Hello, Jjok, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
S
iva1979
Talk to me
05:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihon jo e 16:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you guys. Jjok 04:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Your edit is splendid.I sincerely congratulates it.by the way,Would you have(know) any material about van fleed report ?-- Forestfarmer 15:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Would you mind to edit ja:ヴァンフリートレポート?please.-- Forestfarmer 10:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Report of Van Fleet mission to the Far East Jjok 13:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I think some typo.please check this.
"dept" is the 11th line of end in "a Japan" section. It may be "depth"."bot" is the 10th line of mid in "Korean Residents in Japan" section. "were" is the 2nd line of mid "5. Claims and Counter-Claims" section.I think it may be "wire".I don't know what it is.but I think you earlier find all of the words if you searched in web brower(Ctrl+f).-- Forestfarmer 07:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
date | Mythologia | Shougiku_Wine |
---|---|---|
8/1 |
|
|
7/31 |
|
|
7/30 |
|
|
7/29 |
|
|
7/28 |
|
|
7/27 |
|
|
7/26 |
|
|
7/25 |
|
|
7/24 |
|
|
7/23 |
|
|
7/22 |
|
|
7/21 |
|
|
7/20 |
|
|
7/19 |
|
|
7/18 |
|
|
7/17 |
|
|
7/16 |
| |
7/15 |
|
|
Names for Liancourt rocks, and Dagelet and Argonaut islands | |||
---|---|---|---|
Liancourt rocks | Dagelet | Argonaut | |
position | |||
Hanja | 朝鮮海峽 | 大韓海峽 | |
Revised Romanization | Joseon Haehyeop | Daehan Haehyeop | |
McCune-Reischauer | Chosŏn Haehyŏp | Taehan Haehyŏp | |
Japanese name | |||
Kanji | 対馬海峡 | ||
Hiragana | つしまかいきょう | ||
Hepburn Romanization | Tsushima Kaikyō |
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
With respect to the above article, please see WP:SOAP. Best, JChap2007 14:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
プロバイダーどこですか?私は昼間はIIJで休日、夜間はNIFTYです。プロバイダーが違うならIPチェックをかけてもらうようにしませんか?-- Opp2 02:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Jjok; I was hoping you might stop by the Port Hamilton page and make some comments on the naming issue there. Several authors seem to admit is the most standard name in English. Nonetheless, they are persisting in claims that "since Korea owns the islands, it should be named in Korean." Being from Korea myself, I know there are a lot of name issues that I really do care about, and I think it's important to stick to this "common usage" policy everywhere. I'd like to get some editors opinions who are interested in naming in general, but not necessarily that page. This island is a rather unnotable place that had a base on it, and always appears in that context. There are some ambiguity concerns, but these happen for several of the choices (the Korean name itself, for example) and does not currently conflict with any other articles.
I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at this page if you have time. You seem to have a lot of interest in naming issues. While I have one opinion on the name, I encourage you to read over the discussion so far and make up your mind. I want to leave this message because I think there are a few hawks who watch the article and try to "gang up" when the rest of the community might not otherwise notice a small article like this. Komdori 22:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello Jjok,
I noticed your comment about sockpuppets, below the voting at Talk:Dokdo#Requested Move May 2007.
FYI, there was another recent "Appleby-type" case:
New WP:RFCU's can be filed there, if they're related.-- Endroit 14:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi Jjok,
I noticed you left a comment on the page, but I didn't see that you had voted in the poll. I wasn't sure if this was because you simply didn't have an opinion or if it somehow slipped past. --Cheers, Komdori 13:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your added references to the article. But can you participate in the talk page before revising pre-existing edits and propose adding sections, etc.? All sides have been doing this and it's been productive. melonbarmonster 22:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
for re-arranging the links...i couldnt manage to make them look nice. ty Sennen goroshi 19:57, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bigot-nichiro.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Gaijin, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with
biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. The term (gaijin smash) appears to be a
neologism that is not found in any reliably sourced dictionaries. The two sources that were previously cited (UrbanDictionary.com and the blog Japan Probe) are both insufficient and unreliable for the claims made. See
WP:NEO. Another editor has already reverted these edits twice (thank you).
J Readings
12:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Before you add uncited material to the article, please gain consensus for your changes on the article's talk page. Thank you. John Smith's ( talk) 14:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
If you do, then check this out. Talk:Ikuhiko_Hata#Denial_of_existence Let's discuss your changes before you break the 3RR rule and get yourself banned. Yaki-gaijin ( talk) 03:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I spent quite some time researching Japans financial donations to the world...the info comes directly from the U.N. Website. What is wrong? -- Jjk82 ( talk) 06:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Chris, I think her actual name is Ran (蘭, orchid) or Mei (in the amine Kazemakase: Tsukikage Ran). Please reconfirm her name.-- Jjok ( talk) 16:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Dog meat. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Even though your contributions seem not pleasant to Koreans, I had thought you at least tried to stick to original references, but you don't. In accordance with your contributions on Korean related articles such as
Prostitution in South Korea, dog meat section at Korean cuisine,
Comfort women etc, you seem to read Korean language. However, you appear to be not much knowledgeable of Korean cuisine due to your falsification on the duruchigi and jeongol at the dog meat article. So I recommend you to read Korean cuisine articles over the web to learn how Korean cuisine terms are used. You have some good knowledge of Japanese cuisine, so can get the new information quickly. And please don't introduce false information to Wikipedia because this is encyclopedia. Thanks.--
Appletrees (
talk)
23:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
The administrator is the same checkuer who looked into my two reports, so your alarming for the report seems really usful (oh, really).-- Appletrees ( talk) 18:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Your assumption doesn't add up. So please enlighten me.
you may need to doubt the existence of government-assisted massive Japanese lobbying organizations such as VANK (while it seems only one editor is actually causing edit-wars with you)
I googled vank and the official website says "한국바로알리기 민간기획단" on the site below which seems just ordinary website related to Korea. And it looks like a private organization because of the internet domain (Every governmental site has "go.ko" in the adress). Are you saying that the site is operated by Korean government?
If my understanding is right, are you implying that the odn ip users who belong to some Japanese lobbist site just like VANK deliberately caused edit wars with me????
These assumption sound weird, so I asked you why you wrote it like that? Thanks.-- Appletrees ( talk) 19:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
The relation between imperial household and Baekjae of Japan is being discussed. I hope for your opinion. [7]-- Princesunta ( talk) 10:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Your photo of Yakiniku has insufficient information on the image, and 221.190.251.169 ( talk · contribs) (ocn.ne.jp) raised the issue first [8]. We don't know whether it was really taken by you due to lack of information. It seems to be taken in any English-speaking world, especially North America, but I'm not sure of it. You generally stick to sourcing, so please provide info. The matter has been discussed in commons, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Korean-style BBQ.JPG Thanks. -- Appletrees ( talk) 16:11, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at
Manacpowers , you will be
blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the
welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, racially motivated edits, such as those you made to
Prostitution in South Korea, are considered
vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be
blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. --
Appletrees (
talk)
16:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
It DOES constitute Personal attack to not only Manacpowers but also Koreans because Jjok really intended so at the summary. If you want to be so related to the mockery, I tell you again, that is an personal attack no matter how you defend for Jjok. -- Appletrees ( talk) 19:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
FYI: Jjok, you are being discussed at WP:AN/I here.-- Endroit ( talk) 17:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
As per our archived discussion at WP:AN/I here, I have initiated WP:DR in the respective talk pages as follows:
Please continue discussion there.-- Endroit ( talk) 18:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your good work on Toyoko Tokiwa. Please continue!
One question, a couple of comments:
Yokohama zaijū no shashinka Tokiwa Toyoko san does indeed look like a newspaper article. But how do you know that it's from 毎日新聞? I don't notice this information anywhere. (I am sleepy though.)
I have mixed feelings about red links. If they encourage writers to create articles, fine. But they are hideous. Therefore I don't add them (and I actually subtract them) if I don't think an article is likely any time soon.
Incidentally, a month or so ago 日本カメラ (or maybe アサヒカメラ) had a little feature on 笹本恒子, now in her nineties and still taking photographs. She deserves a decent article, but I can't afford the time in the next few weeks. -- Hoary ( talk) 02:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. Well, I'll stop deleting redlinks then (though I shan't rush to add them).
Yes, "Hewlett Packard" was a stupid mistake. (i) "hp", + (ii) top page shows computers, + (iii) brain not wide awake =
I don't think that Zenhan likes writing in English, but I might try. -- Hoary ( talk) 04:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for persevering, Jjok. I've just emerged from the shower to discover that Takako Tokiwa and Ken Domon have both sprung "infoboxes" (not your doing, of course!), which does not make me happy. I'd better head off to Doutor to get a まぐろチーズ sandwich and an espresso. (Oh yes, and I have plenty of non-WP stuff to do.) -- Hoary ( talk) 05:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
上野 is of course Ueno, but how about the 初雄 part of the name 上野初雄 (author of a web page cited in Toyoko Tokiwa)? (Japanese names are such a pain. The moment I assume "Ueno", I expect that somebody will point out that no, for this particular person it's "Kamino" or something else.) -- Hoary ( talk) 23:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jjok. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jjok~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
00:54, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Diaoyutai senkaku.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:47, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Jjok, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --
S
iva1979
Talk to me
05:26, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihon jo e 16:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Thank you guys. Jjok 04:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
Your edit is splendid.I sincerely congratulates it.by the way,Would you have(know) any material about van fleed report ?-- Forestfarmer 15:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Would you mind to edit ja:ヴァンフリートレポート?please.-- Forestfarmer 10:06, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Report of Van Fleet mission to the Far East Jjok 13:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I think some typo.please check this.
"dept" is the 11th line of end in "a Japan" section. It may be "depth"."bot" is the 10th line of mid in "Korean Residents in Japan" section. "were" is the 2nd line of mid "5. Claims and Counter-Claims" section.I think it may be "wire".I don't know what it is.but I think you earlier find all of the words if you searched in web brower(Ctrl+f).-- Forestfarmer 07:08, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
date | Mythologia | Shougiku_Wine |
---|---|---|
8/1 |
|
|
7/31 |
|
|
7/30 |
|
|
7/29 |
|
|
7/28 |
|
|
7/27 |
|
|
7/26 |
|
|
7/25 |
|
|
7/24 |
|
|
7/23 |
|
|
7/22 |
|
|
7/21 |
|
|
7/20 |
|
|
7/19 |
|
|
7/18 |
|
|
7/17 |
|
|
7/16 |
| |
7/15 |
|
|
Names for Liancourt rocks, and Dagelet and Argonaut islands | |||
---|---|---|---|
Liancourt rocks | Dagelet | Argonaut | |
position | |||
Hanja | 朝鮮海峽 | 大韓海峽 | |
Revised Romanization | Joseon Haehyeop | Daehan Haehyeop | |
McCune-Reischauer | Chosŏn Haehyŏp | Taehan Haehyŏp | |
Japanese name | |||
Kanji | 対馬海峡 | ||
Hiragana | つしまかいきょう | ||
Hepburn Romanization | Tsushima Kaikyō |
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
With respect to the above article, please see WP:SOAP. Best, JChap2007 14:55, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
プロバイダーどこですか?私は昼間はIIJで休日、夜間はNIFTYです。プロバイダーが違うならIPチェックをかけてもらうようにしませんか?-- Opp2 02:20, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Jjok; I was hoping you might stop by the Port Hamilton page and make some comments on the naming issue there. Several authors seem to admit is the most standard name in English. Nonetheless, they are persisting in claims that "since Korea owns the islands, it should be named in Korean." Being from Korea myself, I know there are a lot of name issues that I really do care about, and I think it's important to stick to this "common usage" policy everywhere. I'd like to get some editors opinions who are interested in naming in general, but not necessarily that page. This island is a rather unnotable place that had a base on it, and always appears in that context. There are some ambiguity concerns, but these happen for several of the choices (the Korean name itself, for example) and does not currently conflict with any other articles.
I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at this page if you have time. You seem to have a lot of interest in naming issues. While I have one opinion on the name, I encourage you to read over the discussion so far and make up your mind. I want to leave this message because I think there are a few hawks who watch the article and try to "gang up" when the rest of the community might not otherwise notice a small article like this. Komdori 22:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello Jjok,
I noticed your comment about sockpuppets, below the voting at Talk:Dokdo#Requested Move May 2007.
FYI, there was another recent "Appleby-type" case:
New WP:RFCU's can be filed there, if they're related.-- Endroit 14:33, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi Jjok,
I noticed you left a comment on the page, but I didn't see that you had voted in the poll. I wasn't sure if this was because you simply didn't have an opinion or if it somehow slipped past. --Cheers, Komdori 13:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your added references to the article. But can you participate in the talk page before revising pre-existing edits and propose adding sections, etc.? All sides have been doing this and it's been productive. melonbarmonster 22:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
for re-arranging the links...i couldnt manage to make them look nice. ty Sennen goroshi 19:57, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bigot-nichiro.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without
citing a
reliable source, as you did to
Gaijin, is not consistent with our policy of
verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with
biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with
Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. The term (gaijin smash) appears to be a
neologism that is not found in any reliably sourced dictionaries. The two sources that were previously cited (UrbanDictionary.com and the blog Japan Probe) are both insufficient and unreliable for the claims made. See
WP:NEO. Another editor has already reverted these edits twice (thank you).
J Readings
12:32, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Before you add uncited material to the article, please gain consensus for your changes on the article's talk page. Thank you. John Smith's ( talk) 14:02, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
If you do, then check this out. Talk:Ikuhiko_Hata#Denial_of_existence Let's discuss your changes before you break the 3RR rule and get yourself banned. Yaki-gaijin ( talk) 03:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
I spent quite some time researching Japans financial donations to the world...the info comes directly from the U.N. Website. What is wrong? -- Jjk82 ( talk) 06:52, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Chris, I think her actual name is Ran (蘭, orchid) or Mei (in the amine Kazemakase: Tsukikage Ran). Please reconfirm her name.-- Jjok ( talk) 16:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Dog meat. Your edits appear to be
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Even though your contributions seem not pleasant to Koreans, I had thought you at least tried to stick to original references, but you don't. In accordance with your contributions on Korean related articles such as
Prostitution in South Korea, dog meat section at Korean cuisine,
Comfort women etc, you seem to read Korean language. However, you appear to be not much knowledgeable of Korean cuisine due to your falsification on the duruchigi and jeongol at the dog meat article. So I recommend you to read Korean cuisine articles over the web to learn how Korean cuisine terms are used. You have some good knowledge of Japanese cuisine, so can get the new information quickly. And please don't introduce false information to Wikipedia because this is encyclopedia. Thanks.--
Appletrees (
talk)
23:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
The administrator is the same checkuer who looked into my two reports, so your alarming for the report seems really usful (oh, really).-- Appletrees ( talk) 18:30, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Your assumption doesn't add up. So please enlighten me.
you may need to doubt the existence of government-assisted massive Japanese lobbying organizations such as VANK (while it seems only one editor is actually causing edit-wars with you)
I googled vank and the official website says "한국바로알리기 민간기획단" on the site below which seems just ordinary website related to Korea. And it looks like a private organization because of the internet domain (Every governmental site has "go.ko" in the adress). Are you saying that the site is operated by Korean government?
If my understanding is right, are you implying that the odn ip users who belong to some Japanese lobbist site just like VANK deliberately caused edit wars with me????
These assumption sound weird, so I asked you why you wrote it like that? Thanks.-- Appletrees ( talk) 19:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
The relation between imperial household and Baekjae of Japan is being discussed. I hope for your opinion. [7]-- Princesunta ( talk) 10:23, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Your photo of Yakiniku has insufficient information on the image, and 221.190.251.169 ( talk · contribs) (ocn.ne.jp) raised the issue first [8]. We don't know whether it was really taken by you due to lack of information. It seems to be taken in any English-speaking world, especially North America, but I'm not sure of it. You generally stick to sourcing, so please provide info. The matter has been discussed in commons, Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Korean-style BBQ.JPG Thanks. -- Appletrees ( talk) 16:11, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at
Manacpowers , you will be
blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the
welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, racially motivated edits, such as those you made to
Prostitution in South Korea, are considered
vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be
blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. --
Appletrees (
talk)
16:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
It DOES constitute Personal attack to not only Manacpowers but also Koreans because Jjok really intended so at the summary. If you want to be so related to the mockery, I tell you again, that is an personal attack no matter how you defend for Jjok. -- Appletrees ( talk) 19:08, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
FYI: Jjok, you are being discussed at WP:AN/I here.-- Endroit ( talk) 17:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
As per our archived discussion at WP:AN/I here, I have initiated WP:DR in the respective talk pages as follows:
Please continue discussion there.-- Endroit ( talk) 18:34, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your good work on Toyoko Tokiwa. Please continue!
One question, a couple of comments:
Yokohama zaijū no shashinka Tokiwa Toyoko san does indeed look like a newspaper article. But how do you know that it's from 毎日新聞? I don't notice this information anywhere. (I am sleepy though.)
I have mixed feelings about red links. If they encourage writers to create articles, fine. But they are hideous. Therefore I don't add them (and I actually subtract them) if I don't think an article is likely any time soon.
Incidentally, a month or so ago 日本カメラ (or maybe アサヒカメラ) had a little feature on 笹本恒子, now in her nineties and still taking photographs. She deserves a decent article, but I can't afford the time in the next few weeks. -- Hoary ( talk) 02:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. Well, I'll stop deleting redlinks then (though I shan't rush to add them).
Yes, "Hewlett Packard" was a stupid mistake. (i) "hp", + (ii) top page shows computers, + (iii) brain not wide awake =
I don't think that Zenhan likes writing in English, but I might try. -- Hoary ( talk) 04:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for persevering, Jjok. I've just emerged from the shower to discover that Takako Tokiwa and Ken Domon have both sprung "infoboxes" (not your doing, of course!), which does not make me happy. I'd better head off to Doutor to get a まぐろチーズ sandwich and an espresso. (Oh yes, and I have plenty of non-WP stuff to do.) -- Hoary ( talk) 05:59, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
上野 is of course Ueno, but how about the 初雄 part of the name 上野初雄 (author of a web page cited in Toyoko Tokiwa)? (Japanese names are such a pain. The moment I assume "Ueno", I expect that somebody will point out that no, for this particular person it's "Kamino" or something else.) -- Hoary ( talk) 23:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Jjok. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Jjok~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
00:54, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on File:Diaoyutai senkaku.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 ( talk) 21:47, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)