This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Thank you for your edits to the Red-Haired Shanks article. Currently a user proposed it is an article for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Red-Haired_Shanks. Feel free to make your opinion known. -- Plumber ( talk) 20:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Shoot as been started on 10 September 2021(reliable sources) [1]
First Teaser Out and They Mentioned Release Date also (independent Sources) [2] Shiva20202020 ( talk) 08:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi @ JJMC89:, Please see this and give some feedback about this. Thanks and regards! Fade258 ( talk) 06:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
The bot hasn't processed any categories since yesterday morning - has it stopped or is there some error on the working page? Timrollpickering ( talk) 23:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey, this isn’t to appeal the outcome of the request or anything but I felt it was super undue to say “take a moment to learn what counter vandalism is” and such when I have over 1000 contribs with most of them counter-vandalism. I don’t appreciate being belittled, although I’m sure that wasn’t your intention maybe. It could also even be a general format/template but if that’s the case you should think better when to use it maybe. Kind regards. Amadeus22 🙋 🔔 06:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
My question is why cannot add this picture on those series is not a violation of this logo feel free to answer this question I just asking why? 63.143.200.6 ( talk) 18:07, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
I missed the deletion of File:BagBalmOblique.jpg last year. I think it's a better picture than the one that is currently in use on the article. Could you restore it so I can add a proper rationale and fix any other fair use issues? Thanks. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Since you run a bot, perhaps you wouldn't mind taking a look at User talk:DatGuy/Archives/2022/May#File:Youth Olympic Games Third Version.svg. I'm trying to figure out why DatBot reduced File:Youth Olympic Games Third Version.svg and tagged it with {{ orfurrev}} since the file isn't and never seems to have been licensed as non-free. I think it might have something to do with this edit (which seems to be a mistake), but I'm not sure. The deleted revisions were subsequently restored by Jonteemil, but it's still not clear why the file was reduced and the oilder revisions tagged for speedy deletion per F5 in the first place. Do you know whether files tagged with {{ Non-free reduce}} simply reduced regardless of the file's licensing? I have basically zero knowledge of how bots work, but I'm assuming there's something about a file that tells a bot its non-free. Just for reference, the reason I stumbled upon this file was because it was flagged as a NFCC#9 violation for some reason, and I thought that could also be due to adding of "Non-free reduce" to the file's page. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 22:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
you just unhid the "deleted" versionsNo, nothing was as I said ever deleted. If I hadn't removed {{ Orphaned non-free revisions}} then the versions except the most recent would have been deleted.
If it's just because of the "Non-free reduce" template, then that doesn't seem like it should happen since such a mistake is relatively easy to make.Yes, that mistake is the reason. I don't think that mistake is done very often, but I mean if it happens again it is very easy to reverse it, so I don't think this should be given such a high priority, but yes, optimally DatBot would check both if {{ Orphaned non-free revisions}} is there and if the file is non-free. Jonteemil ( talk) 13:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
Thank you for your edits to the Red-Haired Shanks article. Currently a user proposed it is an article for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Red-Haired_Shanks. Feel free to make your opinion known. -- Plumber ( talk) 20:40, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Shoot as been started on 10 September 2021(reliable sources) [1]
First Teaser Out and They Mentioned Release Date also (independent Sources) [2] Shiva20202020 ( talk) 08:22, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi @ JJMC89:, Please see this and give some feedback about this. Thanks and regards! Fade258 ( talk) 06:22, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
The bot hasn't processed any categories since yesterday morning - has it stopped or is there some error on the working page? Timrollpickering ( talk) 23:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey, this isn’t to appeal the outcome of the request or anything but I felt it was super undue to say “take a moment to learn what counter vandalism is” and such when I have over 1000 contribs with most of them counter-vandalism. I don’t appreciate being belittled, although I’m sure that wasn’t your intention maybe. It could also even be a general format/template but if that’s the case you should think better when to use it maybe. Kind regards. Amadeus22 🙋 🔔 06:33, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
My question is why cannot add this picture on those series is not a violation of this logo feel free to answer this question I just asking why? 63.143.200.6 ( talk) 18:07, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
I missed the deletion of File:BagBalmOblique.jpg last year. I think it's a better picture than the one that is currently in use on the article. Could you restore it so I can add a proper rationale and fix any other fair use issues? Thanks. -- SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Since you run a bot, perhaps you wouldn't mind taking a look at User talk:DatGuy/Archives/2022/May#File:Youth Olympic Games Third Version.svg. I'm trying to figure out why DatBot reduced File:Youth Olympic Games Third Version.svg and tagged it with {{ orfurrev}} since the file isn't and never seems to have been licensed as non-free. I think it might have something to do with this edit (which seems to be a mistake), but I'm not sure. The deleted revisions were subsequently restored by Jonteemil, but it's still not clear why the file was reduced and the oilder revisions tagged for speedy deletion per F5 in the first place. Do you know whether files tagged with {{ Non-free reduce}} simply reduced regardless of the file's licensing? I have basically zero knowledge of how bots work, but I'm assuming there's something about a file that tells a bot its non-free. Just for reference, the reason I stumbled upon this file was because it was flagged as a NFCC#9 violation for some reason, and I thought that could also be due to adding of "Non-free reduce" to the file's page. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 22:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
you just unhid the "deleted" versionsNo, nothing was as I said ever deleted. If I hadn't removed {{ Orphaned non-free revisions}} then the versions except the most recent would have been deleted.
If it's just because of the "Non-free reduce" template, then that doesn't seem like it should happen since such a mistake is relatively easy to make.Yes, that mistake is the reason. I don't think that mistake is done very often, but I mean if it happens again it is very easy to reverse it, so I don't think this should be given such a high priority, but yes, optimally DatBot would check both if {{ Orphaned non-free revisions}} is there and if the file is non-free. Jonteemil ( talk) 13:25, 20 May 2022 (UTC)