Message added 11:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your example on Légal_Trap
Unfortunately the board does not make sense, as Qxd1 is mate in 1. I tried to look up your source but couldn't find the relevant game. I reverted the example for now, but feel free to add it when we figure out the correct board! Isaac ( talk) 01:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
| 8 |              | 8 | |||||||
| 7 | 7 | ||||||||
| 6 | 6 | ||||||||
| 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| 4 | 4 | ||||||||
| 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| 2 | 2 | ||||||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Reductio ad absurdum. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --
Chetvorno
TALK
19:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
The article SmithProject has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NSOFT
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Message added 11:27, 23 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your example on Légal_Trap
Unfortunately the board does not make sense, as Qxd1 is mate in 1. I tried to look up your source but couldn't find the relevant game. I reverted the example for now, but feel free to add it when we figure out the correct board! Isaac ( talk) 01:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
| 8 | | 8 | |||||||
| 7 | 7 | ||||||||
| 6 | 6 | ||||||||
| 5 | 5 | ||||||||
| 4 | 4 | ||||||||
| 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| 2 | 2 | ||||||||
| 1 | 1 | ||||||||
| a | b | c | d | e | f | g | h | ||
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Reductio ad absurdum. Your edits appear to constitute
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the
loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --
Chetvorno
TALK
19:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
The article SmithProject has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NSOFT
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)