Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Robbie Savage, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist ( talk) 11:15, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Black hat (computer security). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Martin Urbanec ( talk) 16:58, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Black hat (computer security), you may be blocked from editing. — CAPTAIN JTK ( talk) 17:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Black hat (computer security). Layah50♪ ( 話して~! ) 17:14, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Jamaal5! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 17:27, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Should reflect your editing. Your wp:ES of "Fix" to IBM alignment models I don't think is a very a good description of your edit. I strongly recommend using an ES that fits your edit. Thank you Adakiko ( talk) 13:23, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Happy editing! Cheers, Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 19:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Robbie Savage, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist ( talk) 11:15, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Black hat (computer security). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Martin Urbanec ( talk) 16:58, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Black hat (computer security), you may be blocked from editing. — CAPTAIN JTK ( talk) 17:10, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Black hat (computer security). Layah50♪ ( 話して~! ) 17:14, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi Jamaal5! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ■ ∃ Madeline ⇔ ∃ Part of me ; 17:27, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Should reflect your editing. Your wp:ES of "Fix" to IBM alignment models I don't think is a very a good description of your edit. I strongly recommend using an ES that fits your edit. Thank you Adakiko ( talk) 13:23, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Happy editing! Cheers, Pizzaplayer219 Talk Contribs 19:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.