Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Varāhamihira—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk)
04:25, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
However if really one looks close one can resolve the apprent contradictions by taking 1st SHAKA SAMVAT around 551 BCE and 2nd Shaka Samvat from 78 CE as Suggested by HINDU Traditional viewpoint which is ellaborated by Pandit Kota Venkatachalam. [1]. As for forgery in ancient HINDU Scriptures it should be noted that it was a practice British Colonial mind set to force changes in published versions of texts as evident from comparing manuscripts especially regarding years in books like Panch Siddantikas [2]
References
Hello, I'm
Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions—specifically
this edit to
Varāhamihira—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Teahouse or the
Help desk. Thanks.
Materialscientist (
talk)
04:25, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
However if really one looks close one can resolve the apprent contradictions by taking 1st SHAKA SAMVAT around 551 BCE and 2nd Shaka Samvat from 78 CE as Suggested by HINDU Traditional viewpoint which is ellaborated by Pandit Kota Venkatachalam. [1]. As for forgery in ancient HINDU Scriptures it should be noted that it was a practice British Colonial mind set to force changes in published versions of texts as evident from comparing manuscripts especially regarding years in books like Panch Siddantikas [2]
References