WELCOME TO MY TALK PAGE! Click here to leave me a message Need to message me in private? Send me an email |
Thanks for creating my account Have a great day SabexRLG ( talk) 18:32, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi! Really new to Wikipedia so you'll have to help me out if I'm doing something wrong!
I've found that the Sri Harmandir Sahib Wikipedia page is called "Golden Temple" because of the popularity of the name "Golden Temple". However, that's not what the Gurdwara is called. It's official name is Sri Harmindar Sahib. I'm comparing this to the Wiki pages of the Gherkin in London and Ayers Rock, both titled by their official names, despite popularity (especially as the Gherkin is called the Gherkin my certainly most people). I'm offering this, as many Sikhs feel that the name Golden Temple is disrespectful.
What do you think? I think that if you disagree, that perhaps I should edit the page to suggest that "Golden Temple" is the nickname given to Sri Harmindar Sahib.
AjeetSamra ( talk) 22:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Regarding this close, RickinBaltimore is not a checkuser. When he mentions "confirmed" in his appeal decline, he's talking about my CU confirmation.-- Ponyo bons mots 21:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Please undo and add all of the animals in my zoo with reliable sources, now. GeorgeTigerZebraLeopardPeacockZOO ( talk) 02:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
You closed the above as "not moved. There doesn't appear to be much of an appetite for a move at this time."
This would make every bit of sense if the RtM was for the initial move. However, the initial move had already occurred without discussion, was reverted (showing cause for opposition), then RE-reverted by the original mover (in violation of WP:RMUM), at which point discussion was opened rather than join in the move-war (a BRRD situation).
If there isn't "much of an appetite for a move", then the status quo ante should be restored.
This was documented in that section:
Please reconsider your decision. Thank you. – .Raven .talk 22:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of N'Ko script. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. – .Raven .talk 03:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Milkshake! page still has unsourced content added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OutlasterGuto ( talk • contribs) 19:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 ( talk) 06:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
I do not mean to insult here, but I see it as quite unfair as to your unexplained reply of, as I quote, 'no', in the edit request of 'The 'educational' categorisation of channel Cocomelon disputed' in the article 'List of most-subscribed YouTube channels'. I have seen that you have given at least a sentence in explanation for your refusal of editing in the article according to certain requests. I would appreciate it very much if you would give me the same treatment and provide me with an explanation as to why my request has been blocked.
I once again apologise for any offense or disruption I might have caused and I wish you a good day.
I will attach the request here for your convenience:
The 'educational' categorisation of channel Cocomelon disputed
Some may consider Cocomelon as entertainment over education and so in my opinion the categorisation of said channel should be changed to fit it's general purpose. Gantnitsa ( talk) 21:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Thank you.
- Gantnitsa ( talk) 20:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Dear @ SkyWarrior
I want you to help me learn how l can create my own userbox on my userpage. I am a new editor. Olivia Harry ( talk) 19:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
WELCOME TO MY TALK PAGE! Click here to leave me a message Need to message me in private? Send me an email |
Thanks for creating my account Have a great day SabexRLG ( talk) 18:32, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Hi! Really new to Wikipedia so you'll have to help me out if I'm doing something wrong!
I've found that the Sri Harmandir Sahib Wikipedia page is called "Golden Temple" because of the popularity of the name "Golden Temple". However, that's not what the Gurdwara is called. It's official name is Sri Harmindar Sahib. I'm comparing this to the Wiki pages of the Gherkin in London and Ayers Rock, both titled by their official names, despite popularity (especially as the Gherkin is called the Gherkin my certainly most people). I'm offering this, as many Sikhs feel that the name Golden Temple is disrespectful.
What do you think? I think that if you disagree, that perhaps I should edit the page to suggest that "Golden Temple" is the nickname given to Sri Harmindar Sahib.
AjeetSamra ( talk) 22:47, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
Regarding this close, RickinBaltimore is not a checkuser. When he mentions "confirmed" in his appeal decline, he's talking about my CU confirmation.-- Ponyo bons mots 21:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Please undo and add all of the animals in my zoo with reliable sources, now. GeorgeTigerZebraLeopardPeacockZOO ( talk) 02:35, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
You closed the above as "not moved. There doesn't appear to be much of an appetite for a move at this time."
This would make every bit of sense if the RtM was for the initial move. However, the initial move had already occurred without discussion, was reverted (showing cause for opposition), then RE-reverted by the original mover (in violation of WP:RMUM), at which point discussion was opened rather than join in the move-war (a BRRD situation).
If there isn't "much of an appetite for a move", then the status quo ante should be restored.
This was documented in that section:
Please reconsider your decision. Thank you. – .Raven .talk 22:59, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a Move review of N'Ko script. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. – .Raven .talk 03:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Milkshake! page still has unsourced content added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OutlasterGuto ( talk • contribs) 19:10, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 ( talk) 06:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
I do not mean to insult here, but I see it as quite unfair as to your unexplained reply of, as I quote, 'no', in the edit request of 'The 'educational' categorisation of channel Cocomelon disputed' in the article 'List of most-subscribed YouTube channels'. I have seen that you have given at least a sentence in explanation for your refusal of editing in the article according to certain requests. I would appreciate it very much if you would give me the same treatment and provide me with an explanation as to why my request has been blocked.
I once again apologise for any offense or disruption I might have caused and I wish you a good day.
I will attach the request here for your convenience:
The 'educational' categorisation of channel Cocomelon disputed
Some may consider Cocomelon as entertainment over education and so in my opinion the categorisation of said channel should be changed to fit it's general purpose. Gantnitsa ( talk) 21:30, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Thank you.
- Gantnitsa ( talk) 20:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Dear @ SkyWarrior
I want you to help me learn how l can create my own userbox on my userpage. I am a new editor. Olivia Harry ( talk) 19:47, 31 December 2023 (UTC)