![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I noticed that you are using the Talk page to various articles as a forum for your personal opinion with no contribution and not related to the article at all. It is a disgrace for a admin that is active here for >15 years to do this. Please improve your behaviour, Thank you. On a side note: Think about if you should moderate articles where you are obviously biased in the first place, your history is full of very questionable decisions. Maybe ask other admins who are not biased to handle this, you are just human after all and your political bias is shining through -- Judahclipt ( talk) 18:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC) — Judahclipt ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Astonishing that someone who is 15y admin would make such political blog posts and surprising that no other admin who is enforcing WP:NOTFORUM takes action and that a new user has to remind you. btw. im fine if you want one of your friends to check my IP, if this helps you feel save and avoids possible conspiracy theories from you or Doug, so be it. Sorry if you feel attacked by getting reminded about basic wikipedia rules. -- Judahclipt ( talk) 20:24, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Trump knows that if he loses, he's screwed. Jail or not, he's bankrupt. Republicans are distancing themselves. Barr has reached a point where even he won't go further (there is a qualitative difference between nobbling a prosecution as a favor and starting one for political advantage). The only people still loyal to him are the original Trump campaign clown bus, less the ones who have gone to jail.,
I must ask you, why didn’t you back me up at the noticeboard? You said you’d support letting me edit talk pages. That may have been my only chance for weeks to get any editing privileges back. I would just like you to explain to me why you did not back me up (and openly oppose) when I went for an unban. Maybe it’s something we can work out so that next time I try you will advocate for me and not against me. Thanks Lima Bean Farmer ( talk) 07:46, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Would you support this? Lima Bean Farmer ( talk) 19:46, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | |
Dona nobis pacem
![]() |
music today, - enchanting, said a critic about the Mendelssohn that I heard on 3 October, - this video is older, and the YT in the article comes with a Bach encore as she played for us. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
16 October memories less musical, moar black&white, a great conductor, a great editor, both appreciated too little -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:03, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
I added a bit more background behind the apples. On ANI, you said "needs to stop" and I asked "how?" -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Am I misinterpreting the diffs or did Atsme modify Bus stop's comment in the course of this diff to remove wording which Bus stop then re-inserted in this subsequent response to you? Perhaps telepathy or extraterrestrials are involved. -- ‿Ꞅtruthious 𝔹andersnatch ͡ |℡| 11:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
obvious beyond a reasonable doubt that sockpuppetry is occurringas proposed in the WP:SIGNS of Sockpuppetry essay.I'm glad it turned out to be innocuous, though it would have been kind of cool if one of the supernatural phenomena explanations turned out to be real. -- ‿Ꞅtruthious 𝔹andersnatch ͡ |℡| 00:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
I replied to your comment there a while ago. I am not sure if you watch it. Graywalls ( talk) 06:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
About [4], please consider WP:PROXYING, regardless of whether or not you personally agreed with the community's decision. -- Tryptofish ( talk) 17:14, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
You coming to this page to stir up trouble with terms like "fash" and "neo-nazi apologist" is not productive or helpful. Wikieditor19920 ( talk) 09:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Guy, I have mentioned you in an AE report here: [5]. I'm not requesting that action be taken against you, but I have suggested that given your views expressed at Talk:Julian Assange, you probably shouldn't be acting as an admin there. - Darouet ( talk) 14:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
For your excellent, calm rebuttal of the Hunter Biden conspiracy theory at Jimbo's talk page. It's much appreciated. Jr8825 • Talk 00:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC) |
Is there a way to run a check on whose been inserting certain links like the "COI" link to evaluate if it's worthy of reporting? It looks like the COI bot link is populated only after the links have been reported Graywalls ( talk) 01:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
In Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory#Talk page mention you wrote « it's unclear to me how, for example, something like the blood libel could be transformed by being mainstreamed by grifters into anything other than an antisemitic conspiracy theory. » FYI, according to Richard Landes, Nidra Poller and some other proponents of the Muhammad al-Durrah conspiracy theory, claiming that the israeli army kill children is blood libel. [6] Visite fortuitement prolongée ( talk) 10:59, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Am I mistaken, or does this history show a sole focus on pushing BLP violating smears and content? -- Valjean ( talk) 15:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi JzG, I just wanted to let you know I removed two comments that were very much WP:NOTFORUM material from a discussion you closed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk%3AHunter_Biden&type=revision&diff=985389328&oldid=985387677
I also don't think the accounts they came from, User:Krischik and User:Bjorklund21 make a lot of sense, especially the Krischik one. IHateAccounts ( talk) 17:57, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
What do you think of this edit [7] (and several similar edits in the user's history)?
I personally don't like the use of "Controversies" when there really is no controversy -- when every source says the subject of the page is bad and zero sources say that it is good. But I am not sure about "public behavior"; it sort of implies something done in public as opposed to, say, on twitter.
The only replacements that I have come up with all involve the word "craptacular"... -- Guy Macon ( talk) 04:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi JzG,
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Hunter_Biden&diff=prev&oldid=985443845 seems to be a violation of the policy especially since the accusation has been shown false by Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/ukraine-corruption-burisma-biden-trump-giuliani/2020/06/14/9ca28342-adb1-11ea-a43b-be9f6494a87d_story.html IHateAccounts ( talk) 02:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
@ JzG: this seems to be a violation of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons too: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Cpurick&diff=prev&oldid=985543697 IHateAccounts ( talk) 22:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
George T. Conway III closes with: "I believe that if the president somehow does lose, he might 'have to leave the country.' I believe he probably should." -- Valjean ( talk) 16:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi JzG, I just thought I should let you know about /info/en/?search=Talk:Killings_of_Aaron_Danielson_and_Michael_Reinoehl#Anti-fascist. He's ranting about David Ray Griffin on that page now. IHateAccounts ( talk) 14:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
... you archive fast. Please explain what the idea is behind redirecting talk pages to user pages? (I nominated articles by banned and blocked users for GA, DYK?) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:35, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
You made a comment about B2C on 30 Sept/1st Oct (sorry not got exact diff) which led to an attempt to rewrite WP:NPA. I have only just noticed the drama and don't intend to follow it but hope that what I have said on the NPA talk page does not misrepresent you or Calton the other admin/editor. Apologies if what I think you and Calton said was my misreading. In ictu oculi ( talk) 09:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I noticed that you are using the Talk page to various articles as a forum for your personal opinion with no contribution and not related to the article at all. It is a disgrace for a admin that is active here for >15 years to do this. Please improve your behaviour, Thank you. On a side note: Think about if you should moderate articles where you are obviously biased in the first place, your history is full of very questionable decisions. Maybe ask other admins who are not biased to handle this, you are just human after all and your political bias is shining through -- Judahclipt ( talk) 18:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC) — Judahclipt ( talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Astonishing that someone who is 15y admin would make such political blog posts and surprising that no other admin who is enforcing WP:NOTFORUM takes action and that a new user has to remind you. btw. im fine if you want one of your friends to check my IP, if this helps you feel save and avoids possible conspiracy theories from you or Doug, so be it. Sorry if you feel attacked by getting reminded about basic wikipedia rules. -- Judahclipt ( talk) 20:24, 17 October 2020 (UTC)Trump knows that if he loses, he's screwed. Jail or not, he's bankrupt. Republicans are distancing themselves. Barr has reached a point where even he won't go further (there is a qualitative difference between nobbling a prosecution as a favor and starting one for political advantage). The only people still loyal to him are the original Trump campaign clown bus, less the ones who have gone to jail.,
I must ask you, why didn’t you back me up at the noticeboard? You said you’d support letting me edit talk pages. That may have been my only chance for weeks to get any editing privileges back. I would just like you to explain to me why you did not back me up (and openly oppose) when I went for an unban. Maybe it’s something we can work out so that next time I try you will advocate for me and not against me. Thanks Lima Bean Farmer ( talk) 07:46, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Would you support this? Lima Bean Farmer ( talk) 19:46, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | |
Dona nobis pacem
![]() |
music today, - enchanting, said a critic about the Mendelssohn that I heard on 3 October, - this video is older, and the YT in the article comes with a Bach encore as she played for us. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:55, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
16 October memories less musical, moar black&white, a great conductor, a great editor, both appreciated too little -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 20:03, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
I added a bit more background behind the apples. On ANI, you said "needs to stop" and I asked "how?" -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 21:20, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
Am I misinterpreting the diffs or did Atsme modify Bus stop's comment in the course of this diff to remove wording which Bus stop then re-inserted in this subsequent response to you? Perhaps telepathy or extraterrestrials are involved. -- ‿Ꞅtruthious 𝔹andersnatch ͡ |℡| 11:21, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
obvious beyond a reasonable doubt that sockpuppetry is occurringas proposed in the WP:SIGNS of Sockpuppetry essay.I'm glad it turned out to be innocuous, though it would have been kind of cool if one of the supernatural phenomena explanations turned out to be real. -- ‿Ꞅtruthious 𝔹andersnatch ͡ |℡| 00:05, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
I replied to your comment there a while ago. I am not sure if you watch it. Graywalls ( talk) 06:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
About [4], please consider WP:PROXYING, regardless of whether or not you personally agreed with the community's decision. -- Tryptofish ( talk) 17:14, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
You coming to this page to stir up trouble with terms like "fash" and "neo-nazi apologist" is not productive or helpful. Wikieditor19920 ( talk) 09:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi Guy, I have mentioned you in an AE report here: [5]. I'm not requesting that action be taken against you, but I have suggested that given your views expressed at Talk:Julian Assange, you probably shouldn't be acting as an admin there. - Darouet ( talk) 14:57, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() |
The Civility Barnstar |
For your excellent, calm rebuttal of the Hunter Biden conspiracy theory at Jimbo's talk page. It's much appreciated. Jr8825 • Talk 00:43, 24 October 2020 (UTC) |
Is there a way to run a check on whose been inserting certain links like the "COI" link to evaluate if it's worthy of reporting? It looks like the COI bot link is populated only after the links have been reported Graywalls ( talk) 01:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Hello,
In Talk:Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory#Talk page mention you wrote « it's unclear to me how, for example, something like the blood libel could be transformed by being mainstreamed by grifters into anything other than an antisemitic conspiracy theory. » FYI, according to Richard Landes, Nidra Poller and some other proponents of the Muhammad al-Durrah conspiracy theory, claiming that the israeli army kill children is blood libel. [6] Visite fortuitement prolongée ( talk) 10:59, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Am I mistaken, or does this history show a sole focus on pushing BLP violating smears and content? -- Valjean ( talk) 15:52, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi JzG, I just wanted to let you know I removed two comments that were very much WP:NOTFORUM material from a discussion you closed here: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk%3AHunter_Biden&type=revision&diff=985389328&oldid=985387677
I also don't think the accounts they came from, User:Krischik and User:Bjorklund21 make a lot of sense, especially the Krischik one. IHateAccounts ( talk) 17:57, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
What do you think of this edit [7] (and several similar edits in the user's history)?
I personally don't like the use of "Controversies" when there really is no controversy -- when every source says the subject of the page is bad and zero sources say that it is good. But I am not sure about "public behavior"; it sort of implies something done in public as opposed to, say, on twitter.
The only replacements that I have come up with all involve the word "craptacular"... -- Guy Macon ( talk) 04:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi JzG,
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Talk:Hunter_Biden&diff=prev&oldid=985443845 seems to be a violation of the policy especially since the accusation has been shown false by Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/ukraine-corruption-burisma-biden-trump-giuliani/2020/06/14/9ca28342-adb1-11ea-a43b-be9f6494a87d_story.html IHateAccounts ( talk) 02:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
@ JzG: this seems to be a violation of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons too: https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Cpurick&diff=prev&oldid=985543697 IHateAccounts ( talk) 22:48, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
George T. Conway III closes with: "I believe that if the president somehow does lose, he might 'have to leave the country.' I believe he probably should." -- Valjean ( talk) 16:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi JzG, I just thought I should let you know about /info/en/?search=Talk:Killings_of_Aaron_Danielson_and_Michael_Reinoehl#Anti-fascist. He's ranting about David Ray Griffin on that page now. IHateAccounts ( talk) 14:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
... you archive fast. Please explain what the idea is behind redirecting talk pages to user pages? (I nominated articles by banned and blocked users for GA, DYK?) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:35, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
You made a comment about B2C on 30 Sept/1st Oct (sorry not got exact diff) which led to an attempt to rewrite WP:NPA. I have only just noticed the drama and don't intend to follow it but hope that what I have said on the NPA talk page does not misrepresent you or Calton the other admin/editor. Apologies if what I think you and Calton said was my misreading. In ictu oculi ( talk) 09:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)