To Leave a New Message Please click here to start a new Section. Remember to sign your post with four tildes (~~~~). Thank you!

My Talk Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25 Archive 26 Archive 27 Archive 28 Archive 29 Archive 30 Archive 31 Archive 32 Archive 33 Archive 34 Archive 35 Archive 36 Archive 37 Archive 38 Archive 39 Archive 40 Archive 41 Archive 42 Archive 43 Archive 44 Archive 45 Archive 46 Archive 47 Archive 48 Archive 49 Archive 50 Archive 51 Archive 52 Archive 53 Archive 54 Archive 55 Archive 56 Archive 57 Archive 58 Archive 59 Archive 60 Archive 61 Archive 62

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Welcome!

Hello, Jim1138, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Hi, you reported edit war for Tenaliram page. It seems like someone added proper reference to the page. It will be great if you remove that edit war. Thank you. Ashok ( talk) 09:57, 25 April 2014 (UTC) reply

It is the term BBC use see here: is that good enough for you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.130.56.205 ( talk) 08:36, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Jim, The article 'Splatter Film' was flagged as containing numerous points without references - these were conjectural value judgements about which films are influential. So, I removed them to leave the facts (cited material) in tact. As Wikipedia's remit has it, 'ncyclopedic content must be verifiable'. I didn't leave a summary log accidentally - I clicked back to retrieve a reference that I had accidentally removed : I was about to restore it when you undid my changes. I now don't know how to retrieve the edits I made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.211.5 ( talk) 08:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Yes Jim, I am aware I removed some other citations, but unless the main points of contention are substantiated (which they were not), those additional citations are meaningless. No bibliographic conflicts were caused by removing the additional citations. I have re-edited and added a report log to explain my changes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.211.5 ( talk) 08:57, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Jim1138,

I am new to this, so if u can help then that would be great :0) The changes I am trying to make are in the Ukraine section. I noticed that all the names used are still the Russian (or "Russified") names that reflect the "Russification" process of WW2, etc. I know what names are correct because I am a Ukrainian native speaker. But for documentation purposes you can verify that the correct Ukrainian names were officially recognized by the US State Dept in 1997 (I do not know the exact document number). There is an excellent article that refers to exactly this issue in the following newspaper article:

http://www.evalleyvoice.com/docs/ValleyVoiceJune2011.pdf

Please scroll down to page 4 to read it. Thus, other names that should be corrected, for example are:

Lvov should be LVIV

Ternopol should be TERNOPIL

Chernobyl should be CHORNOBYL

etc-etc

These changes should also be made in the main block of INFO on Ukraine (at top-right), so that the capital is correctly listed as "Kyiv" (and NOT as Kiev). This would mean also correcting the sections/pages on Kyiv alone, as well as the pages for the "Chornobyl Nuclear Accident" (which still also uses the incorrect Russian name of "Chernobyl")

These may seem like minor trivialities, but if Wikipedia is to continue to be the excellent resource it is, then this needs to happen.... and it seems only fair to the millions of Ukrainians around the world to whom these names 'belong' (much as we would not want names of US cities to be listed only in Icelandic ;0). In light of recent events in Ukraine, I think these correction take on a special sense of immediacy when one considers the struggle Ukraine currently is facing against Russian aggression. The names, like those of any country, are a viatl part of their innate identity.

Being a novice, I'm not sure I'm the right person to do these changes, but perhaps you and your people have someone who is adept at doing what is probably an easy cut/replace (for thos who know how to do such things).

Thank you in advance for your kind help!

0)

75.82.202.53 ( talk) 09:12, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Common English names are used. See WP:COMMONNAME. Official or alternate names can be added to an article of that topic, but probably shouldn't be added to other articles unless it helps clarify. The common English names should be used, otherwise people will not know what is being talked about. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 09:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Please be careful about reverting determined edit warriors, you let yourself be drawn in. A look at the user's history shows they were up to maybe 7RR, and all that was needed was for them to revert after I dropped the warning template. Don't expose yourself by being too eager to revert. Acroterion (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Acroterion I did go overboard on that one and it wasn't vandalism. I will keep it under 3RR. Thanks for letting me know. Jim1138 ( talk) 17:45, 16 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Well I thought the change was obvious because the part of changed was "Relationship" and just listing their occupations is not their relationship ex.Rob & Sheila's relationship is "Lumberjack/Marketing Exc." they are married — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.12.132 ( talk) 01:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Replied on user talk:69.248.12.132 Jim1138 ( talk) 17:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi there! I noticed that you edited the Sonic Generations wiki recently, so I have a question for you. Am I allowed to put in the PC requirements to run the game? If I can, where do I put it? BustaBunny ( talk) 14:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC) reply

BustaBunny Kind of want to avoid Wikipedia from being a how-to manual. So it's likely you shouldn't (see WP:NOTMANUAL). You might check other software articles to see what is done. You can link to the software's page, thought that should be limited to one link unless there are special circumstances. See WP:ELOFFICIAL. Hope this helps! Jim1138 ( talk) 17:34, 16 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the help, but just one more thing, I asked you and 3 other users this same question for a quick answer. Is that allowed? I ask because there seems to be some trouble going because of it over at sergecross73's place. BustaBunny ( talk) 22:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC) reply

FYI, the trouble isn't that he asked 3 people the same question, but rather, multiple editors on my talk page suspect him of being a sockpuppet. Sergecross73 msg me 02:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Regarding my change to Johny Hendricks's article (changed reach to 69 inches), my source was the UFC production notes for UFC 171. I know it's difficult to list this as a source but the tale of the tape for the main event in UFC 171 showed that 69 inches is the correct reach for Hendricks. How can I support this change in the article? (the reach that is showing right now, 71 inches, is incorrect and has no source supporting it) Psycho-Krillin ( talk) 16:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Psycho-Krillin: It does seem that the majority favors 69", wish the search results were more consistent. Kind of wonder if Hendricks' reach is 71", but his manager is trying to get it publicized as 69" to make his opponents over-confident. Shifting birth years for actresses seems quite common. If you do a search on "Johny Hendricks reach 69" as well as "Johny Hendricks reach 71" you will get hits on both. Bloodyellow: 71" Bloodyellow: 69". espn: 69" espn: 69" It's a little confusing, but it tends to lean toward 69". Maybe use the last ESPN ref? Best to use a reference for something like this as there seems to be much edit warring on this kind of stuff. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Please change it as you see fit, but do add a reference! Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 17:21, 16 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Thank you, I did as you advised. Psycho-Krillin ( talk) 18:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC) reply

I know wikipedia works best on computers, but I have had some issues with the mobile site. Is there a place I can go to get help with it? BustaBunny ( talk) 02:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC) reply

BustaBunny Perhaps Help:Mobile access or wp:Teahouse? I am not familiar with mobile access. Hope this helps! Jim1138 ( talk) 02:52, 17 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks, will check it out later. BustaBunny ( talk) 03:33, 17 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE The expansion and distribution of disinformation, subjective material and detesting an unknown member. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.133.107 ( talk • contribs)

I was about to help the page about free ware but I pressed by mistake Shift + Delete while I was going to press Enter. It won't happen again

\(°_°)/

Psubrat2000 ( talk) 08:30, 18 March 2014 (UTC) reply

I blocked this user indef, but that should better have been reported to WP:UAA. Daniel Case ( talk) 21:27, 18 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Daniel Case That was an automatic Huggle AIV report. I just reverted for "unexplained deletion". I didn't realize that there were no warnings on their talk page nor that there was a UAA issue. Not sure why Huggle did that. Thanks Jim1138 ( talk) 22:13, 18 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Huggle 3 is really buggy and unstable, since I should not normally warn whitelisted users like you. Eye snore ( pc) 22:46, 18 March 2014 (UTC) reply

hbvijoefikefquhiaeuilhvhyvvrfeh  — Preceding 
unsigned comment added by 
94.8.203.20 (
talk) 
19:33, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
reply 

I saw your comments regarding COI and I am sorry to trouble you.

I can assure you, I have no connection at all with EMCs. I am simply bringing the level of the page to a higher standard of science with my background in material sciences. This page lives with the facts that the discovery of the technology is connected to one university in Sweden and the process became patented. In order to bring balance, there are no explicit references to the company (other than its official website) or any patent. There is even no reference at all to the process even being patented.

Before xmas, a user called maproom made a number of comments regarding the need to establish more about why the process yielded the improvements documented. Another user voiced the same concerns. As a result I spent about 10 hours writing about concrete chemistry. It then turned out maproom did not know the difference between cement and concrete (that's fine, and hopefully he learned something). After the extensive content about concrete chemistry was added, the second user stated they were satisfied with the changes made.

After about 2.5 months "silence" the latest raft of criticisms started. Again centering that the page did not explain the process. I made further edits. Then, the user Karl (who account shows intense activity virtually only on this page) started making a number of assertions which are just completely "off the scale". There is no need to even begin taking the comments because it is obvious that anyone with a sound grounding in material science would not raise these issues. Some of the accusations made have been simply outrageous. But i do not have the time to answer them. It is simply too distracting and time consuming.

• In time, Karl's comment have become more extreme. In particular he has made statements about Ronin being a "director" of the company. I do not know this. But when I ask where is this stated, he says "on the website". But it isn't. I have searched the website now three times. When asked to show where it is stated, he then states it is stated in PDFs available from the website. Well, again I have looked - and this is not evident either. I cannot find a single PDF.

• He then makes comments about EMCs being Portland cement. This is absolutely not true.

• Then he states that "the Australians did this first". I ask him several times to back this up so that it can be considered and if necessary included on the page. But he never responds.

The entire tone, lack of precision, unsubstantiated assertions leads me to beleive he is connected to the Portland cement industry. Or, may be he has a bad experience of working with Ronin. It is all very odd. Why I wonder if Karl is in COI.

I want to add there are solid technical reasons as to why there is only a certain "level" to which I am prepared to explain the "EMC Activation" process. This is nothing to do with my lack of understanding the subjects involved in order to provide an explanation. I could do this. But, it is simply that beyond a certain level, one is in danger of crossing the threshold into original research. And I am very concerned that because of this limitation, users who do not understand the restrictions on original research will keep requiring the unwritable. As it is, today I have sent three hours wring on the tribochemical background giving rise to the theory behind the process. But, there are legitimate limits imposed by Wikipedia itself regarding original research.

Thank you for reading this if you did

Kind regards

23:18, 18 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.66.81.80 ( talk)

Are you seriously going to delete my calling out someone for making false and insulting statements about me, but not delete their false and insulting statements about me? And lecture me about it?

I wouldn't mind a bit if you deleted my response to incivility if you also deleted the incivility I responded to. Otherwise, your lecturing is either misinformed or misguided. Lockean One ( talk) 01:10, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Lockean One You are giving me generalities with no specifics. A cursory view does not seem to support your claim. Jim1138 ( talk) 01:41, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

LOL, I won't be wasting my time obliging you there since barely more than a cursory view is all it would take to see what I'm referring to. Lockean One ( talk) 02:52, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello

Yesterday I disputed an article's section (PIA: Fleet) which kept getting abused. I put 'dispute' in section and made an edit on talk page of PIA at /info/en/?search=Talk:Pakistan_International_Airlines, listing abuse section. The abuser, Naveed245, keeps abusing fleet section of PIA article. He is not referencing his edits and over riding my edits, which have references. Moreover, he makes multiple edits every time which makes it hard for me as i can't undo, and have to redo section manually every time. I'm citing official website and news article from reputable press.

Please tell me what to do. He removed the dispute warning from artivle and did not reply on talk page of PIA under dispute section. I tried to look up his edits to see if i can provide references (thinking he may be right), but he's getting those info from an unoffical-fan created PIA facebook page. Thus, it has ample of uncited and false info.

I tried to warn him many times, left message on his talk page. I tried everything possible i know of, but he won't give up. I checked his edits on other artivles, where he also posts uncited and false info (e.g, Malaysia airline crashed in south china sea when it hasn't been confirmed).

Article in question: /info/en/?search=Pakistan_International_Airlines Section: Fleet Talk page: /info/en/?search=User_talk:Uabbas92#Pakistan_International_Airlines Section: Dispute

Uabbas92 ( talk) 04:37, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Jim1138Thanks for reply. Am I doing something wrong? I don't want to get banned as the purpose of my edits are to give actual info than preferred or rumored info. I had left him message on talk page, but no response.

So should I fix article or leave it as-is (with wrong information)? If i fix it, the next day he'll undo it and I'll have yo repeat process again.... Uabbas92 ( talk) 04:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Jim1138I think Naveed is doing The three-revert rule thing. He should be banned for 24 hours? He did 4 edits under 24 hours... Accidentally I did the same trying to fix the vandalism.

Uabbas92 No need to ping me on my own talk page. I would recommend staying away for a bit. You shouldn't have to worry about a block. I would recommend putting an invitation to discuss PIA directly on Naveed's talk page. Also, ping Naveed every time you leave a message on talk:PIA. Take a look at wp:dispute resolution to familiarize yourself with the process. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 05:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Jim1138He did it again.. I want to talk in dispute, but he keeps removing dispute banner nor replying on talk page. He's not responding to my messages... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uabbas92 ( talk • contribs) 23:09, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

{{@|Jim1138} So I followed your advice. It was not the right one. My dispute was closed and I was referred to yet another place. /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Naveed245 is where I opened dispute about user conduct. Now it requires both parties to respond. HE DOES NOT RESPOND! God's sake man. I am trying to do the right job here, giving citation and I have to beg the guy to come and talk on PIA page, leave messages on his page, get mods to get him to communicate. If he's not interested and CAN NOT follow the rules (no edit summary, no citation, ruining undo option), why do I have to jump around and do the right thing? So much for democracy at wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uabbas92 ( talk • contribs) 22:17, 21 March 2014 (UTC) reply

/info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Naveed245 . Please sign the page. I need two people to sign in total. Naveed won't sign... Also detail what you've done to get him to resolve dispute. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uabbas92 ( talk • contribs) 04:28, 23 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Jim, thanks for trying to be helpful, but no, I do not actually need your help. I made an appropriate edit which was incorrectly flagged by another user as vandalism. That does not mean I need a giant, colorful box of links to help topics on my user page. I am learning a lot about the culture of Wikipedia, though, and the tendency for people to try to help so quickly that they end up being less than helpful in practice. No need to add any more links, graphics, or generic advice to my user page in response to this.! Claudiaalismaki ( talk) 04:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Claudiaalismaki It's your talk page so you are free to remove most anything. People who feel the need to communicate with you (within reason of course) are allowed to post there. See Wikipedia:User pages for info on that. If someone requests a citation, you should provide one or discuss why it's not needed. BTW: that's your "user talk page", your "user page" is here: user:Claudiaalismaki Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 04:54, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

I understand that people are allowed to talk there, and I never said you aren't allowed to. I can't figure out a way to remove the thing you added at the top and would rather it not be there. So I'm hoping you will honor my request not to insert anything like that again. Thanks for understanding. For clarification, the user that reverted my edit did not request a citation. It's not really helpful to get advice that doesn'thave anything to do with the issue at hand. Claudiaalismaki ( talk) 04:59, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Claudiaalismaki You can either click on "View history" at the top of your talk page and click "Undo" on my edit, or you can edit the page, select what you don't want, (everything if you wish), delete it, and save the page. If you wish, I can remove it for you. A primer on editing can be found here: Help:Editing Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 05:05, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

please submit info on Alan Strong of the Georgia Fire. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astrong1 ( talk • contribs) 05:01, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

i want to edit internet protocol suite but i am not able to add images in this... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.16.61.188 ( talk) 10:16, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

I am really thankful to you for reverting vandalism on article Lancelet. Dear fellow I am really really worried about biology section of wikipedia becoz few users have interest in it and they be easily vandalized. Please put as much biology articles as possible under your watchlist including Pinacocyte, Pinacoderm, choanocyte, Choanoderm, Ostia(Sponges). Septate ( talk) 15:00, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Jim1138,

About the user Ijggak, my user (I created it), I just wanted to remove it or, at least, remove the data what I have written as a description. Could this be performed, please?

If not the user removed, at least, removed the data.

Thanks! 79.150.251.138 ( talk) 15:08, 19 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Before deleting POMG I recommend you read it to see if it is valid. Thank you for your careful consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.126.249.33 ( talk) 12:38, 20 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Dear Jim,

Can you please PROTECT the article on SALVATORE CUFFARO. It is being repeatedly vandalized by CIVA. I have reverted his last changes but he keeps vandalizing it. CUFFARO is a convicted criminal and he is spending his time in jail for mafia association. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.245.13 ( talk) 17:02, 20 March 2014 (UTC) reply

JIM,

The vandal has put in the infobox at the voice profession : politician and doctor ( not former politician, and as for the doctor cuffaro has been expelled from the medical order)

I am feeling bored and disapponted by all this... you know what... maybe let's the mafia have their way. ( in the end who cares about having a correct an unbiased information ) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.245.13 ( talk) 17:48, 20 March 2014 (UTC) reply

In wikipedia Italy accuse me of being against Cuffaro, here in favor. Just as well...-- Civa61 ( talk) 19:01, 20 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Jim, you have nothing to apologize, CIVA is well known in italian circles together with other people of the so-called wikimafia.

Anyway you might have noticed that the above mentioned guy has just deleted the conviction charges.

Cuffaro has been definitely convicted by the Supreme Court for aiding and abetting the mafia, and that sentence is final (2011). The sentence from (2012) in a lower court and another trial refers to the application of the principle of "Ne bis in idem" to the effect that no legal action can be instituted "twice" for the same cause of action, Cuffaro beign already convivicted for the very same facts could not be tried and convicted again in another trial for the same facts. ( ne bis idem). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.245.13 ( talk) 19:44, 20 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Civa will be well known but not spear mud, and hides behind an anonymous. -- Civa61 ( talk) 20:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Dear Jim,

I must confess I am a bit tired. And as I have mentioned before I know for a fact CIVA has not even the remotest intention of improving on the article but just "blanking out" essential parts related to Cuffaro's criminal history. I think CIVA should be at least temporarily blocked from doing further edits on this specific article, and possibly from all mafia related articles.

You might have noted all his edits with no exception on this specific article are aimed at "embellish" the matter of fact that Cuffaro is a mafia convicted guy, kinda sprinkling a bit of "sugar" here and there, omitting data and giving misleading information. Let's see what I can do to straigthen the record. Jim can I also contact you privately by mail ?

PS. I am not so much into wikipedia technicalities, like "pinging" an user and so on, the reason why I am not involved in this project is exactly due to these italian wiki-mafia, guys like CIVA, tampering against any objective data. It is awful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.245.13 ( talk) 21:23, 20 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Jim, as I told you I am not into wikipedia technicalities.

As you might have noticed I stopped editing on Cuffaro's article even if in its current state it is missing key data due to the intervention of CIVA in order to avoid further confrontation with that disgusting individual, but I would like at least to report him as a problematic user.

May I ask you what is the procedure to report CIVA as a "problematic user" ? Thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.195.245.13 ( talk) 22:13, 20 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Truly those who is a "problematic user" in wikipedia.it and blocked it was 88.195.245.13 [1]. -- Civa61 ( talk) 23:20, 20 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Phone cloning allows you to find out information about anybody if you can steal their phone for a few minutes in order to clone the sim. (Example, forgetting your phone in your car, then the bad guy uses a slimjim to unlock you door and copy your sim.) Once you have the sim cloned you can listen to other people's voice messages and SMS by cloning their sim? true or false? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.255.205.112 ( talk • contribs)

I know. I tried to make it a link, but it didn't work. Dance3600 ( talk) 05:16, 22 March 2014 (UTC) reply

The change of genre is obvious y don't put any neutal point I only put the predominant hpgenre in the song — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewbf ( talk • contribs) 06:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thirty Meter Telescope may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |built = ''planned'' (est. completion 2022)<ref>[http://www.latimes.com/science/la-me-uc-regents-20140321,0,2913286.story#axzz2wfj61rsk LA Times UC
• * High precision (~0.01 arcsecond) astrometric imaging and (<<0.001 arcsecond) astrometry at near-infrared wavelengths (1.0–2.5 μm)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Dear Sir/madam I made a mistake in editing a page. Actually what I wanted is to create the content of new page titled as welfare computing and the content as follows. I made a mistake in editing the page. Could you correct it for me please. Because I am new to this editing. resently a small trend to develop this field in japan. Thanks in advance.

Welfare Computing is interdisciplinary research division of computer science that relates to welfare industry and related machatronics design problems — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wasantha samarathunga ( talk • contribs) 08:22, 22 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Wasantha samarathunga I have been busy and don't know what you are referring to. There is nothing in your editing history that would give me a hint. Signing off shortly. Jim1138 ( talk) 08:48, 22 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Would you care to weigh in on this discussion? It concerns whether a particular review quote should be removed from an article. Dan56 ( talk) 23:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC) reply

What time zone does Wikipedia use? I ask because I though for sure that wikipedia was an american site, but according to the time stamps in my edits, it's already the 15th somehow? BustaBunny ( talk) 00:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC) BustaBunny I'm pretty sure it is Universal Time, but don't know of anything stating so. Jim1138 ( talk) 00:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello there. You contacted me yesterday regarding an edit I made to the Total Drama All-Stars page? Well, the lack of official sources on Total Drama has always been an issue. But if you look on all of the forums where fans talk about the show the most, the critical reaction is supremely negative.WisdomSeer (talk) 21:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WisdomSeer ( talk • contribs)

re on WisdomSeer's talk Jim1138 ( talk) 21:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC) reply

A-holes of the labour market — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.216.98.58 ( talk) 07:50, 1 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I made a change to Jeff Martin's Wikipedia page about him winning our family's March Madness pool. Since it's a family pool, I'm not sure how there would be a citation (should I forward you the chain of emails?). But it is factual. Please update my changes so i can share it with Jeff and the family. It's factual and everyone would get a kick out of it. Respond to bhblacklow @ g m a i l . c o m

-Brian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.79.58.22 ( talk) 23:28, 6 April 2014 (UTC) reply

The change I made to Melbourne Airport was for the following reason: The text on the hyperlink said "third most traveled route in the world", or something to that effect. When I clicked on the link to find out what the most traveled air routes in the world were, the chart said it was the fifth most traveled route. In that there were four others listed above it with higher annual passenger capacity. I don't need to provide a citation...I change the text to match the chart it was linking to. When the text said "third" and the chart says "fifth", one of them was wrong. I don't really care which one gets changed, but it's a given that they should match. 69.47.57.162 ( talk) 04:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Sir, the language part of Hazaaron Khwaishein Aisi is a Hindi film not English. Because Hindi films have English dialogues but its not billed as English too film. And sir its ok you didn't make a mistake in fact thank. Sir, if you edit the English part of film it will reverted by another user. I don't mind. Because here some users get anxious when they find English in Infobox. The film Ra.One is Hindi & English movie too but some user made it total Hindi for no apparent reason. Infact i have to complain about the users who keep editing and revert the edits. No single wikipedian is supporting Ra.One's edit. Anyways, thank you again R★S★S ( Your Precious Reply) 17:24, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Sir, can you please help me? Sir, post the language for Ra.One as Hindi & English. Because the film is set in London & India. Some users are irritating and hence an edit war starts with another fellow users. I will be highly obliged. If they revert, block them. Because sir, the other users tried to made the edit and reverted always. No wikipedian is supporting me. Thanks again R★S★S ( Your Precious Reply) 17:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, I made several edits that you continue to undo. I specified in the subject why i made my change and you continue to cancel it. I am right?

Hey, I'm sorry about that. I had forgotten it. The citation is up now and thanks for pointing it out to me. DmitryVasily ( talk) 18:48, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

This user blank out entire content from Hi, Mom!. I was about to revert vandalism, but you did it. Keep fighting against vandalism. A.Minkowiski ( talk) 19:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hey Jim, just wanted to see if my edit could not be removed thanks, I'm a friend of Wi11337 and we're just trying something out on his user page. (Also I know for a fact he is an awful beatboxer).

Thanks

87.114.185.0 ( talk) 19:35, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Like i was said when i was reverted but explained one that this party is clearly a paleoconservative. I was readed it's party platform that including advocates protectionist economy and non-interventionism (foreign policy) so my edits is sourced and accurate, thanks Adn1990 ( talk) 20:44, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Adn1990: You removed sourced content without explaining why. Given the two reverts, I would suggest discussing it on talk:Constitution Party (United States) Jim1138 ( talk) 19:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Jim1138: No , it's not sourced and i explaining my clarifications like i say before, sorry Adn1990 ( talk) 21:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Adn1990: Source for it being paleoconservative? You did remove sourced content. Dougweller ( talk) 21:14, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Dougweller: No , this two contents are poorly referenced. And like you know that's a paleoconservative party, right. Adn1990 ( talk) 22:36, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello there, it's me again. Regarding credible sources on the poor reception of All-Stars as the two of us had been discussing last week, a lot of the criticism aimed at the season was attributed to the character Mike/Mal who was the main villain of the season, and controversial for his portrayal of MPD in a comedic manner. I was pointed to the Total Drama Facebook page where a known associate of Fresh TV did in fact acknowledge the character as having been controversial, in part due to this season. Could that be considered a reliable source? WisdomSeer ( talk) 20:04, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Sir, despite of it i did lots of hardwork for the language but no good return. And yes it's a bilingual film. I also applied a source from IMDB but they said its not a good source and IMdb shows Ra.One as Hindi Tamil Telugu Cantonese & English though (Tamil Telugu & Cantonese) is dubbed but English is a language too. Matter is really tough R★S★S ( Your Precious Reply) 03:53, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Jim1138 this is Mathematicalist. I see your blackjack deletion. I am not sure if you are a gambling expert as I am. When you walk the aisles and the hallways at the big gambling industry events such as G2E and ICGRT and the Gaming Industry Summit you hear the truths that casino customers never hear. That is why it says "some say". How else can I reference what a major casino blackjack shift manager says in the hallways at G2E? Wikipedia is about the people not about the private interests. It is about the only place where the people can speak though private interests like the casino industry pay a lot more attention to Wikipedia than Wikipedia people think. Industries like casinos and pharmaceuticals that prey on the public by way of their seductive mystiques are very focused on online and Wikipedia with its high Google status is not an afterthought it is a priority. Please restore that deletion. The public should avoid blackjack tournaments that are merely another means of setting up its fleecing in the casinos. Thanks Jim1138. Appreciate your understanding of this. When you are in Las Vegas next be sure to let me know in advance so we can meet up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathematicalist ( talk • contribs) 04:55, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Mathematicalist: The issue is that Wikipedia needs to be verifiable. People want to be able to research information. Significant content must be wp:cited with reliable sources (RS). As your edits were unsourced, I removed them. Please feel free to restore them with an RS. Please review wp:welcome for information on editing Wikipedia. Thank you Jim1138 ( talk) 05:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks my friend so much. But this source didnt work too. I find Imdb as one and final source but still they wont approve. I will make my edit successfull and wont give up easily. But i m helpless now. Still didnt get a source rather than Imdb R★S★S ( Your Precious Reply) 04:56, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Anyways, I really wanna thank you for your so much help. Will do my edit soon and must say here Wikipedians do help. Thanks again Jim. R★S★S ( Your Precious Reply) 05:18, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Excuse me, Jim1138. Meant "The casinos don't need you to look out for them!" If you continue this clear misconduct then you should at least tell us all which casino company you are affiliated with. Blackjack tournaments as all gambling tournaments are meant to degrade gambler judgment and playing discipline so that the real house edge doubles or even triples. I imagine you don't know a hell of a lot about gambling. Or maybe you are an adherent of that half witted Wizard of Odds who is actually a front for online gambling which is an extremely negative development for our collective sanity. Leave that post of mine in place and go bother the Barry Obama post to get it deleted on the grounds of fraudulence. Thanks man! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathematicalist ( talk • contribs) 06:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I thought I quite clearly explained my reasons for removing the material in my edit summary--it was a verbatim copy of a newspaper report, and as such was a violation of copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.142.207 ( talk) 08:24, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

In 24 hours, a user Kailash29792 had violated the 3 Revert Rule on page Ra.One. Plus he is engaged in Edit war since language part has 2 important source. This is the chance where my edit can be preserved. Or else he will start a new Edit war. Report this user or else my sourced information will be reverted. Thanks R★S★S ( Your Precious Reply) 13:45, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

The IP 31.53.37.58 has been making continued reverting of those infoboxes, particularly about photos. Could you look into doing something about it? I've been reverting his reverts, but its getting tiring now. Byzantium Purple ( talk) 16:55, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Byzantium Purple: I (or you) could open a ticket on WP:AN/EW. Would you be concerned about getting blocked? I haven't been following too closely. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 17:07, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Well, I have been reverting all his reverts, but its purely to prevent his reverts from being permanent. I'm willing to stop if this is looked at. I may have made some quite unappropriate comments when reverting, but it was when I was heated and angry. Could you open a ticket? Byzantium Purple ( talk) 17:17, 8 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Byzantium Purple: I need to warn you to be neutral here. I'll look into adding a ticket. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk)

• The term 'gender' and the term 'sex' do not give same meaning. Sex is what is between our legs and gender is what is between our ears. Even wikipedia has different articles of sex and gender. We should not let readers confuse those terms which have different meanings. So I had removed the terms 'sex equality and sexual equality' from the article.
• Well another term comes of narrow definition of gender in gender equality. Not only men and women are equal, genderqueers are also equal. They are not included in this article so I had removed the term that 'men and women are equal' and replaced with 'all people are equal'.
• The term 'sex'and 'gender' are not the same. It has different meanings. So sex equality means equality between male sex, female sex and intersex whereas gender equality is the equality between men, women and genderqueer people. So it is better that these terms do not collapse each other. That's why i removed the redirect of sex equality to gender equality.

So I'd like to request you to remove the terms 'sex equality and sexual equality' from the article and define it not only equality between men and women but also genderqueer people. - Krozan7 ( talk) 04:33, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Krozan7: per Gender, it does appear to be used interchangeably. If you read my note, I removed it as you did not explain your removal. I suggest you discuss this on the talk pages as there are others who would disagree. Jim1138 ( talk) 04:41, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for reviewing List of Time-Banks around the World, Jim1138.

Unfortunately Loriendrew has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Your csd was removed by article author, unreviewing article

To reply, leave a comment on Loriendrew's talk page. — Preceding undated comment added 10:51, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, I just want to ask, in what way is changing the line "It was announced that Star Trek 3 is scheduled to be released" to "It was announced that Star Trek 13 is scheduled to be released" worthy of including a source? I just need to count the Star Trek movies already made to get to the conclusion that Star Trek 12's sequel will be Star Trek 13, so I don't see why my change has been reverted. Especially since the next sentence mentions a "thirteenth Star Trek movie" anyway, so why write Star Trek 3 in the first place? Greetings Smintili ( talk) 22:00, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply

OK message received.

However the article history and talk page history clearly shows a campaign by a single user to push his view.

I am not the first to try and deal with this and I guess I won't be the last.

Thanks 86.162.127.214 ( talk) 22:23, 10 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Jim, I mentioned you in AN/I under "Please Temp Block Dick for Disruptive Reversions".

Duxwing ( talk) 16:07, 13 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Ey man I started the Shakadza page, and where were you by then? Now you think you know better about my village than me? Get off your high horse dude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oscar Mpfunzeni ( talk • contribs) 21:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC) reply

In response to your previous message The majority of countries use the term "anaesthetist" and therefore that should be the correct form used in the Wikipedia article "Anesthesiologist" is used by a small minority of English-speaking countries. Thanks Bcrook92 ( talk) 21:47, 13 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Bcrook92, if you want to change the title of the article per WP:COMMONNAME please see WP:RM. -- NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Bcrook92: That's the way the policy wp:Engvar is written. I do keep to policy for all variants. One could easily argue that since the servers are on American soil, everything should be in American English. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 21:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Well, The Legend of Spyro wasn't a Sony Pictures Animation September 2016 film, nor was it a 20th Century Fox film, and it wasn't in the source, it was actually from an unknown contributer Larry1996 ( talk) 03:07, 14 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Larry1996: It would be very helpful if you were to leave an wp:edit summary. All I see is a bunch of text being removed and it would be difficult to figure out why. Please leave edit summaries! Also, if you would, have a link to the article in question such as 2016 in film. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 03:11, 14 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Well, I think you did make a mistake, the Legend of Spyro wasn't a Sony Pictures Animation September 2016 film, nor was it a 20th Century Fox film, and it wasn't in the source, nor were the actors in Angry Birds, there have been no news about that either, it was actually from an unknown contributer

Larry1996 ( talk) 03:24, 14 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Larry1996: Pardon my poor explanation. I undid your edit because you didn't explain it and I couldn't figure out why you removed it, not because I thought it was in error. Please redo it, preferably with an edit summary. Thanks for the note. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 03:30, 14 April 2014 (UTC) reply

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You're popular today! :-) NeilN talk to me 03:41, 14 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Jim!

The page is seeing lot of IP vandalism because of the election season in India. Specifically the Middle name of the person seems to be of prime concern. Based on my knowledge and the citations found by me: Times of India page. His father's name was "Mohan Rao Nilekani" and thats where the middle name comes from. Also the following confirms: The Telegraph.

And to add to it, the person himself has uploaded his Govt. Identity card in his Twitter Page.

Please look into the matter.-- Deepon ( talk) 07:07, 15 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Deepon: The Twitter and Telegraph links don't work. Jim1138 ( talk) 07:15, 15 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Jim1138: For me the links are working if I click on them, can try opening it in edit mode and copying the url in a new tab. -- Deepon ( talk) 07:18, 15 April 2014 (UTC) reply

The Twitter worked that time. I did fix The Telegraph link btw, the pipe: "|" should not go in that kind of link. Usually no need to ping someone on their own talk page. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 07:21, 15 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks Jim, so I think we can change the middle name to "Mohan" and make the page semi-protected (It has already been proposed). -- Deepon ( talk) 07:28, 15 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Jim, the products category on Kent RO page is to provide with the users the information about the various product categories the company offers and not promotion of all or one product/model. For reference, you might want to see the Samsung page where the various operations and other info is given in much detail.

hello, i aint vandalizing anything. he is a fraud. and we know it. he claims big things which he hasnt achieved. if this is the way people are going to popularise about themselves by screwing up their own names in the middle of every contemporary art sites and contents.. why then there would be more pages about common men than about the true big masters in the field. if you have no particular knowledge about the field of arts to find this a vandalization stop interrupting me, or its high time you help me to remove such imposters from getting their names up on the wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notredane ( talk • contribs) 07:42, 15 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Notredane: Start a new section in talk:Devajyoti Ray and discuss your concerns. Add sources to support your points. Calling someone a "fraud" or "imposter" is in violation of WP:BLP and could result in your being WP:BLOCKED. Jim1138 ( talk) 07:46, 15 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, Jim1138. You might be interested in seeing this. Thanks, Poeticbent talk 16:43, 15 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Out Loud (Boom Boom Satellites album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electronic ( check to confirm |  fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:55, 15 April 2014 (UTC) reply

GAY ACTS ARE STUPID SINS! STOP SUPPORTING THE GAY ILLNESS! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CC4D:8B0:D821:9BCF:BC2:3729 ( talk) 04:49, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I put the verifiable content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharath Chowdary ( talk • contribs) 05:05, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello, I am Muchacha 208.I want to explain you that I recently removed some content from Hovik Abrahamyan, because I have seen an offensive phrase.Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Muchacha 208 ( talk • contribs) 12:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Jim Thanks for the message on Greek external link. You removed * Foreign Service Institute Greek basic course, audio, assignments, G+ hangouts and media sources I have read the Wiki guidelines, and this site is not a commercial site, it is part of the Open courseware movement. NO banners, no fees, not even a donate button. Wiki.. has FSI listed http://www.fsi-language-courses.org/Content.php?page=Greek which is the same material, World Mentoring Academy is a LMS like moodle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.84.54.67 ( talk) 15:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC) reply

this page has no references, hence most of the information is not valid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.172.215 ( talk) 06:39, 17 April 2014 (UTC) reply

you hurt my live ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.128.23.150 ( talk) 06:46, 17 April 2014 (UTC) reply

All I wrote was my birth year and city, is that really a violation or can't I write about myself at all? And does being logged in or not make a difference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.36.12 ( talk) 07:36, 17 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Neeraj.T ( talk) 06:42, 18 April 2014 (UTC)Help out in giving information about how to insert a picture in the page.I tried to do the same in the page concurrent lines but could only able to give a link there. reply

Hi, I would like to add some content in wiki page 'Victor Manjila'. Could you please help me to do that — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohamed Roshan ( talk • contribs) 08:41, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I presume you mean "hobbies and not-for-profit companies" started collecting Spits under the Warbird banner? Even if not, "for profit" should have an hyphen to ease legibility. If they ARE money-spinning ventures, it might read better as "hobbies and businesses". No sources for this: just it seemed hard to take in at one reading. 146.200.148.218 ( talk) 10:25, 23 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I didn't understand why you changed it from "not-for-profit" to "for-profit". Groups who do this may use the "not-for-profit" as they don't expect to make a profit and "for profits" are often required to show a profit occasionally. Allows donations with write-offs, etc. I notice the link is dead. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk)

Hello, this of course is me and it depends on what time period you mean. if you are in the colonial times than infact it is only in the mid Atlantic region. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Walnut man 108 ( talk • contribs) 00:43, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Walnut man 108: Maybe so, then you need to fix multiple articles and the US Census. See Northeastern_United_States#Composition Please use a section header (you can click on "New section" at the top of the page) and to sign your name with for tildes "~~~~" Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 00:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

There is a template for cocktail with a specific point for IBA Official drinks. In what way is it disruptive to ensure that, 1, all the drinks in the IBA official list are noted as BEING IBA official drinks, and, 2, the list adhere to the IBA standard, which clearly states that they use cl as a measure, and nothing else? Otherwise, why is the 'IBA Official Cocktail' template even there? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.48.153 ( talk) 01:25, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

No reason both can't be there. I add both units. Why can't you? Jim1138 ( talk) 01:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Because both units aren't specified. If the IBA used both, I wouldn't say anything. Also, you DON'T use both. Instead, you reverted the edit completely, which not only removed the IBA template, but also the measurements, so that cl ISN'T used. Which is wrong. 85.229.48.153 ( talk) 01:33, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

IBA is not the only standard. Jim1138 ( talk) 01:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Are you in all honesty saying that there is a specific point in the template to note if it is an official IBA cocktail or not, but the template should be written to another, nebolous standard, because they 'are not the only standard'? Ok, then. What standard SHOULD be used, in your opinion? One that is consistant and which preferrably has a point in the template to note that the drink conforms to THAT one, as well as an page or paper that can be sourced? The IBA is the nearest thing there is to an world authority within the bartending world, as far as I know, and the drinks on their list should therefor conform to their standard. If you have another suggestion of what standard to follow, please put it forward. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.48.153 ( talk) 01:48, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

The IBA is not used in the United States. I suspect the IBA is not used other places as well. You can easily leave both units. There is no reason to remove one to make way for the other. 02:04, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Yes, the IBA is most certainly used in the US. The I is for International, and the US have been a member of the IBA, through the United States Bartenders Guild, since 1961! And while it isn't in every country in the world, it is the nearest thing to a world standard there is. And IT DOESN'T USE OTHER UNITS. Beside which, and I repeat, if it's ok to use both units, as you say, ignoring the NO OTHER UNITS part, why did you then only use one unit, as well as remove the part about it being an official IBA cocktail? This, along with your threats about blocking me when I, once more, corrected things and left reasons for it, is starting to make me wonder if this isn't less about me making an edit, and no, it wasn't vandalism, and more about you being a toxic leader who is feeling upset because I dared challenge your authority. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.48.153 ( talk) 02:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I undid your "removal of content". If it is so ubiquitous, why were the articles generated with ounces and remain that way so long? You are welcome to use metric, even have them be the first units, but the ounces need to stay. Jim1138 ( talk) 02:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

So, since no-one has bothered to correct the errors in the recipes, it's wrong to correct them? Is that what you're saying? You aren't actually taking this in, are you? The wiki-page for IBA, as well as the IBAs OWN page clearly state that they don't use other measures. The edits I made to the French 75 page, and other pages, haven't REMOVED anything. They've CORRECTED things which were wrong. YOU, on the other hand, reverted the change to something which is WRONG. You didn't edit it in turn to allow for the use of ounces, which, even if it wasn't correct, could've been understandable. You reverted several corrections, the measurements used being only one. This causes me to think that, the reason the articles contained ounces and not centi-litres is less because they've never been changed, and more because people like you have reverted things again. Now, let's break this down to its basics, ok? As I understand it, you do not put your own spin or opinions or anything like that into Wikipedia. You stick with the plain straight facts. And those facts are that the IBA is the nearest thing to a world authority. This is why there is a tag in the cocktail templates for if a drink is an IBA cocktail or not. The IBA specifies the use of one measurement(beyond neboulus things like dashes and the like) and that's the centi-litre. Thus, millilitres(which was used in several recipes as well) and ounces don't belong. Thus, removal of the ounces or milli-litres in the recipes, and the replacement of them with centi-litres are a correction of an error. The fact that you revert the correction I did, not once but several times, despite me giving a reason, and then finally threatening me with blockage for making that edit...I don't know, but it doesn't exactly give the best impression, you know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.48.153 ( talk) 02:37, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

What makes you think they're wrong? There is not universal agreement on drink recipes. I did googled and the first link that came up barschool.com uses ounces, not cl. Jim1138 ( talk) 02:54, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Are you refusing to comprehend what you're told, or are you just trolling by now?? There is an IBA tag in the template. There is no barschool.com tag, correct? IBA is the nearest thing to a world authority. Thus, the IBA standard is the one that should be followed, on the recipes of cocktails that are in the IBA Offical Cocktails list. The IBA uses ONLY cl in their cocktails. Thus, the recipes of the cocktails in the list should only use cl. Not something else, not cl and something else. ONLY cl. If you can show me an authority of the same seniority and general world-wide coverage, that uses ounces ounces or cl and ounces, fine. But since there is no such tag in the template, but there IS an IBA tag, I'd say that that chance is rather small. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.229.48.153 ( talk) 03:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Who are you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcs76 ( talk • contribs) 02:00, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Mcs76: I'm JIM-1138, great-great-great grandfather to THX1138. Jim1138 ( talk) 02:02, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

We've recently updated the article with a new family head , since we found out that there is a great-great-grand son of Alexander of Russia.

We don't have any news articles to prove this claim -as well as other head families- but we do have his name on the Russian Imperial Family official tree posted at the Families official website confirmed by the government of Russia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.66.9.24 ( talk) 07:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hey, Jim1138, the article is incorrect in asserting that Charles Cotesworth Pinckney and not Charles Pinckney proposed the fugitive slave clause. They are two different people, in fact cousins, and both were at the convention. I attempted to change it. It appears you changed it because the link is ambiguous, the link should go to the wikipedia page Charles Pinckney (Governor). I cited to the James Madison's notes taken at the actual convention. This was my first edit so i may not have done it correctly, but i think it important that the information be correct rather than the cite or link be perfect. thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.122.168.1 ( talk) 15:11, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Reply on anon's talk. Jim1138 ( talk) 18:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC) reply

He clearly has not changed. Could you report him again, please? Byzantium Purple ( talk) 01:09, 25 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Byzantium Purple: I don't recall having interacted with Scorpnorx. I do get overwhelmed here, so you should fill me in more: links, etc. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 01:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC) reply

you do not fix it and it still leaves the biography so ugly, it looks like embers blind.

then arrange these appointments do not see are red, are poorly made and that is very bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.156.213.107 ( talk) 18:45, 25 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Jim, Soursop is also called Graviola. I posted under the "alternative cancer treatment" paragraph. The paragraph I shared was supported with a link to ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed which cited an official study about soursops ability to inhibits tumorigenicity and metastasis of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo through altering cell metabolism.

How is this off topic and why do you keep erasing my posts that are incredibly well supported with links to official and University research papers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Health Watch 22 ( talk • contribs) 19:13, 25 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Health Watch 22: I would suggest maintaining the use of the article name Soursop instead of Graviola. It's not good practice to switch and it is not clearly defined as Graviola until a few sentences down. Jim1138 ( talk) 19:21, 25 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Jim, I'll quote for you from the very wikipedia article in question here:

Other common names include: Coração de Boi (Mozambique), Evo (Ewe, Volta Region, Ghana), Ekitafeeli (Uganda), Stafeli (Swahili), Aluguntugui (Ga, Greater Accra Region, Ghana), guanábana (Spanish), graviola (Brazilian Portuguese, pronounced: [ɡɾɐviˈɔlɐ]),

Graviola. Soursop is also called Graviola. Graviola is just as official a name for the Annona muricata as Soursop.

I really am struggling to see your argument against my posts here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Health Watch 22 ( talk • contribs) 19:27, 25 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Thank you for correcting me, it was by mistake i made the edit on the page Nizamabad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farhan112233 ( talk • contribs) 19:29, 25 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello Jim, the info which i am editing on the page (Nizamabad) is completely correct I don't understand why are you undoing my edits, as I already Informed you before that my previous edit was a mistake please allow me to continue my edits because the information on the page (Nizamabad) is not at all correct.

As I edited the whole information with the references but still you guys are undoing it back to the info which is not at all with any reference, could you provide any reference for the info which is undone by you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farhan112233 ( talk • contribs) 20:26, 25 April 2014 (UTC) Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farhan112233 ( talk • contribs) 19:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Jim:

I believe that you removed the links in error.

Here is why:

1) The In-Memory Database Comparisons is precisely what encyclopedia's must have. It compares supported functions between databases that are asked by our customers and other vendors' customers every day. Additionally, these are comparison facts - not opinions. This matrices offer forms that every enterprise customer asks when they are vetting different database.

2) As for the In-Memory Solutions, these describe the poignant areas of discussion by the CEO of Gartner. There is a common misconception about what caching is and what persistent cache is. Additionally, Sensor Data and others follow the same rationale.

Please let me know your thoughts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.242.234.34 ( talk) 19:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ 96.242.234.34: Altibase comparing their database with others a reliable source? No. Jim1138 ( talk) 19:59, 25 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Can you suspect him/her? He/she is currently genre warrior. 183.171.177.48 ( talk) 13:33, 27 April 2014 (UTC) reply

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is " Traditional Chinese medicine". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot  ^{operator /  talk} 04:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply

A kitten for you, i hope you accept me as a friend. thanks for your outermost attention. thx.

Krosshairz ( talk) 18:50, 29 April 2014 (UTC) reply

To: Jim1138

Fm: Lawrence E. Dittmer (Dittmerle@yahoo.com)

I posted a change to the Wiki article on Ivaran Lines. I added to the section on HISTORY which contains a short bio of Stockard Shipping, Ivaran's East Coast agent, but the article did not mention that Ivaran also had an agent in the U.S. Gulf for many years before it was sold to CP Ships in 1998. This agent was Riise Shipping Company which represented Ivaran Line's interest in Houston, New Orleans, and Mobile. I was employed with Riise shipping from 1986 to 2000. I was an Assistant Vice President and General Traffic Manager. The Owner and President of the company was Captain Lars Riise. I was intimately involved with Ivaran Line's business the entire time I was employed at Riise Shipping. I handled many voyages of Ivaran's regular cargo vessels as well as all voyages on their passenger/freighter, MS AMERICANA.

I don't don't know if this is sufficient proof. But I can assure you that Riise Shipping Company did exist and they were the U.S. Gulf agents for Ivaran lines prior to their sale to CP Ships. As info, Ivaran lines also had a corporate entity in the USA. They were Ivaran Lines USA and were located in Jersey City, NY. The Vice President and General Manager at that time was Mr. Peter Schusting.

Regards,

70.196.133.47 ( talk) 03:13, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply

I made my personal opinion about my school available online please respect my freedom of speech. My opinion is as valid as yours and I want what is true to be what people read on Wikipedia not just another add or false information. Not just the majority truth that is what the majority thinks to be true I hope that I have changed your mind on this issue so that you won't do what you did to my comment on the page to someone else next time just state that you disagree and why you disagree.

I made my personal opinion about my school available online please respect my freedom of speech. My opinion is as valid as yours and I want what is true to be what people read on Wikipedia not just another add or false information. Not just the majority truth that is what the majority thinks to be true I hope that I have changed your mind on this issue so that you won't do what you did to my comment on the page to someone else next time just state that you disagree and why you disagree. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.65.251 ( talk) 04:39, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Thank you for your comment on my user talk page. Going to try WP:DENY with this user as they are becoming quite a nuisance. Just wanted to say thanks for jumping in! EvergreenFir ( talk) 05:04, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Incidents#Harrassing_a_New_Editor_User_talk:Nativecultnlaw_by_User_talk:EvergreenFir. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply

That IP is pretty quick, jumping straight to ANI. Odd. -- NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:53, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ NeilN: Quite a grasp of templates for a 'new' editor. Verbose, but short on discussion. Jim1138 ( talk) 05:55, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi, Wanted to understand why were the changes as promotional as I had shared the details as well as updated number along with the reference links.

Would be great if you guide me on what exactly the problem was with the page edits. The facts that i needed to update were:

• CEO name Vikas Saxena
• Nimbuzz not any more an aggregator hence we had removed the word 'aggregator'
• Martin Smink was only associated with Nimbuzz for only 2 months of the initial days.
• Nimbuzz Does not support Yahoo anymore.

Please guide on how to move ahead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shahnawazkarim ( talk • contribs) 06:40, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi! Thanks for being attentive to what I am attempting to do. Because Ghormley was basically rifted from command due to bad performance, there is a lot of controversy surrounding this part of his career, even today. I am attempting to provide a broader reason within the context of many details to provide a better explanation then the one that was given by the original author(s). I am working with some new references and attempting to add them. I will keep the old references and add them back in as I smooth things out a bit. Please give me some time to work on this before making corrections to my edits. This way, I won't have to get confused and undo what you have attempted to correct (but did not understand my intentions as I have said). If after I have made the edits and you still believe I am in error, please feel free to add back wherever I made errors. I am going to come back to this article for further expansion since it is getting late. Once again, I will add back the old citation references once I have my new references ironed out. Thanks, and let me know if there is anything else I can do to explain myself here - new at this, :) Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimc52 ( talk • contribs) 07:47, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Jimc52: Best to document it on the article page so others can find it. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 07:53, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the response :) I will try to do a better job of documenting edits, but I am making so many minor changes! Going back over grammar and syntax and trying to learn the code to do reference and citations correctly too. Thank you for your very helpful comments! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimc52 ( talk • contribs) 08:33, 30 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Hello Jim

I am SO SORRY for having caused ANY problems. I got this email from Mary's assistant and she asked if I could change the Wikipedia info for Ms Costa. I inserted it exactly as it was written..and added nothing of my own.

Can you tell me the proper procedure to follow to get these changes for Ms Costa's bio?? I am very grateful for your help in this matter.

All the best.. Ron Pollard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronsdivas ( talk • contribs) 17:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC) reply

When I edited the article Archaeology and the Book of Mormon, I modified an unverified statement. The statement is biased and a violation of neutrality, I altered it to retain the claim without the negative stance.

Jayman85 ( talk) 18:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Jayman85: I did not say you are a weasel, WP:WEASEL is policy. Adding words as "some claim", etc. to wp:reliably sourced established facts would make them appear to be in doubt which they are not. That is weasel words and should be avoided. Jim1138 ( talk) 18:23, 1 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Touché, I see your point, but do you see mine? The author of this article clearly wishes to disprove the Book of Mormon, there are plenty that do. That is fine, in the pursuit of knowledge you can't taint results with personal bias. Having said that, the entire article is threaded with slights against anyone that disagrees with the author and he makes several claims that are not substantiated but still deriding. Jayman85 ( talk) 18:26, 1 May 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Jayman85: That I would agree with. Just avoid weasel words! Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 18:29, 1 May 2014 (UTC) reply

How can you agree with a statement about the author of the article, User:COGDEN, who actually created it with material from another article? In fact of course, there is no 'author' of this article, it's had over 500 editors. Dougweller ( talk) 19:11, 1 May 2014 (UTC) reply

And the two of you, and the IP, need to stop editing right now as you are all at 3RR or past it. Dougweller ( talk) 19:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC) reply

shut up 94.8.203.20 ( talk) 19:32, 1 May 2014 (UTC) reply

is it ok if you unblock me(jungleewan)? i was blocked unfairly and by the time i complain from the person,i wasblocked already.

respectfully, jungleewan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piachpia ( talk • contribs) 20:58, 1 May 2014 (UTC) reply

The edit to Jordan Maron may be a wp:content dispute, but I don't think it is wp:vandalism. Please avoid using "vandalism" unless it fits the definition under wp:vandalism. Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 23:08, 1 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Ah. Good call. Since the change apparently broke a link in the reference, I assumed it was vandalism. Afterwards I noticed that the original link was ALSO a dead link. Thanks. ( HullIntegrity talk) 00:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Hey Jim1138,

Sorry for not explaining why I made the changes in the above page. I made the changes in order to tidy up that section, after noticing that there were some repeats within the paragraph itself.

http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=User_talk:Jim1138&action=edit&section=100#

It's okay, sir -- 69.113.54.158 ( talk) the wikipedia editor formerly known as Smartie2thaMaxXx. 01:34, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Jim, Thanks for your concern, but I'm just moving the stuff from my old username to my new one. HuffTheWeevil ( talk) 01:48, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Dear Jimmy. I have been trying to remove defamatory material from this listing. If you listen to what adam savage says he does not reference Peter Rees. That is because he would be sued if he did. Similarly well referenced material was added to this listing and it was removed. In fact it contained independent references not simply relying on Adams version of events alone. We would appreciate your support in making Wikipedia as accurate as possible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter rees tv ( talk • contribs) 07:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

I've responded to a similar post on my talk page, noting that in the YouTube video, Savage refers the then producer who is no longer with the show. How many people are in that category? -- AussieLegend ( ✉) 08:26, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

@ AusieLegend: Likely get more cooperation if more pleasant. "Dear Jimmy..." Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 08:29, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Can you help me revert it back for pages that Laratadelaciudad (a user has been blocked) had done for? (Except for pages that has been reverted it back) I'm afraid he has another IP address will attacking it back. 183.171.178.92 ( talk) 08:27, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

@ 183.171.178.92: Revert what back? I'm dense... Cheers Jim1138 ( talk) 08:30, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

I already added the source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drankie ( talk • contribs) 09:15, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Drankie: There was no source on your Tanner Foust edit when I undid it. Is the current edit a wp:reliable source? Jim1138 ( talk) 09:18, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

@ Jim1138: I guess a tweet from his Official Twitter account where he wrote what I added is a realiable source.

@ Drankie: In general, twitter being WP:SELFPUB, is of questionable reliability, but may be OK in cases such as this. BTW: no need to ping on the user's page. Happy editing! Jim1138 ( talk) 09:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

I am not vandalizing wikipedia, or being disruptive. I am trying to upload images that are examples of work by the architect, who is my employer. It is not clear at all why you deleted them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Makhould ( talk • contribs) 10:03, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Hi Jim - I seem to have edit conflicted with you several times this morning, latest on User talk:Bob Woolmer Sales. I assure you this isn't intentional - we just seem to be looking at the same things at the moment! Best wishes,  — SMALL JIM  10:22, 2 May 2014 (UTC) reply

knecker