I changed my username and moved my talk history here.
Hello, Jared.h.wood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
RJFJR (
talk) 17:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
FDW777 ( talk) 17:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Thinking errors. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 3#Thinking errors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,
Rosguill
talk 18:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Greetings,
Since I stumbled upon related sources I initiated an article draft Draft:Irrational beliefs. I am looking for some help in article expansion. Please do visit the draft, and help expand if feel interested in the topic.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku ( talk) 10:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
In hopes of not doing another move request after yours is done, I wanted to see what you thought of my suggestion of United States Capital Attack in your move request. Casprings ( talk) 22:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
What a mess the Requested Move has been. I sincerely apologize for my part in the confusion at Talk:2021_storming_of_the_United_States_Capitol#Requested_move_23_January_2021. Along with dozens of opinions about the title, I also was influenced by several people making requests or giving conflicting advice. I recognize that my inexperience combined with this situation led to some rash updates to the process and I apologize for that. Please know that my attempts to improve the situation were made in good faith and seemed good at the time. Well, I have learned lessons from this. I hope they are the right lessons. JaredHWood 💬 20:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your well-contextualized introduction on my Talk page!
AND
Welcome to the team working on improving spaceflight articles!
Very glad to have you join the effort. There are always thousands of edits that might be made, and hundreds are every day. Hope to see you in WikiProject Spaceflight as well. I'll respond to the details on the specific article you mentioned over on my Talk page; but just wanted you to feel a good strong welcome to the more major effort we've got going on improving articles related to spaceflight. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 02:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Jared. I said what I had to say to your question over on the Starship Talk page a couple of days ago. But I've been thinking further along those lines, and that has to do with learning and a bit of WP philosophy, some of mine anyway, which you mentioned on my Talk page recently. If you'd like to engage, and have a chat; I think that could be productive. We could just continue on here if you want to do it. Let me know and I'll kick it off with some thoughs. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 15:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
N2e It was fun to be here during the SN9 flight test and experience for myself what you have called "enthusiastic editors" on the Starship pages. JaredHWood 💬 21:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
After I wrote that an hour ago, I stumbled upon a fresh look at the Starship development history article. The arcane detail has definitely gone over the top, in my view. I have started a discussion over there, and tagged the article as well. FYI. N2e ( talk) 03:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Jared.h.wood! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hello Jared. Please don't think I'm unnecessarily targeting you by reverting several of your connected edits. There really is nothing wrong with Flat Earth Society, except perhaps that there might be a permanent topic, but that's not a reason to redirect it to a page that will not help readers searching for other items. What about moving it to Flat Earth Society (disambiguation) and then redirecting Flat Earth Society to Modern flat Earth beliefs as a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. I could do that if you agree. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The SPFLT Achievement Patch | |
Thank you for your edits on spaceflight-related articles! Neopeius ( talk) 04:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC) |
If you have an interest in early satellites, I've got tons of resources to share. :) --
Neopeius (
talk) 04:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Go to the WPSPACEFLIGHT channel.
-- Neopeius ( talk) 14:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Your edit to
Starlink has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk) 11:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the tweak; it's better-- 217.155.32.221 ( talk) 22:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
I changed my username and moved my talk history here.
Hello, Jared.h.wood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
RJFJR (
talk) 17:07, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
FDW777 ( talk) 17:14, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect
Thinking errors. The discussion will occur at
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 3#Thinking errors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed,
Rosguill
talk 18:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Greetings,
Since I stumbled upon related sources I initiated an article draft Draft:Irrational beliefs. I am looking for some help in article expansion. Please do visit the draft, and help expand if feel interested in the topic.
Thanks and warm regards
Bookku ( talk) 10:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
In hopes of not doing another move request after yours is done, I wanted to see what you thought of my suggestion of United States Capital Attack in your move request. Casprings ( talk) 22:23, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
What a mess the Requested Move has been. I sincerely apologize for my part in the confusion at Talk:2021_storming_of_the_United_States_Capitol#Requested_move_23_January_2021. Along with dozens of opinions about the title, I also was influenced by several people making requests or giving conflicting advice. I recognize that my inexperience combined with this situation led to some rash updates to the process and I apologize for that. Please know that my attempts to improve the situation were made in good faith and seemed good at the time. Well, I have learned lessons from this. I hope they are the right lessons. JaredHWood 💬 20:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your well-contextualized introduction on my Talk page!
AND
Welcome to the team working on improving spaceflight articles!
Very glad to have you join the effort. There are always thousands of edits that might be made, and hundreds are every day. Hope to see you in WikiProject Spaceflight as well. I'll respond to the details on the specific article you mentioned over on my Talk page; but just wanted you to feel a good strong welcome to the more major effort we've got going on improving articles related to spaceflight. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 02:56, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi Jared. I said what I had to say to your question over on the Starship Talk page a couple of days ago. But I've been thinking further along those lines, and that has to do with learning and a bit of WP philosophy, some of mine anyway, which you mentioned on my Talk page recently. If you'd like to engage, and have a chat; I think that could be productive. We could just continue on here if you want to do it. Let me know and I'll kick it off with some thoughs. Cheers. N2e ( talk) 15:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
N2e It was fun to be here during the SN9 flight test and experience for myself what you have called "enthusiastic editors" on the Starship pages. JaredHWood 💬 21:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
After I wrote that an hour ago, I stumbled upon a fresh look at the Starship development history article. The arcane detail has definitely gone over the top, in my view. I have started a discussion over there, and tagged the article as well. FYI. N2e ( talk) 03:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Jared.h.wood! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Hello Jared. Please don't think I'm unnecessarily targeting you by reverting several of your connected edits. There really is nothing wrong with Flat Earth Society, except perhaps that there might be a permanent topic, but that's not a reason to redirect it to a page that will not help readers searching for other items. What about moving it to Flat Earth Society (disambiguation) and then redirecting Flat Earth Society to Modern flat Earth beliefs as a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT. I could do that if you agree. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 09:03, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
![]() |
The SPFLT Achievement Patch | |
Thank you for your edits on spaceflight-related articles! Neopeius ( talk) 04:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC) |
If you have an interest in early satellites, I've got tons of resources to share. :) --
Neopeius (
talk) 04:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Go to the WPSPACEFLIGHT channel.
-- Neopeius ( talk) 14:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Your edit to
Starlink has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added
copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of
permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read
Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be
blocked from editing. See
Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —
Diannaa (
talk) 11:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for the tweak; it's better-- 217.155.32.221 ( talk) 22:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)