Hello, Isabellebrant, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
Hello, I'm Kleuske. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Advocacy have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Kleuske ( talk) 12:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, but this is not promotional material. Think that if this would be promotional, then half of the items in the same lists should be deleted. Isabellebrant ( talk) 13:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Outline of public affairs. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Kleuske ( talk) 12:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interest Groups & Advocacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interest Groups & Advocacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 331dot ( talk) 13:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, but I am a few hours on wikipedia. I add an article on a subject on which I have some (well, a lot of) expertise and, sorry for the harsh words, I get immediately the message that the stuff I post will be considered for deletion (although there is no commercial or political interest whatsoever and although I see nothing offensive). What a welcome! I think that I will cancel my account soon... Isabellebrant ( talk) 13:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Isabellebrant. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Interest Groups & Advocacy, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 331dot ( talk) 13:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
It is scarcely ever acceptable to post content copied from elsewhere to Wikipedia, as you did at Interest Groups & Advocacy, as doing so is almost always a copyright infringement. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 14:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Isabellebrant, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
Hello, I'm Kleuske. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Advocacy have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Kleuske ( talk) 12:30, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, but this is not promotional material. Think that if this would be promotional, then half of the items in the same lists should be deleted. Isabellebrant ( talk) 13:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Outline of public affairs. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Kleuske ( talk) 12:32, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Interest Groups & Advocacy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Interest Groups & Advocacy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 331dot ( talk) 13:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, but I am a few hours on wikipedia. I add an article on a subject on which I have some (well, a lot of) expertise and, sorry for the harsh words, I get immediately the message that the stuff I post will be considered for deletion (although there is no commercial or political interest whatsoever and although I see nothing offensive). What a welcome! I think that I will cancel my account soon... Isabellebrant ( talk) 13:57, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Isabellebrant. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Interest Groups & Advocacy, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 331dot ( talk) 13:18, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
It is scarcely ever acceptable to post content copied from elsewhere to Wikipedia, as you did at Interest Groups & Advocacy, as doing so is almost always a copyright infringement. The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 14:07, 14 October 2016 (UTC)