This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
An article you recently created,
NER Class Z, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
12:51, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for creating LNER Class D47. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba ( talk) 10:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NER Class Z until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Onel5969 TT me 13:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 ( talk) 17:45, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 ( talk) 15:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Much of Draft:LNER Class D47 is closely paraphrased from [1]. This is unacceptable. Wikipedia content must be written in your own words. Take a look here. This is not your first warning about copyright, and if you continue to introduce copyrighted material into Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ilovejames5! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Garuda3 ( talk) 23:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Template:Wikicsd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fram ( talk) 09:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Judging from your user page, you like cookies, so have one! Zerbu 💬 20:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC) |
An article you recently created,
NER Class 4CC, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look. And please remember, re-adding uncited material is considered disruptive editing as per #2 at
WP:DISRUPTSIGNS, which is policy, and could get you blocked from editing.
Onel5969
TT me
15:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Ilovejames5. Here are a few bits of advice, which I offer in the hope that at least some of them may be helpful to you. Over the years I have offered various kinds of advice to new or fairly new editors who are not yet clear about some aspects of how Wikipedia works, and some have taken the advice, some haven't. Probably more have than haven't, but obviously it's up to you whether you take this advice or not.
As I said above, I offer this advice in the hope that some or all of it may be helpful to you. If you need clarification of any of what I have said, please feel very welcome to ask me. JBW ( talk) 21:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
It’s now more than 612 edits to main space Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 04:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
[2] Once again, parts of this article are very closely paraphrased from an online source. You've been warned numerous times about this, and if this happens again it's going to ANI; as it stands I am questioning your competence to edit here. All additions to Wikipedia must be in your own words. This is not negotiable. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 14:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Ilovejames5: Please when you create the userboxes put the the first three in Category:Train user templates. And the last one in Category:Toy user templates.
This user likes Electric locomotives. Please use photograph File:143 589 Berlin Hbf(8040048786).jpg Please use red.
This user likes Gas turbine locomotives. Please use photograph File:Union Pacific 18.jpg Please use yellow.
This user likes Diesel locomotives. Please use photograph File:CSX 441 GE AC4400CW.jpg Please use blue.
This user likes Model trains. Please use photograph File:Germany, Epcot - des petits trains en janvier 2022.JPG Please use green.
Catfurball ( talk) 23:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
This user likes electric locomotives. |
This user likes Gas turbine locomotives. |
This user likes diesel locomotives. |
This user likes model trains. |
Happy to help! I hope you also make some good contributions (I’m also quite new) . Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 01:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
There really is no reason at all to make this post. Fram ( talk) 11:54, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Ilovejames5, copyright, and general CIR behavior. Thank you. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 19:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the User talk:Ilovejames5 article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. -- Yamla ( talk) 12:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Salvio
giuliano
23:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Ilovejames5/Archives/2023 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Why do you give me an indefinite block as my first one??? Also, when did I edit disruptively??? This block is really not acceptable! Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 04:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't think that you understand the seriousness with which we take copyright matters. You clearly mean well, but we cannot permit you to continue to make copyright violations and have others clean up after you. There are other issues with your behavior as well, as noted in the ANI discussion. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 07:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Also, please see some of my other edits. Only a small amount of edits match what you said! Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 04:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Ilovejames5/Archives/2023 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
People have given me more than enough warnings about copyvio, but you blocked me before i could redeem myself.
Decline reason:
You just don't get it. You were given plenty of opportunities to redeem yourself, and didn't take them. Also, as was pointed out to you in the response to your last unblock request, there are other problems apart from copyright, which you haven't addressed. JBW ( talk) 08:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ilovejames5/Archives/2023 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
@ JBW:, I have totally learned my lesson, please unblock me. After that I will make sure to follow all policies, and you will see I am clearly an editor who is trying to improve Wikipedia. Please accept my request, because I really need to be unblocked. I am not an editor who only edits disruptively. After you unblock me and a few months passes, you will see my competence to edit here. I am completely fed up with this block, and it is honestly overly annoying. Please unblock me ASAP. I now understand a lot of stuff about Wikipedia, including: * Copyright is serious, and must never ever be ignored * Every editor (including me) must follow WP:V and WP:N Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 09:39, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
We can't wait a few months for you to gain competence. Your unblock requests aren't convincing anyone. Step away. en.wikipedia isn't the place for you at this time. Perhaps in six months or a year, when you have months of significant editing on another project with zero problems, you can come back here and request an unblock. Not now, though. Yamla ( talk) 11:14, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ilovejames5/Archives/2023 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am completely fed up with the rude tone of the previous decline, and I am certainly going to not edit disruptively ever again. Also I expect a respond with a more polite tone. Please unblock me, because I have many good-faith edits that this annoying block prevented. Even if you don’t immediately accept, please give me a second chance. Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 11:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Absolutely not at this point. You need to walk away from the project for some time, and to be blunt grow up. Take 6-12 months, review our policies on copyright, how to behave on Wikipedia and then come back with a solid unblock request and it will be reviewed fairly. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 13:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
An article you recently created,
NER Class Z, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
12:51, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Thanks for creating LNER Class D47. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Jamiebuba ( talk) 10:17, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NER Class Z until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Onel5969 TT me 13:15, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Wikipedia:WikiProject User warnings does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 ( talk) 17:45, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 ( talk) 15:11, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Much of Draft:LNER Class D47 is closely paraphrased from [1]. This is unacceptable. Wikipedia content must be written in your own words. Take a look here. This is not your first warning about copyright, and if you continue to introduce copyrighted material into Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 20:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Ilovejames5! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Garuda3 ( talk) 23:16, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Template:Wikicsd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fram ( talk) 09:46, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Judging from your user page, you like cookies, so have one! Zerbu 💬 20:43, 23 January 2023 (UTC) |
An article you recently created,
NER Class 4CC, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look. And please remember, re-adding uncited material is considered disruptive editing as per #2 at
WP:DISRUPTSIGNS, which is policy, and could get you blocked from editing.
Onel5969
TT me
15:11, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Ilovejames5. Here are a few bits of advice, which I offer in the hope that at least some of them may be helpful to you. Over the years I have offered various kinds of advice to new or fairly new editors who are not yet clear about some aspects of how Wikipedia works, and some have taken the advice, some haven't. Probably more have than haven't, but obviously it's up to you whether you take this advice or not.
As I said above, I offer this advice in the hope that some or all of it may be helpful to you. If you need clarification of any of what I have said, please feel very welcome to ask me. JBW ( talk) 21:49, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
It’s now more than 612 edits to main space Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 04:52, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
[2] Once again, parts of this article are very closely paraphrased from an online source. You've been warned numerous times about this, and if this happens again it's going to ANI; as it stands I am questioning your competence to edit here. All additions to Wikipedia must be in your own words. This is not negotiable. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 14:20, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
@ Ilovejames5: Please when you create the userboxes put the the first three in Category:Train user templates. And the last one in Category:Toy user templates.
This user likes Electric locomotives. Please use photograph File:143 589 Berlin Hbf(8040048786).jpg Please use red.
This user likes Gas turbine locomotives. Please use photograph File:Union Pacific 18.jpg Please use yellow.
This user likes Diesel locomotives. Please use photograph File:CSX 441 GE AC4400CW.jpg Please use blue.
This user likes Model trains. Please use photograph File:Germany, Epcot - des petits trains en janvier 2022.JPG Please use green.
Catfurball ( talk) 23:28, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
This user likes electric locomotives. |
This user likes Gas turbine locomotives. |
This user likes diesel locomotives. |
This user likes model trains. |
Happy to help! I hope you also make some good contributions (I’m also quite new) . Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 01:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
There really is no reason at all to make this post. Fram ( talk) 11:54, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Ilovejames5, copyright, and general CIR behavior. Thank you. Trainsandotherthings ( talk) 19:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the User talk:Ilovejames5 article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".
You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. -- Yamla ( talk) 12:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Salvio
giuliano
23:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Ilovejames5/Archives/2023 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Why do you give me an indefinite block as my first one??? Also, when did I edit disruptively??? This block is really not acceptable! Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 04:28, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I don't think that you understand the seriousness with which we take copyright matters. You clearly mean well, but we cannot permit you to continue to make copyright violations and have others clean up after you. There are other issues with your behavior as well, as noted in the ANI discussion. I am declining your request. 331dot ( talk) 07:22, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Also, please see some of my other edits. Only a small amount of edits match what you said! Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 04:43, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
Ilovejames5/Archives/2023 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
People have given me more than enough warnings about copyvio, but you blocked me before i could redeem myself.
Decline reason:
You just don't get it. You were given plenty of opportunities to redeem yourself, and didn't take them. Also, as was pointed out to you in the response to your last unblock request, there are other problems apart from copyright, which you haven't addressed. JBW ( talk) 08:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ilovejames5/Archives/2023 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
@ JBW:, I have totally learned my lesson, please unblock me. After that I will make sure to follow all policies, and you will see I am clearly an editor who is trying to improve Wikipedia. Please accept my request, because I really need to be unblocked. I am not an editor who only edits disruptively. After you unblock me and a few months passes, you will see my competence to edit here. I am completely fed up with this block, and it is honestly overly annoying. Please unblock me ASAP. I now understand a lot of stuff about Wikipedia, including: * Copyright is serious, and must never ever be ignored * Every editor (including me) must follow WP:V and WP:N Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 09:39, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
We can't wait a few months for you to gain competence. Your unblock requests aren't convincing anyone. Step away. en.wikipedia isn't the place for you at this time. Perhaps in six months or a year, when you have months of significant editing on another project with zero problems, you can come back here and request an unblock. Not now, though. Yamla ( talk) 11:14, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ilovejames5/Archives/2023 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am completely fed up with the rude tone of the previous decline, and I am certainly going to not edit disruptively ever again. Also I expect a respond with a more polite tone. Please unblock me, because I have many good-faith edits that this annoying block prevented. Even if you don’t immediately accept, please give me a second chance. Ilovejames 5🚂 :) 11:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Absolutely not at this point. You need to walk away from the project for some time, and to be blunt grow up. Take 6-12 months, review our policies on copyright, how to behave on Wikipedia and then come back with a solid unblock request and it will be reviewed fairly. RickinBaltimore ( talk) 13:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.