and diffs. Otherwise, a MfD discussion is probably needed. Regards, -- Pudeo ( talk) 13:33, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
"Comparison with MrX's case is unwarranted... There is no apparent grudge"Nice. @ JFG. - Mr X 🖋 16:18, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
"...There is no apparent grudge"Yes, that is a big difference. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 18:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
The page User:K.e.coffman/My allegedly problematic behaviour has not been updated in over a year & no one else expressed concerns. I prefer to keep this page. Separately, Arbcom didn't seem too interested in my user pages either. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
I nominated it for deletion here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:K.e.coffman/My allegedly problematic behaviour. Regards, -- Pudeo ( talk) 14:20, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Please self-revert. There is a discussion taking place on the content and it is the norm to not revert content being challenged/discussed while discussion re: inclusion is still taking place. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 18:15, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
WP:JERK and WP:BATTLE/WP:POKEdoes not sound very WP:CIVIL to me. And OR cited to Rush Limbaugh -- you considered that an appropriate addition to the article?
My post re: WP:JERK wasn't me calling you a jerk. Some questions,
"neither is civil"If you say so. I happen to disagree because I know what the essay says in total and I know what my intention was. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 22:05, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
You reverted my response. That's... interesting. I thought we were having a discussion that was going to lead to some understanding. Now I'm sadly starting to see you in a different light. Yikes. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 22:24, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
HH88 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
I remember that you deal with some of this issue of Neo Nazi editors. I take this username as clearly meaning "Heil Hitler". The user's edit history confirms interest in this topic. It is well known that 88 is a Neo Nazi code for HH as in Heil Hitler. Perhaps you could keep an eye on this situation. I tried to report this to administrators but failed to convey how clearly this is a troll or disruptive name. I will take this to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names if I don't forget after giving this individual "time to respond". —DIYeditor ( talk) 03:56, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
It is the back of the T-shirt that is most offensive. https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--Tvu1Rryn--/c_scale,f_auto,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/lth3ml2ohwry5jiim52z.jpg
From source: https://splinternews.com/portland-police-criticized-for-charging-counterproteste-1828115880
2601:601:1900:E990:1831:904B:A04F:28BB ( talk) 06:46, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blockstack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blockstack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 19:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
FYI, I translated Vernichtungskrieg into English. My German isn't that great and it was machine assisted, so feel free to ruthlessly improve if you desire. ☆ Bri ( talk) 18:51, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Masha Bruskina, a seventeen-year-old girl who participated in non-violent resistance, was apparently a "Jewish resistance fighter", a "Soviet partisan", and a "Belarusian partisan" [4] Catrìona ( talk) 01:40, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Weasel words in the bio of a convicted Nazi war criminal: his "involvement" in the murder of 335 civilians "while serving in Italy" "led to allegations of war crimes" [5] in Karl Hass Catrìona ( talk) 04:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
The tireless work you have done on removing and challenging the various shades of Nazi apologism, as well as campaigning to bring it to attention in various spheres, continues to make Wikipedia a better place. Thank you for all that you have done, and all that you do. — Sasuke Sarutobi ( push to talk) 13:55, 12 August 2018 (UTC) |
Did you mean to have a "not" in your !vote here? XOR'easter ( talk) 15:33, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I'll try this way. Musdan77 ( talk) 00:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for all the work you've done on removing historical fiction from Luftwaffe biographies. I recently thought of a possible solution for the claims table controversy: moving the claims table and explanation to a separate article, for example List of Erich Hartmann's aerial victory claims. This would be analagous to filmographies and discographies, which are often listed in a separate article from an entertainers biography. A short list of bios which would be suitable for this treatment include Erich Hartmann, Gunther Rall, Otto Kittel, Gerhard Barkhorn, Hans-Joachim Marseille, Johnnie Johnson and Pat Pattle. Since I know you have been active in this area, I wanted to solicit your feedback before proceeding, as well as not knowing the appropriate channel to start a general RFC. Catrìona ( talk) 17:04, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi. I'm asking you to delete this subpage:
User:K.e.coffman/My_allegedly_problematic_behaviour with {{
Db-u1}}
.
WP:POLEMIC states that: Users should generally not maintain in public view negative information related to others without very good reason. Negative evidence, laundry lists of wrongs, collations of diffs and criticisms related to problems, etc., should be removed, blanked, or kept privately (i.e., not on the wiki) if they will not be imminently used, and the same once no longer needed.
Please see a recent MfD about a similar subpage: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MrX/w. In it, it was decided that the userpage can stay only for a duration needed for gathering evidence. Since yours has existed for months and you did not use any of it in the ArbCom case, it's not permitted by the user page policy in my view. If you want to keep the page, you could re-create it and remove mentions of the users and diffs. Otherwise, a MfD discussion is probably needed. Regards, -- Pudeo ( talk) 13:33, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
"Comparison with MrX's case is unwarranted... There is no apparent grudge"Nice. @ JFG. - Mr X 🖋 16:18, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
"...There is no apparent grudge"Yes, that is a big difference. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 18:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
The page User:K.e.coffman/My allegedly problematic behaviour has not been updated in over a year & no one else expressed concerns. I prefer to keep this page. Separately, Arbcom didn't seem too interested in my user pages either. K.e.coffman ( talk) 00:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
I nominated it for deletion here: Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:K.e.coffman/My allegedly problematic behaviour. Regards, -- Pudeo ( talk) 14:20, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Please self-revert. There is a discussion taking place on the content and it is the norm to not revert content being challenged/discussed while discussion re: inclusion is still taking place. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 18:15, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
WP:JERK and WP:BATTLE/WP:POKEdoes not sound very WP:CIVIL to me. And OR cited to Rush Limbaugh -- you considered that an appropriate addition to the article?
My post re: WP:JERK wasn't me calling you a jerk. Some questions,
"neither is civil"If you say so. I happen to disagree because I know what the essay says in total and I know what my intention was. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 22:05, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
You reverted my response. That's... interesting. I thought we were having a discussion that was going to lead to some understanding. Now I'm sadly starting to see you in a different light. Yikes. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 22:24, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
HH88 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
I remember that you deal with some of this issue of Neo Nazi editors. I take this username as clearly meaning "Heil Hitler". The user's edit history confirms interest in this topic. It is well known that 88 is a Neo Nazi code for HH as in Heil Hitler. Perhaps you could keep an eye on this situation. I tried to report this to administrators but failed to convey how clearly this is a troll or disruptive name. I will take this to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User names if I don't forget after giving this individual "time to respond". —DIYeditor ( talk) 03:56, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
It is the back of the T-shirt that is most offensive. https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--Tvu1Rryn--/c_scale,f_auto,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/lth3ml2ohwry5jiim52z.jpg
From source: https://splinternews.com/portland-police-criticized-for-charging-counterproteste-1828115880
2601:601:1900:E990:1831:904B:A04F:28BB ( talk) 06:46, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blockstack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blockstack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jtbobwaysf ( talk) 19:10, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
FYI, I translated Vernichtungskrieg into English. My German isn't that great and it was machine assisted, so feel free to ruthlessly improve if you desire. ☆ Bri ( talk) 18:51, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Masha Bruskina, a seventeen-year-old girl who participated in non-violent resistance, was apparently a "Jewish resistance fighter", a "Soviet partisan", and a "Belarusian partisan" [4] Catrìona ( talk) 01:40, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Weasel words in the bio of a convicted Nazi war criminal: his "involvement" in the murder of 335 civilians "while serving in Italy" "led to allegations of war crimes" [5] in Karl Hass Catrìona ( talk) 04:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
The tireless work you have done on removing and challenging the various shades of Nazi apologism, as well as campaigning to bring it to attention in various spheres, continues to make Wikipedia a better place. Thank you for all that you have done, and all that you do. — Sasuke Sarutobi ( push to talk) 13:55, 12 August 2018 (UTC) |
Did you mean to have a "not" in your !vote here? XOR'easter ( talk) 15:33, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
I'll try this way. Musdan77 ( talk) 00:33, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Thanks for all the work you've done on removing historical fiction from Luftwaffe biographies. I recently thought of a possible solution for the claims table controversy: moving the claims table and explanation to a separate article, for example List of Erich Hartmann's aerial victory claims. This would be analagous to filmographies and discographies, which are often listed in a separate article from an entertainers biography. A short list of bios which would be suitable for this treatment include Erich Hartmann, Gunther Rall, Otto Kittel, Gerhard Barkhorn, Hans-Joachim Marseille, Johnnie Johnson and Pat Pattle. Since I know you have been active in this area, I wanted to solicit your feedback before proceeding, as well as not knowing the appropriate channel to start a general RFC. Catrìona ( talk) 17:04, 3 August 2018 (UTC)