![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2018 Pacific hurricane season. Since you had some involvement with the 2018 Pacific hurricane season redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer ( talk) 15:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Can you finish off dealing with the comments - ive started writing something for the lead here, but i am goning to be rather busy over the next few days with Phet. Ill be around on IRC if you need me though :) Jason Rees ( talk) 18:28, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:10, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
1989-90 South Pacific cyclone season at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk) 20:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
If youre planning to do a timeline for the 88-89 SPAC TC season then you need to be aware that it was the first season that nadi monitored the area between 140W to 120W. Jason Rees ( talk) 01:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for creating an article for the upcoming Aus season, I hope you dont mind but i merged your version to the one i quickly created the other day. Which is in the correct place if ive missed something feel free to add it. Jason Rees ( talk) 23:38, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, The cite drop down menu doesn't appear on my edit toolbar. How do I get it to appear? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby122 ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Anhamirak, this edit effectively froze my nomination. Is this what you intended to do? Crum375 ( talk) 04:28, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
I believe it was a few days ago that you did a GA review of USAir_Flight_405. The author was concerned that you did not provide any feedback through the GA process to give guidance for further improvements so they requested a peer review to get some feedback. I reviewed the article and found a number of items that under the GA criteria I would not have passed (reconsider GA criteria sections 1.a and 2.a). You can see my comments here Wikipedia:Peer_review#USAir_Flight_405. The writer is already making the changes and I think the article will indeed be a GA. I just wanted you to reconsider giving an article GA status in the future when it may still need additional elements of improvement according to the GA criteria. Thanks for your contributions. § Music Sorter § ( talk) 15:09, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, is it possible for you to make an image of the tracks of all category 3 hurricanes? Just the ones that have reached category 3 status, but not the ones that have gone higher than a 3. Thank you, Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 17:22, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have reached the step when you have to go to the tracks directory and compile it by running
./autogen.sh && make
Can you tell me how to do this step as I get an error in my tracks directory when cygwin starts to check whether I am cross compiling. Thank you, Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 23:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Since you are listed as active on Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Tracks, I wanted to let you know that I made Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Tracks/Requests so we can have a centralized track map requests place. Any help would be very appreciated. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 23:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Since you enjoy doing tracks so much: Can u do us a trackmap for Cyclone Namu (33P). Theres a problem that theirs no JTWC ATCF File so ive taken the track below from the Neumann files. Dr Charles Neumann in 2000 under a US Navy contract went through and analyzed the JTWC BT so the BT below should be fine to be used. If you do the track can you please chuck it in my sandbox for Namu. Jason Rees ( talk) 01:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
I dont have a track map generator. Anirudh Emani ( talk) 08:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Just as an FYI - i found some of the TCRs written up by Nadi for that season last night via the met office. Ive added the systems in to the timeline with generic statements for now as i may be able to go down to Exeter and get them. Jason Rees ( talk) 14:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | Just a happy Birthday message to you, Iune, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
-- Sweet xx Talk 09:31, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | The Wikipedia Birthday Committee wishes you a very happy birthday! Enjoy your special day. |
Armbrust Talk Contribs 13:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Happy birthday. Jason Rees ( talk) 17:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
i didnt know that there was a log for it... so i kept on posting such things. Thank you for informing me.. Anirudh Emani ( talk) 12:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Me and CB were talking last night about the PTS tracking data page and we feel it would be better for everyone if we just did in the original format (ie not 360- XXXX). So instead of just copying MINDULLE's stuff across can u copy it all. Thanks. Jason Rees ( talk) 03:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Hope this helps - there are several JTWC files covering the period and it seems to have been relocated quite a bit on one occasion-- Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 17:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Original source: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc10/WPAC/96W.INVEST/trackfile.txt, recovered at: 2010-08-05 1845Z
Original source: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc10/WPAC/96W.INVEST/trackfile.txt, recovered at: 2010-08-05 0645Z
Original source: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc10/WPAC/96W.INVEST/trackfile.txt, recovered at: 2010-08-04 2245Z
Original source: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc10/WPAC/96W.INVEST/trackfile.txt, recovered at: 2010-08-04 0645Z
Is there a possible way for you to come to the IRC whenever you can? I wanna discuss with you about the new infobox and the changes that could be made. I just thought it may be easier there instead of here since I have many questions and suggestions that would be way too much to say here. Darren 23 Edits| Mail 21:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Please make sure you logout of your old account and login to your new one so you don't get accused of sockpuppeting or mess up the transfer of your edits. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 19:14, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
I was talking to JR on the IRC about JMA TDs, and he said talk to you. So... I was thinking, the JMA TDs should be numbered by the invest number. If another depression occurs with the same invest number, just as is with multiple "Tropical Depression"s I guess Wikipedia numbers them for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Pacific_typhoon_season#Tropical_Depression_7. You could add 2, 3, etc,. Syntheticalconnections ( talk)( my contribs) 22:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
are you really from Andhra Pradesh and can you really speak Telugu? Anirudh Emani ( talk) 06:10, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Ive tracked down most of the systems for 1998-99 using Gary's Summaries. i have currently got no clue about 24 & 25F. Maybe its an early example of Nadi shoving in systems but not warning on it like 12F this year which i am 99.9% sure was the CPAC-SPAC Crossover (90C) in Feb as the dates match. Jason Rees ( talk) 13:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Iune hid this message as it broke their talk page templates. — Iune (talk) 23:35, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
You did a track map the other day of the Australian warning centers AOR's. Where is it as i think i have the perfect place to put. Sorry forgot to sign. Jason Rees ( talk) 22:43, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey there Iune, thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot, alerting you that
non-free files are
not allowed in user or talk space. I
removed some files I found on
User:Iune/Countries/January 1. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your
user-space drafts or your
talk page.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I was alerted to User:Iune/CycloneSeason/10 by User:Anikingos when I asked him about his. Please refer to WP:FAKEARTICLE. This is a by-the-book violation of that guideline, and I'd ask you request it be deleted. Alternatively, I can bring this to WP:MFD if you wish to seek broader community consensus. Regards, Strange Passerby ( talk • c • status) 15:34, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Number 32B, October 20, 2010
The Hurricane Herald
This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all project related events of September 2010 and some events of October 2010
Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.
Storm of the month
'
Typhoon Fanapi' is Storm of the Month
Early on September 14, the JMA reported that a tropical depression had formed east of Taiwan. The Joint Typhoon Warning Center soon designated the depression as 12W with PAGASA naming it Inday shortly thereafter. Later on the same day, the tropical depression was upgraded to a tropical storm and was officially given the name Fanapi by the JMA. On September 16, the storm further intensified into a severe tropical storm. That same day, the JMA further upgraded it into a typhoon. Fanapi turned west and intensified into a category 1 typhoon that night. On the following day, the storm further intensified into a category 2 typhoon. On September 18, the storm further intensified to a Category 3 typhoon and moved straight into Taiwan. It made landfall in Hualien County at 8:40 a.m. (10.40am AEST) on September 19, with winds of 162 kilometres (101 mi) and across the island at a speed of 20km/h. Shortly after its landfall, it moved south and again turned east and rapidly weakened into a Severe Tropical Storm. It had a Category 1 equivalent strength at that time. At 06:00 PM (Local time), the typhoon went back into the ocean. Post Storm Analysis proved that the system stayed on land for 9 hours approximately. The storm made its second landfall at Zhangpu County, Zhangzhou, Fujian province, China, at a Category 1 Typhoon intensity. The Storm caused a large scale damage to Taiwan. In the early hours of September 21, Fanapi weakened into a tropical depression over Guangdong province, China. On Septemner 22, Fanapi dissipated completely.
Other tropical cyclone activity
New members
Articles Requiring Help
Main and Important Articles
Member of the month
Jason Rees is the member of the month - October 2010
To do
Storm article statistics
Tropical cyclone articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | Other | ??? | Total | |
![]() |
6 | 12 | 64 | 66 | 148 | ||
![]() |
1 | 1 | 9 | 16 | 27 | ||
![]() |
8 | 22 | 126 | 259 | 415 | ||
B | 3 | 6 | 21 | 23 | 53 | ||
C | 5 | 23 | 87 | 97 | 212 | ||
Start | 5 | 58 | 232 | 239 | 4 | 538 | |
Stub | 1 | 17 | 94 | 59 | 171 | ||
Current | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |||
Future | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Category | 524 | 1 | 525 | ||||
Disambig | 7 | 581 | 588 | ||||
Template | 167 | 1 | 168 | ||||
Assessed | 29 | 141 | 637 | 770 | 1,294 | 27 | 2,898 |
Unassessed | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Total | 29 | 141 | 637 | 771 | 1,294 | 29 | 2,901 |
Project News
-- Anirudh Emani ( talk) 10:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Current storms excluded
05/15/2010 M=10 0 SNBR=0000 LAILA XING=0 05/15L 63 932 15 1010L 64 929 15 1010L 66 924 15 1010L 68 919 15 1010* 05/16L 71 913 15 1010L 81 906 15 1010L 91 901 15 1010L 99 896 15 1009* 05/17L106 890 20 1007*111 885 25 1004*115 878 30 1000*116 870 35 996* 05/18*119 859 35 996*124 846 40 993*130 834 50 985*132 827 55 982* 05/19*134 819 65 974*137 815 65 974*140 814 65 974*145 812 60 978* 05/20*150 808 60 978*154 806 50 985*155 806 50 985*158 805 60 978* 05/21*164 807 50 985*168 810 40 993*171 814 35 996*172 819 35 996* 05/22*171 824 30 1000*176 832 30 1000*185 840 30 1000*189 842 30 1000* 05/23*191 844 30 1000*193 849 30 1000*193 854 30 1000*193 861 25 1004* 05/24*193 873 25 1004*192 888 25 1004*191 903 25 1004*188 918 25 1004* HR 05/17/2010 M= 7 0 SNBR=0000 BANDU XING=0 05/17* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0L 92 576 20 1007* 05/18* 96 571 25 1004*101 564 25 1004*104 558 25 1004*107 551 25 1002* 05/19*110 545 30 1000*111 540 30 1000*113 535 35 996*115 530 35 996* 05/20*119 527 40 993*121 526 40 993*123 525 45 989*124 523 45 989* 05/21*125 521 40 993*126 520 55 982*126 519 55 982*126 517 50 985* 05/22*126 515 45 989*126 513 40 993*126 511 35 996*126 507 30 1000* 05/23*125 501 25 1004*123 495 25 1004* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* TS 05/30/2010 M= 9 0 SNBR=0000 PHET XING=0 05/30L144 658 15 1010L144 654 15 1010L144 650 15 1010L145 647 20 1005* 05/31*146 645 25 1004*147 643 30 1001*150 639 30 1000*154 635 35 996* 06/01*158 632 40 993*162 628 55 982*168 623 60 978*171 615 75 967* 06/02*174 610 90 956*178 605 110 941*182 600 125 929*184 598 120 933* 06/03*186 596 115 937*191 595 115 937*200 595 105 944*208 592 105 944* 06/04*215 592 90 956*223 592 75 967*230 594 65 974*236 597 55 982* 06/05*239 603 45 989*238 610 40 993*235 616 40 993*232 624 40 993* 06/06*229 641 40 993*235 657 35 996*246 673 30 1000*249 682 30 1000* 06/07*267 711 30 1000* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* HR 10/05/2010 M= 4 0 SNBR=0000 BOB02 XING=0 10/05* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0L141 872 15 1010* 10/06L144 869 15 1010L147 866 15 1010L154 863 15 1010L160 861 15 1010* 10/07L170 860 15 1010L181 860 15 1010L193 860 15 1010L205 868 20 1007* 10/08*215 882 25 1000*228 898 25 1000*236 912 25 1001*237 917 25 1004* TD 10/13/2010 M= 3 0 SNBR=0000 BOB03 XING=0 10/13* 0 0 0 0*162 901 25 1004*162 897 25 1001*163 894 25 1003* 10/14*164 891 25 1004*165 888 30 1000*167 884 30 1000*174 876 30 1000* 10/15*181 868 30 1000*185 859 30 1000*188 850 30 1000* 0 0 0 0* TD
-- Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 09:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
When do you plan to test the current infobox you were working on in SHEM? Darren 23 Edits| Mail 03:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Sorry but i was rather tired last night and headed off earlier than i usually do, Im around now and i should be around this evening though. Jason Rees ( talk) 16:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I've been revamping this article over the past two days and I think it's ready for FLC. You contributed to the revamping too (with more edits than I made, albeit over a year ago); do you want credit too? -- Dylan620 ( t • c) 17:02, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Dylan620 has eaten your {{
cookie}}! The cookie made them
happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{
cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{ subst:munch}}!
thankz very much for the track of the storm.. :) .. HunterZone ( talk) 17:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. Fun Pika 21:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Wait until the advisory comes out before updating the pages, just in case. The system is still technically west of the International Dateline and out of CPHC's hands. Thegreatdr ( talk) 19:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
[1] - I just wanted to say, I love the new image in that article! Great find. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 23:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to Wikipedia:WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 12:55, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Come (back) onto IRC at some point bar Wednesday and ill tell ya what i think. Jason Rees ( talk) 01:47, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Yep, that's fine; there's clearly been significant work on the article by you this year. J Milburn ( talk) 23:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Dylan620 (
t •
c •
r) has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the
WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!
Cheers! -- Dylan620 ( t • c • r) 18:17, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed your activity as a Good Article reviewer, and wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.
If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!
You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).
I hope to hear from you soon.-- Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation ( talk) 20:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. Signups are now closed, and we have 129 listed competitors, 64 of whom will make it to round two. Congratulations to
The Bushranger (
submissions), who, at the time of writing, has a comfortable lead with 228 points, followed by
Hurricanehink (
submissions), with 144 points. Four others have over 100 points. Congratulations also go to
Yellow Evan (
submissions), who scored the first points in the competition, claiming for
Talk:Hurricane King/GA1,
Miyagawa (
submissions), who scored the first non-review points in the competition, claiming for
Dognapping, and
Jarry1250 (
submissions) who was the first in the competition to use our new "multiplier" mechanic (
explanation), claiming for
Grigory Potemkin, a subject covered on numerous Wikipedias. Thanks must also go to Jarry1250 for dealing with all bot work- without you, the competition wouldn't be happening!
A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round two is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 22:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Iune. I've taken the liberty of relisting the FLC as it really seemed to miss out on any real attention. If I were you, I'd ask for some reviews from the folks at the various wikiprojects who may be interested. Thanks for your patience, and diligence, and good luck. The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Hey, I started the review for Rona-Frank. You have seven days, bladyblah. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 07:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Jason Rees has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
- BTW Ping me on IRC at some point when youve got a couple of hours to spare and ill help you forfill my concerns with the 2004-05 Aus timeline. I can also give you some pointers on how to get your GAN (Justin/Frank?) passed by Hink. Jason Rees ( talk) 06:23, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
So begins round two of the WikiCup! We now have eight pools, each with eight random contestants. This round will continue until the end of April, when the top two of each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers of those remaining, will make it to round three. Congratulations to
The Bushranger (
submissions) (first, with 487 points) and
Hurricanehink (
submissions) (second, with 459), who stormed the first round.
Casliber (
submissions) finished third with 223. Twelve others finished with over 100 points- well done to all of you! The final standings in round one can be seen
here. A mere 8 points were required to reach round two; competition will no doubt be much more fierce this round, so be ready for a challenge! A special thanks goes, again, to
Jarry1250 (
submissions) for dealing with all bot work. This year's bot, as well as running smoothly, is doing some very helpful things that last year's did not. Also, thanks to
Stone (
submissions) for some helpful behind-the-scenes updating and number crunching.
Some news for those who are interested- March will see a GAN backlog elimination drive, which you are still free to join. Organised by WikiProject Good articles, the drive aims to minimise the GAN backlog and offers prizes to those who help out. Of course, you may well be able to claim WikiCup points for the articles you review as part of the drive. Also ongoing is the Great Backlog Drive, looking to work on clearing all of the backlogs on Wikipedia; again, incentives are offered, and the spirit of friendly competition is alive, while helping the encyclopedia is the ultimate aim. Though unrelated to the WikiCup, these may well be of interest to some of you.
Just a reminder of the rules; if you have done significant work on content this year and it is promoted in this round, you may claim for it. Also, anything that was promoted after the end of round one but before the beginning of round two may be claimed for in round two. Details of the rules can be found on this page. For those interested in statistics, a running total of claims can be seen here, and a very interesting table of that information (along with the highest scorers in each category) can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
We are half way through round two of the WikiCup, which will end on 28 April. Of the 64 current contestants, 32 will make it through to the next round; the two highest in each pool, and the 16 next highest scorers. At the time of writing, our current overall leader is
Hurricanehink (
submissions) with 231 points, who leads Pool H.
Piotrus (
submissions) (Pool G) also has over 200 points, while 9 others (three of whom are in Pool D) have over 100 points. Remember that certain content (specifically, articles/portals included in at least 20 Wikipedias as of 31 December 2010 or articles which are considered "
vital") is worth double points if promoted to good or featured status, or if it appears on the main page in the Did You Know column. There were some articles last round which were eligible for double points, but which were not claimed for. For more details, see
Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring.
A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round three is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:51, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Round 2 of the
2011 WikiCup is over, and the new round will begin on 1 May. Note that any points scored in the interim (that is, for content promoted or reviews completed on 29-30 April) can be claimed in the next round, but please do not start updating your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. Fewer than a quarter of our original contestants remain; 32 enter round 3, and, in two months' time, only 16 will progress to our penultimate round.
Casliber (
submissions), who led Pool F, was our round champion, with 411 points, while 7 contestants scored between 200 and 300 points. At the other end of the scale, a score of 41 was high enough to reach round 3; more than five times the score required to reach round 2, and competition will no doubt become tighter now we're approaching the later rounds. Those progressing to round 3 were spread fairly evenly across the pools; 4 progressed from each of pools A, B, E and H, while 3 progressed from both pools C and F. Pools D and G were the most successful; each had 5 contestants advancing.
This round saw our first good topic points this year; congratulations to
Hurricanehink (
submissions) and
Nergaal (
submissions) who also led pool H and pool B respectively. However, there remain content types for which no points have yet been scored;
featured sounds,
featured portals and
featured topics. In addition to prizes for leaderboard positions, the WikiCup awards other prizes; for instance, last year, a prize was awarded to
Candlewicke (
submissions) (who has been eliminated) for his work on
In The News. For this reason, working on more unusual content could be even more rewarding than usual!
Sorry this newsletter is going out a little earlier than expected- there is a busy weekend coming up! A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 19:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
We're half way through round 3 of the
2011 WikiCup. There are currently 32 remaining in the competition, but only 16 will progress to our penultimate round.
Casliber (
submissions), of pool D, is our overall leader with nearly 200 points, while pools A, B and C are led by
Racepacket (
submissions),
Hurricanehink (
submissions) and
Canada Hky (
submissions) respectively. The score required to reach the next round is 35, though this will no doubt go up significantly as the round progresses. We have a good number of high scorers, but also a considerable number who are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. Also, an important note concerning nominations at
featured article candidates: if you are nominating content for which you intend to claim WikiCup points, please make this clear in the nomination statement so that the FAC director and his delegates are aware of the fact.
A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:21, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Ok, I will ask you for permission next time. Sorry. Y E Tropical Cyclone 16:04, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Can you redo the 95-96 SPAC seasonal track map and remove the extratropical cyclones from it. Thanks. Jason Rees ( talk) 23:00, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
We are half way through 2011, and entering the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; the semi-finals are upon us! Points scored in the interim (29/30 June) may be counted towards next round, but please do not update your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. 16 contestants remain, and all have shown dedication to the project to reach this far. Our round leader was
Casliber (
submissions) who, among other things, successfully passed three articles through featured article candidates and claimed an impressive 29 articles at Did You Know, scoring 555 points. Casliber led pool D. Pool A was led by
Wizardman (
submissions), claiming points for a featured article, a featured list and seven good article reviews, while pool C was led by
Eisfbnore (
submissions), who claimed for two good articles, ten articles at Did You Know and four good article reviews. They scored 154 and 118 respectively. Pool B was by far our most competitive pool; six of the eight competitors made it through to round 4, with all of them scoring over 100 points. The pool was led by
Hurricanehink (
submissions), who claimed for, among other things, three featured articles and five good articles. In addition to the four pool leaders, 12 others (the four second places, and the 8 next highest overall) make up our final 16. The lowest scorer who reached round 4 scored 76 points; a significant increase on the 41 needed to reach round 3. Eight of our semi-finalists scored at least twice as much as this.
No points were awarded this round for featured pictures, good topics or In the News, and no points have been awarded in the whole competition for featured topics, featured portals or featured sounds. Instead, the highest percentage of points has come from good articles. Featured articles, despite their high point cost, are low in number, and so, overall, share a comparable number of points with Did You Know, which are high in number but low in cost. A comparatively small but still considerable number of points come from featured lists and good article reviews, rounding out this round's overall scores.
We would again like to thank
Jarry1250 (
submissions) and
Stone (
submissions) for invaluable background work, as well as all of those helping to provide reviews for the articles listed on
Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please do keep using it, and please do help by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup.
Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here, for those interested, though it appears that neither are completely accurate at this time. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
We are half way through the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; there is less than a month to go before we have our final 8. Our pool leaders are
Adabow (
submissions) (Pool A, 189 points) and
PresN (
submissions) (Pool B, 165 points). The number of points required to reach the next round is not clear at this time; there are some users who still do not have any recorded points. Please remember to update your submissions' pages promptly. In addition, congratulations to PresN, who scored the first featured topic points in the competition for his work on
Thatgamecompany related articles. Most points this round generally have, so far, come from good articles, with only one featured article (
White-bellied Sea Eagle, from
Casliber (
submissions)) and two featured lists (
Hugo Award for Best Graphic Story, from PresN and
Grammy Award for Best Native American Music Album, from
Another Believer (
submissions)). Points for Did You Know and good article reviews round out the scoring. No points have been awarded for In the News, good topics or featured pictures this round, and no points for featured sounds or portals have been awarded in the entire competition. On an unrelated note, preparation will be beginning soon for next year's WikiCup- watch this space!
There is little else to be said beyond the usual. Please list anything you need reviewing on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, so others following the WikiCup can help, and please do help if you can by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup- points are, of course, offered for reviews at GAC. Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 11:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Eurovision is currently suffering from inactivity, despite having a large number of active users as project members. It is recommended that you add the project talk page to your watchlist if you have not already done so, since there are a number of proposals on this talk page which will significantly impact on the project that should be of interest to you.
You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision, please remove your username from this page.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 22:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC).
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2018 Pacific hurricane season. Since you had some involvement with the 2018 Pacific hurricane season redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer ( talk) 15:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Can you finish off dealing with the comments - ive started writing something for the lead here, but i am goning to be rather busy over the next few days with Phet. Ill be around on IRC if you need me though :) Jason Rees ( talk) 18:28, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. The Rambling Man ( talk) 17:10, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of
1989-90 South Pacific cyclone season at the
Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath
your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!
Yoninah (
talk) 20:53, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
If youre planning to do a timeline for the 88-89 SPAC TC season then you need to be aware that it was the first season that nadi monitored the area between 140W to 120W. Jason Rees ( talk) 01:58, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for creating an article for the upcoming Aus season, I hope you dont mind but i merged your version to the one i quickly created the other day. Which is in the correct place if ive missed something feel free to add it. Jason Rees ( talk) 23:38, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, The cite drop down menu doesn't appear on my edit toolbar. How do I get it to appear? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobby122 ( talk • contribs) 22:20, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Anhamirak, this edit effectively froze my nomination. Is this what you intended to do? Crum375 ( talk) 04:28, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
I believe it was a few days ago that you did a GA review of USAir_Flight_405. The author was concerned that you did not provide any feedback through the GA process to give guidance for further improvements so they requested a peer review to get some feedback. I reviewed the article and found a number of items that under the GA criteria I would not have passed (reconsider GA criteria sections 1.a and 2.a). You can see my comments here Wikipedia:Peer_review#USAir_Flight_405. The writer is already making the changes and I think the article will indeed be a GA. I just wanted you to reconsider giving an article GA status in the future when it may still need additional elements of improvement according to the GA criteria. Thanks for your contributions. § Music Sorter § ( talk) 15:09, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, is it possible for you to make an image of the tracks of all category 3 hurricanes? Just the ones that have reached category 3 status, but not the ones that have gone higher than a 3. Thank you, Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 17:22, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I have reached the step when you have to go to the tracks directory and compile it by running
./autogen.sh && make
Can you tell me how to do this step as I get an error in my tracks directory when cygwin starts to check whether I am cross compiling. Thank you, Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 23:19, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Since you are listed as active on Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Tracks, I wanted to let you know that I made Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Tracks/Requests so we can have a centralized track map requests place. Any help would be very appreciated. Titoxd( ?!? - cool stuff) 23:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Since you enjoy doing tracks so much: Can u do us a trackmap for Cyclone Namu (33P). Theres a problem that theirs no JTWC ATCF File so ive taken the track below from the Neumann files. Dr Charles Neumann in 2000 under a US Navy contract went through and analyzed the JTWC BT so the BT below should be fine to be used. If you do the track can you please chuck it in my sandbox for Namu. Jason Rees ( talk) 01:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
I dont have a track map generator. Anirudh Emani ( talk) 08:59, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Just as an FYI - i found some of the TCRs written up by Nadi for that season last night via the met office. Ive added the systems in to the timeline with generic statements for now as i may be able to go down to Exeter and get them. Jason Rees ( talk) 14:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | Just a happy Birthday message to you, Iune, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! |
-- Sweet xx Talk 09:31, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
![]() | The Wikipedia Birthday Committee wishes you a very happy birthday! Enjoy your special day. |
Armbrust Talk Contribs 13:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
Happy birthday. Jason Rees ( talk) 17:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
i didnt know that there was a log for it... so i kept on posting such things. Thank you for informing me.. Anirudh Emani ( talk) 12:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Me and CB were talking last night about the PTS tracking data page and we feel it would be better for everyone if we just did in the original format (ie not 360- XXXX). So instead of just copying MINDULLE's stuff across can u copy it all. Thanks. Jason Rees ( talk) 03:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Hope this helps - there are several JTWC files covering the period and it seems to have been relocated quite a bit on one occasion-- Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 17:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Original source: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc10/WPAC/96W.INVEST/trackfile.txt, recovered at: 2010-08-05 1845Z
Original source: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc10/WPAC/96W.INVEST/trackfile.txt, recovered at: 2010-08-05 0645Z
Original source: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc10/WPAC/96W.INVEST/trackfile.txt, recovered at: 2010-08-04 2245Z
Original source: http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc10/WPAC/96W.INVEST/trackfile.txt, recovered at: 2010-08-04 0645Z
Is there a possible way for you to come to the IRC whenever you can? I wanna discuss with you about the new infobox and the changes that could be made. I just thought it may be easier there instead of here since I have many questions and suggestions that would be way too much to say here. Darren 23 Edits| Mail 21:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Please make sure you logout of your old account and login to your new one so you don't get accused of sockpuppeting or mess up the transfer of your edits. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 19:14, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
I was talking to JR on the IRC about JMA TDs, and he said talk to you. So... I was thinking, the JMA TDs should be numbered by the invest number. If another depression occurs with the same invest number, just as is with multiple "Tropical Depression"s I guess Wikipedia numbers them for example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Pacific_typhoon_season#Tropical_Depression_7. You could add 2, 3, etc,. Syntheticalconnections ( talk)( my contribs) 22:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
are you really from Andhra Pradesh and can you really speak Telugu? Anirudh Emani ( talk) 06:10, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Ive tracked down most of the systems for 1998-99 using Gary's Summaries. i have currently got no clue about 24 & 25F. Maybe its an early example of Nadi shoving in systems but not warning on it like 12F this year which i am 99.9% sure was the CPAC-SPAC Crossover (90C) in Feb as the dates match. Jason Rees ( talk) 13:41, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Iune hid this message as it broke their talk page templates. — Iune (talk) 23:35, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
You did a track map the other day of the Australian warning centers AOR's. Where is it as i think i have the perfect place to put. Sorry forgot to sign. Jason Rees ( talk) 22:43, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Hey there Iune, thank you for your contributions. I am a
bot, alerting you that
non-free files are
not allowed in user or talk space. I
removed some files I found on
User:Iune/Countries/January 1. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your
user-space drafts or your
talk page.
Thank you, -- DASHBot ( talk) 05:01, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I was alerted to User:Iune/CycloneSeason/10 by User:Anikingos when I asked him about his. Please refer to WP:FAKEARTICLE. This is a by-the-book violation of that guideline, and I'd ask you request it be deleted. Alternatively, I can bring this to WP:MFD if you wish to seek broader community consensus. Regards, Strange Passerby ( talk • c • status) 15:34, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Number 32B, October 20, 2010
The Hurricane Herald
This is the monthly newsletter of WikiProject Tropical Cyclones. The Hurricane Herald aims to give a summary, both of the activities of the WikiProject and global tropical cyclone activity. If you wish to change how you receive this newsletter, or no longer wish to receive it, please add your username to the appropriate section on the mailing list. This newsletter covers all project related events of September 2010 and some events of October 2010
Please visit this page and bookmark any suggestions of interest to you. This will help improve monitoring of the WikiProject's articles.
Storm of the month
'
Typhoon Fanapi' is Storm of the Month
Early on September 14, the JMA reported that a tropical depression had formed east of Taiwan. The Joint Typhoon Warning Center soon designated the depression as 12W with PAGASA naming it Inday shortly thereafter. Later on the same day, the tropical depression was upgraded to a tropical storm and was officially given the name Fanapi by the JMA. On September 16, the storm further intensified into a severe tropical storm. That same day, the JMA further upgraded it into a typhoon. Fanapi turned west and intensified into a category 1 typhoon that night. On the following day, the storm further intensified into a category 2 typhoon. On September 18, the storm further intensified to a Category 3 typhoon and moved straight into Taiwan. It made landfall in Hualien County at 8:40 a.m. (10.40am AEST) on September 19, with winds of 162 kilometres (101 mi) and across the island at a speed of 20km/h. Shortly after its landfall, it moved south and again turned east and rapidly weakened into a Severe Tropical Storm. It had a Category 1 equivalent strength at that time. At 06:00 PM (Local time), the typhoon went back into the ocean. Post Storm Analysis proved that the system stayed on land for 9 hours approximately. The storm made its second landfall at Zhangpu County, Zhangzhou, Fujian province, China, at a Category 1 Typhoon intensity. The Storm caused a large scale damage to Taiwan. In the early hours of September 21, Fanapi weakened into a tropical depression over Guangdong province, China. On Septemner 22, Fanapi dissipated completely.
Other tropical cyclone activity
New members
Articles Requiring Help
Main and Important Articles
Member of the month
Jason Rees is the member of the month - October 2010
To do
Storm article statistics
Tropical cyclone articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | Other | ??? | Total | |
![]() |
6 | 12 | 64 | 66 | 148 | ||
![]() |
1 | 1 | 9 | 16 | 27 | ||
![]() |
8 | 22 | 126 | 259 | 415 | ||
B | 3 | 6 | 21 | 23 | 53 | ||
C | 5 | 23 | 87 | 97 | 212 | ||
Start | 5 | 58 | 232 | 239 | 4 | 538 | |
Stub | 1 | 17 | 94 | 59 | 171 | ||
Current | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 | |||
Future | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Category | 524 | 1 | 525 | ||||
Disambig | 7 | 581 | 588 | ||||
Template | 167 | 1 | 168 | ||||
Assessed | 29 | 141 | 637 | 770 | 1,294 | 27 | 2,898 |
Unassessed | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
Total | 29 | 141 | 637 | 771 | 1,294 | 29 | 2,901 |
Project News
-- Anirudh Emani ( talk) 10:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Current storms excluded
05/15/2010 M=10 0 SNBR=0000 LAILA XING=0 05/15L 63 932 15 1010L 64 929 15 1010L 66 924 15 1010L 68 919 15 1010* 05/16L 71 913 15 1010L 81 906 15 1010L 91 901 15 1010L 99 896 15 1009* 05/17L106 890 20 1007*111 885 25 1004*115 878 30 1000*116 870 35 996* 05/18*119 859 35 996*124 846 40 993*130 834 50 985*132 827 55 982* 05/19*134 819 65 974*137 815 65 974*140 814 65 974*145 812 60 978* 05/20*150 808 60 978*154 806 50 985*155 806 50 985*158 805 60 978* 05/21*164 807 50 985*168 810 40 993*171 814 35 996*172 819 35 996* 05/22*171 824 30 1000*176 832 30 1000*185 840 30 1000*189 842 30 1000* 05/23*191 844 30 1000*193 849 30 1000*193 854 30 1000*193 861 25 1004* 05/24*193 873 25 1004*192 888 25 1004*191 903 25 1004*188 918 25 1004* HR 05/17/2010 M= 7 0 SNBR=0000 BANDU XING=0 05/17* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0L 92 576 20 1007* 05/18* 96 571 25 1004*101 564 25 1004*104 558 25 1004*107 551 25 1002* 05/19*110 545 30 1000*111 540 30 1000*113 535 35 996*115 530 35 996* 05/20*119 527 40 993*121 526 40 993*123 525 45 989*124 523 45 989* 05/21*125 521 40 993*126 520 55 982*126 519 55 982*126 517 50 985* 05/22*126 515 45 989*126 513 40 993*126 511 35 996*126 507 30 1000* 05/23*125 501 25 1004*123 495 25 1004* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* TS 05/30/2010 M= 9 0 SNBR=0000 PHET XING=0 05/30L144 658 15 1010L144 654 15 1010L144 650 15 1010L145 647 20 1005* 05/31*146 645 25 1004*147 643 30 1001*150 639 30 1000*154 635 35 996* 06/01*158 632 40 993*162 628 55 982*168 623 60 978*171 615 75 967* 06/02*174 610 90 956*178 605 110 941*182 600 125 929*184 598 120 933* 06/03*186 596 115 937*191 595 115 937*200 595 105 944*208 592 105 944* 06/04*215 592 90 956*223 592 75 967*230 594 65 974*236 597 55 982* 06/05*239 603 45 989*238 610 40 993*235 616 40 993*232 624 40 993* 06/06*229 641 40 993*235 657 35 996*246 673 30 1000*249 682 30 1000* 06/07*267 711 30 1000* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* HR 10/05/2010 M= 4 0 SNBR=0000 BOB02 XING=0 10/05* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0* 0 0 0 0L141 872 15 1010* 10/06L144 869 15 1010L147 866 15 1010L154 863 15 1010L160 861 15 1010* 10/07L170 860 15 1010L181 860 15 1010L193 860 15 1010L205 868 20 1007* 10/08*215 882 25 1000*228 898 25 1000*236 912 25 1001*237 917 25 1004* TD 10/13/2010 M= 3 0 SNBR=0000 BOB03 XING=0 10/13* 0 0 0 0*162 901 25 1004*162 897 25 1001*163 894 25 1003* 10/14*164 891 25 1004*165 888 30 1000*167 884 30 1000*174 876 30 1000* 10/15*181 868 30 1000*185 859 30 1000*188 850 30 1000* 0 0 0 0* TD
-- Keith Edkins ( Talk ) 09:26, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
When do you plan to test the current infobox you were working on in SHEM? Darren 23 Edits| Mail 03:05, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Sorry but i was rather tired last night and headed off earlier than i usually do, Im around now and i should be around this evening though. Jason Rees ( talk) 16:34, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I've been revamping this article over the past two days and I think it's ready for FLC. You contributed to the revamping too (with more edits than I made, albeit over a year ago); do you want credit too? -- Dylan620 ( t • c) 17:02, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Dylan620 has eaten your {{
cookie}}! The cookie made them
happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{
cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{ subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{ subst:munch}}!
thankz very much for the track of the storm.. :) .. HunterZone ( talk) 17:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. Fun Pika 21:08, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
Wait until the advisory comes out before updating the pages, just in case. The system is still technically west of the International Dateline and out of CPHC's hands. Thegreatdr ( talk) 19:06, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
[1] - I just wanted to say, I love the new image in that article! Great find. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 23:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello, happy new year and welcome to the 2011 WikiCup! Your submissions' page can be found here and instructions of how to update the page can be found here and on the submissions' page itself. From the submissions' page, a bot will update the main scoresheet. Our rules have been very slightly updated from last year; the full rules can be found here. Please remember that you can only receive points for content on which you have done significant work in 2011; nominations of work from last year and "drive-by" nominations will not be awarded points. Signups are going to remain open through January, so if you know of anyone who would like to take part, please direct them to Wikipedia:WikiCup/2011 signups. The judges can be contacted on the WikiCup talk page, on their respective talk pages, or by email. Other than that, we will be in contact at the end of every month with the newsletter. If you want to stop or start receiving newsletters, please remove your name from or add your name to this list. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 12:55, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Come (back) onto IRC at some point bar Wednesday and ill tell ya what i think. Jason Rees ( talk) 01:47, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Yep, that's fine; there's clearly been significant work on the article by you this year. J Milburn ( talk) 23:04, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Dylan620 (
t •
c •
r) has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the
WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!
Cheers! -- Dylan620 ( t • c • r) 18:17, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed your activity as a Good Article reviewer, and wanted to let you know about the Wikipedia Ambassador Program, and specifically the role of Online Ambassador. We're looking for friendly Wikipedians who are good at reviewing articles and giving feedback to serve as mentors for students who are assigned to write for Wikipedia in their classes.
If you're interested, I encourage you to take a look at the Online Ambassador guidelines; the "mentorship process" describes roughly what will be expected of mentors in the coming term. If that's something you want to do, please apply!
You can find instructions for applying at WP:ONLINE. The main things we're looking for in Online Ambassadors are friendliness, regular activity (since mentorship is a commitment that spans several months), and the ability to give detailed, substantive feedback on articles (both short new articles, and longer, more mature ones).
I hope to hear from you soon.-- Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation ( talk) 20:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. Signups are now closed, and we have 129 listed competitors, 64 of whom will make it to round two. Congratulations to
The Bushranger (
submissions), who, at the time of writing, has a comfortable lead with 228 points, followed by
Hurricanehink (
submissions), with 144 points. Four others have over 100 points. Congratulations also go to
Yellow Evan (
submissions), who scored the first points in the competition, claiming for
Talk:Hurricane King/GA1,
Miyagawa (
submissions), who scored the first non-review points in the competition, claiming for
Dognapping, and
Jarry1250 (
submissions) who was the first in the competition to use our new "multiplier" mechanic (
explanation), claiming for
Grigory Potemkin, a subject covered on numerous Wikipedias. Thanks must also go to Jarry1250 for dealing with all bot work- without you, the competition wouldn't be happening!
A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round two is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 22:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello Iune. I've taken the liberty of relisting the FLC as it really seemed to miss out on any real attention. If I were you, I'd ask for some reviews from the folks at the various wikiprojects who may be interested. Thanks for your patience, and diligence, and good luck. The Rambling Man ( talk) 18:17, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Hey, I started the review for Rona-Frank. You have seven days, bladyblah. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk) 07:34, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
Jason Rees has given you a c ookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{ subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{ subst:munch}}!
- BTW Ping me on IRC at some point when youve got a couple of hours to spare and ill help you forfill my concerns with the 2004-05 Aus timeline. I can also give you some pointers on how to get your GAN (Justin/Frank?) passed by Hink. Jason Rees ( talk) 06:23, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
So begins round two of the WikiCup! We now have eight pools, each with eight random contestants. This round will continue until the end of April, when the top two of each pool, as well as the next 16 highest scorers of those remaining, will make it to round three. Congratulations to
The Bushranger (
submissions) (first, with 487 points) and
Hurricanehink (
submissions) (second, with 459), who stormed the first round.
Casliber (
submissions) finished third with 223. Twelve others finished with over 100 points- well done to all of you! The final standings in round one can be seen
here. A mere 8 points were required to reach round two; competition will no doubt be much more fierce this round, so be ready for a challenge! A special thanks goes, again, to
Jarry1250 (
submissions) for dealing with all bot work. This year's bot, as well as running smoothly, is doing some very helpful things that last year's did not. Also, thanks to
Stone (
submissions) for some helpful behind-the-scenes updating and number crunching.
Some news for those who are interested- March will see a GAN backlog elimination drive, which you are still free to join. Organised by WikiProject Good articles, the drive aims to minimise the GAN backlog and offers prizes to those who help out. Of course, you may well be able to claim WikiCup points for the articles you review as part of the drive. Also ongoing is the Great Backlog Drive, looking to work on clearing all of the backlogs on Wikipedia; again, incentives are offered, and the spirit of friendly competition is alive, while helping the encyclopedia is the ultimate aim. Though unrelated to the WikiCup, these may well be of interest to some of you.
Just a reminder of the rules; if you have done significant work on content this year and it is promoted in this round, you may claim for it. Also, anything that was promoted after the end of round one but before the beginning of round two may be claimed for in round two. Details of the rules can be found on this page. For those interested in statistics, a running total of claims can be seen here, and a very interesting table of that information (along with the highest scorers in each category) can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:35, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
We are half way through round two of the WikiCup, which will end on 28 April. Of the 64 current contestants, 32 will make it through to the next round; the two highest in each pool, and the 16 next highest scorers. At the time of writing, our current overall leader is
Hurricanehink (
submissions) with 231 points, who leads Pool H.
Piotrus (
submissions) (Pool G) also has over 200 points, while 9 others (three of whom are in Pool D) have over 100 points. Remember that certain content (specifically, articles/portals included in at least 20 Wikipedias as of 31 December 2010 or articles which are considered "
vital") is worth double points if promoted to good or featured status, or if it appears on the main page in the Did You Know column. There were some articles last round which were eligible for double points, but which were not claimed for. For more details, see
Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring.
A running total of claims can be seen here. However, numerous competitors are yet to score at all- please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. The number of points that will be needed to reach round three is not clear- everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 00:51, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Round 2 of the
2011 WikiCup is over, and the new round will begin on 1 May. Note that any points scored in the interim (that is, for content promoted or reviews completed on 29-30 April) can be claimed in the next round, but please do not start updating your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. Fewer than a quarter of our original contestants remain; 32 enter round 3, and, in two months' time, only 16 will progress to our penultimate round.
Casliber (
submissions), who led Pool F, was our round champion, with 411 points, while 7 contestants scored between 200 and 300 points. At the other end of the scale, a score of 41 was high enough to reach round 3; more than five times the score required to reach round 2, and competition will no doubt become tighter now we're approaching the later rounds. Those progressing to round 3 were spread fairly evenly across the pools; 4 progressed from each of pools A, B, E and H, while 3 progressed from both pools C and F. Pools D and G were the most successful; each had 5 contestants advancing.
This round saw our first good topic points this year; congratulations to
Hurricanehink (
submissions) and
Nergaal (
submissions) who also led pool H and pool B respectively. However, there remain content types for which no points have yet been scored;
featured sounds,
featured portals and
featured topics. In addition to prizes for leaderboard positions, the WikiCup awards other prizes; for instance, last year, a prize was awarded to
Candlewicke (
submissions) (who has been eliminated) for his work on
In The News. For this reason, working on more unusual content could be even more rewarding than usual!
Sorry this newsletter is going out a little earlier than expected- there is a busy weekend coming up! A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 19:06, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
We're half way through round 3 of the
2011 WikiCup. There are currently 32 remaining in the competition, but only 16 will progress to our penultimate round.
Casliber (
submissions), of pool D, is our overall leader with nearly 200 points, while pools A, B and C are led by
Racepacket (
submissions),
Hurricanehink (
submissions) and
Canada Hky (
submissions) respectively. The score required to reach the next round is 35, though this will no doubt go up significantly as the round progresses. We have a good number of high scorers, but also a considerable number who are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. Also, an important note concerning nominations at
featured article candidates: if you are nominating content for which you intend to claim WikiCup points, please make this clear in the nomination statement so that the FAC director and his delegates are aware of the fact.
A running total of claims can be seen here. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:21, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
Ok, I will ask you for permission next time. Sorry. Y E Tropical Cyclone 16:04, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
Can you redo the 95-96 SPAC seasonal track map and remove the extratropical cyclones from it. Thanks. Jason Rees ( talk) 23:00, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
We are half way through 2011, and entering the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; the semi-finals are upon us! Points scored in the interim (29/30 June) may be counted towards next round, but please do not update your submissions' pages until the next round has begun. 16 contestants remain, and all have shown dedication to the project to reach this far. Our round leader was
Casliber (
submissions) who, among other things, successfully passed three articles through featured article candidates and claimed an impressive 29 articles at Did You Know, scoring 555 points. Casliber led pool D. Pool A was led by
Wizardman (
submissions), claiming points for a featured article, a featured list and seven good article reviews, while pool C was led by
Eisfbnore (
submissions), who claimed for two good articles, ten articles at Did You Know and four good article reviews. They scored 154 and 118 respectively. Pool B was by far our most competitive pool; six of the eight competitors made it through to round 4, with all of them scoring over 100 points. The pool was led by
Hurricanehink (
submissions), who claimed for, among other things, three featured articles and five good articles. In addition to the four pool leaders, 12 others (the four second places, and the 8 next highest overall) make up our final 16. The lowest scorer who reached round 4 scored 76 points; a significant increase on the 41 needed to reach round 3. Eight of our semi-finalists scored at least twice as much as this.
No points were awarded this round for featured pictures, good topics or In the News, and no points have been awarded in the whole competition for featured topics, featured portals or featured sounds. Instead, the highest percentage of points has come from good articles. Featured articles, despite their high point cost, are low in number, and so, overall, share a comparable number of points with Did You Know, which are high in number but low in cost. A comparatively small but still considerable number of points come from featured lists and good article reviews, rounding out this round's overall scores.
We would again like to thank
Jarry1250 (
submissions) and
Stone (
submissions) for invaluable background work, as well as all of those helping to provide reviews for the articles listed on
Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please do keep using it, and please do help by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup.
Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here, for those interested, though it appears that neither are completely accurate at this time. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 23:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
We are half way through the penultimate round of this year's WikiCup; there is less than a month to go before we have our final 8. Our pool leaders are
Adabow (
submissions) (Pool A, 189 points) and
PresN (
submissions) (Pool B, 165 points). The number of points required to reach the next round is not clear at this time; there are some users who still do not have any recorded points. Please remember to update your submissions' pages promptly. In addition, congratulations to PresN, who scored the first featured topic points in the competition for his work on
Thatgamecompany related articles. Most points this round generally have, so far, come from good articles, with only one featured article (
White-bellied Sea Eagle, from
Casliber (
submissions)) and two featured lists (
Hugo Award for Best Graphic Story, from PresN and
Grammy Award for Best Native American Music Album, from
Another Believer (
submissions)). Points for Did You Know and good article reviews round out the scoring. No points have been awarded for In the News, good topics or featured pictures this round, and no points for featured sounds or portals have been awarded in the entire competition. On an unrelated note, preparation will be beginning soon for next year's WikiCup- watch this space!
There is little else to be said beyond the usual. Please list anything you need reviewing on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, so others following the WikiCup can help, and please do help if you can by providing reviews for the articles listed there. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews generally at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup- points are, of course, offered for reviews at GAC. Two final notes: Firstly, please remember to state your participation in the WikiCup when nominating articles at FAC. Finally, some WikiCup-related statistics can be seen here and here. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn and The ed17 11:21, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Eurovision is currently suffering from inactivity, despite having a large number of active users as project members. It is recommended that you add the project talk page to your watchlist if you have not already done so, since there are a number of proposals on this talk page which will significantly impact on the project that should be of interest to you.
You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision, please remove your username from this page.
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Eurovision at 22:37, 3 August 2011 (UTC).
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |