Hi. "East Cork" and "West Cork" have no statutory definition in the context in which you are using them. Please stop lobbing them into every town/village article that is either vaguely east or west of Cork city.
Also, if you want to continue editing, for the 100th time, please make a case for an unblock of your exiting user. Continually creating new users (to circumvent blocks) is totally inappropriate and will likely result in a perma-ban. Guliolopez ( talk) 10:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
If you want to assist the project, and feel you can do so within project norms, then please work on something "new". Ideally in a sandbox environment or similar. Instead of persistently disrupting dozens of other/existing articles. And please do so from your original account. Guliolopez ( talk) 10:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! IrishJ123,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
David.moreno72
11:10, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
|
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
19:45, 12 October 2017 (UTC)IrishJ123 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Why exactly am I blocked for?
Decline reason:
It literally tells you why you were blocked right above this unblock request. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 19:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi. Yet again, when afforded even a small amount of leeway, you use it in a way that is not helpful to your own interests. Or the interests of the project. You *cannot* copy and paste content from copyrighted sources - a guideline that you (and your umpteen socks) have been advised of many times. As per the previous notices on this guideline, unlike some policies (like perhaps our etiquette guidelines) it is one of a number of Wikipedia policies which have legal considerations. As has been mentioned many times before, your continued persistence in contra-policy editing is not helpful to the project. You have previously stated that your goal is to help the project. Please do so by finding something else to do with your time. Outside of Wikipedia. Thanks. Guliolopez ( talk) 19:56, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi. "East Cork" and "West Cork" have no statutory definition in the context in which you are using them. Please stop lobbing them into every town/village article that is either vaguely east or west of Cork city.
Also, if you want to continue editing, for the 100th time, please make a case for an unblock of your exiting user. Continually creating new users (to circumvent blocks) is totally inappropriate and will likely result in a perma-ban. Guliolopez ( talk) 10:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
If you want to assist the project, and feel you can do so within project norms, then please work on something "new". Ideally in a sandbox environment or similar. Instead of persistently disrupting dozens of other/existing articles. And please do so from your original account. Guliolopez ( talk) 10:43, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello! IrishJ123,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
David.moreno72
11:10, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
|
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
19:45, 12 October 2017 (UTC)IrishJ123 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Why exactly am I blocked for?
Decline reason:
It literally tells you why you were blocked right above this unblock request. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla ( talk) 19:54, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi. Yet again, when afforded even a small amount of leeway, you use it in a way that is not helpful to your own interests. Or the interests of the project. You *cannot* copy and paste content from copyrighted sources - a guideline that you (and your umpteen socks) have been advised of many times. As per the previous notices on this guideline, unlike some policies (like perhaps our etiquette guidelines) it is one of a number of Wikipedia policies which have legal considerations. As has been mentioned many times before, your continued persistence in contra-policy editing is not helpful to the project. You have previously stated that your goal is to help the project. Please do so by finding something else to do with your time. Outside of Wikipedia. Thanks. Guliolopez ( talk) 19:56, 12 October 2017 (UTC)