![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Thank you for your edits in my draft Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/The_Early_Nationalists_of_India_(Moderates). Rudra ( talk) 10:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC) |
Please see: User talk:Rudra john cena#Another account
Thank you, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 01:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Read: User talk:Rudra john cena#Rudra john cena/Jim Cartar
As this account seems to be an attempt at a fresh start, I will block Rudra john cena and you must only use this account and create no others. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 08:41, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kainaz Motivala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi there. I know you are just trying to be helpful, but sometimes others find it simpler if just one person handles a matter. Thank you for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 23:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Your suggestion was fine.— No, it was not. I saw that post and ignored it. You suggested to keep his userpage "simple". The issue was not related to simplicity or complexity of the userpage. The userpage was deleted under Wikipedia:CSD#G11 — using userpage for advertisement/promotion. A better (read "correct") suggestion could be asking him not to create userpage like a fake article or detailed biography or resume.
I shall surely provide much information on Total Knee and Hip Replacement Surgeries. I won't be surprised if he adds his suggestions or prescriptions in some disease articles. Mentioning the Wikipedia policies e.g. please contribute to medical science related articles following Wikipedia policies, check WP:OR, WP:V, WP:NPOV etc could be better. You and that editor have similar level of expertise. A blind can not lead another blind. Tito☸ Dutta 13:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
can you please be polite when talking with me— shut up. From the very first day you have flooded me with notifications and help requests and now you are asking why I am getting involved! And why are you notifying and adding talkback messages if you don't want me to reply? -- Tito☸ Dutta 17:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
shut up. From the very first day you have flooded me with notifications and help requests and now you are asking why I am getting involved!—What else, you are the one who started talking with me first at my alternate accounts talk page, this is not called involvement instead this can be called Adding fuel in fire (i.e. provoking others to feel bad about someone) and by the way every expert Wikipedian receives hundreds of notifications, none of them complains like you, every new user has rights to ask for help from a experienced user like you but no one use this term
shut up.to a new user. It was a small issue of suggestions but you have started fighting with me. You are the one who pokes his nose in others conversations you did it multiple times on User:Anna Frodesiak talk page, in my talk page in User:BgWhites talk page etc. Before pointing fingers on others please think 100times that if you are doing the correct one or not. Before you critisise others please think once if you are doing the right thing or not. It was User:MelanieN for whom I am not fighting.
You suggested to keep his userpage "simple". The issue was not related to simplicity or complexity of the userpage.—Are you judging my suggestions. I know my suggestions were not good and I have already stopped suggesting others. But I have just told Niraj Vora to make his user page Simple after I have seen the suggestion by Anna-
Editors who arrive, make it plainand in a earlier discussion she told something like this "one must add only Basic Information on there user page" I know you are thinking what I am trying to explain with this, If you try to find the meaning of simple in Oxford English Dictionary, isbn=0-19-569258-6 then you will find the meaning is Plain and basic that mean I have commented partially same what User:Anna Frodesiak already said him. So, Tito-
No, it was not.also means that the comment introduced by Anna was also not totally perfect. 2ndly a New user cannot always understand the heavy meanings of Wikipedia guidelines so it is our not me but other users responsibility to make them understand step by step not only providing
see this guidelines firstmakes them understand the total system how Wikipedia works. I don't know if you have seen other parts of the discussion or not but I have mentioned the advertising or self-promotional topic already some where there.
Secondly you asked him to contribute in medical science related subjects.—Is it wrong to encourage new users to contribute. I personally think that one should contribute in a article in which he as good knowledge. That is why I asked him to contribute in the field which is his profession.
I won't be surprised if he adds his suggestions or prescriptions in some disease articles.—Do you think that Indian editors are so stupid that they will add prescriptions about diseases, He maybe new but it is his common sense that he will not do such a idiotic blunder. (This point makes me laugh) Anna has already said that some users are watching his contributions if he makes any error then they will revert changes he will make.
Hi Jim Cartar, Thank you for you help with creating an article. I saw your notes and have added some citations to the /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mark_W._Rocha page. I was wondering if this is notable enough to get the article approved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark W. Rocha ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
By the way, about that red-linked user category you list on your userpage, Category:Users who use Mozzila: Did you mean to list Category:Wikipedians who use Mozilla Firefox? Or maybe Mozilla Aurora or Mozilla Nightly? -- MelanieN ( talk) 21:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
OK, I took a quick look at your draft. You have put a lot of work into this article; did you write it as a school assignment? If so I bet you got a good grade, because it is very well done as a school paper. Wikipedia has other criteria.
Your draft has already been reviewed by someone who has a lot of experience with articles about Indian history. I agree with their assessment: the article is not well supported by references. Most of your references are not Reliable Sources, which means things like scholarly articles or books, reports from major newspapers, etc. Yourarticlelibrary.com is not a Reliable Source; those are self-written essays which anyone can write and submit, there is no fact-checking or other verification. (You could upload your draft to that library!) Same problem with the blog for exam preparation. Your draft could certainly be tidied up and copy edited, but that would not do any good if the article was not supported by Reliable Sources. Also, as someone else mentioned, the title of the article is not good.
On the other hand, this material is interesting and it doesn't seem to be well covered at Wikipedia, so I think there is a place for it. My recommendation is that you not try to make this a free-standing article, at least not right now. Instead, add some of the information - the parts that have Reliable Sourcing - to existing articles like British Raj#1870s–1907: Social reformers, moderates vs. extremists, or to Indian independence movement#Rise of Indian nationalism (1885–1905). You will get feedback from other editors who work at those articles; accept their comments and learn from them, and gradually expand the information. Eventually you may have enough material to split off into a separate article. But don't start out trying to write a brand new article. That's my advice. And in fact it's generally good advice for new users: start out by improving existing articles, not by trying to create new ones -- MelanieN ( talk) 16:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jim - Thanks so much for your helpful edits and note. I'm hoping you can clarify your suggestion to: "You must add more informations about the subject instead of making the article a plot summary."
I came up with this draft, do you think it suffices? Or what else would you suggest?
As a blogger
Wealthy Single Mommy, Emma writes about her life as a professional, single parent in New York City, and speaks to issues facing professional women. She is known for taking a strong stand that women should continue their careers and strive for financial independence after having children, as well as term marriage contracts as an answer to high divorce rates. Since launching in August, 2012, the blog gained an international following and media attention -- and is often criticized for being unrealistic in her dating, and judgmental of other women's choices, including by bloggers at The Chicago Tribune
[1], the blog Heartiste
[2].
All help appreciated! thanks Jim! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonnabefamous ( talk • contribs) 19:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
"You must add more informations about the subject instead of making the article a plot summary."I meant that you should add sections about the subject, something like Early life of the subject, personal life of the subject, etc.
Great, thanks for this .... I made changes ... does this suffice? Thanks again!
Gonnabefamous ( talk) 21:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jim, I'm afraid you must be feeling that we're all criticising you an awful lot, and I'm very sorry to make yet another request, but please could you stop telling people to come to your talk page to get advice from your friendly talk page stalkers, as you did today at User talk:Ladypn. I know you are trying to be helpful, but if we want to provide an advice service, we can provide it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. If people ask you for advice about AFCs, please in future would you advise them to go there (as I've just done for Gonnabefamous). This is the best way, because different editors know about different things, and a wider range of experience is likely to be available at that help desk. I hope that's OK. -- Stfg ( talk) 21:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
By the way, you might like to have a look at WP:OVERLINK. We don't usually link to more than one mention of the same thing–Are you telling this after seeing this AfC draft. If so then I know, it is something I have done due to lack of time (My entrance examinations are going on). So I'm typing this to tell that I don't have enough time to add the references to its respective sections. But you know that if I don't add them in the draft then it is certain that the draft may decline. So, I have just added the references to its lead section and leaved it to the reviewer to fix it. If It is not fixed in next few days, then I will try to fix it after exam. Thank you Stfg for your advice. Jim Cartar ( talk) 07:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
I have been detected as a sock puppet after I have already disclosed in my user page that I and User:Rudra john cena are the same. I have been blocked from editing for a reason which I haven't done. Please see : Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rudra john cena and you guys will understand what I am trying to explain. I have only and only created this account as alternate and I have already disclosed this issue but now they have detected some other account. But I swear in the name of God I don't have any other account, please help me User:MelanieN, User:Anna F remote, User:Stfg, User:Anna Frodesiak, User:VQuakr, User:Admrboltz, User:Bgwhite. And all please help me unblock. I don't have any other account. Guyzz please, please, please believe me. Please. Please help me.
I wanted to do a new start so I created this account and leaved Rudra john cena account forever. You can ask Anna she knows. And as claimed in sock investigation that I have copyvios but actually I don't have any. See the location from were I and the other account as claimed is accessing Wikipedia. You will understand that it is not me. Please I beg you please unblock. I am not guilty. Jim Cartar ( talk) 10:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
You've made it clear that you wish to become an administrator someday. A bit of guidance: If I were you, I'd get out of the helping others business, and into content creation. Why? Content creation is the absolute best place to start as a Wikipedian. It gives you experience in many areas, and will better enable you to help others to create content (WP:AfC). It is also really, really important at an WP:RfA, and many won't support you if you haven't created a substantial amount.
A great way is to make species articles. They don't have to be huge. You can copy the formatting from other articles. The prose can consist of several, simply stated facts. Sources are easy to find. The images are already waiting for the articles. Imagine at your userpage, a list of articles that you created. Here are images needing articles that you might be interested in starting:
Please let me know if you need any help. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 01:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
wish to become an administrator someday.–This was my dream which was already shattered. :'( Please suggest me Anna what should I do. Jim Cartar ( talk) 09:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
I see that you are continuing with your project of de-orphaning articles. That's good! But one correction: you added "Jack M. Ducker" to "List of painters by name beginning with J". The lists are alphabetized by LAST name, so he really belongs at "List of painters by name beginning with D". Thanks for doing this and keep up the article improvements! -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:14, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
About the article K. N. Srinivasan: You are absolutely correct that this person is notable and should have an article here. Right now there are no in-line cited references at the article. However, Cullen suggested two such references at the AfD discussion. Do you feel able to add those references to the article, as in-line citations? If so, you could give yourself credit for "rescuing" the article. If you need help in knowing how to add in-line citations just ask me. -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() Because it is so vast, there are a large number of different cultures involved in
Prehistoric Asia
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Human skeleton • Reconnaissance satellite Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 03:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
![]() |
The Editor's Barnstar |
Thank you for your edits in my draft Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/The_Early_Nationalists_of_India_(Moderates). Rudra ( talk) 10:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC) |
Please see: User talk:Rudra john cena#Another account
Thank you, Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 01:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
Read: User talk:Rudra john cena#Rudra john cena/Jim Cartar
As this account seems to be an attempt at a fresh start, I will block Rudra john cena and you must only use this account and create no others. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 08:41, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kainaz Motivala, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horror ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi there. I know you are just trying to be helpful, but sometimes others find it simpler if just one person handles a matter. Thank you for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 23:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Your suggestion was fine.— No, it was not. I saw that post and ignored it. You suggested to keep his userpage "simple". The issue was not related to simplicity or complexity of the userpage. The userpage was deleted under Wikipedia:CSD#G11 — using userpage for advertisement/promotion. A better (read "correct") suggestion could be asking him not to create userpage like a fake article or detailed biography or resume.
I shall surely provide much information on Total Knee and Hip Replacement Surgeries. I won't be surprised if he adds his suggestions or prescriptions in some disease articles. Mentioning the Wikipedia policies e.g. please contribute to medical science related articles following Wikipedia policies, check WP:OR, WP:V, WP:NPOV etc could be better. You and that editor have similar level of expertise. A blind can not lead another blind. Tito☸ Dutta 13:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
can you please be polite when talking with me— shut up. From the very first day you have flooded me with notifications and help requests and now you are asking why I am getting involved! And why are you notifying and adding talkback messages if you don't want me to reply? -- Tito☸ Dutta 17:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
shut up. From the very first day you have flooded me with notifications and help requests and now you are asking why I am getting involved!—What else, you are the one who started talking with me first at my alternate accounts talk page, this is not called involvement instead this can be called Adding fuel in fire (i.e. provoking others to feel bad about someone) and by the way every expert Wikipedian receives hundreds of notifications, none of them complains like you, every new user has rights to ask for help from a experienced user like you but no one use this term
shut up.to a new user. It was a small issue of suggestions but you have started fighting with me. You are the one who pokes his nose in others conversations you did it multiple times on User:Anna Frodesiak talk page, in my talk page in User:BgWhites talk page etc. Before pointing fingers on others please think 100times that if you are doing the correct one or not. Before you critisise others please think once if you are doing the right thing or not. It was User:MelanieN for whom I am not fighting.
You suggested to keep his userpage "simple". The issue was not related to simplicity or complexity of the userpage.—Are you judging my suggestions. I know my suggestions were not good and I have already stopped suggesting others. But I have just told Niraj Vora to make his user page Simple after I have seen the suggestion by Anna-
Editors who arrive, make it plainand in a earlier discussion she told something like this "one must add only Basic Information on there user page" I know you are thinking what I am trying to explain with this, If you try to find the meaning of simple in Oxford English Dictionary, isbn=0-19-569258-6 then you will find the meaning is Plain and basic that mean I have commented partially same what User:Anna Frodesiak already said him. So, Tito-
No, it was not.also means that the comment introduced by Anna was also not totally perfect. 2ndly a New user cannot always understand the heavy meanings of Wikipedia guidelines so it is our not me but other users responsibility to make them understand step by step not only providing
see this guidelines firstmakes them understand the total system how Wikipedia works. I don't know if you have seen other parts of the discussion or not but I have mentioned the advertising or self-promotional topic already some where there.
Secondly you asked him to contribute in medical science related subjects.—Is it wrong to encourage new users to contribute. I personally think that one should contribute in a article in which he as good knowledge. That is why I asked him to contribute in the field which is his profession.
I won't be surprised if he adds his suggestions or prescriptions in some disease articles.—Do you think that Indian editors are so stupid that they will add prescriptions about diseases, He maybe new but it is his common sense that he will not do such a idiotic blunder. (This point makes me laugh) Anna has already said that some users are watching his contributions if he makes any error then they will revert changes he will make.
Hi Jim Cartar, Thank you for you help with creating an article. I saw your notes and have added some citations to the /info/en/?search=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Mark_W._Rocha page. I was wondering if this is notable enough to get the article approved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark W. Rocha ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
By the way, about that red-linked user category you list on your userpage, Category:Users who use Mozzila: Did you mean to list Category:Wikipedians who use Mozilla Firefox? Or maybe Mozilla Aurora or Mozilla Nightly? -- MelanieN ( talk) 21:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
OK, I took a quick look at your draft. You have put a lot of work into this article; did you write it as a school assignment? If so I bet you got a good grade, because it is very well done as a school paper. Wikipedia has other criteria.
Your draft has already been reviewed by someone who has a lot of experience with articles about Indian history. I agree with their assessment: the article is not well supported by references. Most of your references are not Reliable Sources, which means things like scholarly articles or books, reports from major newspapers, etc. Yourarticlelibrary.com is not a Reliable Source; those are self-written essays which anyone can write and submit, there is no fact-checking or other verification. (You could upload your draft to that library!) Same problem with the blog for exam preparation. Your draft could certainly be tidied up and copy edited, but that would not do any good if the article was not supported by Reliable Sources. Also, as someone else mentioned, the title of the article is not good.
On the other hand, this material is interesting and it doesn't seem to be well covered at Wikipedia, so I think there is a place for it. My recommendation is that you not try to make this a free-standing article, at least not right now. Instead, add some of the information - the parts that have Reliable Sourcing - to existing articles like British Raj#1870s–1907: Social reformers, moderates vs. extremists, or to Indian independence movement#Rise of Indian nationalism (1885–1905). You will get feedback from other editors who work at those articles; accept their comments and learn from them, and gradually expand the information. Eventually you may have enough material to split off into a separate article. But don't start out trying to write a brand new article. That's my advice. And in fact it's generally good advice for new users: start out by improving existing articles, not by trying to create new ones -- MelanieN ( talk) 16:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jim - Thanks so much for your helpful edits and note. I'm hoping you can clarify your suggestion to: "You must add more informations about the subject instead of making the article a plot summary."
I came up with this draft, do you think it suffices? Or what else would you suggest?
As a blogger
Wealthy Single Mommy, Emma writes about her life as a professional, single parent in New York City, and speaks to issues facing professional women. She is known for taking a strong stand that women should continue their careers and strive for financial independence after having children, as well as term marriage contracts as an answer to high divorce rates. Since launching in August, 2012, the blog gained an international following and media attention -- and is often criticized for being unrealistic in her dating, and judgmental of other women's choices, including by bloggers at The Chicago Tribune
[1], the blog Heartiste
[2].
All help appreciated! thanks Jim! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gonnabefamous ( talk • contribs) 19:11, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
"You must add more informations about the subject instead of making the article a plot summary."I meant that you should add sections about the subject, something like Early life of the subject, personal life of the subject, etc.
Great, thanks for this .... I made changes ... does this suffice? Thanks again!
Gonnabefamous ( talk) 21:15, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jim, I'm afraid you must be feeling that we're all criticising you an awful lot, and I'm very sorry to make yet another request, but please could you stop telling people to come to your talk page to get advice from your friendly talk page stalkers, as you did today at User talk:Ladypn. I know you are trying to be helpful, but if we want to provide an advice service, we can provide it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk. If people ask you for advice about AFCs, please in future would you advise them to go there (as I've just done for Gonnabefamous). This is the best way, because different editors know about different things, and a wider range of experience is likely to be available at that help desk. I hope that's OK. -- Stfg ( talk) 21:40, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
By the way, you might like to have a look at WP:OVERLINK. We don't usually link to more than one mention of the same thing–Are you telling this after seeing this AfC draft. If so then I know, it is something I have done due to lack of time (My entrance examinations are going on). So I'm typing this to tell that I don't have enough time to add the references to its respective sections. But you know that if I don't add them in the draft then it is certain that the draft may decline. So, I have just added the references to its lead section and leaved it to the reviewer to fix it. If It is not fixed in next few days, then I will try to fix it after exam. Thank you Stfg for your advice. Jim Cartar ( talk) 07:48, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
I have been detected as a sock puppet after I have already disclosed in my user page that I and User:Rudra john cena are the same. I have been blocked from editing for a reason which I haven't done. Please see : Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rudra john cena and you guys will understand what I am trying to explain. I have only and only created this account as alternate and I have already disclosed this issue but now they have detected some other account. But I swear in the name of God I don't have any other account, please help me User:MelanieN, User:Anna F remote, User:Stfg, User:Anna Frodesiak, User:VQuakr, User:Admrboltz, User:Bgwhite. And all please help me unblock. I don't have any other account. Guyzz please, please, please believe me. Please. Please help me.
I wanted to do a new start so I created this account and leaved Rudra john cena account forever. You can ask Anna she knows. And as claimed in sock investigation that I have copyvios but actually I don't have any. See the location from were I and the other account as claimed is accessing Wikipedia. You will understand that it is not me. Please I beg you please unblock. I am not guilty. Jim Cartar ( talk) 10:03, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:06, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
You've made it clear that you wish to become an administrator someday. A bit of guidance: If I were you, I'd get out of the helping others business, and into content creation. Why? Content creation is the absolute best place to start as a Wikipedian. It gives you experience in many areas, and will better enable you to help others to create content (WP:AfC). It is also really, really important at an WP:RfA, and many won't support you if you haven't created a substantial amount.
A great way is to make species articles. They don't have to be huge. You can copy the formatting from other articles. The prose can consist of several, simply stated facts. Sources are easy to find. The images are already waiting for the articles. Imagine at your userpage, a list of articles that you created. Here are images needing articles that you might be interested in starting:
Please let me know if you need any help. :) Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 01:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
wish to become an administrator someday.–This was my dream which was already shattered. :'( Please suggest me Anna what should I do. Jim Cartar ( talk) 09:39, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
I see that you are continuing with your project of de-orphaning articles. That's good! But one correction: you added "Jack M. Ducker" to "List of painters by name beginning with J". The lists are alphabetized by LAST name, so he really belongs at "List of painters by name beginning with D". Thanks for doing this and keep up the article improvements! -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:14, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
About the article K. N. Srinivasan: You are absolutely correct that this person is notable and should have an article here. Right now there are no in-line cited references at the article. However, Cullen suggested two such references at the AfD discussion. Do you feel able to add those references to the article, as in-line citations? If so, you could give yourself credit for "rescuing" the article. If you need help in knowing how to add in-line citations just ask me. -- MelanieN ( talk) 15:34, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
![]() Because it is so vast, there are a large number of different cultures involved in
Prehistoric Asia
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Human skeleton • Reconnaissance satellite Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT ( talk) 03:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC) • |
---|
{{
cite news}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)