Thanks for sharing! JRed176 ( talk) 18:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.
scope_creep
Talk 11:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Getting Started
Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 11:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
TheSandDoctor
Talk 20:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
JRed176 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here: An appeal has been filed because nothing I edited was done with any ill intent. In fact, many of the edits still appear on live pages. There was a misunderstanding in one instance about where the emphasis for a citation needed post ought to appear. In my experience all information ought to be sourced and have citations rather than none at all; however, there are exceptions it appears. It has been edifying to learn more in this regard and I have asked for the appeal to be unblocked rather than having to start another account. I am proud of my work and shouldn't have to feel forced to just get another account and carry on. Instead let me prove myself here, thanks JRed176 ( talk) 19:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Threatening to create more block evading accounts is hardly a way to get unblocked. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 19:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It's not a threat but a reality and a human right that I have. You don't own Wikipedia as much as you believe you do sir, madam, or they. Of course, I'd be forced to do that. I would like the matter to be looked into by others. You sense that I'm Black in my comments and are a racist. You just want Black folks gone off Wikipedia. If you want a lawsuit for race discrimination, please keep at it. JRed176 ( talk) 02:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
JRed176 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here: The administrator who reviewed this last misconstrued a comment about acquiring a new account as would any reasonable person in this situation as a "threat". I don't believe I did anything wrong warranting this and appeal as a person of color facing racial discrimination by the editor who senses I'm Black. I will have no choice but to seek legal counsel immediately and press forward unless I'm treated fairly. I humbly ask for another review into the alleged damage that was done by simply posting "citation needed" in areas that were unsourced!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JRed176 ( talk) 02:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline as, with talk apge access revoked, there's no way a discussion can happen. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
is closed. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 04:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Addendum. Noting legal threat on this page. Noting original account User talk:Darshak.parmar. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 04:29, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
JRed176 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I would like a second chance to show how much I have learned to responsibly edit. Thank you so much for that opportunity. JRed196 ( talk) 23:51, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You will need to clearly withdraw the legal threat above, just for starters, as well as discuss your accusations of racism(when we have no way of definitively knowing your race). You will need to also discuss the use of multiple accounts. 331dot ( talk) 06:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- is open. Noting withdrawal of legal threat.
-- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 01:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for sharing! JRed176 ( talk) 18:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible
conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.
scope_creep
Talk 11:35, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
Getting Started
Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.
The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
Tips- Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
- It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
- If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
- Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
- When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
- If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
- Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.
Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards ( talk) 11:10, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
TheSandDoctor
Talk 20:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
JRed176 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here: An appeal has been filed because nothing I edited was done with any ill intent. In fact, many of the edits still appear on live pages. There was a misunderstanding in one instance about where the emphasis for a citation needed post ought to appear. In my experience all information ought to be sourced and have citations rather than none at all; however, there are exceptions it appears. It has been edifying to learn more in this regard and I have asked for the appeal to be unblocked rather than having to start another account. I am proud of my work and shouldn't have to feel forced to just get another account and carry on. Instead let me prove myself here, thanks JRed176 ( talk) 19:42, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Threatening to create more block evading accounts is hardly a way to get unblocked. --jpgordon 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 19:47, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It's not a threat but a reality and a human right that I have. You don't own Wikipedia as much as you believe you do sir, madam, or they. Of course, I'd be forced to do that. I would like the matter to be looked into by others. You sense that I'm Black in my comments and are a racist. You just want Black folks gone off Wikipedia. If you want a lawsuit for race discrimination, please keep at it. JRed176 ( talk) 02:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
JRed176 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here: The administrator who reviewed this last misconstrued a comment about acquiring a new account as would any reasonable person in this situation as a "threat". I don't believe I did anything wrong warranting this and appeal as a person of color facing racial discrimination by the editor who senses I'm Black. I will have no choice but to seek legal counsel immediately and press forward unless I'm treated fairly. I humbly ask for another review into the alleged damage that was done by simply posting "citation needed" in areas that were unsourced!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! JRed176 ( talk) 02:17, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Procedural decline as, with talk apge access revoked, there's no way a discussion can happen. — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
is closed. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 04:23, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- Addendum. Noting legal threat on this page. Noting original account User talk:Darshak.parmar. -- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 04:29, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
JRed176 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I would like a second chance to show how much I have learned to responsibly edit. Thank you so much for that opportunity. JRed196 ( talk) 23:51, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You will need to clearly withdraw the legal threat above, just for starters, as well as discuss your accusations of racism(when we have no way of definitively knowing your race). You will need to also discuss the use of multiple accounts. 331dot ( talk) 06:28, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- is open. Noting withdrawal of legal threat.
-- Deepfriedokra ( talk) 01:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC)