![]() |
Hi Internet Informant! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to
Inception, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's
categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's
verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. --
DonIago (
talk)
06:34, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Alex Jones (radio host) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 03:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ian.thomson ( talk) 03:41, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
How do you justify this version which changed Trump to "Drumpf"? Doug Weller talk 13:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Internet Informant. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
My Hero Academia, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. As with all other article content, categories are subject to
WP:Verifiability and must be sourced. Since you added a series of categories that were not source, several of which are rather preposterous, I have reverted them. —
Farix (
t |
c)
10:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Avengers: Infinity War— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
Shellwood (
talk)
13:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to
Star Trek, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's
categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's
verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you.
DonIago (
talk)
16:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Star Trek. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please review the guidelines for adding categories. They must clearly be supported by the article's verifiable content. "The show is set in space" doesn't automatically mean it's a space opera. It should be easy enough to add content to the article establishing that it is thought of as such prior to adding the category. DonIago ( talk) 20:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Contact (1997 American film). Please stop adding categories that are unsupported by the article's verifiable content immediately. Nowhere in this article does the phrase "hard science fiction" appear, which to me makes it clear that you're simply expressing your opinion.
DonIago (
talk)
15:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I came here to say the same thing about this edit, which asserts a genre for a film not mentioned or sourced in the article. This violates WP:DEFINING and WP:NOR. I don't believe this is the first time I've noticed you doing this, and you're receiving a lot of warnings about this, and you seem to be unresponsive about the concerns. If you have questions, ask them, but if you do this anymore, you're going to receive a short block from editing. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:22, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Sorry if I’ve upset anyone here. I’ll refrain from such outlandish editing in the future. I’m just citing what’s already been mentioned on other Wikipedia pages with reputable sources. I’m not bias. I’ll continue editing, but only minimal, grammatical ones in articles I come across. I understand your concerns and I want to keep Wikipedia the neutral accurate crowd-sourced encyclopaedia people come back to again and again.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Internet Informant ( talk • contribs)
As mentioned above many times pleas stop with the categories. It is becoming increasingly obvious that you don’t know how to use categories on Wikipedia. If you continue to add inappropriate categories to articles you will be A) blocked and B) prohibited from editing categories. Canterbury Tail talk 08:27, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. {{
unblock|reason=Unintentional violation of editing categories; only meant to build upon solely pre-existing sources in articles I contributed to and nothing more. I believe I’m being targeted here. I’ll add extra citation with every change I make from now on if that will suffice. I never mean to bend contexts on things I write or contribute to.}}
2:05, 21 May, 2018. (UTC)
I can't believe, after all the instructions, warnings, and blocks, that you would go and make this edit. This makes zero sense. It is a film, not a meme. Your continued bad judgement regarding categories is very disruptive. You are blocked for 2 weeks. When it expires, I recommend staying away from categories altogether, as you clearly do not understand the basics of how they work (like WP:DEFINING.) Sergecross73 msg me 16:03, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Internet Informant ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #22115 was submitted on Jul 18, 2018 16:55:42. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 16:55, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
"Must Play" is not a consensus or qualitative summary given by Metacritic, we only include the consensus/qualitative summary as per manual of style. Also, we tend to keep scores out of the prose. TheDeviantPro ( talk) 04:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Internet Informant. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blake's 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gareth Thomas ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Did you mean to put this edit in the old section? There's a current discussion going on about a potential move in the bottom section. Argento Surfer ( talk) 12:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Yes. Thank you for the reminder. Anyway I believe the article is separate to the copyright problems of the subject. The title should be written as 'Captain Marvel (DC Comics)/Shazam!' I truly believe it's that simple a change and respects the old and present history of the character. Internet Informant ( talk) 14:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Palpatine was inappropriate. That article is about a fictional character, so it cannot be added to Category:Internet memes since that article is not about an Internet meme. I see you have been repeatedly warned and blocked in the past for doing exactly this. Please stop, or it is likely you will be blocked again. Railfan23 ( talk) 03:51, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for
prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Internet Informant. Thank you.
JOE
BRO
64
19:51, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Regarding this, it's a no, per WP:Reliable sources and WP:MEDRS. If you want to change the rules on these matters, I suggest you go to those guideline talk pages and propose that. Otherwise, I will take this matter to the WP:Reliable sources noticeboard and/or bring WP:Med into it. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 13:02, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Category:Members of the Motion Picture Association has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 00:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CastJared. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
The Last of Us (TV series), but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
CastJared (
talk)
21:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
this link explains the situation with bugs bunny https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enRM2TifKls Bringeroflies ( talk) 23:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi Internet Informant! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to
Inception, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's
categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's
verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. --
DonIago (
talk)
06:34, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Alex Jones (radio host) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 03:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ian.thomson ( talk) 03:41, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
How do you justify this version which changed Trump to "Drumpf"? Doug Weller talk 13:13, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Internet Informant. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
My Hero Academia, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. As with all other article content, categories are subject to
WP:Verifiability and must be sourced. Since you added a series of categories that were not source, several of which are rather preposterous, I have reverted them. —
Farix (
t |
c)
10:27, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of
your recent contributions —specifically
this edit to
Avengers: Infinity War— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the
Help Desk. Thanks.
Shellwood (
talk)
13:33, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to
Star Trek, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's
categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's
verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you.
DonIago (
talk)
16:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Star Trek. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please review the guidelines for adding categories. They must clearly be supported by the article's verifiable content. "The show is set in space" doesn't automatically mean it's a space opera. It should be easy enough to add content to the article establishing that it is thought of as such prior to adding the category. DonIago ( talk) 20:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you
disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at
Contact (1997 American film). Please stop adding categories that are unsupported by the article's verifiable content immediately. Nowhere in this article does the phrase "hard science fiction" appear, which to me makes it clear that you're simply expressing your opinion.
DonIago (
talk)
15:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Yes, I came here to say the same thing about this edit, which asserts a genre for a film not mentioned or sourced in the article. This violates WP:DEFINING and WP:NOR. I don't believe this is the first time I've noticed you doing this, and you're receiving a lot of warnings about this, and you seem to be unresponsive about the concerns. If you have questions, ask them, but if you do this anymore, you're going to receive a short block from editing. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:22, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Sorry if I’ve upset anyone here. I’ll refrain from such outlandish editing in the future. I’m just citing what’s already been mentioned on other Wikipedia pages with reputable sources. I’m not bias. I’ll continue editing, but only minimal, grammatical ones in articles I come across. I understand your concerns and I want to keep Wikipedia the neutral accurate crowd-sourced encyclopaedia people come back to again and again.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Internet Informant ( talk • contribs)
As mentioned above many times pleas stop with the categories. It is becoming increasingly obvious that you don’t know how to use categories on Wikipedia. If you continue to add inappropriate categories to articles you will be A) blocked and B) prohibited from editing categories. Canterbury Tail talk 08:27, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. {{
unblock|reason=Unintentional violation of editing categories; only meant to build upon solely pre-existing sources in articles I contributed to and nothing more. I believe I’m being targeted here. I’ll add extra citation with every change I make from now on if that will suffice. I never mean to bend contexts on things I write or contribute to.}}
2:05, 21 May, 2018. (UTC)
I can't believe, after all the instructions, warnings, and blocks, that you would go and make this edit. This makes zero sense. It is a film, not a meme. Your continued bad judgement regarding categories is very disruptive. You are blocked for 2 weeks. When it expires, I recommend staying away from categories altogether, as you clearly do not understand the basics of how they work (like WP:DEFINING.) Sergecross73 msg me 16:03, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Internet Informant ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #22115 was submitted on Jul 18, 2018 16:55:42. This review is now closed.
-- UTRSBot ( talk) 16:55, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
"Must Play" is not a consensus or qualitative summary given by Metacritic, we only include the consensus/qualitative summary as per manual of style. Also, we tend to keep scores out of the prose. TheDeviantPro ( talk) 04:22, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Internet Informant. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blake's 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gareth Thomas ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Did you mean to put this edit in the old section? There's a current discussion going on about a potential move in the bottom section. Argento Surfer ( talk) 12:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Yes. Thank you for the reminder. Anyway I believe the article is separate to the copyright problems of the subject. The title should be written as 'Captain Marvel (DC Comics)/Shazam!' I truly believe it's that simple a change and respects the old and present history of the character. Internet Informant ( talk) 14:50, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Palpatine was inappropriate. That article is about a fictional character, so it cannot be added to Category:Internet memes since that article is not about an Internet meme. I see you have been repeatedly warned and blocked in the past for doing exactly this. Please stop, or it is likely you will be blocked again. Railfan23 ( talk) 03:51, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
You are suspected of
sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for
prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the
guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at
Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Internet Informant. Thank you.
JOE
BRO
64
19:51, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
Regarding this, it's a no, per WP:Reliable sources and WP:MEDRS. If you want to change the rules on these matters, I suggest you go to those guideline talk pages and propose that. Otherwise, I will take this matter to the WP:Reliable sources noticeboard and/or bring WP:Med into it. Flyer22 Reborn ( talk) 13:02, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
Category:Members of the Motion Picture Association has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect ( talk) 00:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
CastJared. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
The Last of Us (TV series), but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
CastJared (
talk)
21:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
this link explains the situation with bugs bunny https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enRM2TifKls Bringeroflies ( talk) 23:14, 24 April 2024 (UTC)