Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Liaison psychiatry, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Liaison psychiatry was changed by Justinmarley (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2008-06-29T11:28:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 11:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to
Liaison psychiatry, but we regretfully cannot accept
original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk ·
contribs)
08:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
What is your interest in Liaison Psychiatry? A cursory examination of the literature would reveal the importance of the included texts Justinmarley ( talk) 05:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)justinmarley
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to
Talk:Liaison psychiatry has been
reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a
warning or blocking template. Please use
the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk ·
contribs)
10:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did to
Liaison psychiatry, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk ·
contribs)
10:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Liaison psychiatry. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. You seriously need to just stop and actually take some time to learn editing basics. Also, you do not
WP:OWN the article, and you need to realize that others will edit, and correct, anything you add to articles, especially when you continue violating basic editing guidelines and the
manual of style that applies to all articles. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk ·
contribs)
10:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
|
Please, use these links to help learn about editing. Also, note that posting the same topic over and over in the editor request board will not get you "help" any faster, but rather will annoy others and will likely result in your requests being ignored completely. Keep in mind that while it may be daytime or early evening for you, its very early in the morning for many editors, and a holiday weekend, so not too many people are around right now to answer questions. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk ·
contribs)
11:35, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
11:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
You have been accused of
sockpuppetry. Please refer to
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Justinmarley for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk ·
contribs)
17:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
This allegation is consistent with a series of what I perceive to be other hostile behaviours by Collectonian and I have reported this appropriately Justinmarley ( talk) 21:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)justinmarley
-- Addbot ( talk) 00:12, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Maen. K. A. ( talk) 23:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.
Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Liaison psychiatry, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Liaison psychiatry was changed by Justinmarley (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2008-06-29T11:28:09+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot ( talk) 11:28, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to
Liaison psychiatry, but we regretfully cannot accept
original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk ·
contribs)
08:55, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
What is your interest in Liaison Psychiatry? A cursory examination of the literature would reveal the importance of the included texts Justinmarley ( talk) 05:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)justinmarley
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to
Talk:Liaison psychiatry has been
reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a
warning or blocking template. Please use
the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our
introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk ·
contribs)
10:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did to
Liaison psychiatry, you will be
blocked from editing Wikipedia. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk ·
contribs)
10:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Liaison psychiatry. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution. You seriously need to just stop and actually take some time to learn editing basics. Also, you do not
WP:OWN the article, and you need to realize that others will edit, and correct, anything you add to articles, especially when you continue violating basic editing guidelines and the
manual of style that applies to all articles. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk ·
contribs)
10:59, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
|
Please, use these links to help learn about editing. Also, note that posting the same topic over and over in the editor request board will not get you "help" any faster, but rather will annoy others and will likely result in your requests being ignored completely. Keep in mind that while it may be daytime or early evening for you, its very early in the morning for many editors, and a holiday weekend, so not too many people are around right now to answer questions. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk ·
contribs)
11:35, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should
sign your posts by typing four
tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --
SineBot (
talk)
11:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
You have been accused of
sockpuppetry. Please refer to
Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Justinmarley for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk ·
contribs)
17:46, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
This allegation is consistent with a series of what I perceive to be other hostile behaviours by Collectonian and I have reported this appropriately Justinmarley ( talk) 21:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)justinmarley
-- Addbot ( talk) 00:12, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Maen. K. A. ( talk) 23:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration.
Cheers, Ocaasi t | c 20:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)