![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Janejellyroll has not edited Wikipedia since 7 September 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
You might as well stop editing wonky because it will keep coming back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!>:0
I AM TRYING TO MAKE A PAGE ABOUT OUR GROUP A.M.C! Why are you deleting this!? i am giving a reason as you specified. This really stupid. Also, im not so sure if you are the one, but my friend created another club too about maps and cities. Stop deleting htat too. Its not like wikipedia should not expand. Wikipedia is a free place. People get known here. If you delete my posts, then the A.C.M will never expand. for people like you, you ruin people's hopes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Reaper90210 ( talk • contribs) 02:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC).
Please keep my new entries on various youth group events; CHIC '88, CHIC '91, CHIC '94, Jesustyle, etc. These were major events attended by tens of thousands over the years and are noteworthy in the history of American evangelical church movements. I will complete the entries soon and footnote and cite these soon if you allow them to be posted. Thanks, MarineEric
Congratulations for your job on patrolling websites. I have started to play around with Wikipedia in the last couple of days, and created some random, non offensive, websites. You were fast and precise on your comments. It is because of people like you that Wikipedia is this great website. Take care! Riauhobi 10:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for helping revert vandalism on Tara Reid. It must have required a fair amount of vigilance to revert 13 vandalisms in 37 minutes (that is, watching the History page, etc.)
In case you were wondering, the hosts of the main radio channel of Triple J told people to do it, and they did. They later commented on the sprotect, and moved on.
Also, you might find God-mode lite, a piece of code people can use for anti-vandalism, useful. Just copy this to your Monobook.js... I'm just mentioning it if you want to use it. It supports a psuedo-admin rollback, which is useful for reverting vandalism, so long as you don't abuse it. (Also, see information on vandal-reverting IRC channels, which are quite useful, in WP:IRC). Thanks for your help. Gracenotes T § 17:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
There was some vandalism you missed on the Mario Lopez article. Compare my version with yours and you'll see what I mean. Acalamari 02:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
user janejellyroll has shown clear discrimination against canadians and their heritage.
if u think canadian heritage is nonsense you're a bigger racist than i previously imagined. your are reprehensible.-- Clayzer 05:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
I didn't know there was a Canadian "race", eh? :) Wahkeenah 02:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page some days ago! -- Goochelaar 14:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up on that - I only looked at the 1st 50! revisions of that disambig page - what a mess. I didn't see the other 50+ :( I'm going to go over to the admin page and request a semi-protect on that for a while, maybe the Canadian Cran will get tired and go away... SkierRMH 08:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Wow, you're fast! -- Randall00 Talk 21:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for your excellent recent work on RC patrol. If there is any more nonsense relating to "Top Gun Mach 2" or similar, please let me know directly. Thanks. Newyorkbrad 03:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for removing vandalism from my user page. Steve-g 09:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Is this you? If so, Hi! If not, Hi!. Either way, I noticed your welcome edit to My Lai Massacre (an article I pay close attention to, given my username...). A belated welcome to WP. Hope to cross paths again! Pinkville 13:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC) aka
![]() |
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
For tireless efforts in the fight against vandals, and excellent work on general clean-up and menial tasks! Jammy Simpson | Talk | 23:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC) |
You beat me to reverting 207.62.105.98's vandalism. Well done! -- Cdogsimmons 01:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
I believe his behaviour qualifies him for 3RR. Your thoughts?-- Xnuala ( talk) 02:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: your ancestor page, there are several free genealogy wiki sites where it would be more appropriate: http://genealogy.wikia.com, http://www.wikitree.org, http://rodovid.org, etc. Also check Category:Genealogy websites and List of general genealogy databases. Let me know if you'd like a copy of the deleted page so you don't have to retype it all. — Wknight94 ( talk) 01:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
your a stupid whore. Im going to kick your ass, wikipedia is a place to type lies that 3rd party retards like you will believe. I don't even know why answers.com uses some of your guys posts.
fuck you.
your a real big bitch. There is a myspace conspiracy and Im going to prove it, wikipedia is a place to posts stpud lies for 3rd party retards like you and the rest of the world.
Fuck yo crib nigga —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gatman140 ( talk • contribs) 03:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC).
My sincerist apologise. I should do it in person, so i can flick your ass of for getting into other people's business. Don't be so noisy you probbaly have a myspace and now all about the conspiracy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gatman140 ( talk • contribs) 03:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC).
Just wanted to give you kudos for your hard work destroying and reverting vandalism. Rock on, Rockstar915 04:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
User talk:Lukeoil is continuing his vandalism. Maybe we need to look at a suspension...
Regards,
JohnI 17:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
If you see the 8 YouTube videos I left at the External Links of the Columbine High School Massacre page, they took Diary entries from the two kids, and they said they were apart of the "Trench Coat Mafia."
Royaljared 17:31, 7th of April 2007
I have read your page after you deleted somethings and so people come here because you delete work. Personal comments are about people feeling upset that you delete work. How personal does a person feel when their subject matter is deleted when the person doing the deleting has offered nothing to the subject. That is far more personal. Deleting is the crack cocane of wikipedia and the junkies on this stuff really upset in both worlds. I guess we will have to live with both. Personal choice to be a deleter. RoddyYoung 12:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Dear Janejellyroll,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page ( here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.
Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 11:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't think it's appropriate for Eric Dill to redirect to The Click Five, so, I think something should be written about it. However, I don't have any ideas, because he's not that interesting. I wondered if you perhaps might want to help me with this project. -- Char645 01:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
An anti banstorm for delete with out trying to improve. Burning of books comes to mind when I consider the contributions of deleters. RoddyYoung 12:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC) ps how do you revert your pages so fast?
Are you certain about Alumni not having notability. This comments qualifies for another anti-banstorm. Are you suggesting that I find the most notable Alumni and then write a page on that then then move to the next etc. I was on the Board of the Waikato University Alumni for one year 2005/06 and I know it better than any other Alumni. Over time Alumni will see that they are notable and a culture of Alumni noting what they do will grow up. Are you aware that universities are the conscience and critic of society and for that reason the Alumni is a place that holds the lights of higher learning. Personal, no I understand your point about doing a job from a management stance, but what I was saying was from a governance point of view and highlighting policy planning. I see from your confusion over this that you think it was personal and I will have to approach governance in another quater.RoddyYoung 11:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Wow, you are amazing. If there is a tally kept of all the edits one person makes, you might be at the top of the list. Have you ever considered getting a life? Or at least a job?
You aren't perfect either. From now on I will remove speedy deletion tags if their not justified. He spent a lot of time on that article. Harebag 01:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
JaneJellyRoll,
could you take a few minutes to have another look at Email forwarding and just see whether its going in the right direction and .... whether you think it will remain - I'm really trying to write another web page altogether and I would like to know whether I can put a link into this article to help explain the concept (when someone who knows what they are talking about has a go!).
Alternatively, do you happen to know someone technical in Wikipedia who could check all the terminology, because e.g. I can't remember whether a mail client is a real term!
I still can't quite believe there isn't already an article!
Mike 11:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
hi, i don't understand why my article doesn't meet the requirements. i have provided 2 external links, both of which i used for information on the article in question. what more must i add? Brclmu 04:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
i've added a link to a review of one of the band's albums. i think that having a profile from a reputable metal website plus a review on a largely popular metal e-zine gives them notability. plus the fact they actually have an official website. that makes 3 sources proving the bands existence. enough? Brclmu 05:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the note about my adoptee. I assume good faith but I'll review the rules with my adoptee whether or not no-no's were done.
VK35
01:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help, i understand now what you mean by "notability" and have added certain things i believe confirm the band as "notable". another thing that i am having trouble understanding is pictures. I want to upload pictures but do not want to commit copyright infringement and i am also unsure how i upload a picture. would you be able to fill me in quickly about it? Brclmu 03:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Yo Janejellyroll! I dig your message, but I ain't pickin up what you're layin down. Yo all need to be more constructive when you telling a n***a hiz edits done been reverted. Yo can't just be revertin' without no edits on da talk page. Yo all gotta reach con-sen-sus. Peace bro.
I have asked an admin for some help with this case. Wahkeenah 02:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
It is amazing to me what we can learn from watching what others "read into something" -- like what people might place in "blanks" to creat a word that is not actually there -- when there are many various possibilities. Psychologists have used this type of test to learn about people for many years now. I would just like to point out what Janejellyroll has revealed about her own racial views by creating such an offensive word so quickly from the blanks that were present in the above user's former name. Racism/Racist -- The truth is clear as to who the racist is. Maybe she should consider apologizing to the user or maybe she should think about other possibilities prior to jumping to conclusions. Best wishes for peace and harmony and that people will think instead of hate! -- MullinsLabsInc 16:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
You are calling this gentleman's name offensive. How do you think your name sounds? It is a direct insult to anyone of heavy weight. If he has to change his, so should you.
Also, "LEGEND" when it has been research by numerous sources, peer-reviewed, and published by many professional journals and sources -- is not NEW RESEARCH. Might be new to you, but not to the world. Maybe the "new research" is what you need to do to learn about history, legends, and yes, about slurs --since you have chosen a very insulting slur for your own name!
What is good for one person, should be good for another.
If you are not going to change your name, then the gentleman that you have banned, should have all rights restored and returned, and receive apologies.
A FREE AMERICAN and a card carrying member of the ACLU
Once again, you don't know what you are saying. Check locations of IP address, we are not the same person. We just happen to be people who share a point of view. Don't ignore facts just because they represent opinions which differ from yours. You are the reason that ignorance exists in this world - closed-minded facism. AND YES--JELLYROLL is an insulting slur...
Be advised that if this is not addressed legal action will be taken against both of you.
(You would think you would check out information prior to attempting to publish it, but you repeatly publish incorrect information based completely upon your opinions, which are not - and not even close to - fact.)
An offended and concerned reader and a mother (not anyone from any street!!!!)
Why do they have to be the person? Could they not be two people that share opinions? I know that I agree them and see what I have read here as a little closed minded from Wahkeenah and Janejellyroll -- I know that I am new here, but this looks more like the spreading of hate, not the pursuit of wisdom. Stop the hate - -- MullinsLabsInc 16:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
What is wrong with you? Why are you so nasty people? These people never did anything to you, but you run around "reporting to admin, and name-calling. Can't you get along with people. Try peace. -- 207.144.59.134 18:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
You might want to note that MullinsLabInc, is a valid business. Just a small warning that to deface the creditability of this business could result in legal action. Now let's all try to get along with each other. Peace, Mullins 22:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
I have reported the user to an admin again, due to the threats he's now making against us. Wahkeenah 23:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
DO NOT attack VK35. He is not a suspect and I do not want him treated like one. For the last time I'm leaving wikipedia. I tried to be reasonable with you guys but you weren't. If you write me mail I won't respond because I'm DONE! Harebag 18:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I admit and apolgize for using JV17 disruptivly in edit wars. If you want to report me or not it is up to you. If you do not however I promise to do the following,
As I say it is up to you.--law-enforcement-type-of-guy 00:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
It is nice to see you being helpful and improving wikipedia with your corrections and I want to take back half the anti-banstorming comments I have made. You have atoned for your deleting and I appreciate that. Keep up the good work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RoddyYoung ( talk • contribs) 13:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC).
Well I do thing that little changes are the best and this lets a page grow and become more than a delete. Smile and the world smiles with you. roddy RoddyYoung 12:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I saw the external link and was like, oh, ok, they've got a website, that counts for something, right? My apologies. We might want to delete that talk page. Dooms Day349 20:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
You tagged Joseph Bloch as not meeting the notability guidelines back in January. Since then, no substantive material has been added to the article and a google search on the name produces nothing that suggests the article meets the WP:BIO or WP:N standard. I therefore suggest it be taken to AfD. Eusebeus 09:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Do you know how I can improve this userbox.
This user loves Dachshunds |
I can't get the image to fit properly. Wiki-wikify 02:16, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
This is one of my first successfully uploaded pictures. What do you think? I think the one asking the question looks kinda like Charlie Brown. Wiki-wikify 02:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
File:Stickman isn't developed.JPG
What do you think of this one? Wiki-wikify 02:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
I uploaded those images simply for humour. 69.145.163.26 20:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Trailing a vandalizer, I stumbled upon your talk page and noticed you have been harshly attacked several times. I thought you could use this.
Clerks. has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Mr. Blue Sky (2007 film), because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}} to the top of the page.
B. Wolterding (
talk)
10:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Money Management Group, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Money Management Group. Thank you. -- BJBot ( talk) 22:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
FYI, I've re-replaced the notability tag on this article, which you've evidently flagged twice before. Justification is on the talk page. Respectfully, Agricola44 ( talk) 21:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC).
An article that you have been involved in editing, Clayton_Junkins, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clayton_Junkins. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TParis00ap ( talk) 19:07, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
i work with a Va state agency that is trying to get a page removed how do i go about doing it?
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Janejellyroll has not edited Wikipedia since 7 September 2007. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
You might as well stop editing wonky because it will keep coming back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!>:0
I AM TRYING TO MAKE A PAGE ABOUT OUR GROUP A.M.C! Why are you deleting this!? i am giving a reason as you specified. This really stupid. Also, im not so sure if you are the one, but my friend created another club too about maps and cities. Stop deleting htat too. Its not like wikipedia should not expand. Wikipedia is a free place. People get known here. If you delete my posts, then the A.C.M will never expand. for people like you, you ruin people's hopes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Reaper90210 ( talk • contribs) 02:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC).
Please keep my new entries on various youth group events; CHIC '88, CHIC '91, CHIC '94, Jesustyle, etc. These were major events attended by tens of thousands over the years and are noteworthy in the history of American evangelical church movements. I will complete the entries soon and footnote and cite these soon if you allow them to be posted. Thanks, MarineEric
Congratulations for your job on patrolling websites. I have started to play around with Wikipedia in the last couple of days, and created some random, non offensive, websites. You were fast and precise on your comments. It is because of people like you that Wikipedia is this great website. Take care! Riauhobi 10:12, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for helping revert vandalism on Tara Reid. It must have required a fair amount of vigilance to revert 13 vandalisms in 37 minutes (that is, watching the History page, etc.)
In case you were wondering, the hosts of the main radio channel of Triple J told people to do it, and they did. They later commented on the sprotect, and moved on.
Also, you might find God-mode lite, a piece of code people can use for anti-vandalism, useful. Just copy this to your Monobook.js... I'm just mentioning it if you want to use it. It supports a psuedo-admin rollback, which is useful for reverting vandalism, so long as you don't abuse it. (Also, see information on vandal-reverting IRC channels, which are quite useful, in WP:IRC). Thanks for your help. Gracenotes T § 17:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
There was some vandalism you missed on the Mario Lopez article. Compare my version with yours and you'll see what I mean. Acalamari 02:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
user janejellyroll has shown clear discrimination against canadians and their heritage.
if u think canadian heritage is nonsense you're a bigger racist than i previously imagined. your are reprehensible.-- Clayzer 05:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
I didn't know there was a Canadian "race", eh? :) Wahkeenah 02:32, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism on my user page some days ago! -- Goochelaar 14:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the heads up on that - I only looked at the 1st 50! revisions of that disambig page - what a mess. I didn't see the other 50+ :( I'm going to go over to the admin page and request a semi-protect on that for a while, maybe the Canadian Cran will get tired and go away... SkierRMH 08:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Wow, you're fast! -- Randall00 Talk 21:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Hi, and thanks for your excellent recent work on RC patrol. If there is any more nonsense relating to "Top Gun Mach 2" or similar, please let me know directly. Thanks. Newyorkbrad 03:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for removing vandalism from my user page. Steve-g 09:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Is this you? If so, Hi! If not, Hi!. Either way, I noticed your welcome edit to My Lai Massacre (an article I pay close attention to, given my username...). A belated welcome to WP. Hope to cross paths again! Pinkville 13:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC) aka
![]() |
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
For tireless efforts in the fight against vandals, and excellent work on general clean-up and menial tasks! Jammy Simpson | Talk | 23:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC) |
You beat me to reverting 207.62.105.98's vandalism. Well done! -- Cdogsimmons 01:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
I believe his behaviour qualifies him for 3RR. Your thoughts?-- Xnuala ( talk) 02:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Re: your ancestor page, there are several free genealogy wiki sites where it would be more appropriate: http://genealogy.wikia.com, http://www.wikitree.org, http://rodovid.org, etc. Also check Category:Genealogy websites and List of general genealogy databases. Let me know if you'd like a copy of the deleted page so you don't have to retype it all. — Wknight94 ( talk) 01:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
your a stupid whore. Im going to kick your ass, wikipedia is a place to type lies that 3rd party retards like you will believe. I don't even know why answers.com uses some of your guys posts.
fuck you.
your a real big bitch. There is a myspace conspiracy and Im going to prove it, wikipedia is a place to posts stpud lies for 3rd party retards like you and the rest of the world.
Fuck yo crib nigga —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gatman140 ( talk • contribs) 03:22, 31 March 2007 (UTC).
My sincerist apologise. I should do it in person, so i can flick your ass of for getting into other people's business. Don't be so noisy you probbaly have a myspace and now all about the conspiracy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gatman140 ( talk • contribs) 03:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC).
Just wanted to give you kudos for your hard work destroying and reverting vandalism. Rock on, Rockstar915 04:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
User talk:Lukeoil is continuing his vandalism. Maybe we need to look at a suspension...
Regards,
JohnI 17:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
If you see the 8 YouTube videos I left at the External Links of the Columbine High School Massacre page, they took Diary entries from the two kids, and they said they were apart of the "Trench Coat Mafia."
Royaljared 17:31, 7th of April 2007
I have read your page after you deleted somethings and so people come here because you delete work. Personal comments are about people feeling upset that you delete work. How personal does a person feel when their subject matter is deleted when the person doing the deleting has offered nothing to the subject. That is far more personal. Deleting is the crack cocane of wikipedia and the junkies on this stuff really upset in both worlds. I guess we will have to live with both. Personal choice to be a deleter. RoddyYoung 12:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Dear Janejellyroll,
Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page ( here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.
Snowolf (talk) CON COI - 11:32, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't think it's appropriate for Eric Dill to redirect to The Click Five, so, I think something should be written about it. However, I don't have any ideas, because he's not that interesting. I wondered if you perhaps might want to help me with this project. -- Char645 01:55, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
An anti banstorm for delete with out trying to improve. Burning of books comes to mind when I consider the contributions of deleters. RoddyYoung 12:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC) ps how do you revert your pages so fast?
Are you certain about Alumni not having notability. This comments qualifies for another anti-banstorm. Are you suggesting that I find the most notable Alumni and then write a page on that then then move to the next etc. I was on the Board of the Waikato University Alumni for one year 2005/06 and I know it better than any other Alumni. Over time Alumni will see that they are notable and a culture of Alumni noting what they do will grow up. Are you aware that universities are the conscience and critic of society and for that reason the Alumni is a place that holds the lights of higher learning. Personal, no I understand your point about doing a job from a management stance, but what I was saying was from a governance point of view and highlighting policy planning. I see from your confusion over this that you think it was personal and I will have to approach governance in another quater.RoddyYoung 11:45, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Wow, you are amazing. If there is a tally kept of all the edits one person makes, you might be at the top of the list. Have you ever considered getting a life? Or at least a job?
You aren't perfect either. From now on I will remove speedy deletion tags if their not justified. He spent a lot of time on that article. Harebag 01:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
JaneJellyRoll,
could you take a few minutes to have another look at Email forwarding and just see whether its going in the right direction and .... whether you think it will remain - I'm really trying to write another web page altogether and I would like to know whether I can put a link into this article to help explain the concept (when someone who knows what they are talking about has a go!).
Alternatively, do you happen to know someone technical in Wikipedia who could check all the terminology, because e.g. I can't remember whether a mail client is a real term!
I still can't quite believe there isn't already an article!
Mike 11:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
hi, i don't understand why my article doesn't meet the requirements. i have provided 2 external links, both of which i used for information on the article in question. what more must i add? Brclmu 04:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
i've added a link to a review of one of the band's albums. i think that having a profile from a reputable metal website plus a review on a largely popular metal e-zine gives them notability. plus the fact they actually have an official website. that makes 3 sources proving the bands existence. enough? Brclmu 05:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the note about my adoptee. I assume good faith but I'll review the rules with my adoptee whether or not no-no's were done.
VK35
01:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help, i understand now what you mean by "notability" and have added certain things i believe confirm the band as "notable". another thing that i am having trouble understanding is pictures. I want to upload pictures but do not want to commit copyright infringement and i am also unsure how i upload a picture. would you be able to fill me in quickly about it? Brclmu 03:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
Yo Janejellyroll! I dig your message, but I ain't pickin up what you're layin down. Yo all need to be more constructive when you telling a n***a hiz edits done been reverted. Yo can't just be revertin' without no edits on da talk page. Yo all gotta reach con-sen-sus. Peace bro.
I have asked an admin for some help with this case. Wahkeenah 02:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
It is amazing to me what we can learn from watching what others "read into something" -- like what people might place in "blanks" to creat a word that is not actually there -- when there are many various possibilities. Psychologists have used this type of test to learn about people for many years now. I would just like to point out what Janejellyroll has revealed about her own racial views by creating such an offensive word so quickly from the blanks that were present in the above user's former name. Racism/Racist -- The truth is clear as to who the racist is. Maybe she should consider apologizing to the user or maybe she should think about other possibilities prior to jumping to conclusions. Best wishes for peace and harmony and that people will think instead of hate! -- MullinsLabsInc 16:20, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
You are calling this gentleman's name offensive. How do you think your name sounds? It is a direct insult to anyone of heavy weight. If he has to change his, so should you.
Also, "LEGEND" when it has been research by numerous sources, peer-reviewed, and published by many professional journals and sources -- is not NEW RESEARCH. Might be new to you, but not to the world. Maybe the "new research" is what you need to do to learn about history, legends, and yes, about slurs --since you have chosen a very insulting slur for your own name!
What is good for one person, should be good for another.
If you are not going to change your name, then the gentleman that you have banned, should have all rights restored and returned, and receive apologies.
A FREE AMERICAN and a card carrying member of the ACLU
Once again, you don't know what you are saying. Check locations of IP address, we are not the same person. We just happen to be people who share a point of view. Don't ignore facts just because they represent opinions which differ from yours. You are the reason that ignorance exists in this world - closed-minded facism. AND YES--JELLYROLL is an insulting slur...
Be advised that if this is not addressed legal action will be taken against both of you.
(You would think you would check out information prior to attempting to publish it, but you repeatly publish incorrect information based completely upon your opinions, which are not - and not even close to - fact.)
An offended and concerned reader and a mother (not anyone from any street!!!!)
Why do they have to be the person? Could they not be two people that share opinions? I know that I agree them and see what I have read here as a little closed minded from Wahkeenah and Janejellyroll -- I know that I am new here, but this looks more like the spreading of hate, not the pursuit of wisdom. Stop the hate - -- MullinsLabsInc 16:23, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
What is wrong with you? Why are you so nasty people? These people never did anything to you, but you run around "reporting to admin, and name-calling. Can't you get along with people. Try peace. -- 207.144.59.134 18:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
You might want to note that MullinsLabInc, is a valid business. Just a small warning that to deface the creditability of this business could result in legal action. Now let's all try to get along with each other. Peace, Mullins 22:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
I have reported the user to an admin again, due to the threats he's now making against us. Wahkeenah 23:01, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
DO NOT attack VK35. He is not a suspect and I do not want him treated like one. For the last time I'm leaving wikipedia. I tried to be reasonable with you guys but you weren't. If you write me mail I won't respond because I'm DONE! Harebag 18:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
I admit and apolgize for using JV17 disruptivly in edit wars. If you want to report me or not it is up to you. If you do not however I promise to do the following,
As I say it is up to you.--law-enforcement-type-of-guy 00:08, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
It is nice to see you being helpful and improving wikipedia with your corrections and I want to take back half the anti-banstorming comments I have made. You have atoned for your deleting and I appreciate that. Keep up the good work. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by RoddyYoung ( talk • contribs) 13:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC).
Well I do thing that little changes are the best and this lets a page grow and become more than a delete. Smile and the world smiles with you. roddy RoddyYoung 12:58, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I saw the external link and was like, oh, ok, they've got a website, that counts for something, right? My apologies. We might want to delete that talk page. Dooms Day349 20:36, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
You tagged Joseph Bloch as not meeting the notability guidelines back in January. Since then, no substantive material has been added to the article and a google search on the name produces nothing that suggests the article meets the WP:BIO or WP:N standard. I therefore suggest it be taken to AfD. Eusebeus 09:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Do you know how I can improve this userbox.
This user loves Dachshunds |
I can't get the image to fit properly. Wiki-wikify 02:16, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
This is one of my first successfully uploaded pictures. What do you think? I think the one asking the question looks kinda like Charlie Brown. Wiki-wikify 02:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
File:Stickman isn't developed.JPG
What do you think of this one? Wiki-wikify 02:53, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
I uploaded those images simply for humour. 69.145.163.26 20:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Trailing a vandalizer, I stumbled upon your talk page and noticed you have been harshly attacked several times. I thought you could use this.
Clerks. has smiled at you! Smiles promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{
subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
A
proposed deletion template has been added to the article
Mr. Blue Sky (2007 film), because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's
criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if
consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{
db-author}} to the top of the page.
B. Wolterding (
talk)
10:47, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Money Management Group, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Money Management Group. Thank you. -- BJBot ( talk) 22:32, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
FYI, I've re-replaced the notability tag on this article, which you've evidently flagged twice before. Justification is on the talk page. Respectfully, Agricola44 ( talk) 21:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC).
An article that you have been involved in editing, Clayton_Junkins, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clayton_Junkins. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TParis00ap ( talk) 19:07, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
i work with a Va state agency that is trying to get a page removed how do i go about doing it?
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{ User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)