Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency (2020 Q4–January 2021), did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not delete citations, while some things (such as content of an article) may be rendered incorrect with time, they can still be useful. Thanks!
Brownlowe.2 (
talk)
01:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
I wanted to let you know I manually undid some of your edit here: [1] at the 2024 United States presidential election article where you placed Donald Trump first in the list of potential candidates from the Republican Party. According to WP:NPOV, they should be listed alphabetically to ensure impartiality. Thanks, David O. Johnson ( talk) 03:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Labour Party (UK). Your edits could be interpreted as
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your
sandbox. Thank you. —
Czello
14:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Not incorrect. Labour are not "centre-left" in the slightest. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 20:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
The claim of "centre-left" wasn't sourced either though... JugulatorJJ ( talk) 21:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
I've been editing Wikipedia for over decade. Don't try and BS me fake rules you just made up. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 21:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material . . . The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus . . . The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article.The fact that there are innumerable citations later in the article calling Labour centre-left, and given that this is an uncontroversial statement, we didn't need them in the lead. And besides, even if it wasn't sourced, it doesn't somehow make it right for you to insert your own opinion into the article. An editor "for over a decade" should know this. — Czello 21:56, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for adding a source to your changes on Static X. No one is trying to "keep up a facade" or anything silly like that. We just need to add sources when we add content to Wikipedia, and no one, except for you on your second attempt, bothered to add a source. I'm not entirely sure why you identify as an editor for over a decade, but didn't bother to add a source when you added content, but please do it on the first time around moving forward. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 23:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mayor of London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leader of the Conservative Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi it's now been fixed. I meant for it to link to the UK page. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 18:08, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Please explain your contributions using a descriptive
edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at
Exodus (American band), may be confused with
vandalism. And stop adding
Let There Be Blood to the discography section. It IS a compilation album, not a studio album.
MetalDiablo666 (
talk)
00:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
No it's a studio album. It is 100% original recording, recorded at the same time and not previously released. How does that fit the definition of a "compilation"? Everything on it is new. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 13:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in
subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, you may be
blocked from editing. Also, stop removing the "and Ellefson's second departure" part in that section about their new album.
MetalDiablo666 (
talk)
21:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Not vandalism I stated facts. You haven't presented a valid counter-argument. You baselessly accused me of vandalism. Please refrain from doing so. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 02:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
I don't care if you "told me to stop". Wikipedia doesn't belong to you. Anyone is allowed to edit it not just you. I removed it because it was inconsistent with the rest of the headings only being album titles and also there's barely a sentence regarding the matter in the section so why does it warrant being part of the heading when not even 1% of the section covers the topic? Nah I think i'll report you. Making demands and threats acting like you own the site or something. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 16:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bailey Jay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presenter.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
First Lady of the United States. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Drmies (
talk)
16:09, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
It's literally already mentioned and sourced in the top part of the article that the First Lady doesn't have to be the president's wife. Why must the same fact be sourced twice? JugulatorJJ ( talk) 17:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Joe Biden, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding the VPOTUS seal on the template. Now that Biden is POTUS, that's the emblem he gets - everything else is just clutter. Vjmlhds 18:51, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Stop Funding Hate. —
Czello
18:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Megadeth. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Just because it's known that Megadeth has a new bassist, but his identity hasn't been confirmed yet, doesn't mean it's necessary to be added on Wikipedia. Be patient. Patience is a virtue.
MetalDiablo666 (
talk)
Why are the rules different for other bands such as Slipknot? "Tortilla Man" was listed in the members section despite his identity not being known. Why is it one rule for one band and one rule for another? JugulatorJJ ( talk) 00:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Metallica, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:48, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Template:Metallica.
4TheWynne
(talk •
contribs)
01:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
01:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Clint Eastwood filmography. @
Daniel Case: Please take a look at this user's recent activity. They have continued to vandalize articles, going against talk page discussions and MoS guidelines.
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk)
01:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Putting the correct film credit in a filmography is not vandalism. Please explain how I vandalised the page? User:Some Dude From North Carolina is a liar and should be banned for his vandalism and false reports. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 01:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
WP:Commonname doesn't apply to film credits. Like I said "Man With No Name" isn't even a name it's a claim he has no name but he's credited as and referred to as Blondie multiple times in the film. Like I said "Man With No Name" article can appear in the notes section as a see also but to say the character's actual name and credit must not appear on a FILMOGRAPHY is absolutely ridiculous. It doesn't matter if "critics" call him that. (I also challenge you on that false claim. Everyone knows he's called Blondie.) JugulatorJJ ( talk) 01:51, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
However, some topics have multiple names, and some names have multiple topics; this can lead to disagreement about which name should be used for a given article's title. Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used.Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 01:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Which is Blondie... JugulatorJJ ( talk) 01:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Because that's what they're called in the films duh.... JugulatorJJ ( talk) 02:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Actually is how they're credited. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 02:03, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
All names should be referred to as credited, or by common name supported by a reliable source.Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 02:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
02:06, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Hi, I manually reverted your edit here [2] that added LoMenzo as performing on the upcoming Megadeth album as LoMenzo will just be the touring bassist, not the studio bassist: [3]]
Thanks, David O. Johnson ( talk) 04:17, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Megadeth band members, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Template:Megadeth, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. A touring member and an official member aren't the same thing. The only time it's appropriate to restore
James LoMenzo to the current members list is WHEN and IF Megadeth makes a statement to confirm that he's an official member rather than just a touring member, so by all means, have some patience. As I've told you before, patience is a virtue.
MetalDiablo666 (
talk)
01:56, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
He's playing in the band. There is no separation method for current and touring members in templates so they go in the same active section. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 18:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Template:Megadeth. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Daniel Case, please look at this user's activity across the template, main article and members article – they are not listening. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
00:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)And please note ... the next time, should there be one, will be indefinite. Daniel Case ( talk) 00:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
No it is User:4TheWynne (It's "Win" by the way) who isn't listening but I suppose you can't expect much from a guy who can't even spell "Win". JugulatorJJ ( talk) 01:19, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Jugulator, you are seriously making me reconsider my decision to not block you indefinitely. I may not yet do that, but I'm a lot closer to cutting your access to this page off and extend the block thanks to that fireworks display above. If I see any more of it ... Daniel Case ( talk) 22:27, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Daniel Case ( talk) 01:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Alright. Would everyone please leave Jugulator alone and give him a half year to grow up? Daniel Case ( talk) 01:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Really, not making this indefinite is me being merciful. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Daniel Case: Hi, I just thought you'd like to know JugulatorJJ is clearly evading his block with the IP 92.234.204.74. Looking through their contributions is like a mirror. I'm sure you're aware JugulatorJJ regularly edited heavy metal artists' articles as well as articles relating to politics, like timelines of Joe Biden's presidency and so on. My tip-off was the IP editor returning to Template:Meat Loaf to make an almost identical edit to JugulatorJJ—trying to list a Ted Nugent album Meat Loaf contributed to as an album by Meat Loaf by extension. Also quite telling this IP editor started regularly editing in September, not long after Jugulator's block. Ss 112 13:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Timeline of the Donald Trump presidency (2020 Q4–January 2021), did not appear constructive and has been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not delete citations, while some things (such as content of an article) may be rendered incorrect with time, they can still be useful. Thanks!
Brownlowe.2 (
talk)
01:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi,
I wanted to let you know I manually undid some of your edit here: [1] at the 2024 United States presidential election article where you placed Donald Trump first in the list of potential candidates from the Republican Party. According to WP:NPOV, they should be listed alphabetically to ensure impartiality. Thanks, David O. Johnson ( talk) 03:25, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Labour Party (UK). Your edits could be interpreted as
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your
sandbox. Thank you. —
Czello
14:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Not incorrect. Labour are not "centre-left" in the slightest. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 20:10, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
The claim of "centre-left" wasn't sourced either though... JugulatorJJ ( talk) 21:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
I've been editing Wikipedia for over decade. Don't try and BS me fake rules you just made up. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 21:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Because the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material . . . The necessity for citations in a lead should be determined on a case-by-case basis by editorial consensus . . . The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article.The fact that there are innumerable citations later in the article calling Labour centre-left, and given that this is an uncontroversial statement, we didn't need them in the lead. And besides, even if it wasn't sourced, it doesn't somehow make it right for you to insert your own opinion into the article. An editor "for over a decade" should know this. — Czello 21:56, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Thank you for adding a source to your changes on Static X. No one is trying to "keep up a facade" or anything silly like that. We just need to add sources when we add content to Wikipedia, and no one, except for you on your second attempt, bothered to add a source. I'm not entirely sure why you identify as an editor for over a decade, but didn't bother to add a source when you added content, but please do it on the first time around moving forward. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 23:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mayor of London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leader of the Conservative Party. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi it's now been fixed. I meant for it to link to the UK page. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 18:08, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
Please explain your contributions using a descriptive
edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at
Exodus (American band), may be confused with
vandalism. And stop adding
Let There Be Blood to the discography section. It IS a compilation album, not a studio album.
MetalDiablo666 (
talk)
00:06, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
No it's a studio album. It is 100% original recording, recorded at the same time and not previously released. How does that fit the definition of a "compilation"? Everything on it is new. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 13:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to engage in
subtle vandalism by making unexplained changes to information, you may be
blocked from editing. Also, stop removing the "and Ellefson's second departure" part in that section about their new album.
MetalDiablo666 (
talk)
21:54, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Not vandalism I stated facts. You haven't presented a valid counter-argument. You baselessly accused me of vandalism. Please refrain from doing so. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 02:15, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
I don't care if you "told me to stop". Wikipedia doesn't belong to you. Anyone is allowed to edit it not just you. I removed it because it was inconsistent with the rest of the headings only being album titles and also there's barely a sentence regarding the matter in the section so why does it warrant being part of the heading when not even 1% of the section covers the topic? Nah I think i'll report you. Making demands and threats acting like you own the site or something. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 16:04, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bailey Jay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presenter.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
First Lady of the United States. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you.
Drmies (
talk)
16:09, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
It's literally already mentioned and sourced in the top part of the article that the First Lady doesn't have to be the president's wife. Why must the same fact be sourced twice? JugulatorJJ ( talk) 17:07, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Joe Biden, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop adding the VPOTUS seal on the template. Now that Biden is POTUS, that's the emblem he gets - everything else is just clutter. Vjmlhds 18:51, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Stop Funding Hate. —
Czello
18:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add
original research or
novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to
Megadeth. Please cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. Just because it's known that Megadeth has a new bassist, but his identity hasn't been confirmed yet, doesn't mean it's necessary to be added on Wikipedia. Be patient. Patience is a virtue.
MetalDiablo666 (
talk)
Why are the rules different for other bands such as Slipknot? "Tortilla Man" was listed in the members section despite his identity not being known. Why is it one rule for one band and one rule for another? JugulatorJJ ( talk) 00:13, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Metallica, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:48, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Template:Metallica.
4TheWynne
(talk •
contribs)
01:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
01:59, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Clint Eastwood filmography. @
Daniel Case: Please take a look at this user's recent activity. They have continued to vandalize articles, going against talk page discussions and MoS guidelines.
Some Dude From North Carolina (
talk)
01:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Putting the correct film credit in a filmography is not vandalism. Please explain how I vandalised the page? User:Some Dude From North Carolina is a liar and should be banned for his vandalism and false reports. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 01:43, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
WP:Commonname doesn't apply to film credits. Like I said "Man With No Name" isn't even a name it's a claim he has no name but he's credited as and referred to as Blondie multiple times in the film. Like I said "Man With No Name" article can appear in the notes section as a see also but to say the character's actual name and credit must not appear on a FILMOGRAPHY is absolutely ridiculous. It doesn't matter if "critics" call him that. (I also challenge you on that false claim. Everyone knows he's called Blondie.) JugulatorJJ ( talk) 01:51, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
However, some topics have multiple names, and some names have multiple topics; this can lead to disagreement about which name should be used for a given article's title. Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used.Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 01:53, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Which is Blondie... JugulatorJJ ( talk) 01:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Because that's what they're called in the films duh.... JugulatorJJ ( talk) 02:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Actually is how they're credited. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 02:03, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
All names should be referred to as credited, or by common name supported by a reliable source.Some Dude From North Carolina ( talk) 02:04, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
02:06, 27 July 2021 (UTC)Hi, I manually reverted your edit here [2] that added LoMenzo as performing on the upcoming Megadeth album as LoMenzo will just be the touring bassist, not the studio bassist: [3]]
Thanks, David O. Johnson ( talk) 04:17, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Megadeth band members, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Template:Megadeth, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. A touring member and an official member aren't the same thing. The only time it's appropriate to restore
James LoMenzo to the current members list is WHEN and IF Megadeth makes a statement to confirm that he's an official member rather than just a touring member, so by all means, have some patience. As I've told you before, patience is a virtue.
MetalDiablo666 (
talk)
01:56, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
He's playing in the band. There is no separation method for current and touring members in templates so they go in the same active section. JugulatorJJ ( talk) 18:44, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Template:Megadeth. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Daniel Case, please look at this user's activity across the template, main article and members article – they are not listening. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:09, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
00:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)And please note ... the next time, should there be one, will be indefinite. Daniel Case ( talk) 00:37, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
No it is User:4TheWynne (It's "Win" by the way) who isn't listening but I suppose you can't expect much from a guy who can't even spell "Win". JugulatorJJ ( talk) 01:19, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
Jugulator, you are seriously making me reconsider my decision to not block you indefinitely. I may not yet do that, but I'm a lot closer to cutting your access to this page off and extend the block thanks to that fireworks display above. If I see any more of it ... Daniel Case ( talk) 22:27, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Daniel Case ( talk) 01:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Alright. Would everyone please leave Jugulator alone and give him a half year to grow up? Daniel Case ( talk) 01:14, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
Really, not making this indefinite is me being merciful. Daniel Case ( talk) 05:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
@ Daniel Case: Hi, I just thought you'd like to know JugulatorJJ is clearly evading his block with the IP 92.234.204.74. Looking through their contributions is like a mirror. I'm sure you're aware JugulatorJJ regularly edited heavy metal artists' articles as well as articles relating to politics, like timelines of Joe Biden's presidency and so on. My tip-off was the IP editor returning to Template:Meat Loaf to make an almost identical edit to JugulatorJJ—trying to list a Ted Nugent album Meat Loaf contributed to as an album by Meat Loaf by extension. Also quite telling this IP editor started regularly editing in September, not long after Jugulator's block. Ss 112 13:02, 21 January 2022 (UTC)