![]() |
Daily pageviews of User:InternetScavenger89
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This is InternetScavenger89's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. Their input is welcome, and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
|
Hi i am -- InternetScavenger 89 and i love wikipedia. Welcome to my talk page!
Emergency user slap button
Editors: Use this button if the user is malfunctioning. (
direct link)
Editors can a malfunctioning user to the
village stocks.
Please only use this button if i have made a silly mistake, if i have made a worse mistake, contact my talk page!
![]() | This user is a recent changes patroller. |
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for adding images, references, and more to articles! The Tips of Apmh ( talk) 21:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC) |
YESSS MY FIRST BARNSTAR! -- InternetScavenger 89
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|
12 |
![]() |
Cuisine of the Ionian Islands ( talk) | Add sources |
130 |
![]() |
Lamian ( talk) | Add sources |
1,091 |
![]() |
Cooking ( talk) | Add sources |
38 |
![]() |
Cretan cuisine ( talk) | Add sources |
63 |
![]() |
Weston A. Price Foundation ( talk) | Add sources |
826 |
![]() |
Lard ( talk) | Add sources |
746 |
![]() |
Spätzle ( talk) | Cleanup |
235 |
![]() |
Cat food ( talk) | Cleanup |
277 |
![]() |
Milk and meat in Jewish law ( talk) | Cleanup |
47 |
![]() |
Canarian cuisine ( talk) | Expand |
5 |
![]() |
Index of sociology of food articles ( talk) | Expand |
20 |
![]() |
Balearic cuisine ( talk) | Expand |
488 |
![]() |
Russian cuisine ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
1,363 |
![]() |
Vegetarianism ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
260 |
![]() |
Textured vegetable protein ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
39 |
![]() |
Kubbeh ( talk) | Merge |
52 |
![]() |
Brik ( talk) | Merge |
42 |
![]() |
Viewshed ( talk) | Merge |
33 |
![]() |
Hōtō ( talk) | Wikify |
128 |
![]() |
Gene bank ( talk) | Wikify |
2,447 |
![]() |
Veganism ( talk) | Wikify |
21 |
![]() |
Soul food health trends ( talk) | Orphan |
11 |
![]() |
Food labelling in Canada ( talk) | Orphan |
2 |
![]() |
Blikkiesdorp Project ( talk) | Orphan |
202 |
![]() |
Semantic Scholar ( talk) | Stub |
43 |
![]() |
Farfel ( talk) | Stub |
65 |
![]() |
TAP Sports ( talk) | Stub |
13 |
![]() |
Maki mi ( talk) | Stub |
65 |
![]() |
Czernina ( talk) | Stub |
112 |
![]() |
Clément Novalak ( talk) | Stub |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 05:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
~~~~
it'll sign with that signature along with a timestamp. ―
Blaze The Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
17:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Howdy. You seem to be having trouble signing your posts. It's 4 tildes that are used. GoodDay ( talk) 17:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-- InternetScavenger 89 19:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Not meaning to sound rude/harsh but I would say you've mostly made indecent edits, however you have made a few good edits. Since you appear to be interesting in antivandal work I suggest reading WP:VANDAL and possibly seeing if anyone available at WP:CVUA would be willing to assist you. ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:33, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi InternetScavenger89,
I noticed you've been welcoming some new users recently, which is kind. However, the template you are using starts with "Thank you for your contributions". A couple of users you welcomed had already received warnings for vandalism (Users Badussias420, Has been blacklisted1) and one (EmSolaris) hasn't made any edits yet. It's a good idea to check the user's contributions first to make sure the message you're using is appropriate. If you're using the Twinkle tool there are a number of different welcome templates, including ones to use if their edits are unconstructive/tests or outright vandalism.
Kind regards, Princess Persnickety (talk) 21:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC) :)
Re "I am so sorry, i didn't mean to get anyone blocked": It's not your fault! The IP editor themselves was being disruptive and refusing to abide by our rules, so banning them was the only option and determined upon by several other editors. You did the right thing by reporting it. Panini! 🥪 13:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Your replies on various noticeboard threads are not constructive. Work on building the encyclopedia until you have a reasonable amount of experience before trying to get involved in governance and disputes. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi InternetScavenger89, regarding your edits here, did you intend to request a copy-edit (c/e) of Brasserie Ellezelloise or to inform us you have partially copy-edited it? If it's the former, can you please clarify the request and remove the "{{ partly done}}" template? The article doesn't seem promotional to me and doesn't appear to need a copy-edit. If it's the latter, this is not the purpose of the page and only copy-editors who've worked on a request but would like another editor to continue the c/e should place that template there. Please also note someone has reverted your edit at Brasserie Ellezelloise. If you don't really want a copy-edit, please either remove the subsection or place "{{ withdrawn}}" below your request and sign with four tildes like this: ~~~~. Thank you, Baffle☿gab 07:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Generally, it's best not to respond to bait like that. Cheers, – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 07:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Do you have the Newcomer Homepage enabled? If not I think that's a good place to start. Click on Preferences at top right, scroll down to the bottom under User Profile and click on the box beside Display newcomer homepage. Among other things there is a box labeled Suggested Edits. This is a great place to begin and learn how to properly edit articles. I also highly, highly suggest you stay away from noticeboards and the like, even AfD's. Most of it is drama and you don't want to fuel that. Let the admin's do what they are here for. If you have an issue that requires the use of one of these noticeboards then use it. Twinkle can get a lot of new editors in trouble fast so disabling it until you have a better understanding was a great idea. Remember I suggested listening to others was important. Editors like @Drmies, @Bbb23 and @Tamzin are well experienced. I have watched their actions here and respect them a lot so trust me when I say taking their advice is the best thing you could do. I know you are new to Wikipedia. I know you have the best of intentions. Read, read, read! Make small edits and learn the policies. If you decide to write a new article, highly recommended, then pick something you have an interest in but is noncontroversial. Above all else, stay off noticeboards and stay away from templates until you can learn their purpose. I have never warned anyone for vandalism. I have rarely warned anyone for anything and, to my knowledge, haven't templated anyone outside welcoming them. Yet I have made my mistakes too so it happens, we all do it and its part of being bold. Still, when you are given advice, take it and apply it where appropriate. If you have any other questions or concerns don't hesitate to ask. -- ARose Wolf 12:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
I suggest you take a look at WP:UP to see what is and isn't appropriate for your userpage. ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed you included a box for conducting how many views your user page has. Here's a tip if you're on a computer; go into the article history, and under the filter revisions tab lies a row of external tools. Hit "Page Statistics", and you can see all sorts of info about a page (including user pages), such as viewer stats, who has the most edits, the user who authored most of the page, etc. Alternatively, you can put {{Annual readership}} at the top of your talk page for quick access to viewership stats. Panini! 🥪 17:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
19:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
InternetScavenger89 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am here to build an encyclopedia as shown at the top of my talk page. I do not know exactly why i am blocked, and i am working and will continue to work on making better edits, but i cannot continue to do so while blocked. Finally, does indefinite mean never able to edit again? -- InternetScavenger 89 19:10, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirmed logged out vandalism and trolling. See
WP:GOODHAND.
Yamla (
talk)
19:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
UTRS appeal #51647 is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
![]() |
Daily pageviews of User:InternetScavenger89
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
This is InternetScavenger89's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
![]() | This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. Their input is welcome, and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
|
Hi i am -- InternetScavenger 89 and i love wikipedia. Welcome to my talk page!
Emergency user slap button
Editors: Use this button if the user is malfunctioning. (
direct link)
Editors can a malfunctioning user to the
village stocks.
Please only use this button if i have made a silly mistake, if i have made a worse mistake, contact my talk page!
![]() | This user is a recent changes patroller. |
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
Thank you for adding images, references, and more to articles! The Tips of Apmh ( talk) 21:41, 29 November 2021 (UTC) |
YESSS MY FIRST BARNSTAR! -- InternetScavenger 89
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Views/Day | Quality | Title | Tagged with… |
---|---|---|---|
12 |
![]() |
Cuisine of the Ionian Islands ( talk) | Add sources |
130 |
![]() |
Lamian ( talk) | Add sources |
1,091 |
![]() |
Cooking ( talk) | Add sources |
38 |
![]() |
Cretan cuisine ( talk) | Add sources |
63 |
![]() |
Weston A. Price Foundation ( talk) | Add sources |
826 |
![]() |
Lard ( talk) | Add sources |
746 |
![]() |
Spätzle ( talk) | Cleanup |
235 |
![]() |
Cat food ( talk) | Cleanup |
277 |
![]() |
Milk and meat in Jewish law ( talk) | Cleanup |
47 |
![]() |
Canarian cuisine ( talk) | Expand |
5 |
![]() |
Index of sociology of food articles ( talk) | Expand |
20 |
![]() |
Balearic cuisine ( talk) | Expand |
488 |
![]() |
Russian cuisine ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
1,363 |
![]() |
Vegetarianism ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
260 |
![]() |
Textured vegetable protein ( talk) | Unencyclopaedic |
39 |
![]() |
Kubbeh ( talk) | Merge |
52 |
![]() |
Brik ( talk) | Merge |
42 |
![]() |
Viewshed ( talk) | Merge |
33 |
![]() |
Hōtō ( talk) | Wikify |
128 |
![]() |
Gene bank ( talk) | Wikify |
2,447 |
![]() |
Veganism ( talk) | Wikify |
21 |
![]() |
Soul food health trends ( talk) | Orphan |
11 |
![]() |
Food labelling in Canada ( talk) | Orphan |
2 |
![]() |
Blikkiesdorp Project ( talk) | Orphan |
202 |
![]() |
Semantic Scholar ( talk) | Stub |
43 |
![]() |
Farfel ( talk) | Stub |
65 |
![]() |
TAP Sports ( talk) | Stub |
13 |
![]() |
Maki mi ( talk) | Stub |
65 |
![]() |
Czernina ( talk) | Stub |
112 |
![]() |
Clément Novalak ( talk) | Stub |
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom ( talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot ( talk) 05:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
~~~~
it'll sign with that signature along with a timestamp. ―
Blaze The Wolf
TalkBlaze Wolf#6545
17:58, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Howdy. You seem to be having trouble signing your posts. It's 4 tildes that are used. GoodDay ( talk) 17:56, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
-- InternetScavenger 89 19:13, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Not meaning to sound rude/harsh but I would say you've mostly made indecent edits, however you have made a few good edits. Since you appear to be interesting in antivandal work I suggest reading WP:VANDAL and possibly seeing if anyone available at WP:CVUA would be willing to assist you. ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:33, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi InternetScavenger89,
I noticed you've been welcoming some new users recently, which is kind. However, the template you are using starts with "Thank you for your contributions". A couple of users you welcomed had already received warnings for vandalism (Users Badussias420, Has been blacklisted1) and one (EmSolaris) hasn't made any edits yet. It's a good idea to check the user's contributions first to make sure the message you're using is appropriate. If you're using the Twinkle tool there are a number of different welcome templates, including ones to use if their edits are unconstructive/tests or outright vandalism.
Kind regards, Princess Persnickety (talk) 21:12, 30 November 2021 (UTC) :)
Re "I am so sorry, i didn't mean to get anyone blocked": It's not your fault! The IP editor themselves was being disruptive and refusing to abide by our rules, so banning them was the only option and determined upon by several other editors. You did the right thing by reporting it. Panini! 🥪 13:27, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Your replies on various noticeboard threads are not constructive. Work on building the encyclopedia until you have a reasonable amount of experience before trying to get involved in governance and disputes. ScottishFinnishRadish ( talk) 17:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi InternetScavenger89, regarding your edits here, did you intend to request a copy-edit (c/e) of Brasserie Ellezelloise or to inform us you have partially copy-edited it? If it's the former, can you please clarify the request and remove the "{{ partly done}}" template? The article doesn't seem promotional to me and doesn't appear to need a copy-edit. If it's the latter, this is not the purpose of the page and only copy-editors who've worked on a request but would like another editor to continue the c/e should place that template there. Please also note someone has reverted your edit at Brasserie Ellezelloise. If you don't really want a copy-edit, please either remove the subsection or place "{{ withdrawn}}" below your request and sign with four tildes like this: ~~~~. Thank you, Baffle☿gab 07:29, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Generally, it's best not to respond to bait like that. Cheers, – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 07:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Do you have the Newcomer Homepage enabled? If not I think that's a good place to start. Click on Preferences at top right, scroll down to the bottom under User Profile and click on the box beside Display newcomer homepage. Among other things there is a box labeled Suggested Edits. This is a great place to begin and learn how to properly edit articles. I also highly, highly suggest you stay away from noticeboards and the like, even AfD's. Most of it is drama and you don't want to fuel that. Let the admin's do what they are here for. If you have an issue that requires the use of one of these noticeboards then use it. Twinkle can get a lot of new editors in trouble fast so disabling it until you have a better understanding was a great idea. Remember I suggested listening to others was important. Editors like @Drmies, @Bbb23 and @Tamzin are well experienced. I have watched their actions here and respect them a lot so trust me when I say taking their advice is the best thing you could do. I know you are new to Wikipedia. I know you have the best of intentions. Read, read, read! Make small edits and learn the policies. If you decide to write a new article, highly recommended, then pick something you have an interest in but is noncontroversial. Above all else, stay off noticeboards and stay away from templates until you can learn their purpose. I have never warned anyone for vandalism. I have rarely warned anyone for anything and, to my knowledge, haven't templated anyone outside welcoming them. Yet I have made my mistakes too so it happens, we all do it and its part of being bold. Still, when you are given advice, take it and apply it where appropriate. If you have any other questions or concerns don't hesitate to ask. -- ARose Wolf 12:58, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
I suggest you take a look at WP:UP to see what is and isn't appropriate for your userpage. ― Blaze The Wolf TalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:35, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Hello! I noticed you included a box for conducting how many views your user page has. Here's a tip if you're on a computer; go into the article history, and under the filter revisions tab lies a row of external tools. Hit "Page Statistics", and you can see all sorts of info about a page (including user pages), such as viewer stats, who has the most edits, the user who authored most of the page, etc. Alternatively, you can put {{Annual readership}} at the top of your talk page for quick access to viewership stats. Panini! 🥪 17:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Jezebel's Ponyo
bons mots
19:01, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
InternetScavenger89 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am here to build an encyclopedia as shown at the top of my talk page. I do not know exactly why i am blocked, and i am working and will continue to work on making better edits, but i cannot continue to do so while blocked. Finally, does indefinite mean never able to edit again? -- InternetScavenger 89 19:10, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Confirmed logged out vandalism and trolling. See
WP:GOODHAND.
Yamla (
talk)
19:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
UTRS appeal #51647 is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.