Welcome!
Hello, Jannik Schwaß, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome!
You might want to check out Twinkle! It's a tool you enable in your preferences on here, so no installation needed. Makes vandalism reversion and warning go a lot smoother. cymru.lass ( talk • contribs) 18:28, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Jannik Schwaß! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 2 November 2018 (UTC) |
Hi there, re: this edit, why would citations be required for a character list? The primary source, i.e. the series itself, is a sufficient source for uncontroversial content like character summaries, plot, cast list, etc. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:05, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello Jannik
The automated copyvio claim on the page I created is bizarre -- the text is taken from the Mossberg 930 article, however, I just realized that page uses text from the original link
So the copyvio is actually from the Mossberg 930 page.
I have revised the Mossberg 9200 page to remove the copied content.
izaakb ~talk ~contribs 18:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam ( talk) 18:14, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
hi, user makes vandal edits 1 and 2, reversion of reversion 3, and does not react to talk page in months 4, where his kind of edit has been already labeled as invalid. could you pay attention please?-- Arsenekoumyk ( talk) 06:12, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Jannik Schwaß, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{
helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome!
You might want to check out Twinkle! It's a tool you enable in your preferences on here, so no installation needed. Makes vandalism reversion and warning go a lot smoother. cymru.lass ( talk • contribs) 18:28, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi Jannik Schwaß! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 2 November 2018 (UTC) |
Hi there, re: this edit, why would citations be required for a character list? The primary source, i.e. the series itself, is a sufficient source for uncontroversial content like character summaries, plot, cast list, etc. Regards, Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 20:05, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello Jannik
The automated copyvio claim on the page I created is bizarre -- the text is taken from the Mossberg 930 article, however, I just realized that page uses text from the original link
So the copyvio is actually from the Mossberg 930 page.
I have revised the Mossberg 9200 page to remove the copied content.
izaakb ~talk ~contribs 18:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Gilliam ( talk) 18:14, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
hi, user makes vandal edits 1 and 2, reversion of reversion 3, and does not react to talk page in months 4, where his kind of edit has been already labeled as invalid. could you pay attention please?-- Arsenekoumyk ( talk) 06:12, 11 September 2019 (UTC)