This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
A week or two ago you did some edits to images at Akira Kurosawa which looked well made. Could you check the other images to see if they look correct and with proper notations on Wikimedia, and let me know if they are ok. JohnWickTwo ( talk) 17:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. An image was recently removed from 2014 Indian Premier League Final page but it was also being used in 2014 Indian Premier League page. Can you tell me why it was still present and also on why this image was removed now after almost more than a year after it was placed. Thanks. Sagavaj ( talk) 18:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
For this; I have no idea, though—if you can tell me—how that was all made small after this section was opened, when the section you corrected has been there a month or something?! I'm baffled—it only started yesterday! Hope you're well, by the way, and thanks again. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia / cheap sh*t room 20:23, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
<small>
, at the end of a section, but RemexHtml does not do so. All is well here – enjoyed some mean ribs for the Fourth yesterday. —
JJMC89
20:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Hi, you recently removed some icons from White horse of Kent as being wp:NFCC violations. I later removed the same icon from Welling United FC and was reverted because it was claimed it was not a NFCC violation. I thought you might be interested in commenting on the Welling United article seeing as both you and the other editor seem to be more knowledgeable about this than I am. If you would rather not comment, that's fine by me. My position is pretty neutral, I am just curious to know if the use really is a violation or not - and really isavailable under fair use. Thanks. Roger 8 Roger ( talk) 10:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, you tagged this image: File:Jaguar 2012 logo.png as "NFCC not applicable" and I don´t know where the error is, so I can´t solve the problem. Could you explain me the issue please? Thanks! Fma12 ( talk) 02:55, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
I see you have removed various national football team badges from their pages, claiming "No valid WP:NFUR for this page." In the images you removed, pretty much all of them have rationales on their pages, and as a result, most football team pages are looking bare. What, in your mind, would be a "valid NFUR" to restore them to the pages? Tom Danson ( talk) 05:16, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you identify what exactly is copyrighted considering that I wrote the original language. Matty1019 ( talk) 04:20, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
will also have scenic [...] Nigrini.[2] This from therogersrevue.com. [3] — JJMC89 04:36, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Replying, I don't if it's the same thing, can you please help me get rid of it? — User:Social Studies Rules ( talk) 18:56, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Please do not remove the image. It is valuable here, and conformed to the policy. Thanks, Yann ( talk) 16:46, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Maybe I am doing this wrong - can you help me with the license? since Jacob Rader Marcus died in 1995, I believe his picture can be presented in the article under fair -use license. what explanation is missing? Thanks Golan's mom ( talk) 14:25, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Since made the edit to File:Logo for WXGI radio in Richmond, VA.png which seems to be the subject of some disagreement/misunderstanding, perhaps you can clarify it on Neutralhomer's talk page . I'm kinda running out of new ways to try and explain the same thing. FWIW, if I'm completely misunderstanding what you did, then feel free to point that out. I've got no problem admitting when I'm wrong and apologizing for it. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:51, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm sure you made a mistake with this deletion : https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Remix_culture&diff=849159213&oldid=842803805 , the book was released under a free license (CC -BY-SA). You may have seen the mislabeled Webarchive mirror which is indeed non-free, but the original release was free. Shaddim ( talk) 09:55, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello! why was this CD cover removed from the bio page about Maxx? File:Maxx-get-a-way single.jpg what was the violation? and what are the 'rules' for pictures existing on a wiki article for a band Dancemusicfan ( talk) 15:50, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Los Angeles Daily News logo March 17 1934.jpg I don't understand your message. Sorry. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 06:37, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, I've seen you have been removing non-free logos from university athletics articles... is there a category that shows you files w/out a FUR? I've been trying to find one so I can improve them with a PD logo. Thanks, Corky 04:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you removed the File:Nike descending staircase 3sept1939.jpg image from the Evacuation of the Louvre museum art collection during World War II because of non valid Wikipedia:NFUR for this case. However, I seemed to me that all the necessary components were there in the image. What did I forgot? Hervegirod ( talk) 21:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Re removal of image, I copied it from Bonnie Prince Charlie (1948 film) so I assume should be removed from there as well. Robinvp11 ( talk) 08:31, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
@ JJMC89:Explain to me what exactly is missing from the File:Kinghomer.jpg file? You go around tagging it over and over again claiming it doesn't have rationale. The purpose of that upload was to show a pop culture reference to the character as described in the article and I used a shot of Homer Simpson to illustrate how the character has been referenced in pop culture. This is listed on the file page summary and is clearly defined within the details of the article itself in which the file is used (in the King Kong from the 1980s to the present section). So doesn't that cover the "detail of the name of each article on which the image is used"? Isn't what I wrote under "Summary" enough? Doesn't that give the detail of the article in which the image is used and explain the purpose of the upload? Then there is "image is missing a separate, specific, and relevant fair-use rationale in clear, plain language for each use". Well its only used in that one article and free use rationale is clearly listed in the third paragraph. So what is missing exactly? What more needs to be done? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Giantdevilfish ( talk) 14:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
JJMC89, Although the information defined in 10c was on all three pages you marked ( File:NRA Marksmanship Qualification Badges.jpg, File:NRA Explorer Service Handgun Qualification Badges.png, and File:NRA Law Enforcement Excellence-in-Competition Badge.png), I went ahead and updated the templates and expanded on some of the information. The article they support is now cited three different times on each page. There should now be no question that the criteria defined in 10c has been met. -- McChizzle ( talk) 16:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I made correction that I believe addresses concern about this file. Thank you -- CutOffTies ( talk) 01:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
I would think that a cover almost per definition meets the non-free rationale, so I don't understand this removal. Please correct me if I am wrong. Debresser ( talk) 19:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi JMCC89. I think the reason this file keeps getting flag for NFCC#10c might be due to Harlequins Ladies and Harlequin Ladies. I believe the non-free use rationale added here was intended to be for the former, but the editor adding the rationale forgot to add the "s" to "Harlequin". FWIW, I'm not sure if these two articles are duplicates, so I've asked about them at WT:RU#Harlequins Ladies and Harlequin Ladies Football Club. I'm also not sure if the logo could be used even if there was no typo in the rationale since previous FFD discussions about similar non-free use have resulted in the logo only be allowed in men's teams' articles per item 17 of WP:NFC#UUI even if the men's and women's teams both use the same logo, but that is something which might require further discussion. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. I notice that in this edit you restored the <noinclude> tags surrounding the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Could you explain the reasoning behind this? Thanks. DH85868993 ( talk) 12:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello dear. I have restored this page (that you deleted) temporarily. I *know* it seems odd, but we do need it for a few days as we are finalising the Wikipedia:WikiProject WikiFundisoftware V2 version. Please see more explanations here. I'll make sure to redelete it asap [4] (which is likely to be within a week). Thank you for your patience. Anthere ( talk) 23:37, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you have decided to declare war on this image, File:Mickey Mouse Costume.JPG, but it looks like, to me anyway, that you are mass tagging images without any true regard for what harm you are doing. I've seen many image deletionists get into serious trouble over the years at WP:ANI for doing this. You and others like you, mass tag hundreds of images a day. Then some random admin comes along and just mass deletes them without any regard to the possibility that the image was poorly tagged and without discussion. Some editors have actually been banned from tagging images over this type of behavior. You seem to tag a lot of images, maybe you need to slow down and tag them correctly instead of mass tagging them. Quality over quantity. Thank you. Now for your reply if there is one.-- JOJ Hutton 17:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
I removed the non-free content tag on the New York Jets logo, since it seems to be obviously a case of PD-logo (not original enough to qualify for copyright), consisting of only simple text and a simple geometric shape, far below the threshold of originality required for copyright. See this page on Commons for more details. If you disagree or have any concerns, please feel free to voice them. Thanks! D. Benjamin Miller ( talk) 02:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello my name is Sunriseshore
I saw your removal of the Beatles clip, I also read about the non free content policy. I would ask that the clip be reinstated, as it was placed there to give the reader an idea about the culture of the post 1945 world. While the article itself is not about the song its placement is relevant nonetheless. For the history of modern history, and modern history itself the Beatles were revolutionary in shaping popular music.
I will appreciate any reply Sunriseshore ( talk) 05:28, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
When tagging stuff G13, might I suggest using twinkle to do it so that the parameters are automatically filled out? At current, your nominations appear to be missing the timestamp parameter. -- TheSandDoctor Talk 15:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Hiya mate, you left a tag on Charles R. Conn's page. That's fine, could you be a bit more specific about what exactly you find sensational about the page or the tone and I'll try and fix it for you buddy. Best regards Pug of the day ( talk) 17:53, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
2015: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2016: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2017: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2018: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2019: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2020: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2022: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2023: Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec |
A week or two ago you did some edits to images at Akira Kurosawa which looked well made. Could you check the other images to see if they look correct and with proper notations on Wikimedia, and let me know if they are ok. JohnWickTwo ( talk) 17:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi. An image was recently removed from 2014 Indian Premier League Final page but it was also being used in 2014 Indian Premier League page. Can you tell me why it was still present and also on why this image was removed now after almost more than a year after it was placed. Thanks. Sagavaj ( talk) 18:55, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
For this; I have no idea, though—if you can tell me—how that was all made small after this section was opened, when the section you corrected has been there a month or something?! I'm baffled—it only started yesterday! Hope you're well, by the way, and thanks again. —SerialNumber54129 paranoia / cheap sh*t room 20:23, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
<small>
, at the end of a section, but RemexHtml does not do so. All is well here – enjoyed some mean ribs for the Fourth yesterday. —
JJMC89
20:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Hi, you recently removed some icons from White horse of Kent as being wp:NFCC violations. I later removed the same icon from Welling United FC and was reverted because it was claimed it was not a NFCC violation. I thought you might be interested in commenting on the Welling United article seeing as both you and the other editor seem to be more knowledgeable about this than I am. If you would rather not comment, that's fine by me. My position is pretty neutral, I am just curious to know if the use really is a violation or not - and really isavailable under fair use. Thanks. Roger 8 Roger ( talk) 10:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, you tagged this image: File:Jaguar 2012 logo.png as "NFCC not applicable" and I don´t know where the error is, so I can´t solve the problem. Could you explain me the issue please? Thanks! Fma12 ( talk) 02:55, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
I see you have removed various national football team badges from their pages, claiming "No valid WP:NFUR for this page." In the images you removed, pretty much all of them have rationales on their pages, and as a result, most football team pages are looking bare. What, in your mind, would be a "valid NFUR" to restore them to the pages? Tom Danson ( talk) 05:16, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Can you identify what exactly is copyrighted considering that I wrote the original language. Matty1019 ( talk) 04:20, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
will also have scenic [...] Nigrini.[2] This from therogersrevue.com. [3] — JJMC89 04:36, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Replying, I don't if it's the same thing, can you please help me get rid of it? — User:Social Studies Rules ( talk) 18:56, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Please do not remove the image. It is valuable here, and conformed to the policy. Thanks, Yann ( talk) 16:46, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, Maybe I am doing this wrong - can you help me with the license? since Jacob Rader Marcus died in 1995, I believe his picture can be presented in the article under fair -use license. what explanation is missing? Thanks Golan's mom ( talk) 14:25, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. Since made the edit to File:Logo for WXGI radio in Richmond, VA.png which seems to be the subject of some disagreement/misunderstanding, perhaps you can clarify it on Neutralhomer's talk page . I'm kinda running out of new ways to try and explain the same thing. FWIW, if I'm completely misunderstanding what you did, then feel free to point that out. I've got no problem admitting when I'm wrong and apologizing for it. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 07:51, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm sure you made a mistake with this deletion : https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Remix_culture&diff=849159213&oldid=842803805 , the book was released under a free license (CC -BY-SA). You may have seen the mislabeled Webarchive mirror which is indeed non-free, but the original release was free. Shaddim ( talk) 09:55, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello! why was this CD cover removed from the bio page about Maxx? File:Maxx-get-a-way single.jpg what was the violation? and what are the 'rules' for pictures existing on a wiki article for a band Dancemusicfan ( talk) 15:50, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Los Angeles Daily News logo March 17 1934.jpg I don't understand your message. Sorry. BeenAroundAWhile ( talk) 06:37, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89, I've seen you have been removing non-free logos from university athletics articles... is there a category that shows you files w/out a FUR? I've been trying to find one so I can improve them with a PD logo. Thanks, Corky 04:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you removed the File:Nike descending staircase 3sept1939.jpg image from the Evacuation of the Louvre museum art collection during World War II because of non valid Wikipedia:NFUR for this case. However, I seemed to me that all the necessary components were there in the image. What did I forgot? Hervegirod ( talk) 21:29, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Re removal of image, I copied it from Bonnie Prince Charlie (1948 film) so I assume should be removed from there as well. Robinvp11 ( talk) 08:31, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
@ JJMC89:Explain to me what exactly is missing from the File:Kinghomer.jpg file? You go around tagging it over and over again claiming it doesn't have rationale. The purpose of that upload was to show a pop culture reference to the character as described in the article and I used a shot of Homer Simpson to illustrate how the character has been referenced in pop culture. This is listed on the file page summary and is clearly defined within the details of the article itself in which the file is used (in the King Kong from the 1980s to the present section). So doesn't that cover the "detail of the name of each article on which the image is used"? Isn't what I wrote under "Summary" enough? Doesn't that give the detail of the article in which the image is used and explain the purpose of the upload? Then there is "image is missing a separate, specific, and relevant fair-use rationale in clear, plain language for each use". Well its only used in that one article and free use rationale is clearly listed in the third paragraph. So what is missing exactly? What more needs to be done? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Giantdevilfish ( talk) 14:46, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
JJMC89, Although the information defined in 10c was on all three pages you marked ( File:NRA Marksmanship Qualification Badges.jpg, File:NRA Explorer Service Handgun Qualification Badges.png, and File:NRA Law Enforcement Excellence-in-Competition Badge.png), I went ahead and updated the templates and expanded on some of the information. The article they support is now cited three different times on each page. There should now be no question that the criteria defined in 10c has been met. -- McChizzle ( talk) 16:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I made correction that I believe addresses concern about this file. Thank you -- CutOffTies ( talk) 01:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
I would think that a cover almost per definition meets the non-free rationale, so I don't understand this removal. Please correct me if I am wrong. Debresser ( talk) 19:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi JMCC89. I think the reason this file keeps getting flag for NFCC#10c might be due to Harlequins Ladies and Harlequin Ladies. I believe the non-free use rationale added here was intended to be for the former, but the editor adding the rationale forgot to add the "s" to "Harlequin". FWIW, I'm not sure if these two articles are duplicates, so I've asked about them at WT:RU#Harlequins Ladies and Harlequin Ladies Football Club. I'm also not sure if the logo could be used even if there was no typo in the rationale since previous FFD discussions about similar non-free use have resulted in the logo only be allowed in men's teams' articles per item 17 of WP:NFC#UUI even if the men's and women's teams both use the same logo, but that is something which might require further discussion. -- Marchjuly ( talk) 00:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi JJMC89. I notice that in this edit you restored the <noinclude> tags surrounding the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. Could you explain the reasoning behind this? Thanks. DH85868993 ( talk) 12:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello dear. I have restored this page (that you deleted) temporarily. I *know* it seems odd, but we do need it for a few days as we are finalising the Wikipedia:WikiProject WikiFundisoftware V2 version. Please see more explanations here. I'll make sure to redelete it asap [4] (which is likely to be within a week). Thank you for your patience. Anthere ( talk) 23:37, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
I'm not sure why you have decided to declare war on this image, File:Mickey Mouse Costume.JPG, but it looks like, to me anyway, that you are mass tagging images without any true regard for what harm you are doing. I've seen many image deletionists get into serious trouble over the years at WP:ANI for doing this. You and others like you, mass tag hundreds of images a day. Then some random admin comes along and just mass deletes them without any regard to the possibility that the image was poorly tagged and without discussion. Some editors have actually been banned from tagging images over this type of behavior. You seem to tag a lot of images, maybe you need to slow down and tag them correctly instead of mass tagging them. Quality over quantity. Thank you. Now for your reply if there is one.-- JOJ Hutton 17:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
I removed the non-free content tag on the New York Jets logo, since it seems to be obviously a case of PD-logo (not original enough to qualify for copyright), consisting of only simple text and a simple geometric shape, far below the threshold of originality required for copyright. See this page on Commons for more details. If you disagree or have any concerns, please feel free to voice them. Thanks! D. Benjamin Miller ( talk) 02:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello my name is Sunriseshore
I saw your removal of the Beatles clip, I also read about the non free content policy. I would ask that the clip be reinstated, as it was placed there to give the reader an idea about the culture of the post 1945 world. While the article itself is not about the song its placement is relevant nonetheless. For the history of modern history, and modern history itself the Beatles were revolutionary in shaping popular music.
I will appreciate any reply Sunriseshore ( talk) 05:28, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
When tagging stuff G13, might I suggest using twinkle to do it so that the parameters are automatically filled out? At current, your nominations appear to be missing the timestamp parameter. -- TheSandDoctor Talk 15:22, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Hiya mate, you left a tag on Charles R. Conn's page. That's fine, could you be a bit more specific about what exactly you find sensational about the page or the tone and I'll try and fix it for you buddy. Best regards Pug of the day ( talk) 17:53, 30 July 2018 (UTC)