This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Did you notice the :-) at the end? :-) -- Ag ü eybaná 00:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I saw "sick template" and thought "Wow, someone musta made a really cool one!" Damn my 90s lingo. Hope you get better soon :) ~ Riana ⁂ 04:11, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
A little soup to make your body get better, and a small flower to raise your spirit! :) Get well son, my friend! Love, Phaedriel - 07:08, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship, which passed with 50 supports, 1 neutral, and 1 oppose. My goal is to keep earning your trust every time I grab the "mop". (And I'm always open to constructive criticism and advice!) Again, thanks. -- Fabrictramp 15:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
The user was given a final warning on the 23rd, and vandalized again on the 26th (Exact same vandalization as in the past as well). This seems to fall within the guidelines as you posted. Is that not recent enough? Dubkiller 02:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstar and the kind compliment! Both are very appreciated. Cheers and happy editing, Into The Fray T/ C 09:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
I've been looking for an admin for a while, and poof! You appear! Would you perhaps feel well enough to help me with something? If you're still feeling icky, feel free to say no, though. Ariel ♥ Gold 21:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Alright, this is obviously a school IP range:
From the contribs, I'd guess their school is doing a project of some kind on Louis-Joseph Papineau, ( history), William Lyon Mackenzie, ( history), and Thomas Talbot (Upper Canada), ( history) (among others). The reason I think this is all the same school, is from these edits: [1] [2] [3] [4] Also, the edits stopped in mid-afternoon (school got out?)
So, my question is, how do you deal with something like this, it seems to me, going on assumption, that this is either a classroom with multiple computers connected to the internet at the same time, thus, the extremely similar IPs, but the same range, or at the least, a couple computers with dynamic IPs, but also obviously shared. So, oh wise one... what is done with things like this? Ariel ♥ Gold 22:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Okay, so going from that, I can't really narrow down the school's name, although perhaps you can with your fancy tools. Should I just use the {{ SharedIPEDU}}? Ariel ♥ Gold 22:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Replied to your email. Ariel ♥ Gold 00:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't know if this is the place to do this, but my page, L2-Paradise, was deleted due to "blatant advertising". With all due respect, the server I am on is a large community and its history is of some importance to some people. There are other sites on wikipedia that seem to be doing more promoting than my page, like 4chan, especially since I did not post any link to our site or to a vote site to promote us, just historical data. —Preceding unsigned comment added by L2PCloud ( talk • contribs) 00:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 39 | 24 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |||||||||||||
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:12, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up about the deletion of the "Bad Art" article. I haven't been able to get onto the internet for a while since I bought a computer with Vista pre-installed and found it was incompatible with my broadband service. I'm still working around the problem.
"Bad Art" was a style that used to be written up in art textbooks when I was at art school in the 1990s. One of my tutors on fine art foundation level did a whole presentation on it with slides and references. The usage of the term has dwindled since then and it will probably disappear altogether. Although it is a real topic in art history I agree with the article's deletion. Perhaps a brief mention of "bad art" should be included in a broader article on "Notable dead ends in art history" or some such thing. (-: -- wayland 08:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Man
that was quick! I thought something was wrong with the admin page because my entry disappeared so fast!
Many thanks for your quick intervention!
LookingYourBest
10:41, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Why the Ride Tek's page has been delated? As a roller coaster fan I was trying to update the list of Roller coaster manufactures on wikipedia. It was a basic description like this Vekoma —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelo Penone ( talk • contribs) 15:48, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
I changed the block of this user from soft to hard, and used "abusing multiple accounts" as my summary, for that user, judging by their name, was an obvious sock. If you take a look that that user's sockpuppet category, you'll be able to recognize the name pattern. I thought it was best that you know. Acalamari 17:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar! :] -- ALLSTAR ECHO 23:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I reverted one of your edits to the Joe Sakic article. The WP:HOCKEY guidelines states that statistics may only be updated after the en of the season. I noticed that you added the new season to many other articles and I don't have any time to revert them since the time is 02.13 am where I'm at. Could you please revert them to avoid constant updates during the season? -- Krm500 00:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Take a peek at NCCC accomplishments, pretty please? I just spent like 40 minutes cleaning it up somewhat, nearly every line was italicized, and bolded, and there were little to no sections (the TOC was halfway down the page lol). However, this really seems to be just a page with collections of quotes praising the National Civilian Community Corps, and I'm not sure why this article is really needed. There is already an article about it at National Civilian Community Corps, and this article is basically a copy of that one, copied and pasted but then added all these quotes. It seems to me that the accomplishments, if indeed, deserving of their own article, should be listed as what was done, not a collection of quotes that politicians have said about the program. What are your thoughts? Ariel ♥ Gold 00:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Ah, thank ya! :-D. Jmlk 1 7 00:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much! Just doin' my job. :) I'm glad I'm keeping you busy! Hope to see you around! Love, Neranei (talk) 01:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Ice Hockey Newsletter Dear Jmlk17/Archive9! You are receiving as you are a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey There's been more new thing going on at WP:HOCKEY, and I think this will help you to stay informed. Since the last newsletter sent out in August, there's been great changes. Read on to find out! Maxim (talk) This just in:
New recognized content By Maxim Especially due to the featured topic drive, there have been many new featured lists promoted concerning NHL awards. Here's the full list of all the 13 FL's promoted since the last newsletter. [1] [2]
There have been no new good articles or featured articles. Maurice 'Rocket' Richard Trophy has been given A-Class status due to multiple issues raised at FLC.
Did You Know? By
Maxim
Featured Topic Drive By
Maxim Started by User:Scorpion0422, the aim of this drive is to make NHL awards a featured topic. A featured topic is basically a set of very high quality articles ( good articles and featured articles/ lists). In this case, the topic is NHL awards. Many users have helped, including Scorpion0422, Resolute, Serte, Hasek is the best, Maxim, Croat Canuck, Spike Wilbury, FutureNJGov, and T Rex/Dinosaur puppy. The progress has been very good; there are 12 featured lists promoted, and 2 good articles:
Check the project page if you are interested in helping out. Although it's closer to being done than not, there's still work to be done. The next topic that might be tackled is Stanley Cup, but this remains purely speculative and in discussion. |
Note: You have received this because your name is on
Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Newsletter/List. If you no longer wish to receive this message, remove your name. --
Animum Delivery Bot
01:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Can you please adopt me? I really want to learn more stuff about editing Wikipedia, because I am still very 'beginner level' ( Shokwaav 13:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC))
In the future, when you create new 2nd afd nominations, there are slight changes to the template which must be followed (see the instructions in the note when you click "edit." This is so that we can preserve the old afd. I have fixed your nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White guilt by moving the debate to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White guilt (2nd nomination). Yahel Guhan 21:53, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello - I saw a page I wrote deleted within an hour of its creation. I believe I made the case for its significance and I wonder if you read the justificaiton or just auto delete anyone who wrote a page of bio... . Wiki has bios on hundreds of people who did various things in Internet history - some major, some minor... I created the first e-commerce business and set the stage for a million businesses that followed. I made a case for this pioneeering work... a major item in Internet history... Most of my teachers are in WIki and so are several ancestors. I'd appreciate a dialog over this entry rather than get shuffled into the auto-delete basket. What is your criteria for auto-delete???I'd appreciate some discussion on this and restoration of the page. Alexanderrandall5 04:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey man, everything going okay? I hope all is well with you. Glass Cobra ( Review) 06:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Really? That's awesome, thank you! I'm sorry I missed you on AIM, I had gone to bed a little bit after I posted on your talk page. Let's get started when you're back up to 100%, okay? Glass Cobra ( Review) 16:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
This movie that is supposedly so "important" that it deserves an article, has 0 news coverage: [6]. I'd actually guess that CambridgeBayWeather and WarthogDemon are upholding notability guidelines, and it is making someone who doesn't understand those, upset. Ariel ♥ Gold 07:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I would like the link at the bottom of my talk page removed.I do not have the technical skill to do it at this point. I object to there even being a list like that, because any one can complain about any name.I think that the linking of my talk page to that list is an attack. Could you help me rectify this,please? Die4Dixie 10:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I had left a note for you at Aktron's RfA but it was soon withdrawn and you may not have had the chance to see it. Instead of posting it again on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Samulili, I thought I'd just draw your attention to my previous post. :) - Two Oars (Rev) 00:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Did you read the talk page of Taylor Bradford? :D Ariel ♥ Gold 07:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, saw you salted this title not long ago. I was thinking it should probably redirect to D.O.A. (band), which is notable. Any opinions? Chubbles 07:17, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello... this isn't a random issue - there is an ongoing and persistent attempt to delete information from Wikipedia that reveals how magic tricks are done. It almost always involves deleting the methodology, rather than just blanking the article. This has been going on for months. -- Ckatz chat spy 08:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{ subst:Vangel}}! — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 08:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the cleanup on my talk page! Nburden 08:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Good evening, on one of the current rfa's, you put the phrase "hell yes". Please note that "hell" is a sware word and an inapropriate word to use on an online encyclopedia. You may use that language in other places but please keep your language clean here on Wikipedia. Thanks for you cooperation. -- bobsmith319 00:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
True, Wikipedia is not censored, but to prevent future arguements with other users, I would suggest not using such language. I actualy wasn't joking. Eventhough the word is fairly minor, its still considered a sware word and thus probably shouldn't be written on Wikipedia where possible. :) -- bobsmith319 00:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
I would just like to say that this section really made me laugh, especially "sware words." :D Glass Cobra ( Review) 01:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 40 | 1 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |||||||||||||
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
Thanks Jmlk17/Archive9 | |
I would like to thank you for your participation in my successful RfA, which passed with a tally of (44/10/5) [1]. Whether you supported, opposed or were neutral in my RfA, I appreciate your participation and I hope that we can continue to work together to build a stronger and better Wikipedia. | |
Regards, nat t a n g 04:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC) |
but 24.118.153.134, an IP that you blocked in the past few months has started deleting material, adding poor grammar, and reverting constructive edits. I'm new to this sort of thing, so is there anything that can or should be done about it? Hewinsj 04:47, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, could you revert the Brett Favre page to version 161943358 by user Brandi Gibson at 3:38, 3 October 2007. That's the version it should be before the user Snowfire51 keeped reverting it, if you please revert it to the correct version, it can be discussed further from there one in the discussion page, Thanks -- Teri Kosman 08:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Teri Kosman Teri Kosman 08:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)--
Thank you for your intervention regarding another sockpuppet's request to lift semi-protection of the page. Well spotted. Skybunny 18:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you sprotected suicide - any particular reason? The last IP vandalism was 34 hours before the sprotect tag, so that particular one is probably not coming back. The page, by virtue of its content, will always be a magnet for vandals, so unless you're planning to permanently sprotect it, it's probably not worth it in this case. Orpheus 11:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
I just want to thank you (a bit late) for supporting my RfA, which passed 63 to 1. Thanks again, and I hope to do my best. Bearian 01:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Please explain your !vote on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/The Placebo Effect 2; it was very vague, and isn't particularly helpful to the candidate. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I'd like to IfD that image as orphaned, thanks. (I'm trying to clean up licensing issues with images using the deprecated {{ Military-Insignia}} template.) After it's deleted I don't mind keeping it on my watchlist in case User:Roitr socks come back to it; we can cascade-protect it if that's that the case. Thanks again. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:49, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, why did you revert my change? -- Crucially 08:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey man! If you're feeling back up to snuff, I'm ready to start whenever you are! Glass Cobra ( Review) 16:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
The above user has been constantly copying the content at Naruto: Clash of Ninja (series) and creating duplicate articles. In addition, he has uploaded a series of images for these new pages, which would not find use on the original page. Despite constant attempts to open discussion, he has ignored any such entreaties. I've redirected his duplicates, but I can't see most of them ever being a search option. Deletion of the redirects and the images (consensus has decided against using more than one cover image out of fair use issues) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 05:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey I noticed you declined the full-protect. I was wondering what measures could be taken to block this editor and his various sockpuppets (i.e. checkuser, IP block). There are so many sockpuppets that he ages I think this would help for the time being and maybe be able to block his IP address. Thanks for any help. (I will watch your page)
Gonzo fan2007
talk ♦
contribs
05:23, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Are you still around? Ariel ♥ Gold 07:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by grafikbot 09:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Dziekuja = Polish for "Thank You". Many thanks for blocking that user, he was really starting to irk me. Take Care.... NeutralHomer T: C 23:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I am kind of confused, because my intent was the opposite of vandalism, I was trying to make a correction. It says in the article that the first half of season eleven ended on April 18, 2007, and began airing again on October 3, 2007. This is not correct however, because October 3, 2007 marked the START OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE SEASON. Each season is aired in two halfs, the first is aired in the spring, and the second is aired in the fall. So the first half didn't "start again" (which when worded doesn't exactly seem "possible"), the second half merely just started. - 99.237.9.80 02:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
--
Hdt83
Chat has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Can you approve me for NPWatcher here I need an admin to do it and he is on a wikibreak. Shawnpoo 02:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Did you notice the :-) at the end? :-) -- Ag ü eybaná 00:09, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
I saw "sick template" and thought "Wow, someone musta made a really cool one!" Damn my 90s lingo. Hope you get better soon :) ~ Riana ⁂ 04:11, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
A little soup to make your body get better, and a small flower to raise your spirit! :) Get well son, my friend! Love, Phaedriel - 07:08, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship, which passed with 50 supports, 1 neutral, and 1 oppose. My goal is to keep earning your trust every time I grab the "mop". (And I'm always open to constructive criticism and advice!) Again, thanks. -- Fabrictramp 15:15, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
The user was given a final warning on the 23rd, and vandalized again on the 26th (Exact same vandalization as in the past as well). This seems to fall within the guidelines as you posted. Is that not recent enough? Dubkiller 02:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the barnstar and the kind compliment! Both are very appreciated. Cheers and happy editing, Into The Fray T/ C 09:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
I've been looking for an admin for a while, and poof! You appear! Would you perhaps feel well enough to help me with something? If you're still feeling icky, feel free to say no, though. Ariel ♥ Gold 21:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Alright, this is obviously a school IP range:
From the contribs, I'd guess their school is doing a project of some kind on Louis-Joseph Papineau, ( history), William Lyon Mackenzie, ( history), and Thomas Talbot (Upper Canada), ( history) (among others). The reason I think this is all the same school, is from these edits: [1] [2] [3] [4] Also, the edits stopped in mid-afternoon (school got out?)
So, my question is, how do you deal with something like this, it seems to me, going on assumption, that this is either a classroom with multiple computers connected to the internet at the same time, thus, the extremely similar IPs, but the same range, or at the least, a couple computers with dynamic IPs, but also obviously shared. So, oh wise one... what is done with things like this? Ariel ♥ Gold 22:06, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Okay, so going from that, I can't really narrow down the school's name, although perhaps you can with your fancy tools. Should I just use the {{ SharedIPEDU}}? Ariel ♥ Gold 22:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Replied to your email. Ariel ♥ Gold 00:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
I don't know if this is the place to do this, but my page, L2-Paradise, was deleted due to "blatant advertising". With all due respect, the server I am on is a large community and its history is of some importance to some people. There are other sites on wikipedia that seem to be doing more promoting than my page, like 4chan, especially since I did not post any link to our site or to a vote site to promote us, just historical data. —Preceding unsigned comment added by L2PCloud ( talk • contribs) 00:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 39 | 24 September 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |||||||||||||
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 02:12, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up about the deletion of the "Bad Art" article. I haven't been able to get onto the internet for a while since I bought a computer with Vista pre-installed and found it was incompatible with my broadband service. I'm still working around the problem.
"Bad Art" was a style that used to be written up in art textbooks when I was at art school in the 1990s. One of my tutors on fine art foundation level did a whole presentation on it with slides and references. The usage of the term has dwindled since then and it will probably disappear altogether. Although it is a real topic in art history I agree with the article's deletion. Perhaps a brief mention of "bad art" should be included in a broader article on "Notable dead ends in art history" or some such thing. (-: -- wayland 08:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Man
that was quick! I thought something was wrong with the admin page because my entry disappeared so fast!
Many thanks for your quick intervention!
LookingYourBest
10:41, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Why the Ride Tek's page has been delated? As a roller coaster fan I was trying to update the list of Roller coaster manufactures on wikipedia. It was a basic description like this Vekoma —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelo Penone ( talk • contribs) 15:48, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
I changed the block of this user from soft to hard, and used "abusing multiple accounts" as my summary, for that user, judging by their name, was an obvious sock. If you take a look that that user's sockpuppet category, you'll be able to recognize the name pattern. I thought it was best that you know. Acalamari 17:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for the The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar! :] -- ALLSTAR ECHO 23:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi! I reverted one of your edits to the Joe Sakic article. The WP:HOCKEY guidelines states that statistics may only be updated after the en of the season. I noticed that you added the new season to many other articles and I don't have any time to revert them since the time is 02.13 am where I'm at. Could you please revert them to avoid constant updates during the season? -- Krm500 00:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Take a peek at NCCC accomplishments, pretty please? I just spent like 40 minutes cleaning it up somewhat, nearly every line was italicized, and bolded, and there were little to no sections (the TOC was halfway down the page lol). However, this really seems to be just a page with collections of quotes praising the National Civilian Community Corps, and I'm not sure why this article is really needed. There is already an article about it at National Civilian Community Corps, and this article is basically a copy of that one, copied and pasted but then added all these quotes. It seems to me that the accomplishments, if indeed, deserving of their own article, should be listed as what was done, not a collection of quotes that politicians have said about the program. What are your thoughts? Ariel ♥ Gold 00:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Ah, thank ya! :-D. Jmlk 1 7 00:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much! Just doin' my job. :) I'm glad I'm keeping you busy! Hope to see you around! Love, Neranei (talk) 01:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject Ice Hockey Newsletter Dear Jmlk17/Archive9! You are receiving as you are a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey There's been more new thing going on at WP:HOCKEY, and I think this will help you to stay informed. Since the last newsletter sent out in August, there's been great changes. Read on to find out! Maxim (talk) This just in:
New recognized content By Maxim Especially due to the featured topic drive, there have been many new featured lists promoted concerning NHL awards. Here's the full list of all the 13 FL's promoted since the last newsletter. [1] [2]
There have been no new good articles or featured articles. Maurice 'Rocket' Richard Trophy has been given A-Class status due to multiple issues raised at FLC.
Did You Know? By
Maxim
Featured Topic Drive By
Maxim Started by User:Scorpion0422, the aim of this drive is to make NHL awards a featured topic. A featured topic is basically a set of very high quality articles ( good articles and featured articles/ lists). In this case, the topic is NHL awards. Many users have helped, including Scorpion0422, Resolute, Serte, Hasek is the best, Maxim, Croat Canuck, Spike Wilbury, FutureNJGov, and T Rex/Dinosaur puppy. The progress has been very good; there are 12 featured lists promoted, and 2 good articles:
Check the project page if you are interested in helping out. Although it's closer to being done than not, there's still work to be done. The next topic that might be tackled is Stanley Cup, but this remains purely speculative and in discussion. |
Note: You have received this because your name is on
Wikipedia:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Newsletter/List. If you no longer wish to receive this message, remove your name. --
Animum Delivery Bot
01:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
Can you please adopt me? I really want to learn more stuff about editing Wikipedia, because I am still very 'beginner level' ( Shokwaav 13:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC))
In the future, when you create new 2nd afd nominations, there are slight changes to the template which must be followed (see the instructions in the note when you click "edit." This is so that we can preserve the old afd. I have fixed your nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White guilt by moving the debate to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White guilt (2nd nomination). Yahel Guhan 21:53, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Hello - I saw a page I wrote deleted within an hour of its creation. I believe I made the case for its significance and I wonder if you read the justificaiton or just auto delete anyone who wrote a page of bio... . Wiki has bios on hundreds of people who did various things in Internet history - some major, some minor... I created the first e-commerce business and set the stage for a million businesses that followed. I made a case for this pioneeering work... a major item in Internet history... Most of my teachers are in WIki and so are several ancestors. I'd appreciate a dialog over this entry rather than get shuffled into the auto-delete basket. What is your criteria for auto-delete???I'd appreciate some discussion on this and restoration of the page. Alexanderrandall5 04:03, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey man, everything going okay? I hope all is well with you. Glass Cobra ( Review) 06:35, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Really? That's awesome, thank you! I'm sorry I missed you on AIM, I had gone to bed a little bit after I posted on your talk page. Let's get started when you're back up to 100%, okay? Glass Cobra ( Review) 16:50, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
This movie that is supposedly so "important" that it deserves an article, has 0 news coverage: [6]. I'd actually guess that CambridgeBayWeather and WarthogDemon are upholding notability guidelines, and it is making someone who doesn't understand those, upset. Ariel ♥ Gold 07:46, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I would like the link at the bottom of my talk page removed.I do not have the technical skill to do it at this point. I object to there even being a list like that, because any one can complain about any name.I think that the linking of my talk page to that list is an attack. Could you help me rectify this,please? Die4Dixie 10:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
I had left a note for you at Aktron's RfA but it was soon withdrawn and you may not have had the chance to see it. Instead of posting it again on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Samulili, I thought I'd just draw your attention to my previous post. :) - Two Oars (Rev) 00:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Did you read the talk page of Taylor Bradford? :D Ariel ♥ Gold 07:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, saw you salted this title not long ago. I was thinking it should probably redirect to D.O.A. (band), which is notable. Any opinions? Chubbles 07:17, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello... this isn't a random issue - there is an ongoing and persistent attempt to delete information from Wikipedia that reveals how magic tricks are done. It almost always involves deleting the methodology, rather than just blanking the article. This has been going on for months. -- Ckatz chat spy 08:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{ subst:Vangel}}! — Timotab Timothy (not Tim dagnabbit!) 08:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the cleanup on my talk page! Nburden 08:52, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Good evening, on one of the current rfa's, you put the phrase "hell yes". Please note that "hell" is a sware word and an inapropriate word to use on an online encyclopedia. You may use that language in other places but please keep your language clean here on Wikipedia. Thanks for you cooperation. -- bobsmith319 00:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
True, Wikipedia is not censored, but to prevent future arguements with other users, I would suggest not using such language. I actualy wasn't joking. Eventhough the word is fairly minor, its still considered a sware word and thus probably shouldn't be written on Wikipedia where possible. :) -- bobsmith319 00:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
I would just like to say that this section really made me laugh, especially "sware words." :D Glass Cobra ( Review) 01:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 40 | 1 October 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |||||||||||||
Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST | ||||||||||||
|
Thanks Jmlk17/Archive9 | |
I would like to thank you for your participation in my successful RfA, which passed with a tally of (44/10/5) [1]. Whether you supported, opposed or were neutral in my RfA, I appreciate your participation and I hope that we can continue to work together to build a stronger and better Wikipedia. | |
Regards, nat t a n g 04:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC) |
but 24.118.153.134, an IP that you blocked in the past few months has started deleting material, adding poor grammar, and reverting constructive edits. I'm new to this sort of thing, so is there anything that can or should be done about it? Hewinsj 04:47, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, could you revert the Brett Favre page to version 161943358 by user Brandi Gibson at 3:38, 3 October 2007. That's the version it should be before the user Snowfire51 keeped reverting it, if you please revert it to the correct version, it can be discussed further from there one in the discussion page, Thanks -- Teri Kosman 08:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Teri Kosman Teri Kosman 08:36, 3 October 2007 (UTC)--
Thank you for your intervention regarding another sockpuppet's request to lift semi-protection of the page. Well spotted. Skybunny 18:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
I noticed you sprotected suicide - any particular reason? The last IP vandalism was 34 hours before the sprotect tag, so that particular one is probably not coming back. The page, by virtue of its content, will always be a magnet for vandals, so unless you're planning to permanently sprotect it, it's probably not worth it in this case. Orpheus 11:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
I just want to thank you (a bit late) for supporting my RfA, which passed 63 to 1. Thanks again, and I hope to do my best. Bearian 01:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Please explain your !vote on Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/The Placebo Effect 2; it was very vague, and isn't particularly helpful to the candidate. EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I'd like to IfD that image as orphaned, thanks. (I'm trying to clean up licensing issues with images using the deprecated {{ Military-Insignia}} template.) After it's deleted I don't mind keeping it on my watchlist in case User:Roitr socks come back to it; we can cascade-protect it if that's that the case. Thanks again. Videmus Omnia Talk 03:49, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, why did you revert my change? -- Crucially 08:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey man! If you're feeling back up to snuff, I'm ready to start whenever you are! Glass Cobra ( Review) 16:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
The above user has been constantly copying the content at Naruto: Clash of Ninja (series) and creating duplicate articles. In addition, he has uploaded a series of images for these new pages, which would not find use on the original page. Despite constant attempts to open discussion, he has ignored any such entreaties. I've redirected his duplicates, but I can't see most of them ever being a search option. Deletion of the redirects and the images (consensus has decided against using more than one cover image out of fair use issues) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Sephiroth BCR ( Converse) 05:17, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Hey I noticed you declined the full-protect. I was wondering what measures could be taken to block this editor and his various sockpuppets (i.e. checkuser, IP block). There are so many sockpuppets that he ages I think this would help for the time being and maybe be able to block his IP address. Thanks for any help. (I will watch your page)
Gonzo fan2007
talk ♦
contribs
05:23, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Are you still around? Ariel ♥ Gold 07:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
The September 2007 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Delivered by grafikbot 09:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Dziekuja = Polish for "Thank You". Many thanks for blocking that user, he was really starting to irk me. Take Care.... NeutralHomer T: C 23:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I am kind of confused, because my intent was the opposite of vandalism, I was trying to make a correction. It says in the article that the first half of season eleven ended on April 18, 2007, and began airing again on October 3, 2007. This is not correct however, because October 3, 2007 marked the START OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE SEASON. Each season is aired in two halfs, the first is aired in the spring, and the second is aired in the fall. So the first half didn't "start again" (which when worded doesn't exactly seem "possible"), the second half merely just started. - 99.237.9.80 02:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
--
Hdt83
Chat has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Can you approve me for NPWatcher here I need an admin to do it and he is on a wikibreak. Shawnpoo 02:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)