![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, JASpencer, and thank you for your contributions!
Some text in an article that you worked on Catholic temperance movement, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, The Temperance movement in Ireland. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.
It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Catholic temperance movement at any time. MadmanBot ( talk) 21:48, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Temperance fountains, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.
If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Camyoung54 talk 20:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
I have sent you site mail, to progress things. Charles Matthews ( talk) 12:44, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
I have left you a message on the talk page of that article, and it is important that you read it.
I presume that you are a relatively new editor. I have been around for years, and I am very rarely as rude to a newish editor as I have just been to you, on that talk page.
The message is think about the meaning of the sentences that you write.
What you have done is present a fact that has at least three references, which can probably be supported by parish meeting notes, architect's plans, contracts, payments, local news papers etc etc etc etc..... as if it was nothing more than an urban legend believed by a group of local Catholic people. This is very thoughtless use of your sources.
Here is how its done. Note how each sentence is structured. This is about "How to write Wikipedia". The subject is of no consequence.
This list moves from what is known beyond doubt, to what is widely accepted, to an important but unprovable theory by a significant author, to a highly improbable but widely-circulated theory. In each case, the way that the sentence is written takes into account whether the information is reliable.
Stating "Local Catholics claim the building was intended as a cathedral...." gives a verifiable fact no credibility whatsoever.
Amandajm ( talk) 02:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Should we change Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore to Saint Mary Major? I am targetting folk who have altered the entry before. Rococo1700 ( talk) 04:47, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the notice that you have mentioned my name came up in discussion on SarekOfVulcan's talk page. I have left you a comment there. Blueboar ( talk) 14:42, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
I made a comment at WP:RSN which I hope you find helpful. Andrew Dalby 13:25, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
JASpenser, you'll need to nominate this article again on the article talk page, this time with the proper template. The nomination instructions are at WP:GAN; essentially, you need to substitute the GAN template with the proper subtopic, which in turn generates a filled-in GA nominee template. I've reverted the attempt, since the nomination template had no parameters at all, rendering it useless. BlueMoonset ( talk) 06:02, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stanislaus of Szczepanów, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Canon and Divine Office ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Just curious as to why you think it inappropriate to ask the members of a specific WikiProject to clarify consensus on an issue relating specifically to that WikiProject? That's the way its usually done. Blueboar ( talk) 02:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aldeburgh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page District Council ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:37, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grantham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wesleyan Methodist ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 01:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed you reverted my edit. I'd like to know why you disagree with the edit, seeing as it is referenced by a link to a respected academic institution. -- Île flottante ( talk) 21:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cuncacestre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hugh Lindsay ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Cuncacestre may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gallipoli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Callipolis ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gran Priorato Rectificado de Hispania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gran Priorato Rectificado de Hispania until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan ( talk) 21:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Louis André#Larkin, Church and State -- PBS ( talk) 13:22, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
User:MSJapan has begun what can only be described as a scorched earth campaign regarding both my past edits and even my status as a Wikipedia editor. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I would deeply appreciate any assistance in this matter. Kingstowngalway ( talk) 22:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander Montgomery (1720–1800), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Act of Union ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:39, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 18:47, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Haggerston by-election, 1908 may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
FYI, I have added some references to Holy Trinity, Dublin: Augustinian Friars. A better title would be Augustinian Friary of the Holy Trinity, Dublin, but a move during AfD is not a good idea. -- 101.119.15.3 ( talk) 10:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.
You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints -- Jayarathina ( talk) 12:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I am an editor who tends to seek out red-linked pages which are awaiting articles to be written and then write them. Today I have come across a page that I wanted to add to and I discovered you had created a re-direct. When someone creates a re-direct it turns a red-link blue, and I never realise unless I stumble across it, that an article needs to be written. I notice that you have created a number of re-directs. I am wondering if this practise is not counter-productive. Graemp ( talk) 14:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited War-time electoral pact, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third party ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
The article West Surrey by-election, 1870 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
...William
18:24, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
The article Tipperary by-election, 1869 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
...William
18:25, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
The article Queen's County by-election, 1870 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
...William
18:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
You took down the PRODS then tagged the articles as unreferenced even though you created them. There has to be a source for these, written or on the internet. What is it and why not put it in the articles? ...William 18:57, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
...William 19:18, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Category:Roman Catholic missionary orders, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Elizium23 ( talk) 00:12, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's more complicated than it may seem, especially given the fluidity of party labels at the time and the fact that the modern Home Rule party was really only beginning to get going. Whitworth won Kilkenny as a Liberal (and apparently an anti-Home Rule supporter). He then ran for Drogheda and let it be known that he was actually in favour of Home Rule, and won against another Home Rule candidate. Smithwick was described in the Times as a Liberal, but a letter to the editor said he was known as a pro-Home Rule candidate. He won the general election months later as a Home Rule candidate, against another Home Rule candidate. The Times still described him as a Liberal, though.-- Rbreen ( talk) 22:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:30, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:36, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
It is very unencyclopaedic to write that elections are fought, they are held. They are not wars even though some people might think so. I've refined a few that I saw, perhaps you can edit the rest. Thanks ww2censor ( talk) 23:15, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, firstly a small point regarding the Clare By-election of 1826 - there's a difference between Daniel O'Donnell and Daniel O'Connell. (I fixed this one) ;)
However, it's an anachronism to move by-elections from the category "By-elections to the United Kingdom Parliament in Irish constituencies" to Category "By-elections to the United Kingdom Parliament in Northern Irish constituencies". There were no 'Northern Irish constituencies' before 1922. They were all Irish constituencies and were so regarded at the time. Anyone searching for information about elections in Ireland in the Victorian era would certainly expect to find Antrim, Donegal and Dublin in the same category. And nobody in 1885, for instance, would have considered Donegal to be anything other than northern Ireland - politically, the six-county concept of "Northern Ireland" didn't exist then. I believe that category was intended for post-1922 constituencies. A case could be made for those counties to be in both categories; but they would certainly have been regarded as in Ireland. -- Rbreen ( talk) 01:11, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Church of the Saviour, Birmingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitarian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Category:Anti-Catholic politicians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi ( talk) 02:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orkney and Shetland (UK Parliament constituency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boundary Commission ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello, JASpencer, and thank you for your contributions!
Some text in an article that you worked on Catholic temperance movement, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, The Temperance movement in Ireland. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.
It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Catholic temperance movement at any time. MadmanBot ( talk) 21:48, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Temperance fountains, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page.
If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Camyoung54 talk 20:22, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
I have sent you site mail, to progress things. Charles Matthews ( talk) 12:44, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
I have left you a message on the talk page of that article, and it is important that you read it.
I presume that you are a relatively new editor. I have been around for years, and I am very rarely as rude to a newish editor as I have just been to you, on that talk page.
The message is think about the meaning of the sentences that you write.
What you have done is present a fact that has at least three references, which can probably be supported by parish meeting notes, architect's plans, contracts, payments, local news papers etc etc etc etc..... as if it was nothing more than an urban legend believed by a group of local Catholic people. This is very thoughtless use of your sources.
Here is how its done. Note how each sentence is structured. This is about "How to write Wikipedia". The subject is of no consequence.
This list moves from what is known beyond doubt, to what is widely accepted, to an important but unprovable theory by a significant author, to a highly improbable but widely-circulated theory. In each case, the way that the sentence is written takes into account whether the information is reliable.
Stating "Local Catholics claim the building was intended as a cathedral...." gives a verifiable fact no credibility whatsoever.
Amandajm ( talk) 02:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Should we change Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore to Saint Mary Major? I am targetting folk who have altered the entry before. Rococo1700 ( talk) 04:47, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the notice that you have mentioned my name came up in discussion on SarekOfVulcan's talk page. I have left you a comment there. Blueboar ( talk) 14:42, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
I made a comment at WP:RSN which I hope you find helpful. Andrew Dalby 13:25, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
JASpenser, you'll need to nominate this article again on the article talk page, this time with the proper template. The nomination instructions are at WP:GAN; essentially, you need to substitute the GAN template with the proper subtopic, which in turn generates a filled-in GA nominee template. I've reverted the attempt, since the nomination template had no parameters at all, rendering it useless. BlueMoonset ( talk) 06:02, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stanislaus of Szczepanów, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Canon and Divine Office ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 19:49, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Just curious as to why you think it inappropriate to ask the members of a specific WikiProject to clarify consensus on an issue relating specifically to that WikiProject? That's the way its usually done. Blueboar ( talk) 02:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aldeburgh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page District Council ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 18:37, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grantham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wesleyan Methodist ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 01:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi there. I noticed you reverted my edit. I'd like to know why you disagree with the edit, seeing as it is referenced by a link to a respected academic institution. -- Île flottante ( talk) 21:17, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cuncacestre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hugh Lindsay ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Cuncacestre may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 11:16, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gallipoli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Callipolis ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:01, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gran Priorato Rectificado de Hispania is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gran Priorato Rectificado de Hispania until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan ( talk) 21:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Louis André#Larkin, Church and State -- PBS ( talk) 13:22, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
User:MSJapan has begun what can only be described as a scorched earth campaign regarding both my past edits and even my status as a Wikipedia editor. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I would deeply appreciate any assistance in this matter. Kingstowngalway ( talk) 22:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander Montgomery (1720–1800), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Act of Union ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 11:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:39, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Emmette Hernandez Coleman ( talk) 18:47, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Haggerston by-election, 1908 may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 08:58, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
FYI, I have added some references to Holy Trinity, Dublin: Augustinian Friars. A better title would be Augustinian Friary of the Holy Trinity, Dublin, but a move during AfD is not a good idea. -- 101.119.15.3 ( talk) 10:19, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
I have asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast day. You might want to participate in the redirect discussion.
You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Catholicism and/or WikiProject Saints -- Jayarathina ( talk) 12:51, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I am an editor who tends to seek out red-linked pages which are awaiting articles to be written and then write them. Today I have come across a page that I wanted to add to and I discovered you had created a re-direct. When someone creates a re-direct it turns a red-link blue, and I never realise unless I stumble across it, that an article needs to be written. I notice that you have created a number of re-directs. I am wondering if this practise is not counter-productive. Graemp ( talk) 14:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited War-time electoral pact, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third party ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:04, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
The article West Surrey by-election, 1870 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
...William
18:24, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
The article Tipperary by-election, 1869 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
...William
18:25, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
The article Queen's County by-election, 1870 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
...William
18:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
You took down the PRODS then tagged the articles as unreferenced even though you created them. There has to be a source for these, written or on the internet. What is it and why not put it in the articles? ...William 18:57, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
...William 19:18, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Category:Roman Catholic missionary orders, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Elizium23 ( talk) 00:12, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
It's more complicated than it may seem, especially given the fluidity of party labels at the time and the fact that the modern Home Rule party was really only beginning to get going. Whitworth won Kilkenny as a Liberal (and apparently an anti-Home Rule supporter). He then ran for Drogheda and let it be known that he was actually in favour of Home Rule, and won against another Home Rule candidate. Smithwick was described in the Times as a Liberal, but a letter to the editor said he was known as a pro-Home Rule candidate. He won the general election months later as a Home Rule candidate, against another Home Rule candidate. The Times still described him as a Liberal, though.-- Rbreen ( talk) 22:27, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:30, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 12:36, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
It is very unencyclopaedic to write that elections are fought, they are held. They are not wars even though some people might think so. I've refined a few that I saw, perhaps you can edit the rest. Thanks ww2censor ( talk) 23:15, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi, firstly a small point regarding the Clare By-election of 1826 - there's a difference between Daniel O'Donnell and Daniel O'Connell. (I fixed this one) ;)
However, it's an anachronism to move by-elections from the category "By-elections to the United Kingdom Parliament in Irish constituencies" to Category "By-elections to the United Kingdom Parliament in Northern Irish constituencies". There were no 'Northern Irish constituencies' before 1922. They were all Irish constituencies and were so regarded at the time. Anyone searching for information about elections in Ireland in the Victorian era would certainly expect to find Antrim, Donegal and Dublin in the same category. And nobody in 1885, for instance, would have considered Donegal to be anything other than northern Ireland - politically, the six-county concept of "Northern Ireland" didn't exist then. I believe that category was intended for post-1922 constituencies. A case could be made for those counties to be in both categories; but they would certainly have been regarded as in Ireland. -- Rbreen ( talk) 01:11, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Church of the Saviour, Birmingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitarian ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Category:Anti-Catholic politicians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi ( talk) 02:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Orkney and Shetland (UK Parliament constituency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boundary Commission ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 27 December 2013 (UTC)