This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
Hi, can you please review the Bugzy Malone edits I made about the 2nd of May as it was undone to the previously inaccurate page.
Thanks, P.S I mightn't reply quickly on Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.239.94 ( talk) 19:00, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
28th April actually, +193 MB
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.239.94 ( talk) 11:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
I know you'd previously said you'd help revert controversial requests done by Mr Appleyard and then forced into an RM by him. Perhaps you might take a look at Operation Lava Jato? It was moved to that title as a "technical request" by Mr Appleyard, but that change was indeed controversial. When an editor requested that the bold change be reverted, Mr Appleyard created an RM against the status quo, which doesn't make any sense. RGloucester — ☎ 16:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Anarchyte ( work | talk) 12:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi can you undelete the Sounds of Mass Production page? Please let me know what I can do to make it more relevant. Thanks- Brubaker — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brubaker23 ( talk • contribs) 19:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jenks24, I hope you are doing well, I am Sammy.Joseph. I still remember that once I was editing this Article Diyar-e-Dil started a discussion that Its title should be changed. I still remember that that day you finally came out of no where and helped me which actually meant a lot to me! Well now there is an article (a stand alone article) which I want to merge with Its parent article due as It met those conditions which are never meant for Stand alone articles. I started a discussion few weeks ago and apparently no one was there to notice its MERGING TAG can you please help me once again? This is where I started the discussion, Talk:List of Mann Mayal episodes#Merge. Really looking forward to your response please help me once again. Thank you. Sammy.joseph ( talk) 16:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jenks24,
Thank you for all your work on Wikipedia. I myself am brand new to it (newbie). I noticed that the "Christopher Rust" page was deleted. Since I am new, can you tell me what it would take to make the page acceptable? I didn't write the page, but am interested in the person. If there is information that can make his page acceptable, I'd love to help contribute.
Please let me know ... thx.
Glenngow ( talk) 22:55, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jenks24,
I'm fairly late but have a different opinion on the requested move for article on Brock Turner. Here are few of my doubts. Would appreciate your feedback.
One of the three conditions for WP:BLP1E to be met is "If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented...The significance of an event or individual is indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources."
It is pretty clear to everyone that the incident in question is highly significant considering relentless public interest and persistence of coverage. It was certainly significant enough for the Vice President of the country to weigh in. The significance of the incident stems from the fact that it has single-handedly converged public opinion and debate on a number of public pain points 1) Campus rapes/ rape culture 2) Public attitude towards sexual assault 3) The influence of alcohol among college students 4) The influence of alcohol in acts of sexual assault 5) Judicial prudence 6) The volume of punishment for individuals convicted of sexual assaults 7) Judicial performance 8) Impact of sexual assault on victims 9) The influence of race and background in convictions 10) The role of the Jury 11) The recall of Judges 12) Crimes and social-media activism, etc.
Brock Turner was the creator of this incident. If the incident is undoubtedly significant, shouldn't the one person reasoned to have perpetrated the incident be significant for the purpose of facts and information? It is also very very important to understand that the "sentencing" which brought even more worldwide attention to the case, was partly justified by the Judge Aaron Persky, based on his evaluation of who 'Brock Turner' was as an 'individual'. It can thus effectively be argued that, Brock Turner's biography itself led to the minimal punishment and the consequent public backlash. A reader and researcher about this incident may need to study and understand the motivations and background of the person behind the incident to understand both his and the Judges decisions, and thus the incident. A biography about Brock Turner, an adult convicted of a sexual assault in a highly influential case is by no means futile and in fact highly notable. Brock Turner and his role in the incident are also very well documented.
I do think the title of the page should either be left unchanged from "Brock Turner" or at least the current title should be modified with the full name of Brock Turner or a new biographical page should be created on "Brock Turner".
Do let me know your views. Thanks SB1304 ( talk) 06:21, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Just sending a note to let you know I've updated some of the citing on my entry. Thank you. ( ProEmcee ( talk) 05:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC))
Thank you! ( ProEmcee ( talk) 13:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC))
The Covent Garden article has been scheduled to appear on the main page at the end of this month on the 30th. Shortly after it was scheduled, a FAR was opened by User:Scott: Wikipedia:Featured article review/Covent Garden/archive1. I am looking at addressing his concerns, though they are vague, and he appears unwilling to expand on his concerns. As you were involved in the FAC in 2011 ( Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Covent Garden/archive1) would you mind looking at the review, and providing some guidance as to how to proceed. There is some concern that we may need to reschedule because it would be inappropriate to have a featured article on the main page while there is a FAR in place. SilkTork ✔Tea time 19:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Pinging Anthony Appleyard for awareness as well.
Currently, Position of the Catholic Church on Freemasonry needs a histmerge with Catholicism and Freemasonry. The problem goes a bit deeper. See Special:Permalink/308972952. The talk page has 10 archives that were not moved to Papal ban of Freemasonry, with a bad redirect back in 2009 that was uncaught.
In the past 3 days, the page has been moved here, here, and here without regard for subpages or consensus. I suggest a move protection applied, the page history-merged, and talk subpages merged to 1 location.
For reference (don't know if this is all):
Thanks. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 23:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your support Jenks24! and yes I am late but not that late. I was helped and the merger discussion proved to be a success . Thank you! Sammy.joseph ( talk) 11:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
I've made a little proposal at Template talk:RMpmc#Appearance, and since all this is still so new, I'd like your input. What's in your palette? Paine 16:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Highett, Victoria may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:52, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jenks. Thank you for pointing out my error in doing a copy-and-paste move. I have since requested a history merge on the pages in question. Mr.Daywalker16 ( talk) 18:28, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Please revoke talk page access for user:Jenson457. 2602:306:3357:BA0:7543:4BD8:DBA8:38C3 ( talk) 15:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for closing the RM of Carl Nielsen works. The two articles about Busoni's works have not the same scope, as you can easily see looking at them. The list of compositions is a complete list of his works, published or unpublished, repertory pieces or forgotten, ... too much for the average user, so I created a sortable list of those works mentioned in the biography, open to addition, - and called it " works" (also not complete), without a hint at completeness. - Should we now try to move Max Reger works back, for consistency? It was renamed because a few users didn't like the name, while most users and especially readers don't care ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello Jenks. I realised shortly after creating that page that I'd made a mistake. But what's the proper way to rearrange the articles? PiCo ( talk) 08:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Your deletion of this redirect appears to have created about a hundred red links across the board. Just sayin'. -- 199.85.208.19 ( talk) 09:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
These various Taharrush terms are now known in various countries and languages, several Wikipedias have articles on it, and en-Wikipedia can not make it just a redirect to an Egypt-centric article. There was no consensus in Talk:Mass_sexual_assault_in_Egypt/Archive_2#Requested_move_1_February_2016, and things have changed since. -- 89.204.154.11 ( talk) 13:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Came here to leave a note about those King comma moves (thanks for suggesting, as I've done while being name-called and facing "shoo, go away" comments on each page, that the issue should be resolved at the main King page), but all of that pales after seeing and copying to my computer the bird pic on your user page. Nice. Randy Kryn 15:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting that vandalism on my talk page. I didn't even see it, I guess that's for the best seeing as it got revdel'd. . Anarchyte ( work | talk) 04:11, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
82.145.45.33 ( talk) 12:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Australian football | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 1265 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
You see I struck through my remarks when I saw the editor has been here less than.. six months.. right? Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
You recently participated in a move discussion at Talk:Kingdom of Tungning. I have made another proposal based on that discussion here if you would like to weigh in. — AjaxSmack 14:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi
Jenks24, if you have a moment could you have a look at
this diff from
Mohamed1900q, namely the section "so i promise people to add bad information
" - I think, given their previous behaviour and this comment, a
NOTHERE block may be in order? --
samtar
talk or
stalk 08:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
There are a new set of move requests by 2A02:C7D:564B:D300:3C1A:53BD:793E:CDDC, which is on the same /64 as 2A02:C7D:564B:D300:189E:A4B0:6469:D4DE, whose moves you closed last week. I would close them, but it's probably better that the early closes are done by an admin ( NeilN has already blocked the /64 range for 3 months). - Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 08:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Once again, thanks for your help on the Mason Weems Talk page. For good measure I have just reviewed the Page mover and Page move pages, most of which I was already familiar with. I've moved a few pages over the years with no issues, but alas I've gotten something of a crash, hands on, course in the finer aspects of page moving here. Don't know if my timing is best here, but, I've come away from this rather enlightening episode for the better and was hoping I could be granted page mover rights. I should mention that I have no pressing need and no other pages immediately in mind but thought this privilege would be nice to have somewhere along the line. I have had File mover rights on both Wikipedia and Commons for some time now and know well when and when not to move files. Before my request is even considered however I still need to know something. I understand that a page which is protected from moves can only be moved by an administrator -- but would such a move be allowed by editors with Page mover rights? Needless to say, hopefully, I have no intentions of going against consensus, or making any controversial moves but simply want to know about this finer point before being considered. As a writer/editor of historical biographies and history in general I am thoroughly familiar with naming conventions for people, bibliographies and manuscripts, areas where I am mostly involved. In any case, thanx for all of your help. -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 20:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
Hi, can you please review the Bugzy Malone edits I made about the 2nd of May as it was undone to the previously inaccurate page.
Thanks, P.S I mightn't reply quickly on Wiki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.239.94 ( talk) 19:00, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
28th April actually, +193 MB
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.239.94 ( talk) 11:54, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
I know you'd previously said you'd help revert controversial requests done by Mr Appleyard and then forced into an RM by him. Perhaps you might take a look at Operation Lava Jato? It was moved to that title as a "technical request" by Mr Appleyard, but that change was indeed controversial. When an editor requested that the bold change be reverted, Mr Appleyard created an RM against the status quo, which doesn't make any sense. RGloucester — ☎ 16:05, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Anarchyte ( work | talk) 12:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Hi can you undelete the Sounds of Mass Production page? Please let me know what I can do to make it more relevant. Thanks- Brubaker — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brubaker23 ( talk • contribs) 19:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jenks24, I hope you are doing well, I am Sammy.Joseph. I still remember that once I was editing this Article Diyar-e-Dil started a discussion that Its title should be changed. I still remember that that day you finally came out of no where and helped me which actually meant a lot to me! Well now there is an article (a stand alone article) which I want to merge with Its parent article due as It met those conditions which are never meant for Stand alone articles. I started a discussion few weeks ago and apparently no one was there to notice its MERGING TAG can you please help me once again? This is where I started the discussion, Talk:List of Mann Mayal episodes#Merge. Really looking forward to your response please help me once again. Thank you. Sammy.joseph ( talk) 16:01, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jenks24,
Thank you for all your work on Wikipedia. I myself am brand new to it (newbie). I noticed that the "Christopher Rust" page was deleted. Since I am new, can you tell me what it would take to make the page acceptable? I didn't write the page, but am interested in the person. If there is information that can make his page acceptable, I'd love to help contribute.
Please let me know ... thx.
Glenngow ( talk) 22:55, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jenks24,
I'm fairly late but have a different opinion on the requested move for article on Brock Turner. Here are few of my doubts. Would appreciate your feedback.
One of the three conditions for WP:BLP1E to be met is "If the event is not significant or the individual's role was either not substantial or not well documented...The significance of an event or individual is indicated by how persistent the coverage is in reliable sources."
It is pretty clear to everyone that the incident in question is highly significant considering relentless public interest and persistence of coverage. It was certainly significant enough for the Vice President of the country to weigh in. The significance of the incident stems from the fact that it has single-handedly converged public opinion and debate on a number of public pain points 1) Campus rapes/ rape culture 2) Public attitude towards sexual assault 3) The influence of alcohol among college students 4) The influence of alcohol in acts of sexual assault 5) Judicial prudence 6) The volume of punishment for individuals convicted of sexual assaults 7) Judicial performance 8) Impact of sexual assault on victims 9) The influence of race and background in convictions 10) The role of the Jury 11) The recall of Judges 12) Crimes and social-media activism, etc.
Brock Turner was the creator of this incident. If the incident is undoubtedly significant, shouldn't the one person reasoned to have perpetrated the incident be significant for the purpose of facts and information? It is also very very important to understand that the "sentencing" which brought even more worldwide attention to the case, was partly justified by the Judge Aaron Persky, based on his evaluation of who 'Brock Turner' was as an 'individual'. It can thus effectively be argued that, Brock Turner's biography itself led to the minimal punishment and the consequent public backlash. A reader and researcher about this incident may need to study and understand the motivations and background of the person behind the incident to understand both his and the Judges decisions, and thus the incident. A biography about Brock Turner, an adult convicted of a sexual assault in a highly influential case is by no means futile and in fact highly notable. Brock Turner and his role in the incident are also very well documented.
I do think the title of the page should either be left unchanged from "Brock Turner" or at least the current title should be modified with the full name of Brock Turner or a new biographical page should be created on "Brock Turner".
Do let me know your views. Thanks SB1304 ( talk) 06:21, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello! Just sending a note to let you know I've updated some of the citing on my entry. Thank you. ( ProEmcee ( talk) 05:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC))
Thank you! ( ProEmcee ( talk) 13:44, 19 June 2016 (UTC))
The Covent Garden article has been scheduled to appear on the main page at the end of this month on the 30th. Shortly after it was scheduled, a FAR was opened by User:Scott: Wikipedia:Featured article review/Covent Garden/archive1. I am looking at addressing his concerns, though they are vague, and he appears unwilling to expand on his concerns. As you were involved in the FAC in 2011 ( Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Covent Garden/archive1) would you mind looking at the review, and providing some guidance as to how to proceed. There is some concern that we may need to reschedule because it would be inappropriate to have a featured article on the main page while there is a FAR in place. SilkTork ✔Tea time 19:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Pinging Anthony Appleyard for awareness as well.
Currently, Position of the Catholic Church on Freemasonry needs a histmerge with Catholicism and Freemasonry. The problem goes a bit deeper. See Special:Permalink/308972952. The talk page has 10 archives that were not moved to Papal ban of Freemasonry, with a bad redirect back in 2009 that was uncaught.
In the past 3 days, the page has been moved here, here, and here without regard for subpages or consensus. I suggest a move protection applied, the page history-merged, and talk subpages merged to 1 location.
For reference (don't know if this is all):
Thanks. — Andy W. ( talk · ctb) 23:06, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your support Jenks24! and yes I am late but not that late. I was helped and the merger discussion proved to be a success . Thank you! Sammy.joseph ( talk) 11:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
I've made a little proposal at Template talk:RMpmc#Appearance, and since all this is still so new, I'd like your input. What's in your palette? Paine 16:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Highett, Victoria may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:52, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jenks. Thank you for pointing out my error in doing a copy-and-paste move. I have since requested a history merge on the pages in question. Mr.Daywalker16 ( talk) 18:28, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
Please revoke talk page access for user:Jenson457. 2602:306:3357:BA0:7543:4BD8:DBA8:38C3 ( talk) 15:46, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for closing the RM of Carl Nielsen works. The two articles about Busoni's works have not the same scope, as you can easily see looking at them. The list of compositions is a complete list of his works, published or unpublished, repertory pieces or forgotten, ... too much for the average user, so I created a sortable list of those works mentioned in the biography, open to addition, - and called it " works" (also not complete), without a hint at completeness. - Should we now try to move Max Reger works back, for consistency? It was renamed because a few users didn't like the name, while most users and especially readers don't care ;) -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 10:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello Jenks. I realised shortly after creating that page that I'd made a mistake. But what's the proper way to rearrange the articles? PiCo ( talk) 08:36, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
Your deletion of this redirect appears to have created about a hundred red links across the board. Just sayin'. -- 199.85.208.19 ( talk) 09:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
These various Taharrush terms are now known in various countries and languages, several Wikipedias have articles on it, and en-Wikipedia can not make it just a redirect to an Egypt-centric article. There was no consensus in Talk:Mass_sexual_assault_in_Egypt/Archive_2#Requested_move_1_February_2016, and things have changed since. -- 89.204.154.11 ( talk) 13:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Came here to leave a note about those King comma moves (thanks for suggesting, as I've done while being name-called and facing "shoo, go away" comments on each page, that the issue should be resolved at the main King page), but all of that pales after seeing and copying to my computer the bird pic on your user page. Nice. Randy Kryn 15:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting that vandalism on my talk page. I didn't even see it, I guess that's for the best seeing as it got revdel'd. . Anarchyte ( work | talk) 04:11, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
82.145.45.33 ( talk) 12:35, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Australian football | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 1265 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 06:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
You see I struck through my remarks when I saw the editor has been here less than.. six months.. right? Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 10:08, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
You recently participated in a move discussion at Talk:Kingdom of Tungning. I have made another proposal based on that discussion here if you would like to weigh in. — AjaxSmack 14:19, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
Hi
Jenks24, if you have a moment could you have a look at
this diff from
Mohamed1900q, namely the section "so i promise people to add bad information
" - I think, given their previous behaviour and this comment, a
NOTHERE block may be in order? --
samtar
talk or
stalk 08:46, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
There are a new set of move requests by 2A02:C7D:564B:D300:3C1A:53BD:793E:CDDC, which is on the same /64 as 2A02:C7D:564B:D300:189E:A4B0:6469:D4DE, whose moves you closed last week. I would close them, but it's probably better that the early closes are done by an admin ( NeilN has already blocked the /64 range for 3 months). - Niceguyedc Go Huskies! 08:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Once again, thanks for your help on the Mason Weems Talk page. For good measure I have just reviewed the Page mover and Page move pages, most of which I was already familiar with. I've moved a few pages over the years with no issues, but alas I've gotten something of a crash, hands on, course in the finer aspects of page moving here. Don't know if my timing is best here, but, I've come away from this rather enlightening episode for the better and was hoping I could be granted page mover rights. I should mention that I have no pressing need and no other pages immediately in mind but thought this privilege would be nice to have somewhere along the line. I have had File mover rights on both Wikipedia and Commons for some time now and know well when and when not to move files. Before my request is even considered however I still need to know something. I understand that a page which is protected from moves can only be moved by an administrator -- but would such a move be allowed by editors with Page mover rights? Needless to say, hopefully, I have no intentions of going against consensus, or making any controversial moves but simply want to know about this finer point before being considered. As a writer/editor of historical biographies and history in general I am thoroughly familiar with naming conventions for people, bibliographies and manuscripts, areas where I am mostly involved. In any case, thanx for all of your help. -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 20:09, 12 July 2016 (UTC)