This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You reverted my edit to the Ivermectin article which provided three references on the ability of Ivermectin to bind to the COVID-19 spike protein, indicating that it may be useful for treatment of the disease. Clinical trials are ongoing, and it is certainly not yet approved by the various agencies, but I think this information is useful. I think peer-reviewed articles from respectable journals do not qualify as "unreliable/misinformation". Here are the articles: [removed] Please let me know if this changes your opinion. PAR ( talk) 17:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tōgaku, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kakko.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kimono, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paraná.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi there! I'm ADWC312, and I'm currently editing the page Japanese New Zealanders as part of a Wikipedia based university course. I've noticed that you specialise in editing pages focused on Japan, and I am wondering if you'd have any time to check over the Japanese New Zealanders wiki page and edit it. As an extremely new Wikipedian, I'd like to make sure the edits and information I have put in are in line with Wikipedia's guidelines. I'd very much so appreciate any guidance you can offer! Thank you. ADWC312 ( talk) 03:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi -- thanks for adding the BrEng tag here, but FYI I did revert the part of your edit that changed the sentence spacing. I'd set it to two spaces, which is a fairly common preference among Wikipedia editors, and I don't think it's something that should be changed without discussion. I hope you don't mind the revert. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 19:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Hat Full of Sky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monstrous Regiment.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, regarding this edit, I have not come across language tags before, and I edit sumo articles extensively. As far as I am aware, no other sumo article uses them. Is this something I should be using going forward? And is it necessary to use the template on every repetition of the word? That seems somewhat laborious. -- Pawnkingthree ( talk) 14:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
|kanji=
, etc), so you must input content properly.Saw your edit comment on the Japanese grammar page from 2021-12-21, particularly:
replaced nihongo krt with nihongo3, as they essentially do the same thing, and honestly, when I have the time, I'll likely submit krt to TfD.
I wanted to note the differences.
So they're not quite the same thing. If memory serves, the krt
suffix in the one template name is intended as a mnemonic, indicating that the kana (or Japanese) comes first, then the romanization, and then the translation (if provided).
Compare:
{{nihongo|English text.|日本語の文書。|Nihongo no bunsho.|This is a note.|This is an additional note.}}
{{nihongo_krt|English text.|日本語の文書。|Nihongo no bunsho.|This is a note.|This is an additional note.}}
FWIW, I always found it confusing that a template called nihongo
would output the English first -- why include that in the template at all in that case, especially if you're not going to apply any formatting?
At any rate, if the editor wants the Japanese first, and not in parentheses, then {{ nihongo_krt}} is the better choice.
Cheers, ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 00:45, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
([^\u3000-\ufffe])+
to catch non-Asian text, or remove the ^
to catch Asian text.Why were my edits reverted on the Paisley page by you? The content in the origin section is extremely inaccurate. I tried to write absolutely and precisely by linking to documents. What was my edit's problem? Histo.beh ( talk) 13:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
In a recent change to Old Testament, you comment, "I'm concerned that this table solely uses colour to communicate which group each book belongs to." It's not quite that bad. Note that for the three versions of the Old Testament, the groups are all contiguous and identified by headers within the table (cells joined by rowspan). The only information conveyed solely by the colors is their correspondence with the Hebrew Bible groupings, which isn't central to topic of the article. Regards, Dan Bloch ( talk) 19:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I saw that the Sukumizu article was unfortunately made a redirect to Swimsuit due to lack of notable sources, so I searched online and posted some potential sources in the Talk page that might be useful. I also have a summary translation to the Sankei Shimbun article about swimsuit you found on the Talk page as well. If you have the time to take a look at them, I would greatly appreciate the help. -- AtollUphill ( talk) 01:37, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
In a rather old (Jan 1) edit to black-and-red broadbill that I just noticed, you added parentheses around all the subspecies authorities. I've removed those now, but I thought I'd just tell you that species or subspecies authorities in parentheses are used to indicate that those authorities described the species/subspecies in a different genus than it is currently classified in. Making them consistent is actually factually incorrect. AryKun ( talk) 06:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your help making lang-templates more consistent for Bach's works and No. 1! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slub (textiles), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filament.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello,
The reason I removed the links to tayū from the articles Shimabara, Kyoto and Hanamachi is because tayū is currently a disambiguation page, and there's no article listed on that page that points to tayū specifically. They are discussed in the oiran article, so a link there might make sense instead. WP:REDLINK isn't the applicable policy here since it's not actually a redlink; links to disambiguation pages are discouraged per WP:DAB. Mahalo, Musashi1600 ( talk) 02:25, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanted to thank you for adding some revisions to Ugetsu Monogatari, especially the transliteration indicators. I didn't know about those so I'll be sure to use them from now on. :) MenoEnds ( talk) 23:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akahon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jōruri.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Please see my comments in the talk page. If there is no valid reply within a week or two, I'll proceed with a revert of the mass deletion and we can go from there.
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
I just searched for murasaki and found that the page wasn't relevant and the disambiguation link was dead. It looks as though you may have killed it. I'm trying to figure out how to restore it. I'm still new at this and the special property for these links are not obvious to me. Can you help? -- Danindenver ( talk) 06:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Magatama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Okinawan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Ineffablebookkeeper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Kouta".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 12:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mercy Multiplied, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, regarding your edits at Star Trek: Discovery I just wanted to let you know that the formatting of cast lists with larger pargraphs in them has been discussed many times at TV-related articles and the current consensus is to just use break tags. At one point there was a specific template for this formatting, but it was deleted following this discussion in favour of using generic break tags instead. This is noted at MOS:TVCAST, which also notes that we should not be bolding text in cast lists. - adamstom97 ( talk) 22:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Genroku, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jōruri.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi! In relation to this edit, please take a look at MOS:LAYOUTEL. It's unnecessarily (or perhaps unacceptably?) prescriptive for a guideline, but the message is clear: we don't need to create a separate EL section for a commonscat link, it should simply be placed at the start of the last section of the page. Thanks, regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 20:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesus and the woman taken in adultery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Umlaut.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm not exactly sure which part of your last edit did it, but the infobox in Ottoman Empire is utterly massive and should be restored to its previous width ASAP. For the life of me I can't figure out exactly what caused it, probably something to do with the NoWraps. Aza24 (talk) 05:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesus in Manichaeism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pahlavi.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi Ineffablebookkeeper! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
I will be having felafel tonight in Melbourne Australia (I live near large Middle Eastern and Greek communities) and I would like to invite you to join me in spirit
Your thanks made my day!. It took 2 days of work to get the information together, and I had seen no response. I am still hesitant about whether my evidence and data driven approach suits Meta, but if one person is happy that is enough. I agree with your analysis. Wakelamp d[@-@]b ( talk) 00:45, 29 August 2022 (UTC) |
Sorry, I had to undo these 3 edits (2 by you, one of them very big, and one by a bot working in the area of your edits) because they effectively destroyed a large part of the 3rd table in the relevant article. Please feel free to re-enter your changes once you have found and fixed whatever in them caused the table to be damaged. Regards, Tlhslobus ( talk) 06:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 03:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Please format ellipses without square brackets, per the Manual of Style. DrKay ( talk) 12:51, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
How many articles are there on the Wikipedia? Monredo ( talk) 14:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
I have nominated Heian Palace for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm ( talk) 12:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Conversions should only be used once for a specific measurement, not every time. I have, therefore, reverted your additional conversions to the Borodino-class battlecruiser article. Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 14:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Ineffablebookkeeper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Textile arts of Japan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 07:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Ineffablebookkeeper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kouta (music), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 14:01, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Re "it smells like a bad faith effort to avoid association with being described as "cancerous" to me" in [1] - seriously? Please assume good faith, and perhaps look at my other edits that day for the background - and please consider revising your statement there. Mike Peel ( talk) 22:01, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you removed this portion from Entheogen, but wouldn't it be included? Seems like an obvious choice. Thanks. Altanner1991 ( talk) 03:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi. It was all 10 or 11 years ago but if you're interested, you'll find a lot of what you need to know here. It was a project that went badly wrong from corruption and misappropriation of funds, mismanagement of competing local affiliates, to the catastrophic 'education' itself. I warned the WMF what was about to happen but a senior WMF director was not very polite and slammed a metaphorical door in my face saying words to the effect of "Kudpung is a drama monger. What he is suggesting is poppycock." After having had numerous one-on-one Skype talks with some of the other major players, with my knowledge of the cultural dichotomy from my many years living and working in academia in Asia, I offered to go and defuse the issue(s) . It's only a only a 2 hour flight from where I live, but the WMF all jumped on a plane in San Francisco for a junket to India and just made matters worse. Finally they hired an expensive US business consultant to fly out there, investigate, and make a report. Her report was carefully written (as she later told me privately) so as not to sound too accusing of those who hired her, but the summary was clear.
I rallied our en.Wiki volunteers together to make a massive clean up of the results of the 'education' itself. Of the person or persons who were responsible for the failed project, some disappeared into the Asian undergrowth, others had their employment terminated or resigned voluntarily; others, instead of being fired, were given a new stand-alone Foundation affiliate to run and remain in employment but where the WMF itself would be divested of any future responsibility if anything went wrong. There aren't many people around today who remember the fiasco; the WMF has conveniently forgotten it and has gone on to make many more money wasting experiments of various kinds, and still does.
Because they are paid for what they do, the WMF staff think they are more qualified than any of the volunteers and behave with an air of superiority when challenged - even going as far as to threaten users with sanctions if they say too much, as you can see from the RfC. IMO that's the reason why for example with the poorly worded fundraising banners (even with their incorrect use of English), they won't listen. They don't want to lose face as they massively did with ACTRIAL , for example, where the community finally forced them to spend funds on it. Because they don't believe the community will carry out its threat of implementing local blocks of the banners, they double down and will prefer to run the risk. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 04:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, many thanks for your efforts on this article. Could you please note, however, that the Rp template is not used in this article (or anything else that I've brought to formal review). If you are convinced that the additional page numbers are needed then please add the page number to the original ref, or use Sfn. All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 11:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The reason I used the ref note format was that it allowed the same note to link to mulltiple refs. Also I was told in the FAC to move the manual calculations out of the reference list. Serendi pod ous 18:22, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Ineffablebookkeeper Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, RV ( talk) 01:50, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Ineffablebookkeeper,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk) 21:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe ( talk) 21:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~ Pbritti ( talk) 21:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iman (Islam), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deen.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Wisteria floribunda, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)§ion=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 10:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Ineffablebookkeeper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Textile arts of Japan".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:57, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Holy anointing oil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hippolytus.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
CurryTime7-24 ( talk) 19:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Boston marriage, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 12:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Grumpylawnchair has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
†
|
For your work on Japan-related articles. Cheers! Grumpylawnchair ( talk) 17:55, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Ineffablebookkeeper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wikipedia:Delete the main page, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have no idea on which articles you worked, your user and talk page does not show much which is bad. I worked more than three years on Rasputin, Robespierre and Germaine de Stael, etc. My memory is pretty good when it comes to dates, but I cannot keep every detail in my mind. So I make/made hidden comments to get the chronology right. This practise seems very unusual on Wikipedia. Taksen ( talk) 10:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— Religious calling—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. IgnatiusofLondon ( talk) 13:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
You reverted my edit to the Ivermectin article which provided three references on the ability of Ivermectin to bind to the COVID-19 spike protein, indicating that it may be useful for treatment of the disease. Clinical trials are ongoing, and it is certainly not yet approved by the various agencies, but I think this information is useful. I think peer-reviewed articles from respectable journals do not qualify as "unreliable/misinformation". Here are the articles: [removed] Please let me know if this changes your opinion. PAR ( talk) 17:51, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tōgaku, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kakko.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kimono, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paraná.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
Hi there! I'm ADWC312, and I'm currently editing the page Japanese New Zealanders as part of a Wikipedia based university course. I've noticed that you specialise in editing pages focused on Japan, and I am wondering if you'd have any time to check over the Japanese New Zealanders wiki page and edit it. As an extremely new Wikipedian, I'd like to make sure the edits and information I have put in are in line with Wikipedia's guidelines. I'd very much so appreciate any guidance you can offer! Thank you. ADWC312 ( talk) 03:20, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi -- thanks for adding the BrEng tag here, but FYI I did revert the part of your edit that changed the sentence spacing. I'd set it to two spaces, which is a fairly common preference among Wikipedia editors, and I don't think it's something that should be changed without discussion. I hope you don't mind the revert. Mike Christie ( talk - contribs - library) 19:41, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A Hat Full of Sky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monstrous Regiment.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
Hi, regarding this edit, I have not come across language tags before, and I edit sumo articles extensively. As far as I am aware, no other sumo article uses them. Is this something I should be using going forward? And is it necessary to use the template on every repetition of the word? That seems somewhat laborious. -- Pawnkingthree ( talk) 14:34, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
|kanji=
, etc), so you must input content properly.Saw your edit comment on the Japanese grammar page from 2021-12-21, particularly:
replaced nihongo krt with nihongo3, as they essentially do the same thing, and honestly, when I have the time, I'll likely submit krt to TfD.
I wanted to note the differences.
So they're not quite the same thing. If memory serves, the krt
suffix in the one template name is intended as a mnemonic, indicating that the kana (or Japanese) comes first, then the romanization, and then the translation (if provided).
Compare:
{{nihongo|English text.|日本語の文書。|Nihongo no bunsho.|This is a note.|This is an additional note.}}
{{nihongo_krt|English text.|日本語の文書。|Nihongo no bunsho.|This is a note.|This is an additional note.}}
FWIW, I always found it confusing that a template called nihongo
would output the English first -- why include that in the template at all in that case, especially if you're not going to apply any formatting?
At any rate, if the editor wants the Japanese first, and not in parentheses, then {{ nihongo_krt}} is the better choice.
Cheers, ‑‑ Eiríkr Útlendi │ Tala við mig 00:45, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
([^\u3000-\ufffe])+
to catch non-Asian text, or remove the ^
to catch Asian text.Why were my edits reverted on the Paisley page by you? The content in the origin section is extremely inaccurate. I tried to write absolutely and precisely by linking to documents. What was my edit's problem? Histo.beh ( talk) 13:49, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
In a recent change to Old Testament, you comment, "I'm concerned that this table solely uses colour to communicate which group each book belongs to." It's not quite that bad. Note that for the three versions of the Old Testament, the groups are all contiguous and identified by headers within the table (cells joined by rowspan). The only information conveyed solely by the colors is their correspondence with the Hebrew Bible groupings, which isn't central to topic of the article. Regards, Dan Bloch ( talk) 19:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I saw that the Sukumizu article was unfortunately made a redirect to Swimsuit due to lack of notable sources, so I searched online and posted some potential sources in the Talk page that might be useful. I also have a summary translation to the Sankei Shimbun article about swimsuit you found on the Talk page as well. If you have the time to take a look at them, I would greatly appreciate the help. -- AtollUphill ( talk) 01:37, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
In a rather old (Jan 1) edit to black-and-red broadbill that I just noticed, you added parentheses around all the subspecies authorities. I've removed those now, but I thought I'd just tell you that species or subspecies authorities in parentheses are used to indicate that those authorities described the species/subspecies in a different genus than it is currently classified in. Making them consistent is actually factually incorrect. AryKun ( talk) 06:37, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for your help making lang-templates more consistent for Bach's works and No. 1! -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 15:28, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Slub (textiles), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Filament.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Hello,
The reason I removed the links to tayū from the articles Shimabara, Kyoto and Hanamachi is because tayū is currently a disambiguation page, and there's no article listed on that page that points to tayū specifically. They are discussed in the oiran article, so a link there might make sense instead. WP:REDLINK isn't the applicable policy here since it's not actually a redlink; links to disambiguation pages are discouraged per WP:DAB. Mahalo, Musashi1600 ( talk) 02:25, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I just wanted to thank you for adding some revisions to Ugetsu Monogatari, especially the transliteration indicators. I didn't know about those so I'll be sure to use them from now on. :) MenoEnds ( talk) 23:21, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akahon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jōruri.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:07, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Please see my comments in the talk page. If there is no valid reply within a week or two, I'll proceed with a revert of the mass deletion and we can go from there.
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:03, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
I just searched for murasaki and found that the page wasn't relevant and the disambiguation link was dead. It looks as though you may have killed it. I'm trying to figure out how to restore it. I'm still new at this and the special property for these links are not obvious to me. Can you help? -- Danindenver ( talk) 06:20, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Magatama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Okinawan.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:02, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Ineffablebookkeeper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Kouta".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗ plicit 12:42, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mercy Multiplied, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 08:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, regarding your edits at Star Trek: Discovery I just wanted to let you know that the formatting of cast lists with larger pargraphs in them has been discussed many times at TV-related articles and the current consensus is to just use break tags. At one point there was a specific template for this formatting, but it was deleted following this discussion in favour of using generic break tags instead. This is noted at MOS:TVCAST, which also notes that we should not be bolding text in cast lists. - adamstom97 ( talk) 22:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Genroku, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jōruri.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:13, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Hi! In relation to this edit, please take a look at MOS:LAYOUTEL. It's unnecessarily (or perhaps unacceptably?) prescriptive for a guideline, but the message is clear: we don't need to create a separate EL section for a commonscat link, it should simply be placed at the start of the last section of the page. Thanks, regards, Justlettersandnumbers ( talk) 20:00, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesus and the woman taken in adultery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Umlaut.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
I'm not exactly sure which part of your last edit did it, but the infobox in Ottoman Empire is utterly massive and should be restored to its previous width ASAP. For the life of me I can't figure out exactly what caused it, probably something to do with the NoWraps. Aza24 (talk) 05:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesus in Manichaeism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pahlavi.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 09:20, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Hi Ineffablebookkeeper! The thread you created at the
Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|
I will be having felafel tonight in Melbourne Australia (I live near large Middle Eastern and Greek communities) and I would like to invite you to join me in spirit
Your thanks made my day!. It took 2 days of work to get the information together, and I had seen no response. I am still hesitant about whether my evidence and data driven approach suits Meta, but if one person is happy that is enough. I agree with your analysis. Wakelamp d[@-@]b ( talk) 00:45, 29 August 2022 (UTC) |
Sorry, I had to undo these 3 edits (2 by you, one of them very big, and one by a bot working in the area of your edits) because they effectively destroyed a large part of the 3rd table in the relevant article. Please feel free to re-enter your changes once you have found and fixed whatever in them caused the table to be damaged. Regards, Tlhslobus ( talk) 06:11, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Thank you for supporting the NPP initiative to improve WMF support of the Page Curation tools. Another way you can help is by voting in the Board of Trustees election. The next Board composition might be giving attention to software development. The election closes on 6 September at 23:59 UTC. View candidate statement videos and Vote Here. MB 03:31, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Please format ellipses without square brackets, per the Manual of Style. DrKay ( talk) 12:51, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
How many articles are there on the Wikipedia? Monredo ( talk) 14:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
I have nominated Heian Palace for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Bumbubookworm ( talk) 12:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Conversions should only be used once for a specific measurement, not every time. I have, therefore, reverted your additional conversions to the Borodino-class battlecruiser article. Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 14:17, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Ineffablebookkeeper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Textile arts of Japan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 07:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Ineffablebookkeeper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kouta (music), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 14:01, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Re "it smells like a bad faith effort to avoid association with being described as "cancerous" to me" in [1] - seriously? Please assume good faith, and perhaps look at my other edits that day for the background - and please consider revising your statement there. Mike Peel ( talk) 22:01, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I saw you removed this portion from Entheogen, but wouldn't it be included? Seems like an obvious choice. Thanks. Altanner1991 ( talk) 03:28, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi. It was all 10 or 11 years ago but if you're interested, you'll find a lot of what you need to know here. It was a project that went badly wrong from corruption and misappropriation of funds, mismanagement of competing local affiliates, to the catastrophic 'education' itself. I warned the WMF what was about to happen but a senior WMF director was not very polite and slammed a metaphorical door in my face saying words to the effect of "Kudpung is a drama monger. What he is suggesting is poppycock." After having had numerous one-on-one Skype talks with some of the other major players, with my knowledge of the cultural dichotomy from my many years living and working in academia in Asia, I offered to go and defuse the issue(s) . It's only a only a 2 hour flight from where I live, but the WMF all jumped on a plane in San Francisco for a junket to India and just made matters worse. Finally they hired an expensive US business consultant to fly out there, investigate, and make a report. Her report was carefully written (as she later told me privately) so as not to sound too accusing of those who hired her, but the summary was clear.
I rallied our en.Wiki volunteers together to make a massive clean up of the results of the 'education' itself. Of the person or persons who were responsible for the failed project, some disappeared into the Asian undergrowth, others had their employment terminated or resigned voluntarily; others, instead of being fired, were given a new stand-alone Foundation affiliate to run and remain in employment but where the WMF itself would be divested of any future responsibility if anything went wrong. There aren't many people around today who remember the fiasco; the WMF has conveniently forgotten it and has gone on to make many more money wasting experiments of various kinds, and still does.
Because they are paid for what they do, the WMF staff think they are more qualified than any of the volunteers and behave with an air of superiority when challenged - even going as far as to threaten users with sanctions if they say too much, as you can see from the RfC. IMO that's the reason why for example with the poorly worded fundraising banners (even with their incorrect use of English), they won't listen. They don't want to lose face as they massively did with ACTRIAL , for example, where the community finally forced them to spend funds on it. Because they don't believe the community will carry out its threat of implementing local blocks of the banners, they double down and will prefer to run the risk. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง ( talk) 04:04, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Hi, many thanks for your efforts on this article. Could you please note, however, that the Rp template is not used in this article (or anything else that I've brought to formal review). If you are convinced that the additional page numbers are needed then please add the page number to the original ref, or use Sfn. All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 11:55, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The reason I used the ref note format was that it allowed the same note to link to mulltiple refs. Also I was told in the FAC to move the manual calculations out of the reference list. Serendi pod ous 18:22, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
Ineffablebookkeeper Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, RV ( talk) 01:50, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Ineffablebookkeeper,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable
New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (
talk) 21:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{ subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Abishe ( talk) 21:00, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ~ Pbritti ( talk) 21:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iman (Islam), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deen.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Wisteria floribunda, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)§ion=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 10:31, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Ineffablebookkeeper. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Textile arts of Japan".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:57, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Holy anointing oil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hippolytus.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
CurryTime7-24 ( talk) 19:14, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Boston marriage, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 12:26, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Grumpylawnchair has given you a cookie! Cookies promote
WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.
†
|
For your work on Japan-related articles. Cheers! Grumpylawnchair ( talk) 17:55, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Ineffablebookkeeper. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wikipedia:Delete the main page, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 15:02, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have no idea on which articles you worked, your user and talk page does not show much which is bad. I worked more than three years on Rasputin, Robespierre and Germaine de Stael, etc. My memory is pretty good when it comes to dates, but I cannot keep every detail in my mind. So I make/made hidden comments to get the chronology right. This practise seems very unusual on Wikipedia. Taksen ( talk) 10:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing— Religious calling—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. IgnatiusofLondon ( talk) 13:51, 30 December 2023 (UTC)