|
I have added a "{{
prod}}" template to the article
Mitchell handler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Please establish notability and provide
reliable sources or stop creating it. --
Onorem 04:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered
vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may
comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --
Onorem
04:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are however welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. --
Onorem
04:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove
Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --
Onorem
04:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered
vandalism, and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Onorem
04:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalise Wikipedia, you will be
blocked from editing.
Dureo
04:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
I have blocked you indefinitely for repeatedly posting an autobiography as well as vandalizing Wikipedia articles. You may appeal this block by using {{unblock|Your reason}}— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 04:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Imheretohelppeople for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.
Potatoswatter 08:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
|
I have added a "{{
prod}}" template to the article
Mitchell handler, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "
What Wikipedia is not" and
Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to
Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
Please establish notability and provide
reliable sources or stop creating it. --
Onorem 04:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered
vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may
comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --
Onorem
04:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not remove
Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are however welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. --
Onorem
04:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you remove
Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --
Onorem
04:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia. Your edits could be considered
vandalism, and have been
reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the
sandbox. Thank you. --
Onorem
04:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you
vandalise Wikipedia, you will be
blocked from editing.
Dureo
04:49, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
I have blocked you indefinitely for repeatedly posting an autobiography as well as vandalizing Wikipedia articles. You may appeal this block by using {{unblock|Your reason}}— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍) 04:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Imheretohelppeople for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.
Potatoswatter 08:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC)