Hello, JamieWoodfield, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Ola John has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Qed237 (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
You are not the only author so you are not allowed to blank the article. Xx236 ( talk) 10:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Exeter City F.C. because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Mattythewhite (
talk)
10:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Marcus Rashford. Your edits could be interpreted as
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Qed237
(talk)
14:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Tiago Ilori. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Mattythewhite (
talk)
02:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
The article Calum Woodfield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY having never played in a fully professional league or in a senior international fixture.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Kosack (
talk)
05:56, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello, JamieWoodfield, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Ola John has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Qed237 (talk) 18:47, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
You are not the only author so you are not allowed to blank the article. Xx236 ( talk) 10:21, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of
your recent contributions to
Exeter City F.C. because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thanks.
Mattythewhite (
talk)
10:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to
Marcus Rashford. Your edits could be interpreted as
vandalism and have been
reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please
cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's
talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the
sandbox. Thank you.
Qed237
(talk)
14:04, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding
unsourced content, as you did to
Tiago Ilori. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on
verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be
blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Mattythewhite (
talk)
02:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
The article Calum Woodfield has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY having never played in a fully professional league or in a senior international fixture.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Kosack (
talk)
05:56, 3 September 2017 (UTC)