![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
2017
Hi! Thank you for contributing the Feel Train and, um, me articles. I was wondering if you were planning to make a page for the other half of Feel Train, Courtney Stanton. I can provide secondary media sources, documentaries they've starred in, etc, if you're lacking in citations. Dariusk ( talk) 01:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Innisfree987, Thank you for your thoughtful and helpful comments for Draft:Sherry Huss. I added three references from neutral publications about Maker Faire events in which Huss was quoted. Can you please take a look and let me know if this addresses your comments? If so, I will resubmit. Again, thank you! Streamingtech ( talk) 06:29, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I resubmitted a page for review, after completing a great deal of editing, but have not heard anything on my resubmission. The article on about John P. Fishwick, Jr. I'm hoping I've addressed all of your concerns regarding Mr. Fishwick's Wiki "worthiness". His work as a Federal Prosecutor, appointed by President Obama, should be sufficient to warrant an article. Please let me know your thoughts. Hoping we can get the article up right away. Thanks, Rob.
Sundownllc ( talk) 15:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Please don't add to the head category - they should go to one over 40+ national cats (always American in your case it seems), plus the Women one if appropriate, plus perhaps one of the speciality ones. Johnbod ( talk) 04:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Innisfree987. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various
deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at
page reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Hi. Just letting you know that the backlog is still growing. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 00:28, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
Excellent work and very useful of you submitting four editors at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled. Schwede 66 08:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC) |
Thank you for your kindness in this revert. The "Drumpf" changes must have been because of a chrome extension that does it automatically (I think it makes news stories funnier) and I never thought that it would affect my wikiediting. I'll try to find a secondary source for the Sigma Chi information. Again, thank you for assuming the best about me. Wikipedia needs people like you! — Goodtimber ( walk/ talk) 05:11, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow project participants. Not sure how many users are still active as normal Wikipedia editors but felt the need to attempt to get a gauge on who can be called on for help with articles falling under the umbrella of the African diaspora project. According to the project's article table there are over six thousand articles related to the African diaspora; there's not a hundred at FA/GA grade and there's over twelve hundred that are unassessed. With Wikipedia being one of the major information reference points in the world today we should consider this unacceptable. Much work needs to be done on the rating of the importance of articles as well. With more communication amongst participants and a dedication to addressing the articles on the to-do list I believe we can make this WikiProject one of the most well organized and thorough on the site. If you are interested in collaborative work with some of your fellow project members, have certain expertise on any particular subjects, ideals on/about the WikiProject, etc. simply drop your name under the "Project revision" section I've created on the project's talk page and state your intentions and main points of interest in our WikiProject and we can attempt to move forward from there. Hoping to hear from everyone soon! WikiGuy86 ( talk) 04:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Innisfree987. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jed Taylor, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: collaboration with notable producer indicates significance; also, after seven years consensus for inclusion can be presumed ( WP:SILENCE). Use AFD instead. Thank you. So Why 07:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
You gave me a permission; Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled. What exactly is this? Mpen320 ( talk) 1:18, 4 June 2017 (CST)
how can I prove everything on the page I edited is right because every time someone edits something you delete it but it's true facts
Hi, I have deprodded Christopher Penczak, as it was discussed at AfD and kept back in 2006, therefore making it permanently ineligible for proposed deletion. If you still wish to pursue deletion, please feel free to open another AfD. Thanks, — KuyaBriBri Talk 18:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Regarding this: but I didn't PROD it; I just tagged it. If it had been eligible for PROD, I would have PRODded it. Maybe I'm missing something, but I'm not aware that Template:BLP unsourced is only for articles that meet BLPPROD or that the presence of an external link makes an article unsuitable for the tag. Rivertorch FIRE WATER 05:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
Most recently, Senatorial districts in Virginia. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:47, 30 June 2017 (UTC) |
Hi, I am little confused about a tag you recently added. Not sure what non free content you are referring to. Would you please elaborate? As I am confused, I didnt remove the tag, but I added a notability tag. —usernamekiran (talk) 13:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
lets hope so. :) See you around.
—usernamekiran
(talk)
20:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for taking the time to review so many of my articles. Bennv3771 ( talk) 01:28, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
Hey thanks for your helpful edits on my contributions! Just started doing wikipedia editing, so always looking for guidance, especially when in comes to incorporating the correct formatting and templates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaitlinmcnabb ( talk • contribs) 19:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I am curious regarding how you found/came across this article. I am not sure about the notability, but I did some re-arrangement of words in the first line of the article. It is about a post/designation in Department of Commerce. From the official site, I learned is just one single designation with two distinct charges: CFO, and Assistant Secretary for Administration. The entire article needs a little copy-edit here-n-there. I can do it after getting a nice sleep. I also saw you unreviewed few more articles. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Innisfree987 ( talk) 16:08, 13 July 2017 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Innisfree987 ( talk) 18:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 16:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC) |
Thank you for your generous comment you've made on my article creation He's Sure the Boy I Love. :) -- MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 16:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Just a little note WP:FILEUPLOADWIZARD very helpful for adding covers to book articles. It is okay to use jpgs from the web, no need to take a photo of the book. Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 20:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC) |
Hey, would you mind also unchecking my new article Tom Paradise so that it, too, can be reviewed by others? Thanks a bunch! KDS4444 ( talk) 07:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Innisfree! I have been asked to voluntarily resign my rights as a new page patroller. Much as I would prefer to stay, can you assist me with this? I have never resigned a right before and do not know anything at all about the process. Please advise, if you can. Thanks! It's been fun! KDS4444 ( talk) 07:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, could you please specify what exactly is unclear in my article Sisak Fortress. Thanks. -- Silverije ( talk) 17:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Innisfree, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! ansh 666 20:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Innisfree987,
I appreciate your looking over the page for architect Jon Condoret. However, I saw that you removed the list of projects that Jon Condoret did as an architect with the reasoning that these people and info are low-profile, and unsourced, respectively. I believe that the list should be recovered because the goal of the list was not to bring attention to the people who lived and are living in the houses, but to show the projects that Jon Condoret completed during his career as an architect, and to bring attention to Jon Condoret's legacy as an architect specializing as a modernist architect in North Carolina. Also, this project list was received from
North Carolina Modernist Houses, which has given us permission to use the information, and North Carolina Modernist Houses got the information from various sources, including books like North Carolina 1795-1975 by M. Ruth Little, another source was his daughter, also an architect, Arielle Schechter. There were a couple of other sources that are listed on ncmodernist.org/condoret.htm. I just wanted you to know that I think the project list should be recovered, for the reasons I just listed.
Thank you,
George M Smart (
talk)
16:13, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting that addition to Women in the military, which was made by someone who seems to be part of a course which requires students to modify Wikipedia articles, a practice that has increasingly become a headache since most of the additions made by these students tend to be badly written, unbalanced and politicized. I'm not sure whether we can put the brakes on this policy or not: it would be better if these courses merely taught students HOW to write additions to Wikipedia rather than having them actually do it. GBRV ( talk) 16:08, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the sub lists by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:48, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Just as a note, I received a REFUND request for Kennedy (musician), which you had successfully PROD'd back in July. Primefac ( talk) 18:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Jytdog, I of course respect any editor's preferences for their talk page so I won't post this to yours, but I've just realized we've had, I believe, a legitimate miscommunication that I'd like to clear up. When I wrote "Concurring with above", I meant the various editors who'd left advice upthread on your talk page about engaging KDS. So when you referred to a 10-year sock puppet, I thought you meant KDS, as that's all I was referring to in the first place, not any other preceding posts. Apologies for the inclarity and resulting miscommunication; I had thought the substance of my comment indicated what I was talking about, but I see now my header didn't make sufficiently clear which of the above I meant and thus invited confusion. Innisfree987 ( talk) 06:08, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | |
entries for journalists | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 1535 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:20, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
2017
Hi! Thank you for contributing the Feel Train and, um, me articles. I was wondering if you were planning to make a page for the other half of Feel Train, Courtney Stanton. I can provide secondary media sources, documentaries they've starred in, etc, if you're lacking in citations. Dariusk ( talk) 01:20, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Innisfree987, Thank you for your thoughtful and helpful comments for Draft:Sherry Huss. I added three references from neutral publications about Maker Faire events in which Huss was quoted. Can you please take a look and let me know if this addresses your comments? If so, I will resubmit. Again, thank you! Streamingtech ( talk) 06:29, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I resubmitted a page for review, after completing a great deal of editing, but have not heard anything on my resubmission. The article on about John P. Fishwick, Jr. I'm hoping I've addressed all of your concerns regarding Mr. Fishwick's Wiki "worthiness". His work as a Federal Prosecutor, appointed by President Obama, should be sufficient to warrant an article. Please let me know your thoughts. Hoping we can get the article up right away. Thanks, Rob.
Sundownllc ( talk) 15:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Please don't add to the head category - they should go to one over 40+ national cats (always American in your case it seems), plus the Women one if appropriate, plus perhaps one of the speciality ones. Johnbod ( talk) 04:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello Innisfree987. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as
patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the
New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at
New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various
deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at
page reviewer talk.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 19:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
Hi. Just letting you know that the backlog is still growing. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 00:28, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
Excellent work and very useful of you submitting four editors at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled. Schwede 66 08:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC) |
Thank you for your kindness in this revert. The "Drumpf" changes must have been because of a chrome extension that does it automatically (I think it makes news stories funnier) and I never thought that it would affect my wikiediting. I'll try to find a secondary source for the Sigma Chi information. Again, thank you for assuming the best about me. Wikipedia needs people like you! — Goodtimber ( walk/ talk) 05:11, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow project participants. Not sure how many users are still active as normal Wikipedia editors but felt the need to attempt to get a gauge on who can be called on for help with articles falling under the umbrella of the African diaspora project. According to the project's article table there are over six thousand articles related to the African diaspora; there's not a hundred at FA/GA grade and there's over twelve hundred that are unassessed. With Wikipedia being one of the major information reference points in the world today we should consider this unacceptable. Much work needs to be done on the rating of the importance of articles as well. With more communication amongst participants and a dedication to addressing the articles on the to-do list I believe we can make this WikiProject one of the most well organized and thorough on the site. If you are interested in collaborative work with some of your fellow project members, have certain expertise on any particular subjects, ideals on/about the WikiProject, etc. simply drop your name under the "Project revision" section I've created on the project's talk page and state your intentions and main points of interest in our WikiProject and we can attempt to move forward from there. Hoping to hear from everyone soon! WikiGuy86 ( talk) 04:18, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello Innisfree987. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jed Taylor, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: collaboration with notable producer indicates significance; also, after seven years consensus for inclusion can be presumed ( WP:SILENCE). Use AFD instead. Thank you. So Why 07:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
You gave me a permission; Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled. What exactly is this? Mpen320 ( talk) 1:18, 4 June 2017 (CST)
how can I prove everything on the page I edited is right because every time someone edits something you delete it but it's true facts
Hi, I have deprodded Christopher Penczak, as it was discussed at AfD and kept back in 2006, therefore making it permanently ineligible for proposed deletion. If you still wish to pursue deletion, please feel free to open another AfD. Thanks, — KuyaBriBri Talk 18:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Regarding this: but I didn't PROD it; I just tagged it. If it had been eligible for PROD, I would have PRODded it. Maybe I'm missing something, but I'm not aware that Template:BLP unsourced is only for articles that meet BLPPROD or that the presence of an external link makes an article unsuitable for the tag. Rivertorch FIRE WATER 05:21, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
Most recently, Senatorial districts in Virginia. Robert McClenon ( talk) 02:47, 30 June 2017 (UTC) |
Hi, I am little confused about a tag you recently added. Not sure what non free content you are referring to. Would you please elaborate? As I am confused, I didnt remove the tag, but I added a notability tag. —usernamekiran (talk) 13:17, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
lets hope so. :) See you around.
—usernamekiran
(talk)
20:05, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
The Original Barnstar | |
Thanks for taking the time to review so many of my articles. Bennv3771 ( talk) 01:28, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
Hey thanks for your helpful edits on my contributions! Just started doing wikipedia editing, so always looking for guidance, especially when in comes to incorporating the correct formatting and templates. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaitlinmcnabb ( talk • contribs) 19:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I am curious regarding how you found/came across this article. I am not sure about the notability, but I did some re-arrangement of words in the first line of the article. It is about a post/designation in Department of Commerce. From the official site, I learned is just one single designation with two distinct charges: CFO, and Assistant Secretary for Administration. The entire article needs a little copy-edit here-n-there. I can do it after getting a nice sleep. I also saw you unreviewed few more articles. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:39, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Innisfree987 ( talk) 16:08, 13 July 2017 (UTC)You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Innisfree987 ( talk) 18:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 16:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC) |
Thank you for your generous comment you've made on my article creation He's Sure the Boy I Love. :) -- MrLinkinPark333 ( talk) 16:34, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Just a little note WP:FILEUPLOADWIZARD very helpful for adding covers to book articles. It is okay to use jpgs from the web, no need to take a photo of the book. Cheers. In ictu oculi ( talk) 20:37, 9 August 2017 (UTC) |
Hey, would you mind also unchecking my new article Tom Paradise so that it, too, can be reviewed by others? Thanks a bunch! KDS4444 ( talk) 07:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Innisfree! I have been asked to voluntarily resign my rights as a new page patroller. Much as I would prefer to stay, can you assist me with this? I have never resigned a right before and do not know anything at all about the process. Please advise, if you can. Thanks! It's been fun! KDS4444 ( talk) 07:42, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi, could you please specify what exactly is unclear in my article Sisak Fortress. Thanks. -- Silverije ( talk) 17:32, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi Innisfree, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! ansh 666 20:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Hello Innisfree987,
I appreciate your looking over the page for architect Jon Condoret. However, I saw that you removed the list of projects that Jon Condoret did as an architect with the reasoning that these people and info are low-profile, and unsourced, respectively. I believe that the list should be recovered because the goal of the list was not to bring attention to the people who lived and are living in the houses, but to show the projects that Jon Condoret completed during his career as an architect, and to bring attention to Jon Condoret's legacy as an architect specializing as a modernist architect in North Carolina. Also, this project list was received from
North Carolina Modernist Houses, which has given us permission to use the information, and North Carolina Modernist Houses got the information from various sources, including books like North Carolina 1795-1975 by M. Ruth Little, another source was his daughter, also an architect, Arielle Schechter. There were a couple of other sources that are listed on ncmodernist.org/condoret.htm. I just wanted you to know that I think the project list should be recovered, for the reasons I just listed.
Thank you,
George M Smart (
talk)
16:13, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting that addition to Women in the military, which was made by someone who seems to be part of a course which requires students to modify Wikipedia articles, a practice that has increasingly become a headache since most of the additions made by these students tend to be badly written, unbalanced and politicized. I'm not sure whether we can put the brakes on this policy or not: it would be better if these courses merely taught students HOW to write additions to Wikipedia rather than having them actually do it. GBRV ( talk) 16:08, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the sub lists by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:48, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
Just as a note, I received a REFUND request for Kennedy (musician), which you had successfully PROD'd back in July. Primefac ( talk) 18:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
Jytdog, I of course respect any editor's preferences for their talk page so I won't post this to yours, but I've just realized we've had, I believe, a legitimate miscommunication that I'd like to clear up. When I wrote "Concurring with above", I meant the various editors who'd left advice upthread on your talk page about engaging KDS. So when you referred to a 10-year sock puppet, I thought you meant KDS, as that's all I was referring to in the first place, not any other preceding posts. Apologies for the inclarity and resulting miscommunication; I had thought the substance of my comment indicated what I was talking about, but I see now my header didn't make sufficiently clear which of the above I meant and thus invited confusion. Innisfree987 ( talk) 06:08, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
![]() | |
entries for journalists | |
---|---|
... you were recipient no. 1535 of Precious, a prize of QAI! |
-- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:20, 17 December 2017 (UTC)