This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hi JJCM89. I came across File:Second Revolution Flag 2x3.svg since it was flagged for a NFCC#9 review. I was going to remove it from someone's user page, but I not quite sure this needs to be non-free. All of the individual elements are simple or PD, and even combined together its pretty much File:Betsy Ross flag.svg with the roman numeral "II" added; so, I can't see how this would need to be treated as non-free. If there's something I'm missing and it does, then fine and it would then need to be removed from that user page. If not, then maybe the file only needs to be relicensed. I'm posting here because I sure your bot will also eventually find this and end up flagging it for removal. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89. I saw the notice about image size in the edit summary of File:The Papers of Benjamin Franklin, bookcover.jpg The current image size is 404 × 502. How much smaller must the image be for it to comply with non-free content criteria? It doesn't say. -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 23:10, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
The other day, the Georgia Historical Society sent an email to Permissions, concerning this file saying that it was released under a commons license. It is Ticket#2022082410008981 - that should clear up the problems. Is it OK? (I took the photo and uploaded it.) Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89; the disambiguation page Charles III (disambiguation) was moved only a few hours ago; it seems like a straightforward application of reverting to the status quo until there is a consensus to change the status quo. Can I ask why you declined it? BilledMammal ( talk) 03:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
On Found Light, your bot removed File:Laura Veirs - Found Light.jpg for not having a rationale, but the file has both {{ Non-free use rationale album cover}} filled out and {{Non-free album cover|image has rationale=yes}}. Is there something I'm missing here? Why did it do this? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89, question for you at WT:Requests for undeletion#G5. Jay 💬 07:19, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
I have worked in the code so others who are like your bot.... who want to say thank you for your amazing work..
the code is below
have a tremendous day
david adam kess
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
best bot |
nice work to the coder on the bot ,, had no idea on the license for the photo in wikimedia did not jive
all the best.. have an amazing day coder — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.124.227.194 ( talk) 14:18, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Idk how to get it to stop but stop ur bot from removing the single cover to a single i get it’s the same as the cd edition album cover just get it to stop Ytzesza ( talk) 16:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey I want to give you a heads up that the range you blocked says that it has gone over the CIDR limit of /32. 184.56.62.31 ( talk) 15:55, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
All: Sorry, yes, blocking the /28 was definitely too wide. I incorrectly assumed that the existing block that I had expanded was the appropriate target. Something smaller would have likely worked. The target, who was disrupting a number of pages, has hopefully moved on. Any admin could/should have lifted it (sooner) as an obvious error, especially since I wasn't around. — JJMC89 02:14, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi! How come change.org links are blacklisted on Wikipedia? 2A00:23C5:CE25:5101:45D2:AE6C:7522:561C ( talk) 18:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, JJMC89,
I have a question for you. Is it common practice for JJMC89 bot III to not leave a category redirect when it moves a category? Is this true even if there are existing category redirects to that page? For example, look at this version of the Broken Redirect list and see all of the broken category redirects. This is not uncommon to see on that bot report and if there are just a few instances of this, I'll correct the broken redirects to point to the new category page title. But in this case, the admin chose to delete the old redirects that were no longer pointing to the right targets.
Would it be possible for the bot to leave a redirect in cases where there is an existing redirect or would this be unnecessarily complicated? I don't think category redirects are valued very highly on the project but they can be worth preserving in some cases. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 17:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I'm concerned about your actions regarding Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 378#Paranisolambda and more particularly this archived thread where Jay was seeking additional information. Reading through the long history of this case, it looks like there is considerable feeling by a number of admins both at the WP:RFU thread cited above and during the unblock discussion that undoing the G5s would be reasonable after the unblock.
I'm not saying that your closing of the RFU as "Not done" was entirely unreasonable, but legitimate questions were raised, which deserve to be answered. I find it particularly disturbing that you were pinged on your talk page 3 times over the course of a week by Jay, politely requesting that you respond. When I first looked at this, I saw that you had been inactive for a while and that the thread had aged off your talk page, possibly before you became aware of it. To ensure that you had actually seen it, I unarchived it and followed up with email to make sure you were aware of it. I see that it has again aged into your archive after you again declined to respond to Jay's query. Could you please do so now? -- RoySmith (talk) 14:38, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Plastique Tiara. Because you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plastique Tiara, back in April 2019, you may want to participate in the deletion review. JBW ( talk) 21:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Please can you program JJMC89 bot III not to overwrite a category disambiguation template with a category redirect? I thought it would not do this. – Fayenatic London 16:37, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Hi JJCM89. I came across File:Second Revolution Flag 2x3.svg since it was flagged for a NFCC#9 review. I was going to remove it from someone's user page, but I not quite sure this needs to be non-free. All of the individual elements are simple or PD, and even combined together its pretty much File:Betsy Ross flag.svg with the roman numeral "II" added; so, I can't see how this would need to be treated as non-free. If there's something I'm missing and it does, then fine and it would then need to be removed from that user page. If not, then maybe the file only needs to be relicensed. I'm posting here because I sure your bot will also eventually find this and end up flagging it for removal. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89. I saw the notice about image size in the edit summary of File:The Papers of Benjamin Franklin, bookcover.jpg The current image size is 404 × 502. How much smaller must the image be for it to comply with non-free content criteria? It doesn't say. -- Gwillhickers ( talk) 23:10, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
The other day, the Georgia Historical Society sent an email to Permissions, concerning this file saying that it was released under a commons license. It is Ticket#2022082410008981 - that should clear up the problems. Is it OK? (I took the photo and uploaded it.) Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:29, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89; the disambiguation page Charles III (disambiguation) was moved only a few hours ago; it seems like a straightforward application of reverting to the status quo until there is a consensus to change the status quo. Can I ask why you declined it? BilledMammal ( talk) 03:38, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
On Found Light, your bot removed File:Laura Veirs - Found Light.jpg for not having a rationale, but the file has both {{ Non-free use rationale album cover}} filled out and {{Non-free album cover|image has rationale=yes}}. Is there something I'm missing here? Why did it do this? ― Justin (koavf)❤ T☮ C☺ M☯ 19:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello JJMC89, question for you at WT:Requests for undeletion#G5. Jay 💬 07:19, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
I have worked in the code so others who are like your bot.... who want to say thank you for your amazing work..
the code is below
have a tremendous day
david adam kess
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
best bot |
nice work to the coder on the bot ,, had no idea on the license for the photo in wikimedia did not jive
all the best.. have an amazing day coder — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.124.227.194 ( talk) 14:18, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Idk how to get it to stop but stop ur bot from removing the single cover to a single i get it’s the same as the cd edition album cover just get it to stop Ytzesza ( talk) 16:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Hey I want to give you a heads up that the range you blocked says that it has gone over the CIDR limit of /32. 184.56.62.31 ( talk) 15:55, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
All: Sorry, yes, blocking the /28 was definitely too wide. I incorrectly assumed that the existing block that I had expanded was the appropriate target. Something smaller would have likely worked. The target, who was disrupting a number of pages, has hopefully moved on. Any admin could/should have lifted it (sooner) as an obvious error, especially since I wasn't around. — JJMC89 02:14, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi! How come change.org links are blacklisted on Wikipedia? 2A00:23C5:CE25:5101:45D2:AE6C:7522:561C ( talk) 18:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, JJMC89,
I have a question for you. Is it common practice for JJMC89 bot III to not leave a category redirect when it moves a category? Is this true even if there are existing category redirects to that page? For example, look at this version of the Broken Redirect list and see all of the broken category redirects. This is not uncommon to see on that bot report and if there are just a few instances of this, I'll correct the broken redirects to point to the new category page title. But in this case, the admin chose to delete the old redirects that were no longer pointing to the right targets.
Would it be possible for the bot to leave a redirect in cases where there is an existing redirect or would this be unnecessarily complicated? I don't think category redirects are valued very highly on the project but they can be worth preserving in some cases. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 17:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I'm concerned about your actions regarding Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 378#Paranisolambda and more particularly this archived thread where Jay was seeking additional information. Reading through the long history of this case, it looks like there is considerable feeling by a number of admins both at the WP:RFU thread cited above and during the unblock discussion that undoing the G5s would be reasonable after the unblock.
I'm not saying that your closing of the RFU as "Not done" was entirely unreasonable, but legitimate questions were raised, which deserve to be answered. I find it particularly disturbing that you were pinged on your talk page 3 times over the course of a week by Jay, politely requesting that you respond. When I first looked at this, I saw that you had been inactive for a while and that the thread had aged off your talk page, possibly before you became aware of it. To ensure that you had actually seen it, I unarchived it and followed up with email to make sure you were aware of it. I see that it has again aged into your archive after you again declined to respond to Jay's query. Could you please do so now? -- RoySmith (talk) 14:38, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Plastique Tiara. Because you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plastique Tiara, back in April 2019, you may want to participate in the deletion review. JBW ( talk) 21:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Please can you program JJMC89 bot III not to overwrite a category disambiguation template with a category redirect? I thought it would not do this. – Fayenatic London 16:37, 14 September 2022 (UTC)