![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
That triad securities article... you were going to restore it? Can you link to "where"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simultaneous ( talk • contribs) 14:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
My suggestion would be remove the name of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) from the caption and just write Muslims pray like this. We are living in a freedom os speach world but hurting other's feeling is not the right way of freedom of speach. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.82.217.133 ( talk) 22:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I agree with you guys/gals. ArbCom wouldn't take this 'image dispute' case. Article protection/semi-protection is the calmest & most effective method. No matter what the consensus is? It must be respected and upheld. GoodDay ( talk) 15:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Lodongus the mohammed pictures aint going anywhere and stop crying youwhiny muslim —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
85.197.208.168 (
talk)
17:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
|
My RfA | |
Thank you very much, Jmlk17, for your support in my
RfA which I really appreciate. It closed at 83/0/0. I was surprised by the unanimity and will do my best to live up to the new role. All the best, --
ROGER DAVIES
talk
16:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Magnus.ramstrom ( talk) 17:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
This is new to me. Sorry if I do all wrong. I just discovered that the entry "valiant fan projects" is gone and was directed here. I wonder what is the procedure for it to be brought back. Some info: Valiant Fan Projects is a concept notable among comic collectors, mainly those collecting Valiant comics. The article that has disappeared is referenced from the Valiant Comics article. I personally noticed it was gone when researching a question asked on a message board.
Best,
Magnus
Here's a little bump. For notoriety of fan projects, please see articles on fandom and fanzines. For Valiant projects specifically, please see
http://www.valiantcomics.com
Magnus.ramstrom (
talk)
14:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kirill 03:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, just a brief note to let you know that when you delete prods you need to give an informative deletion reason. "Prod left uncontested for five days" really isn't at all informative. Regards, RMHED ( talk) 02:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
No comment. Missed your message on IRC, but am there now. - Rjd0060 ( talk) 04:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Could I get this restored to my userspace? Any version would be fine (best preferred, obviously). Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide ( H20) 09:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Thankyou for restoring Servis. It was deleted again before I had a chance to add to the article! (I have gathered about 30 references about the company demonstrating notability) Could you restore it to my userspace so I can start work on it again please. CustardJack ( talk) 10:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, could you please revert the deleting of Kenneth Stenild, as he played two senior games for AaB in the UEFA Intertoto Cup 2007 in July 2007, and thus is "notable" enough to warrant an individual article. Poulsen ( talk) 14:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
why was my page " blind mans bluff ( movie ) deleated! i own all thr rigths since i help make it and we share it.I got all the pictures and thiers nothing bad 23:00 8/2/2008 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.40.113.239 ( talk • contribs) 16:01, February 8, 2008
i am not advertiseing -- Daryl274 ( talk) 00:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Although I agree that this user's contributions are problematic, they don't actually seem to be vandalism. He seems not to get it, although I think that means we should try and make him get it, rather than banishing him. Would you consider shortening the block? - Revolving Bugbear 14:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
You deleted Zhu Xiao Dong. I think the awards and association position mentioned in the article asserted notability. As well, the Google scholar search at http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?as_q=&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=Zhu+Xiao+Dong&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=med&hl=en&lr=&safe=off suggests that he might be notable. Perhaps someone who reads Chinese might be able to fix the article. -- Eastmain ( talk) 06:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
|
I see that you have just indefblocked Alimustafakhan ( talk · contribs) as a vandalism-only account. Isn't that a bit harsh? What the user did might qualify as pov-pushing, soapboxing or original research, but vandalism? And a vandalism-only account? This user has been around for almost three years, and hasn't had a single block before. Surely a temporary block would have been more appropriate? A ecis Brievenbus 00:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
You restored it, then speedied it? :S Sorry, just a bit confused. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 03:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Bigdaddysun ( talk) 07:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Red Herring Coffeehouse
The Red Herring is a non-profit institution that has a significant history of social action activities and arts programming for more than 40 years. It is not a for-profit company or corporation. "The Free Speech Movement" did much organization here in the fifties and The Students for a Democratic Society in the 60's. Many well known musicians and Filmmakers also have been a part of this place. Do not delete this page!
Hi, you deleted the talk page, but the article still exists. Gwernol had to delete the article in order to re-create it with the history intact as it kept getting redirected to M/S Riverdance by editors who had had no input into the article and did not discuss the proposed move. Can you undelete the talk page please? Mjroots ( talk) 08:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jmlk17, you protected the article Islamophobia some time ago (16 Jan). While attempts towards dispute resolution have been partially successful, there has been a substantial lack of recent talk page activity, even though I have been requesting feedback on new compromise attempts. In the light of the talk page discussion having dried up, would it be okay to have the article unprotected so I can see how the new proposed lead floats, and so that editing to the article can be resumed? Regards, ITAQALLAH 21:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Please restore the page "TOAS Nabard- The Persian Art of Combat" which was deleted via a (prod) tag on 01/19/08.
I appreciate your time an efforts.
Metalmilitian ( talk) 00:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick respnse. The reason we want the page restored is that TOAS Nabard is a form of martial art that Master Safakhoo developed over his life and has been teaching to others for more than 25 years in the US. Through Wiki, we hope that others will come to understand that TOAS Nabard is unique and that not only are there punches, kicks, and grabs, but deeper within is a reason and a understanding of each which can be linked to an ancient persian philosphy and belief. Through these beliefs and approaches, we not only better ourselves physically, we also better understand ourselves on a wholistic basis.
Thank you, Metalmilitian ( talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
This is what we are attempting to accomplish...The notability of TOAS Nabard. We are trying to inform others of the history of the Persian Art of Combat and relate it to the TOAS Nabard way for the general user seeking more information through Wikipedia. It is very hard to establish notability when the subject you are referring to is unique. I hope this helps with your question.
-edit- Please follow this link [1] where you will find that TOAS Nabard and Master Safakhoo have been interviewed by Budo International Magazine and the local Pensacola News Journal. Both of these articles should lend notibility to this wikipage -end edit-
Thanks - Metalmilitian ( talk) 00:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Very much appreciated! Metalmilitian ( talk) 04:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Okay, so you deleted my page very soon, it was a work in progress. How can I post information about this band? I have a verifiable source, from a site called Sonicbirds.com and I have a direct contact with the band to have more supporting documentation available. Should I create a word file first before posting? This is not an advertisement for the band. They have had live performances and professional studio development and mastering.
I'm new to this as well, so please bare that in mind. Apiotuch ( talk) 09:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello jmlk17, can you tell me what was done wrong with my posting? I would like to make the changed needed to fit the format needed by wiki. I am unable to find much info about the usc ibear program, I am a graduate and thought it would be great to post some info about it. The program is ranked by all major business school sites--us news, financial times, bus week. I am not trying to put up an ad, though, I did add the admissions page and maybe this was the issue. I would be happy to remove that link, it is not needed at all...I only added it because I was trying to copy other univ.'s formats. There are many other univ. with info about thier ranked individual programs on wiki. I hope that I can add the info about ibear program too.
Thank you for your time...I love the site. dylan p Dylanp ( talk) 10:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for this. It's a shame really, as he did appear to have something to say and to know about the subject, but he has been intent on this path. Hopefully we can succeed in engaging him in dialogue on his return. Regards, — BillC talk —Preceding comment was added at 18:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Dear Mr.Jmlk17,
I was creating an interesting and true biographic article in Wikipedia on the 11th of Feb 2008. It took about 2 hrs for me to create this authentic article as an official biographer of a leading educationist in India. But soon I was plugged off from wikipedia and my article that contained 100% correct references were delected stating vandalism. If this is the case for an authentic biographer, I do not know how you treat commoners and real vandalists. Not a word that i wrote was untrue or in a way to reduce the credibility of Wikipedia. Then you can introduce a payment mode whereby people who want them to have their profiles in ur website can pay and do so. I think this doesn't contributes to your objective of having a perfect encyclopedia. Your action is unfortunate and unjustified. I am not angry but only feel that I wasted 2 hrs on writing this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Livingston Madras ( talk • contribs) 22:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I really appreciate what you guys are doing in the Wikipedia. I will keep an eye on that Voodoo Tiki article, in order to keep it clean. Thanks again for your time! :)
-- Ubzy ( talk) 02:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jmlk17,
I'd like to request for help:
Please take a look at this section in Anger article: [2]. It is my belief that adding political-flavored images to articles that are not notable or known for any political issue is not appropriate. The concept of anger itself is rather independent of politics; If the images were notable (they are not), they were only justified to represent the concept of anger in the context of politics (but there is no such section there); and lastly the image is not historically notable; there are thousands of images available on the internet that do not have political flavor but represent the matter and I believe there are already such images in the article. Since User:David Shankbone had added such images to many many articles such as Body language, Gesture, Index finger, Type of gesture, Logical argument, Eye contact, Staring, originally I thought this is a violation of WP:POINT as well (but I don't think this is so anymore; maybe a conflict of interest causing ( WP:COI) favoring of those images). Could you please help with this. Thank you very much . -- Be happy!! ( talk) 04:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
You've SP'd the Madeleine McCann article. I think you need to look more closely at this article and its history before excluding just one party in the "edit war". By semi-protecting this article you have excluded the anonymous user (and all others) while leaving the small cabal of editors who control the article to do as they want. I haven't the time or the inclination to examine all of the disputed requests for citation, but I did look at just two, refs 146 and 147. These were the first I came across and I have to say that the sources are not good. In fact they do not in any way back up the statements being made about criticism of the parents. The anonymous user is correct to ask for a citation in these two cases at least. The onus should then be on "the article owners" (Harry the Dog, TerriersFan etc) to source those remarks or remove them. You might like to consider either removing SP or fully-protecting the article. As it stands, it appears that the IP is being excluded just becuase he's an IP editor. 82.20.28.142 ( talk) 14:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
What you removed in [5] was not a "theological discussion". It pertained to the topic at hand and directly to comments made that have not been removed. My comment regarding the differences in doctrine regarding images, icons, and depictions in general is replies directly Kaldari's question of "why Christians don't care that Jesus is depicted and Muslims care if Muhammed is". How do you plan to answer that question if not with a brief explanation of doctrine? My comment to Armanaziz replies directly to his general complaint that the images are unimportant (at least that's what he seems to be saying). I realize I off the rails yesterday, but I was on the right-of-way still. Today I'm on the rails. Put it back pls... - MasonicDevice ( talk) 22:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jmlk17, MIPRO is a Taiwan-based wireless microphone company; recently lanuches industry first digital wireless microphone system. Thus, I'd like to edit MIPRO in Wikipedia; however, this title has been protected. Can you help to unprotect and edit it? (If you need detailed information, I am willing to contribute it). Thanks and I am looking forward to hearing from you soon. Ccdavid ( talk) 06:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you deleted the article Bob's. Can you please undelete it? I will prove that it is notable. Editorofthewiki ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 20:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my RfA! It was closed as successful with 58 supporting, 0 opposing, and 2 neutral. I hope to demonstrate that your trust in me is rightly placed and am always open to critiques and suggestions. Cheers. MBisanz talk 03:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | ![]() |
|
Could you, as the protecting admin, have a look at the end of the talkpage? It appears a consensus has emerged that the the consequences of a damaging edit war should be rolled back. Relata refero ( talk) 08:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello. The band you deleted, has many of the requirements listed by wikipedia. The referencing are included on the page. There is no reason why you should have deleted it.
Yeah dude, it sucks. I don't know whats going on here, but if they don't shape up I'm gonna have to go down there. lol - Rjd0060 ( talk) 15:46, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
You deleted the article before giving me a chance to indicate notability. I was updating the talk page with more explanation and reference. could you please explain why the deletion was so fast? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexGWU ( talk • contribs) 03:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
This article meets the notability criteria:
In 1998 he received the annual award for the "Most Unique Contribution" from the National Association of Transpersonal Hypnotherapists.
He is one of the first scientists using a scientific approach for over 40 years of clinical research and practice to discover and explain soul experiences.AlexGWU (talk) 03:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC) AlexGWU ( talk) 04:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Maybe I didn't understand your response. Is the issue having the Dr. in front of the name in the article?? AlexGWU ( talk) 06:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Dear Jmlk17, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind vote on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (29/5/5).
I understand why you voted oppose, and I will take the advice that you have given. And now that I am a sysop, I will work hard to improve the encyclopedia with my new editing tools. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators.
Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. — Chetblong T C 21:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Muhammad should also be semi-protected from IP addresses. Too much page blanking going on. Thoughts? - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 00:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Please remove the protection from Muhammad and follow Wikipedia:PROT#Content_disputes ("Administrators should not protect or unprotect a page [...] if they are in any way involved in the dispute.") There is a strong evidence, that you are indeed involved: [6]. If User:Rauf-abdul violated WP:3RR you can block the user, but that's no reason to protect the page. Besides, we are currently building a new consensus on WikiEN-l [7]. -- Raphael1 23:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
That is certainly not an inappropriate discussion. Why are you deleting my messages there? If you continue this, i will report you to higher admin. XubayrMA Talk 09:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Haha, I figured I would AGF on your part, even though your edits are rarely ever constructive :P lol – Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 17:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Jmlk 17, it looks like you deleted the entry on RLM Software on Jan 17th after a PROD request went uncontested for 5 days.
Can you let me know why it was deleted? I'm asking that you restore it based on its relevance to FAA Air Traffic Control initiatives.
Thanks FlightTracker ( talk) 21:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)2/18/08
Hey, I saw that recently you changed from neutral to a weak oppose. I don't want to come off as aggressive, but may I ask why you decided to change? It would be helpful to know what was the deciding factor so I can improve upon that. Thank you very much. Icestorm815 • Talk 01:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Can you explain the semi-protection decline? I ask because I'd read the policy where it said, * Pages subject to significant but temporary vandalism or disruption, for example due to media attention, when blocking individual users is not a feasible option. which seemed to fit here. The IP and now a 2nd are doing nothing but vandalising the page. Am I missing something? Travellingcari ( talk) 19:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Hi, Jmlk17 I would ask that you please restore my new page about Julio Bermejo. He is a very important person in the world of tequila. I tried to explain in the article, and provided links to some major publications in english that he has appeared in over the last few years. I did not elaborate more on the nature of his business endeavors for fear of the article being deleted as marketing/pr, which it is not.
I respectfully ask that you read one or more of the news article links that I provided and so you can understand that he is definitely important enough to have his own page. I am sure that over time me and other wikipedians can help flesh out more exact details of Julio and update the page accordingly. I feel strongly that it is very important that Julio's significance in the world of tequila appreciation be documented as such.
Thanks for your consideration.
playphil ( talk) 23:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I really appreciate that. Thanks Jmlk17! And thanks for the quick block on DisabledCat. He/She was going crazy vandalizing pages. Again, thanks and thanks :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
What do you think of this. Speedy? AfD? POV tag? Thanks, Dloh cierekim Deleted? 01:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. He does not seem to have a firm grasp of NPOV. Cheers, Dloh cierekim Deleted? 01:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC) IT's gone!! Dloh cierekim Deleted? 01:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Is "No research. Poorly written" really a speedy deletion criterion? Wouldn't it have been better to list for prod or something? seresin | wasn't he just...? 02:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Destructo 087's Hidden Page | |
Well done finding Destructo's Hidden Page--
Destructo
Talk to me
02:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
( UTC) |
Here you go, Destructo.
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
That triad securities article... you were going to restore it? Can you link to "where"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simultaneous ( talk • contribs) 14:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
My suggestion would be remove the name of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) from the caption and just write Muslims pray like this. We are living in a freedom os speach world but hurting other's feeling is not the right way of freedom of speach. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.82.217.133 ( talk) 22:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I agree with you guys/gals. ArbCom wouldn't take this 'image dispute' case. Article protection/semi-protection is the calmest & most effective method. No matter what the consensus is? It must be respected and upheld. GoodDay ( talk) 15:29, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Lodongus the mohammed pictures aint going anywhere and stop crying youwhiny muslim —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
85.197.208.168 (
talk)
17:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
|
My RfA | |
Thank you very much, Jmlk17, for your support in my
RfA which I really appreciate. It closed at 83/0/0. I was surprised by the unanimity and will do my best to live up to the new role. All the best, --
ROGER DAVIES
talk
16:49, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Magnus.ramstrom ( talk) 17:58, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
This is new to me. Sorry if I do all wrong. I just discovered that the entry "valiant fan projects" is gone and was directed here. I wonder what is the procedure for it to be brought back. Some info: Valiant Fan Projects is a concept notable among comic collectors, mainly those collecting Valiant comics. The article that has disappeared is referenced from the Valiant Comics article. I personally noticed it was gone when researching a question asked on a message board.
Best,
Magnus
Here's a little bump. For notoriety of fan projects, please see articles on fandom and fanzines. For Valiant projects specifically, please see
http://www.valiantcomics.com
Magnus.ramstrom (
talk)
14:22, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect nine coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by February 14! Kirill 03:21, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, just a brief note to let you know that when you delete prods you need to give an informative deletion reason. "Prod left uncontested for five days" really isn't at all informative. Regards, RMHED ( talk) 02:39, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
No comment. Missed your message on IRC, but am there now. - Rjd0060 ( talk) 04:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Could I get this restored to my userspace? Any version would be fine (best preferred, obviously). Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide ( H20) 09:13, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Thankyou for restoring Servis. It was deleted again before I had a chance to add to the article! (I have gathered about 30 references about the company demonstrating notability) Could you restore it to my userspace so I can start work on it again please. CustardJack ( talk) 10:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, could you please revert the deleting of Kenneth Stenild, as he played two senior games for AaB in the UEFA Intertoto Cup 2007 in July 2007, and thus is "notable" enough to warrant an individual article. Poulsen ( talk) 14:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
why was my page " blind mans bluff ( movie ) deleated! i own all thr rigths since i help make it and we share it.I got all the pictures and thiers nothing bad 23:00 8/2/2008 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.40.113.239 ( talk • contribs) 16:01, February 8, 2008
i am not advertiseing -- Daryl274 ( talk) 00:43, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
Although I agree that this user's contributions are problematic, they don't actually seem to be vandalism. He seems not to get it, although I think that means we should try and make him get it, rather than banishing him. Would you consider shortening the block? - Revolving Bugbear 14:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
You deleted Zhu Xiao Dong. I think the awards and association position mentioned in the article asserted notability. As well, the Google scholar search at http://scholar.google.ca/scholar?as_q=&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=any&as_sauthors=Zhu+Xiao+Dong&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_allsubj=some&as_subj=med&hl=en&lr=&safe=off suggests that he might be notable. Perhaps someone who reads Chinese might be able to fix the article. -- Eastmain ( talk) 06:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
|
I see that you have just indefblocked Alimustafakhan ( talk · contribs) as a vandalism-only account. Isn't that a bit harsh? What the user did might qualify as pov-pushing, soapboxing or original research, but vandalism? And a vandalism-only account? This user has been around for almost three years, and hasn't had a single block before. Surely a temporary block would have been more appropriate? A ecis Brievenbus 00:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
You restored it, then speedied it? :S Sorry, just a bit confused. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 03:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Bigdaddysun ( talk) 07:02, 11 February 2008 (UTC) Red Herring Coffeehouse
The Red Herring is a non-profit institution that has a significant history of social action activities and arts programming for more than 40 years. It is not a for-profit company or corporation. "The Free Speech Movement" did much organization here in the fifties and The Students for a Democratic Society in the 60's. Many well known musicians and Filmmakers also have been a part of this place. Do not delete this page!
Hi, you deleted the talk page, but the article still exists. Gwernol had to delete the article in order to re-create it with the history intact as it kept getting redirected to M/S Riverdance by editors who had had no input into the article and did not discuss the proposed move. Can you undelete the talk page please? Mjroots ( talk) 08:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jmlk17, you protected the article Islamophobia some time ago (16 Jan). While attempts towards dispute resolution have been partially successful, there has been a substantial lack of recent talk page activity, even though I have been requesting feedback on new compromise attempts. In the light of the talk page discussion having dried up, would it be okay to have the article unprotected so I can see how the new proposed lead floats, and so that editing to the article can be resumed? Regards, ITAQALLAH 21:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Please restore the page "TOAS Nabard- The Persian Art of Combat" which was deleted via a (prod) tag on 01/19/08.
I appreciate your time an efforts.
Metalmilitian ( talk) 00:27, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick respnse. The reason we want the page restored is that TOAS Nabard is a form of martial art that Master Safakhoo developed over his life and has been teaching to others for more than 25 years in the US. Through Wiki, we hope that others will come to understand that TOAS Nabard is unique and that not only are there punches, kicks, and grabs, but deeper within is a reason and a understanding of each which can be linked to an ancient persian philosphy and belief. Through these beliefs and approaches, we not only better ourselves physically, we also better understand ourselves on a wholistic basis.
Thank you, Metalmilitian ( talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
This is what we are attempting to accomplish...The notability of TOAS Nabard. We are trying to inform others of the history of the Persian Art of Combat and relate it to the TOAS Nabard way for the general user seeking more information through Wikipedia. It is very hard to establish notability when the subject you are referring to is unique. I hope this helps with your question.
-edit- Please follow this link [1] where you will find that TOAS Nabard and Master Safakhoo have been interviewed by Budo International Magazine and the local Pensacola News Journal. Both of these articles should lend notibility to this wikipage -end edit-
Thanks - Metalmilitian ( talk) 00:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Very much appreciated! Metalmilitian ( talk) 04:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Okay, so you deleted my page very soon, it was a work in progress. How can I post information about this band? I have a verifiable source, from a site called Sonicbirds.com and I have a direct contact with the band to have more supporting documentation available. Should I create a word file first before posting? This is not an advertisement for the band. They have had live performances and professional studio development and mastering.
I'm new to this as well, so please bare that in mind. Apiotuch ( talk) 09:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello jmlk17, can you tell me what was done wrong with my posting? I would like to make the changed needed to fit the format needed by wiki. I am unable to find much info about the usc ibear program, I am a graduate and thought it would be great to post some info about it. The program is ranked by all major business school sites--us news, financial times, bus week. I am not trying to put up an ad, though, I did add the admissions page and maybe this was the issue. I would be happy to remove that link, it is not needed at all...I only added it because I was trying to copy other univ.'s formats. There are many other univ. with info about thier ranked individual programs on wiki. I hope that I can add the info about ibear program too.
Thank you for your time...I love the site. dylan p Dylanp ( talk) 10:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for this. It's a shame really, as he did appear to have something to say and to know about the subject, but he has been intent on this path. Hopefully we can succeed in engaging him in dialogue on his return. Regards, — BillC talk —Preceding comment was added at 18:29, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Dear Mr.Jmlk17,
I was creating an interesting and true biographic article in Wikipedia on the 11th of Feb 2008. It took about 2 hrs for me to create this authentic article as an official biographer of a leading educationist in India. But soon I was plugged off from wikipedia and my article that contained 100% correct references were delected stating vandalism. If this is the case for an authentic biographer, I do not know how you treat commoners and real vandalists. Not a word that i wrote was untrue or in a way to reduce the credibility of Wikipedia. Then you can introduce a payment mode whereby people who want them to have their profiles in ur website can pay and do so. I think this doesn't contributes to your objective of having a perfect encyclopedia. Your action is unfortunate and unjustified. I am not angry but only feel that I wasted 2 hrs on writing this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Livingston Madras ( talk • contribs) 22:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
I really appreciate what you guys are doing in the Wikipedia. I will keep an eye on that Voodoo Tiki article, in order to keep it clean. Thanks again for your time! :)
-- Ubzy ( talk) 02:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jmlk17,
I'd like to request for help:
Please take a look at this section in Anger article: [2]. It is my belief that adding political-flavored images to articles that are not notable or known for any political issue is not appropriate. The concept of anger itself is rather independent of politics; If the images were notable (they are not), they were only justified to represent the concept of anger in the context of politics (but there is no such section there); and lastly the image is not historically notable; there are thousands of images available on the internet that do not have political flavor but represent the matter and I believe there are already such images in the article. Since User:David Shankbone had added such images to many many articles such as Body language, Gesture, Index finger, Type of gesture, Logical argument, Eye contact, Staring, originally I thought this is a violation of WP:POINT as well (but I don't think this is so anymore; maybe a conflict of interest causing ( WP:COI) favoring of those images). Could you please help with this. Thank you very much . -- Be happy!! ( talk) 04:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
You've SP'd the Madeleine McCann article. I think you need to look more closely at this article and its history before excluding just one party in the "edit war". By semi-protecting this article you have excluded the anonymous user (and all others) while leaving the small cabal of editors who control the article to do as they want. I haven't the time or the inclination to examine all of the disputed requests for citation, but I did look at just two, refs 146 and 147. These were the first I came across and I have to say that the sources are not good. In fact they do not in any way back up the statements being made about criticism of the parents. The anonymous user is correct to ask for a citation in these two cases at least. The onus should then be on "the article owners" (Harry the Dog, TerriersFan etc) to source those remarks or remove them. You might like to consider either removing SP or fully-protecting the article. As it stands, it appears that the IP is being excluded just becuase he's an IP editor. 82.20.28.142 ( talk) 14:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
What you removed in [5] was not a "theological discussion". It pertained to the topic at hand and directly to comments made that have not been removed. My comment regarding the differences in doctrine regarding images, icons, and depictions in general is replies directly Kaldari's question of "why Christians don't care that Jesus is depicted and Muslims care if Muhammed is". How do you plan to answer that question if not with a brief explanation of doctrine? My comment to Armanaziz replies directly to his general complaint that the images are unimportant (at least that's what he seems to be saying). I realize I off the rails yesterday, but I was on the right-of-way still. Today I'm on the rails. Put it back pls... - MasonicDevice ( talk) 22:37, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jmlk17, MIPRO is a Taiwan-based wireless microphone company; recently lanuches industry first digital wireless microphone system. Thus, I'd like to edit MIPRO in Wikipedia; however, this title has been protected. Can you help to unprotect and edit it? (If you need detailed information, I am willing to contribute it). Thanks and I am looking forward to hearing from you soon. Ccdavid ( talk) 06:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you deleted the article Bob's. Can you please undelete it? I will prove that it is notable. Editorofthewiki ( talk) —Preceding comment was added at 20:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in my RfA! It was closed as successful with 58 supporting, 0 opposing, and 2 neutral. I hope to demonstrate that your trust in me is rightly placed and am always open to critiques and suggestions. Cheers. MBisanz talk 03:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | ![]() |
|
Could you, as the protecting admin, have a look at the end of the talkpage? It appears a consensus has emerged that the the consequences of a damaging edit war should be rolled back. Relata refero ( talk) 08:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello. The band you deleted, has many of the requirements listed by wikipedia. The referencing are included on the page. There is no reason why you should have deleted it.
Yeah dude, it sucks. I don't know whats going on here, but if they don't shape up I'm gonna have to go down there. lol - Rjd0060 ( talk) 15:46, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
You deleted the article before giving me a chance to indicate notability. I was updating the talk page with more explanation and reference. could you please explain why the deletion was so fast? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexGWU ( talk • contribs) 03:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
This article meets the notability criteria:
In 1998 he received the annual award for the "Most Unique Contribution" from the National Association of Transpersonal Hypnotherapists.
He is one of the first scientists using a scientific approach for over 40 years of clinical research and practice to discover and explain soul experiences.AlexGWU (talk) 03:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC) AlexGWU ( talk) 04:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Maybe I didn't understand your response. Is the issue having the Dr. in front of the name in the article?? AlexGWU ( talk) 06:12, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Dear Jmlk17, here is a little note to say thank you for your kind vote on my request for adminship which succeeded with a final result of (29/5/5).
I understand why you voted oppose, and I will take the advice that you have given. And now that I am a sysop, I will work hard to improve the encyclopedia with my new editing tools. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any queries you have. I would be glad to help you along with the other group of kind and helpful administrators.
Thank you again and I look forward to editing alongside you in the future. — Chetblong T C 21:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Muhammad should also be semi-protected from IP addresses. Too much page blanking going on. Thoughts? - ✰ ALLSTAR✰ echo 00:49, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Please remove the protection from Muhammad and follow Wikipedia:PROT#Content_disputes ("Administrators should not protect or unprotect a page [...] if they are in any way involved in the dispute.") There is a strong evidence, that you are indeed involved: [6]. If User:Rauf-abdul violated WP:3RR you can block the user, but that's no reason to protect the page. Besides, we are currently building a new consensus on WikiEN-l [7]. -- Raphael1 23:38, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
That is certainly not an inappropriate discussion. Why are you deleting my messages there? If you continue this, i will report you to higher admin. XubayrMA Talk 09:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Haha, I figured I would AGF on your part, even though your edits are rarely ever constructive :P lol – Gonzo fan2007 talk ♦ contribs 17:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello Jmlk 17, it looks like you deleted the entry on RLM Software on Jan 17th after a PROD request went uncontested for 5 days.
Can you let me know why it was deleted? I'm asking that you restore it based on its relevance to FAA Air Traffic Control initiatives.
Thanks FlightTracker ( talk) 21:32, 18 February 2008 (UTC)2/18/08
Hey, I saw that recently you changed from neutral to a weak oppose. I don't want to come off as aggressive, but may I ask why you decided to change? It would be helpful to know what was the deciding factor so I can improve upon that. Thank you very much. Icestorm815 • Talk 01:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Can you explain the semi-protection decline? I ask because I'd read the policy where it said, * Pages subject to significant but temporary vandalism or disruption, for example due to media attention, when blocking individual users is not a feasible option. which seemed to fit here. The IP and now a 2nd are doing nothing but vandalising the page. Am I missing something? Travellingcari ( talk) 19:31, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
|
Hi, Jmlk17 I would ask that you please restore my new page about Julio Bermejo. He is a very important person in the world of tequila. I tried to explain in the article, and provided links to some major publications in english that he has appeared in over the last few years. I did not elaborate more on the nature of his business endeavors for fear of the article being deleted as marketing/pr, which it is not.
I respectfully ask that you read one or more of the news article links that I provided and so you can understand that he is definitely important enough to have his own page. I am sure that over time me and other wikipedians can help flesh out more exact details of Julio and update the page accordingly. I feel strongly that it is very important that Julio's significance in the world of tequila appreciation be documented as such.
Thanks for your consideration.
playphil ( talk) 23:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
I really appreciate that. Thanks Jmlk17! And thanks for the quick block on DisabledCat. He/She was going crazy vandalizing pages. Again, thanks and thanks :) - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
What do you think of this. Speedy? AfD? POV tag? Thanks, Dloh cierekim Deleted? 01:40, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. He does not seem to have a firm grasp of NPOV. Cheers, Dloh cierekim Deleted? 01:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC) IT's gone!! Dloh cierekim Deleted? 01:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Is "No research. Poorly written" really a speedy deletion criterion? Wouldn't it have been better to list for prod or something? seresin | wasn't he just...? 02:07, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
![]() |
Destructo 087's Hidden Page | |
Well done finding Destructo's Hidden Page--
Destructo
Talk to me
02:30, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
( UTC) |
Here you go, Destructo.