![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I looked at your picture, went to the wrong talk page, and saw no messages, so I presumed you were new.
My apologies. I am a bit absent minded at times. Please delete the nonsense from your picture page, and transfer the Gong, to the right page. I you chose.
I'm glad you got the message.
Amandajm ( talk) 23:33, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Hey Jaguar :). As mentioned on the Wikiproject Hampshire talkpage, we've opened Flow up for community testing. I'd be really grateful if you could hammer on the system (if you haven't already!), let me know any bugs you find, and leave a note at the 'first release' page explaining what you, as a member of Wikiproject Hampshire, would need to see to be okay with it being deployed on that wikiproject's talkpage.
Thanks in advance! Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 19:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
I'm very sorry about that. Obviously I was being over-suspicious. Thanks for not taking offence. BTW, if anything was deleted that you think needs to be restored, let me know. Deb ( talk) 09:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
The references are all the same and say nothing about the subject. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 11:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
He Jaguar, I had a look at Nanloudi Township, and it is weird: the title doesn't correspond to the subject; the article has no link to its chinese interwiki (which is important to avoid duplicates; especially with different translations needed); you accessed the reference in 2011 (not in 2013) and the reference is not a reliable source. This is even after you edited the page with a correction…. Is it possibly you were going a bit too fast to see what was happening? L.tak ( talk) 18:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar. Stop me if you've heard this before. Please, please stop creating Chinese township stubs until you understand the language and geography of China! The references I have checked don't contain any reference whatsoever, you are not transliterating the Chinese names, etc ... A lot of people spent a lot of time clearing up after your last foray into this area and I really don't want that to have to happen again. Best,
► Philg88 ◄
talk
08:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar,
the references on your new Chinese stubs mostly seem to go to the same page, about one of the places. Also, they lack interwiki links etc. Given your obvious lack of WP:COMPETENCE and your lack of progress since last year, I am going to simply delete all of them before people waste more time cleaning up your errors. Happy editing, — Kusma ( t· c) 12:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Merry Christmas! I saw your edits on Bentworth recently, I thought the old colonel had been up to his usual tricks!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
LOL, I always picture Victor Meldrew for some reason... Any chance you could GA review The Dorchester for me?♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:08, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, you can reserve it here and review it whenever the hell you feel like hehe! I don't be-lieeeveee it!!! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:23, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! I've addressed all points except the currency converter which didn't work.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
I was thinking more about getting one or two of the other villages up to GA status. I don't think Bentworth is polished enough especially in the history/geography to be FA worthy. It is very comprehensive though.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:17, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
why does it not conform to your policy. it is a legitimate threat. i could shake the ground beneath your feet. cambodia is ready, let her go.
you can switch to an advisory role is you wish to continue serving. but please make an effort to share responsibility.
a puma!
-- Jason Bourne Jr. ( talk) 14:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
singapore. asean stuff. hong kong. interested? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jason Bourne Jr. ( talk • contribs) 14:29, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to Wells Cathedral however I have just removed the link you added to Salisbury Cathedral which I had just previously removed as it was already linked earlier in the article and a reviewer at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wells Cathedral/archive1 had commented about the overlinking.— Rod talk 17:07, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
|
Hello Jaguar: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Northamerica1000 (talk) 07:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
![]()
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
|
![]() |
Happy New Year, 2014 |
From Amandajm ( talk) 08:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC) |
As you are listed on the wikiproject page for South Sudan as a member, I was thus wondering if you are interested in collaborating on a page together? There is more info on the Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_South_Sudan#Agricultural_page? Lihaas ( talk) 07:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for your edits to Wells Cathedral, however please take a look at the long discussions on the talk page and at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wells Cathedral/archive1 before resizing the images etc (Tate v Tate gallery is also discussed). I welcome everyones input and comments but some of these changes have taken a long time to arrive at consensus.— Rod talk 18:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, hope you're "spiffing" as the colonel might say :-). Any chance you can review this one?♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar, I've reverted your edit to
Tanxia where you added the Chinese characters to the lead. This is not required when there is a {{
Chinese}} Infobox on the page. Please see the
Chinese style guide for details. Cheers,
► Philg88 ◄
talk
15:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry about that Philg, I didn't know. It was just that I used to do it all the time when I created subdivisions I didn't know! I don't know why but every time you create a new Chinese article it comes up on my watchlist? ☠ Jag uar ☠ 18:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Ahhhh ... that's it. Yes, I have noticed the warning on some of those page creations. Brings back many fond memories of 2011 ;). I was surprised to find that some of your stubs survived unscathed - a few with that Fujian reference for places in Guangdong somehow slipped through the net but they're fixed now. Best,
► Philg88 ◄
talk
03:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
So I've noticed that you have been promoting articles to GA status but have not properly closed their reviews. I myself had to update the talk page to Voyager (video game) because of that. Revision You've done that again with Descent 3 so I suggest you read this for closing future GANs. Thanks for your attention. GamerPro64 22:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the smooth review of the The Jungle Book (1967 film). Koala15 ( talk) 18:50, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Addressed bastion, thanks for that. If you're up for a real epic film review I've just nommed Ben-Hur (1959 film) after at least 100 edits.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Grant has been approved and books on their way! I won't be taking on Kubrick first though! Any chance you can review Culture of the Cook Islands/or and Shawnee on Delaware, Pennsylvania for me?♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
The Ritz book is a beast! Can you review Tephrosia apollinea? It's about as comprehensive as it can be for an obscure plant, I ransacked the web on it. Review shouldn't take more than a few minutes! We must resume on that Hampshire town article some time..♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:09, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I've seen many GAs as short with less sourcing. Length isn't important, a basic grasp of the topic is. And I've ransacked google books and JSTOR for sources for it and found all I could!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick review on Gravity Bong, I responded to your comments and I believe the article reads much better now. Crowz RSA 03:23, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
FYI: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Plants#Tephrosia apollinea. Sasata ( talk) 16:10, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
@ Jaguar: I know! I added the citation tag myself because it looks like OR. The lead doesn't need sourcing either. It now looks stubby and flawed, rather than seeming like a half decent summary of what info seems to exist on the web. It has been researched more than some of their other articles, it just happens to contain less content because info on it is so sparse. If I didn't think it was an adequate summary of a very obscure plant species I'd not have nominated it. I think it's pretty informative given the circumstances. Obviously I could pick a very prominent genus or something and write a 100kb article. It's amusing to be lectured on length when 98% of their articles are one liners! They continue to moan about the length but still nobody has shown me a single missing source which contains any real information about it. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
I managed to find scraps on JSTOR which have fleshed it out a bit. It needs cleanup and the JSTOR journal sources formatted now. I still stand by the original as acceptable for GA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
I know you're perfectly capable of conducting a decent GA review and I have no reservations about you reviewing future articles. It's best though not to proclaim things like "world's fastest review" as it's likely to attract unwanted attention. I think though the snobs at WP:Plants would have turned their noses up at it even if your review was 20 kb long.. I now have the books on the Ritz and Waldorf, a little daunting how much I need to read and do..♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
If it means anything I've contacted a few very experienced editors who can't see what all the fuss is about with it being a GA either, so it's not an error in judgement at least in the eyes of experienced non project reviewers, although I don't think anybody would encourage a straight pass. The reviews are supposed to be constructive and see the article improve. You weren't to blame for it as it was a short article and you obviously couldn't see anything to complain about. I hope this won't deter you from future articles and reviews, although of course I hope you can provide half a dozen or so pointers at least, although it might be difficult at times! What's annoying is that they continue to moan about it being inadequate yet none of them can show the sources and back up their claims! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
I've definitely exceeded what is really required for GA now, yup. However much I expand and improve it though I would be very surprised if a single project member would stand up and say "nice job" in expanding it. They're just waiting to point out errors and remove things.. I've reached page 27 of the web now, I rarely go beyond page 2 in web searching!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:46, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
I wanted to inform you that the article, Miley Cyrus, you promoted to GA status is now a FA nominee. I would like it if you would review it. As I know that you haven't really promoted a lot of FA's, you could review it or put me in touch with another FA promoting user. Thanks, Shane Cyrus ( talk) 11:45, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello! I accidentally found my way on the GA nomination page for Benedict Cumberbatch and I enjoyed editing the article based on your suggestions. I do wonder how I can monitor such nomination pages so I can help in the nomination process of certain articles? I would like to help. Thank you! Chocolate Charlie ( talk) 06:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
You are fantastic to have promoted so many articles. You truly deserve. Shane Cyrus ( talk) 14:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
You truly deserve! Shane Cyrus ( talk) 14:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC) |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Jumping Flash! you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
GamerPro64 --
GamerPro64 (
talk)
20:20, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
The article
Jumping Flash! you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Jumping Flash! for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
GamerPro64 --
GamerPro64 (
talk)
20:20, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Can you check back on the Bieber GA and suggest what still needs improvement. Thanks, Shane Cyrus (talk) 11:31, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Hope you can use them for your GAN. - Thibbs ( talk) 01:45, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, you may want to review this. He's a minor character actor so there's next to nothing really written about him. I'm lucky to have written that much about him! It's about as comprehensive as I can make it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:35, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
I looked at your picture, went to the wrong talk page, and saw no messages, so I presumed you were new.
My apologies. I am a bit absent minded at times. Please delete the nonsense from your picture page, and transfer the Gong, to the right page. I you chose.
I'm glad you got the message.
Amandajm ( talk) 23:33, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Hey Jaguar :). As mentioned on the Wikiproject Hampshire talkpage, we've opened Flow up for community testing. I'd be really grateful if you could hammer on the system (if you haven't already!), let me know any bugs you find, and leave a note at the 'first release' page explaining what you, as a member of Wikiproject Hampshire, would need to see to be okay with it being deployed on that wikiproject's talkpage.
Thanks in advance! Okeyes (WMF) ( talk) 19:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
I'm very sorry about that. Obviously I was being over-suspicious. Thanks for not taking offence. BTW, if anything was deleted that you think needs to be restored, let me know. Deb ( talk) 09:48, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
The references are all the same and say nothing about the subject. Anna Frodesiak ( talk) 11:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
He Jaguar, I had a look at Nanloudi Township, and it is weird: the title doesn't correspond to the subject; the article has no link to its chinese interwiki (which is important to avoid duplicates; especially with different translations needed); you accessed the reference in 2011 (not in 2013) and the reference is not a reliable source. This is even after you edited the page with a correction…. Is it possibly you were going a bit too fast to see what was happening? L.tak ( talk) 18:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar. Stop me if you've heard this before. Please, please stop creating Chinese township stubs until you understand the language and geography of China! The references I have checked don't contain any reference whatsoever, you are not transliterating the Chinese names, etc ... A lot of people spent a lot of time clearing up after your last foray into this area and I really don't want that to have to happen again. Best,
► Philg88 ◄
talk
08:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar,
the references on your new Chinese stubs mostly seem to go to the same page, about one of the places. Also, they lack interwiki links etc. Given your obvious lack of WP:COMPETENCE and your lack of progress since last year, I am going to simply delete all of them before people waste more time cleaning up your errors. Happy editing, — Kusma ( t· c) 12:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Merry Christmas! I saw your edits on Bentworth recently, I thought the old colonel had been up to his usual tricks!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:55, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
LOL, I always picture Victor Meldrew for some reason... Any chance you could GA review The Dorchester for me?♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:08, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks, you can reserve it here and review it whenever the hell you feel like hehe! I don't be-lieeeveee it!!! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:23, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! I've addressed all points except the currency converter which didn't work.♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
I was thinking more about getting one or two of the other villages up to GA status. I don't think Bentworth is polished enough especially in the history/geography to be FA worthy. It is very comprehensive though.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:17, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
why does it not conform to your policy. it is a legitimate threat. i could shake the ground beneath your feet. cambodia is ready, let her go.
you can switch to an advisory role is you wish to continue serving. but please make an effort to share responsibility.
a puma!
-- Jason Bourne Jr. ( talk) 14:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
singapore. asean stuff. hong kong. interested? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jason Bourne Jr. ( talk • contribs) 14:29, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your edits to Wells Cathedral however I have just removed the link you added to Salisbury Cathedral which I had just previously removed as it was already linked earlier in the article and a reviewer at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wells Cathedral/archive1 had commented about the overlinking.— Rod talk 17:07, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
|
Hello Jaguar: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, Northamerica1000 (talk) 07:19, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
![]()
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.
|
![]() |
Happy New Year, 2014 |
From Amandajm ( talk) 08:59, 2 January 2014 (UTC) |
As you are listed on the wikiproject page for South Sudan as a member, I was thus wondering if you are interested in collaborating on a page together? There is more info on the Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_South_Sudan#Agricultural_page? Lihaas ( talk) 07:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, Thanks for your edits to Wells Cathedral, however please take a look at the long discussions on the talk page and at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wells Cathedral/archive1 before resizing the images etc (Tate v Tate gallery is also discussed). I welcome everyones input and comments but some of these changes have taken a long time to arrive at consensus.— Rod talk 18:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, hope you're "spiffing" as the colonel might say :-). Any chance you can review this one?♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jaguar, I've reverted your edit to
Tanxia where you added the Chinese characters to the lead. This is not required when there is a {{
Chinese}} Infobox on the page. Please see the
Chinese style guide for details. Cheers,
► Philg88 ◄
talk
15:16, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
Sorry about that Philg, I didn't know. It was just that I used to do it all the time when I created subdivisions I didn't know! I don't know why but every time you create a new Chinese article it comes up on my watchlist? ☠ Jag uar ☠ 18:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Ahhhh ... that's it. Yes, I have noticed the warning on some of those page creations. Brings back many fond memories of 2011 ;). I was surprised to find that some of your stubs survived unscathed - a few with that Fujian reference for places in Guangdong somehow slipped through the net but they're fixed now. Best,
► Philg88 ◄
talk
03:36, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
So I've noticed that you have been promoting articles to GA status but have not properly closed their reviews. I myself had to update the talk page to Voyager (video game) because of that. Revision You've done that again with Descent 3 so I suggest you read this for closing future GANs. Thanks for your attention. GamerPro64 22:41, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the smooth review of the The Jungle Book (1967 film). Koala15 ( talk) 18:50, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Addressed bastion, thanks for that. If you're up for a real epic film review I've just nommed Ben-Hur (1959 film) after at least 100 edits.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:44, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Grant has been approved and books on their way! I won't be taking on Kubrick first though! Any chance you can review Culture of the Cook Islands/or and Shawnee on Delaware, Pennsylvania for me?♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
The Ritz book is a beast! Can you review Tephrosia apollinea? It's about as comprehensive as it can be for an obscure plant, I ransacked the web on it. Review shouldn't take more than a few minutes! We must resume on that Hampshire town article some time..♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:09, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I've seen many GAs as short with less sourcing. Length isn't important, a basic grasp of the topic is. And I've ransacked google books and JSTOR for sources for it and found all I could!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick review on Gravity Bong, I responded to your comments and I believe the article reads much better now. Crowz RSA 03:23, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
LADY LOTUS • TALK 17:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
FYI: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Plants#Tephrosia apollinea. Sasata ( talk) 16:10, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
@ Jaguar: I know! I added the citation tag myself because it looks like OR. The lead doesn't need sourcing either. It now looks stubby and flawed, rather than seeming like a half decent summary of what info seems to exist on the web. It has been researched more than some of their other articles, it just happens to contain less content because info on it is so sparse. If I didn't think it was an adequate summary of a very obscure plant species I'd not have nominated it. I think it's pretty informative given the circumstances. Obviously I could pick a very prominent genus or something and write a 100kb article. It's amusing to be lectured on length when 98% of their articles are one liners! They continue to moan about the length but still nobody has shown me a single missing source which contains any real information about it. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:31, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
I managed to find scraps on JSTOR which have fleshed it out a bit. It needs cleanup and the JSTOR journal sources formatted now. I still stand by the original as acceptable for GA.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
I know you're perfectly capable of conducting a decent GA review and I have no reservations about you reviewing future articles. It's best though not to proclaim things like "world's fastest review" as it's likely to attract unwanted attention. I think though the snobs at WP:Plants would have turned their noses up at it even if your review was 20 kb long.. I now have the books on the Ritz and Waldorf, a little daunting how much I need to read and do..♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:50, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
If it means anything I've contacted a few very experienced editors who can't see what all the fuss is about with it being a GA either, so it's not an error in judgement at least in the eyes of experienced non project reviewers, although I don't think anybody would encourage a straight pass. The reviews are supposed to be constructive and see the article improve. You weren't to blame for it as it was a short article and you obviously couldn't see anything to complain about. I hope this won't deter you from future articles and reviews, although of course I hope you can provide half a dozen or so pointers at least, although it might be difficult at times! What's annoying is that they continue to moan about it being inadequate yet none of them can show the sources and back up their claims! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
I've definitely exceeded what is really required for GA now, yup. However much I expand and improve it though I would be very surprised if a single project member would stand up and say "nice job" in expanding it. They're just waiting to point out errors and remove things.. I've reached page 27 of the web now, I rarely go beyond page 2 in web searching!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:46, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
I wanted to inform you that the article, Miley Cyrus, you promoted to GA status is now a FA nominee. I would like it if you would review it. As I know that you haven't really promoted a lot of FA's, you could review it or put me in touch with another FA promoting user. Thanks, Shane Cyrus ( talk) 11:45, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello! I accidentally found my way on the GA nomination page for Benedict Cumberbatch and I enjoyed editing the article based on your suggestions. I do wonder how I can monitor such nomination pages so I can help in the nomination process of certain articles? I would like to help. Thank you! Chocolate Charlie ( talk) 06:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
You are fantastic to have promoted so many articles. You truly deserve. Shane Cyrus ( talk) 14:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Special Barnstar |
You truly deserve! Shane Cyrus ( talk) 14:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC) |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
Jumping Flash! you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria.
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
GamerPro64 --
GamerPro64 (
talk)
20:20, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
The article
Jumping Flash! you nominated as a
good article has been placed on hold
. The article is close to meeting the
good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See
Talk:Jumping Flash! for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by
Legobot, on behalf of
GamerPro64 --
GamerPro64 (
talk)
20:20, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Can you check back on the Bieber GA and suggest what still needs improvement. Thanks, Shane Cyrus (talk) 11:31, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Hope you can use them for your GAN. - Thibbs ( talk) 01:45, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi, you may want to review this. He's a minor character actor so there's next to nothing really written about him. I'm lucky to have written that much about him! It's about as comprehensive as I can make it.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:35, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |